User talk:CrystalStorm51

Yeah, why?RnR (talk) 02:32, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Burn is a manga series created by Camilla d'Errico. Quite a fun read.RnR (talk) 02:35, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help on the titanium page!TheKaiwind (talk) 00:27, May 3, 2013 (UTC)TheKaiwind.

As I said, I don't think so.Gabriel456 (talk) 23:42, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Just add it as a sub-power of Enhanced Durability, Invulnerability and Supernaturally Dense Tissue Gabriel456 (talk) 23:45, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Fall immunity is extremely specific version of Impact Immunity, way too specific.

Slithering is returned. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:24, July 31, 2015 (UTC)

as far as I'm aware, fanon powers are allowed as long as they're  sensible enough. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:23, August 4, 2015 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 00:31, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Yep Gabriel456 (talk) 01:05, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 03:02, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Fauna Energy Manipulation - Interesting idea, do you know any users? DC does have something like that, but do they actually manipulate the animal energies? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

That actually sounds pretty cool. We have a lot of animal-based pages, but not one where you control the energy of animals. SDPanthera (talk) 15:22, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Are there others? I think it was brown or red, like they Green. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:40, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Green and Red.

Don't know. Don't care. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:52, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

stellar ring creation
RIngs and hoops are types of discs. so anything along those lines really.SageM (talk) 03:36, August 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

There's no need to go so specific powers.

Isoportation/Personal Vector Manipulation - How long ago that was and what was is about? Remember that as admin I do quite a bit work and trying to remember everything I've said just doesn't work.--Kuopiofi (talk) 18:44, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

They are essentially same thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:55, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Whether you teleport on place to shift which way you face or do it by switching your vectors, the effect is exactly same. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:58, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Its interesting.SageM (talk) 00:29, August 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:32, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

It manipulates how active things are. That's pretty specific thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

As in: Attraction and Repulsion as separate powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

It's option. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:20, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

You mean like Storybook Mimicrys Immersive-Variation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:37, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

it's interesting, i am surprised that we don't already have it before. L12345 (talk) 01:34, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun with Book Jumping.

Battery Manipulation - no.

Chemical Emission - make that Chemical Creation and don't do any more Emissions, use Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:27, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine Precision - no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:54, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine Precision? Dexterity. And too much nitpicky thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:02, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:38, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Implosion Manipulation - that's pretty specific.

Book Manipulation - covered by Literary Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:17, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:25, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine, do your page. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:34, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:42, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

As in bells, including all the variations that are mentioned on the links on the bottom of the page? Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:43, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

Similar power to your idea
Similar power to your idea- Maximum Concentration Capacity.SageM (talk) 01:41, August 12, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Please no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because it isn't power. It's description of action. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

What is concentration? Mental action.

I have vague memories that we have something like multitasking already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because it allows one to use that concentration in ways that are otherwise impossible.

Those seem to be about mental ability, without being able to do things. Might as well do that multitasking. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:05, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Concentration is bit tricky thing, since you're balancing between making it essentially description to what normal concentration is and MCC. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:49, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

I thought you were planning to do lower powered version than MCC? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:41, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:57, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

heck if I know. Maybe you should send a message to Kuo, and see what he says (it'll be awhile though...I think he's usually off by this time) Gabriel456 (talk) 23:00, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

That's going to be tricky one, especially explaining the powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

If you can pull it out, go for it. Just don't be surprised if there's lot of editing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

hey, i think i have a user for that Constellation Manipulation you is planning to too, she is the Fallen Angel of the Cygnus Constellation, and as such, can manipulate it. L12345 (talk) 17:24, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

I actually thought that at some point. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:46, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

Might want to check Enhanced Combat if there's something similar just in case. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:52, August 14, 2015 (UTC)

Go on then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 03:29, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

it's cool, i would like to be able to do several tasks at the same time. L12345 (talk) 21:45, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Give it a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:26, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Not really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:58, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Map Manipulation - interesting. Go on. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:48, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Path Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:37, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

your power
Interesting and different.SageM (talk) 21:41, August 18, 2015 (UTC)SageM

you're welcome. L12345 (talk) 22:46, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

For the future reference: if there's no explanation given it's the exactly same reason I've been telling to you quite often: too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Transformation Mimicry - and that would do... ? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Interesting. Variation of Power Replication? Got User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:27, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:46, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Nope. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:14, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Both sound usable, go for it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:17, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Contract Nullification. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Cartoon Mimicry - make that Cartoon Physiology and you got something, just mimicking what cartoon does won't cut it.

Lateral Locomotion - covered by several powers, most obviously Telekinesis. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:15, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Word Manifestation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:05, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Invisible Wall Generation - Go with Force-Field Wall Generation, that's the same idea but wider application.

