User blog comment:DYBAD/Character Sheet/@comment-4867780-20150724235345

Precisions regarding the Prime Undefiness, that many may find ellusive :

It's kind of a Schrodinger thing. What is not not defined holds the potential to be "anything". Once it is defined, it becomes "something", and by becoming "something" loses its ability to be "anything". When the Prime Undefineness "emerged into defined existence", it thus became infinities of "something" (multiverses) collectively forming "everything" (omniverse).

On the othe hand, the unique splinter of Prime Undefineness that survived was different, as it was flawed with the inability to become "something", thus preserving its ability to be "anything". When it merged with the first entity (a human being from an alternate Earth), it did not become "something" due to its inherent inability, instead memorizing this foreign data and emulating its templates/patterns like a mirror, thus gaining sentience and identity while its original nature remained unchanged. Since then, it learnt and used many others, the same way you buy new clothes and change them everyday while remaining the same being beneath them.

Regarding the apparent incompatibility between Lawrence and the concept of "infinite possibilities".

The best way to describe it is to use a visual reference. Imagine you're standing in a flat desert that stretches infinitely in all directions. Right next to you, there is a gaping bottomless hole in the ground. You can't reasonably walk into it, for you would just fall into oblivion. So it's mere existence seems to imply that the place isn't infinite after all. Yet from this hole, you could walk an infinite distance for an infinite amount of time in any direction, confirming that the infinity is still there despite the hole's existence.

Replace the "hole" by Lawrence and "infinity" by Omniverse, and they compatibility comes to light.