Talk:Ultipotence/@comment-43678302-20200220082609/@comment-43678302-20200222004321

There are manys of describing Omnipotence, of course infinite is only one way to describe it but it's not limited to just being "Infinite or unlimited Power". You also said that "Obviously knowledge is a serious limiting factor but has no effect of the power within a given entity, just limits HOW they use it". By the limitations the last one says"Overuse may dull the user's sense of reality" That's one affect for entity. In the capability it says "Users therefore have unlimited means at their disposal, but must have a clear enough idea of what they want to achieve and how they will do it." Another effect for the entity. Unlike Ultipotence, Omnipotence is not knowing how everything works, it's just doing it. You said "FOR THE LAST TIME I'VE SAID USERS OF THIS WOULD LOSE TO AN OMNIPOTENT BUT IT WOULDN'T BE A ONE SHOT" about 3 times now(i think), I heared you and answered you the first time in your argument with Nekron2 saying "A true Omnipotent being will win because they can. Plain and Simple." Easily in fact, just by wanting it. They don't even need to be present. You also said "in terms OF RAW POWER ALONE BOTH ENTITIES ARE EQUAL." Which you are correct in that regard alone, however it doing mean it will save them. It won't protect them. I understand what your saying but just because I understand you doesn't mean I agree with. Same thing with YOU.

I already give you an answer why Omnipotence isn't just a power. I didn't dodge it. You can see my whole answer from where "well here you go:" To "if you like it or not". You just refuse to see it as anything else. Which is fine.

Everything you've said up until now i've answered or proven wrong. I won't take the fault if you don't get it.