Talk:Instilled Knowledge/@comment-4370030-20180709120328/@comment-24729606-20190327210645

as for the difference between this and instant learning that is actually fairly simple. instant learning is the ability to copy, mimic, or imitate something one has seen, observed, or born witness with near perfect fidelity after having seen, observed, or born witness to it once. to put it another way instant learning takes place in the brain and/or mind of its user/possessor and is thus partly dependent on ones will. instilled knowledge on the other hand is knowledge one either has at such a deep level that it cannot be said to have been learned or it is knowledge one arrives at through processes beyond the physical experiential world. for example say that one watches someone do something and afterwards can do it themselves almost perfectly. that is instant learning. if one learns something but is either unaware of how they did so or simply knows something without being able to identity the source of or means by which they know it that would be instilled knowledge. personally while instant learning does sound useful instilled knowledge just sounds like a major headache. after all if one doesn't understand how one knows something than the validity or utility of that knowledge is nearly impossible to determine.