Talk:Absolute Violence/@comment-26973278-20190716051911/@comment-26973278-20191103030226

The day I check up on the wiki, 3 months after this argument has basically finished, and you're still going. Wow, how much free time do you really have?

My arguments are not dishonest nor incompetent, but whatever floats your boat. I'm not saying wikipedia/encyclopedias have ownership, I'm saying the content they use does. You took content from my page, basically gave no credit, added some adjective onto it and called an original page. Footnotes and references are giving credit to where they got the content, usually wikipedia/encyclopedias are very strict on that because you can't just write some random information down without evidence, evidence that other people worked on getting.

If those citations are really just there to confirm if information they are getting is true, why do they tell us where exactly they got it from? If ownership doesn't matter, they could just say "some study" and leave it that, but they can't. The reason they can't is because someone has credit for making that discovery/study.

Also, I don't owe you any apology. Ever.

"I can't believe you are such a stubborn, dismissive, and a fucking dense asshole." -ChocolateElemental, August 17 "Now who's the fucking hypocrite?" -ChocolateElemental, August 17 "Fucking hypocrite." -ChocolateElemental, August 17 "Still not true CrabHermit, you're still a douchebag." -ChocolateElemental, August 28

And to finish this off: "Fix and improve your behavior, end of story." -ChocolateElemental, August 28