Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-120.146.174.231-20130519081406/@comment-4867780-20170924214522

Because the very concept of Omnipotence is weird and broken, so it can only make sense within a meaningful context.

An Omnipotent *can* create something stronger than itself... and instantly beat it anyway, as easily as you say "lol nope" - precisely because it is *Omnipotence*. So the whole "stronger than Omnipotence" idea is inherently invalid, hence why we take the clearer and simpler path of saying that nothing can (truly) be stronger : because it can both create *and* beat it, defeating the point.

As for transfictional Omnipotence... pluck any so-called Omnipotent character from their verse and throw them in that of another writer's, preferably one who doesn't like the character, and witness an Anti-OP bigass nerf hit them in the face like a train at full speed. Then you will understand why this official restriction was added to the page.