User blog comment:DYBAD/Character Sheet/@comment-25417020-20141113182103/@comment-5265497-20141114161139

"If inner entropy doesn't kill you, then external entropy will." How long are you going to attempt to apply that fallacy to fictional characters who can and have overcame both? The character on this page is pretty much a contradiction to everything you just said. This truly shouldn't even be debatable.

"The only "eternal" thing is capital E "Everything" but it cannot reasonably be considered a "thing" due to its complete lack of actual identity." It is really not that far-fetched to believe something that was sentient always existed especially with characters who arethe embodiment of multiversal concepts, characters who have infinite ressurection, any powerful cosmic entity.

Absolute Immortality is just the ability of a character to never die... no rhetorics, no circuitous ramblings, no complications, so how does one lose this ability?

"Power is relative, and we already went over that in details." You used an interpretive transfictional rhetoric with a premise of temporality to come to that conclusion. And again, if you look at a verse the way its supposed to be looked out (in-universe) instead of branching it out to every other totality which is simply not supposed to be done, then a character remains omnipotent.

"I don't believe in Omnipotence, but yes his power is complete." And you believe one character can have a complete power, but another one cannot? Isn't that simple discrimination. :)