Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-36309590-20190304232359

SalvationBringer wrote: I bring up freedom because your "omnipotence" violates freedom of other beings. What if omnipotent being decides to take away other's freedom? Each soul in reality has the right to be free, and at least in theory can seize that right with own power. And no "omnipotence" would hinder that.

Also everyone has the right to have something their own, unique, unable to be copied. If you have all powers, then this is violated.

And why do you even think that this "omnipotence" is supreme? This sounds like that "duality" you mentioned. You can formulate a power that can resist omnipotence despite that it can't be resisted. And if you say that it's forbidden, why? Omnipotence itself is claimed to be beyond logic, and you don't even need to break logic for that, as you can't define default supremity over others as power. Ability to be above anyone else can't be within the definition, it is applied to other beings rather then the one with omnipotence. This is what should be forbidden.

And even if we don't forbid it, if someone is enslaved, then they can be liberated even if subjected to total supremity of other. You realize we're dealing with fiction right? And that such things do not exist in our reality, as far as we can tell anyway, right? So why does it matter if Omnipotence violates free will or not?