Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30737595-20170404140029/@comment-29375707-20171029193112

If an author calls "fire manipulation" of "dimensional manipulation", is it going to be in fact dimensional manipulation or is it going to be fire manipulation? The most that the author can do is say that omnipotence means something other than "all power". But from this, he is not talking about omnipotence, but calling omnipotence a thing that is not omnipotence. True omnipotence can not be overcome. No matter what the author says, this does not change the semantics of omnipotence.