Talk:Living Anomaly/@comment-24053170-20190520182038/@comment-27591597-20190520190711

With all due respect, lad, I'm going to smack you upside the head.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/system:page-tags/tag/alive#pages

You also seem to forget that those unique advantages are still considered anomalies, and in-universe the reason the SCP foundation contains these subjects is because they simply cannot explain why (and sometimes how) the SCPs gain their anomalies. With the exception of Neutralized SCPs, all SCPs are at the very least considered anomalous.

While I do admit that a lot of SCPs are inanimate, there are still plenty of anomalous subjects that are considered "living", humanoid or otherwise. Simply labelling them "some of the Euclid-class SCPs" is not going to cut it. Might I add that SCP-239, a human child, is classified as Keter?