Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171003142429/@comment-29564364-20171120171801

@DeathstroketheHedgehog I reject Author Authority's first, second, fifth and eighth limitations because those do not follow from the first and second paragraphs of the capabilities. If Authors have the same "absolute power and overwhelming authority" as their writers, then nothing within their verse can oppose them in the same way that nothing within a work of fiction can oppose its writer's will. And my argument remains logically sound if we replace Omnipotence with 4th Wall Breaching, Omnilock, Origin Transcendance, Non-Created Physiology and/or Authority Manipulation.

@Nekron2 «Application means the power may or may not be applicaple to a user [...]» No. To paraphrase the Page Creation and Details page, applications are powers that most users could use with minimal training; the basic set.

«[...] author authority itself is an application of omnipotence remember that.Many powers like omniarch,etc have this as an application.» Omnipotence Embodiment, Author Authority and Reality Dreaming are listed under "Omnipotent Abilities," not "Applications." Omnipotent abilities are not applications of Omnipotence, but powers that give access to it. In other words, Omnipotence is an application of those powers, not the other way around.

«You said Variation of omnipotence embodiment, i.e, similar to something.» Yes, they are similar in that they fit the description of the base power in some way. Rare are the variations that don't.