Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-27077671-20190226131200

The orange duck 42 wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: The orange duck 42 wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: The orange duck 42 wrote: Retrorge wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: Retrorge wrote: Yeah, I also think that omnipotence is the strongest power available. POWER, not ability. If you take the word ability into consider, omnipotence is the second best ability. Omnivastance, as I told you, is using not only power, but also knowledge and presence. If you knew everything what happens in existence, we might also know omnipotence's weakness. But we can't, since we AREN'T omniscient. An omniscient person would know what an omnipotent person would do next, how he'd do it, and how to tackle it. There is no major difference between 'power' and 'ability' for you to even claim either of the two are different and can make your made-up term better than omnipotence. In fact, by viewing omniscience as a power, it only puts it under the omnipotence branch.

To quote Holokami, "if you think you've grasped something like omnipotence, then you haven't grasped it at all. " An ability is an entire category. Powers go in it, and nothing other than omniotence is the best power. If you take the other two categories in abilities, i.e. knowledge and portation, then when all  of them combined can give the best ability possible. Imagine being able to control all the 3 best powers in existence (omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence), and trying to fight a person with only omnipotence. YOU'D win, since you'd have infinite knowledge of how to defeat that person. Even if he does kill you, you come back in literally NO TIME since you're Omnipresent. You'd have enough knowledge to know how to kill him. And since this omnipotence is just fiction, we can defeat it by using our T.V. remotes. If the power to defeate it is held in our t.v remotes, does that mean Author authority is better? Or mabey it would be viewer embodyment. omg, do you not understand that every ability listed and not listed in this wiki, as well as everything boundlessly beyond that, is already in omnipotence? yes, Omnipotence has all the powers on this wiki, but something like Author authority has omnipotence, thus having all the powers on this wiki. this also goes for metapotence, logic defiaince, Omnicreator, and a few others as well. so now I think the anwer to the original question is.........

'''nothing beats Omnipotence, but some things are equal with it. '''

Of cource, all arguments on this thread have been logical soooooo

LOGIC DEFIANCE FOREVER

you can't argue against logic defiance because arguments are based in logic. Quoting you: "yes, Omnipotence has all the powers on this wiki"

You just conceded, because every other power you attempted to list now automatically falls under omnipotence. Yes, Omnipotence has every power, but other powers have every power too. this means that they are equal. So in part you are right, nothing beats omnipotence, but some things can match it.

Omnipotence is an aplication of some powers, just like all those powers are an aplication of Omnipotence. Having Every Power =/= omnipotence, that's just complete arsenal. Omnipotence has every power on the absolute unsurpassable scale'''. '''That's what you fail to comprehend.

What you also fail to comprehend is that the moment you attempt to limit omnipotence in any sort of way, you instantly change it to nigh omnipotence. So every feeble attempt you make to surpass omnipotence won't ever stack up to the level of omnipotence without changing the meaning of it entirely.

Seriously, it's like you didn't even read the definition of omnipotence.