Teleportation Possession - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Hello Flamerstreak ! I'm awaiting Kuopiofi's answer, I need to understand his reasons. DYBAD (talk) 01:53, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

So it wasn't just me XD Thanks for your honesty ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 02:27, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

I think we have something like that already... don't quote me on that, but it sounds bit too familiar. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Cephalopod Physiology pretty much covers that one. You could add Variation where User is nothing but head tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Just add Head Physiology and say that User is completely head with not even vestigial body. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:46, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Hey again, Flamerstreak ! As we thought, Teleporting Possession is way too close to Possessive Teleportation to stay. Sorry for the disappointment, and good day to you all the same. DYBAD (talk) 06:42, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Oh no its totally fine don't worry about it. I just was filling in pages I felt were needed. No worries at all. QueenNamina (talk) 08:08, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Supernatural Speed, Absolute Speed and Supersonic Flying cover that already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Covered by Architecture Manipulation.

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Number Projection - interesting idea, tho bit limited. Can you think how to expand it? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:12, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Usable ideas, but I meant with letters (no ideas how that'd work, maybe style of writing, what the words means, etc.) or something else. In Warhammer orc constructs that are red go faster because they think they should, as for an example. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:25, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Maybe something on the lines that the appropriate word (maybe even sentence) to the situation, the more effective it is. Alphabet is only one of the letter systems after all. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:25, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

The appropriate word/sentence part? For example using words that describe what the situation is and/or how you want to change it, with the power/effect being greater the better user describes the situation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:41, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Yep. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:41, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

That'd be Skin Manipulation and Skin Constructs. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Well, if by Prehensile Skin you mean making the skin to stretch and extend from the body to manipulate/attack, that's well worth doing and Sub-power of Skin Manipulation.

Compass Sense - ability to know which way is north/specific direction?

Celestial Light Manipulation - name might be confused with Celestial Manipulation. How exactly would "light from the heavens" be "otherworldly afterlife light"?

I think you might want to check Esoteric Light Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:34, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Prehensile Skin - have fun.

Compass Sense - remember to add it into Compass Physiology. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:21, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

No, thats not the species I was talking about, the species has lots of excess skin that they can control in various ways.SageM (talk) 01:58, August 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Transition Manipulation: Explanation
Transition manipulation is the power to manipulate all transitions, the process by which something transfers from one state into another. here are some examples- Day into Night, Life into Death, Solid into Liquid into Gas, Conscious into Unconscious, etc etc. Existence is full of transitions and this power allows you to manipulate all of them. Anything that transitions in any way you can control and manipulate. Even powers have transition states. Just take a look at all the powers on this wiki and think of how many of them have transition states.

Does that help explain it?SageM (talk) 07:51, August 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I think that was never really addressed, as it would depend on the alphabet used. Roman alphabet alone has several versions in use, check here for the various differences. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:26, August 25, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:02, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

Good idea, can't believe no-one has done that yet. Got a name/Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:29, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

i just removed a :And. from here:alter the shape and of beings and objects L12345 (talk) 23:59, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

i liked it, i think it would be funny to change the shape of thing and persons. oh, and also, what do you think bout the last power i made? Solar And Lunar Embodiment. L12345 (talk) 00:05, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Specific doesn't always mean it's sub-power of something, it's mostly that it's too narrowly focused on certain area/thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 03:31, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

That goes into the pointless category. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:04, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Expand that to using sound to generate the effect and you got a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:23, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Wouldn't Time Acceleration already cover that? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Oops, that was supposed to be Flash-Forward, that's more what you were thinking? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:15, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

I'd say F-F covers it pretty much, tho it could use some expanding itself. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:22, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Some level of special effect/Limitation at best, I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:26, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

You mean like being able to blend in with animals, making them think User as one of their own? That'd be doable, but check first if there's anything similar already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:30, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Reincarnation doesn't really mention anything about when the User is reborn, so I added Limitation that covers preincarnation among other possibilities. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:45, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Make that Orb/Spherical Shield or something like that, allowing the user to create spherical shield/defense/wall/whatever of energy/matter around themselves and have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:27, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Well, we do have Egg Manipulation, might be bit misleading... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:43, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Just keep it in broader form, making it egg-only version would be way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:23, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

SdM isn't limited to stardust, it's all "remnants of cosmic substances". --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:23, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

That's pretty specific power, maybe some variation of Temporal Rewind. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:55, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

Something like that, I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:16, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

That isn't enough? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:05, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Travel Manipulation - sounds more like Movement than Travel. Connected to Vector Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Yes, why not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Torque Manipulation - either we have something similar or I'm remembering from TV tropes... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:49, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

All right. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

It is a little hard to understand the power, but i liked it. L12345 (talk) 22:12, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

hey flamerstreak, wouldn't that Virtual Reality Manipulation you is thinking of not the same that Virtual Warping? L12345 (talk) 22:52, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

oh, ok then. and also, users for that Afterlife Manipulation you is planning to do probably are Deities of Afterlife from mythology, right? L12345 (talk) 23:14, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Afterlife Manipulation - fine, go ahead.

VRM - several powers get close to it already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Why don't you take a look at it, prove if I' remember right or wrong.

Because none has done it yet. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:13, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

CM - I think we have something like that. Pretty close at least.

Fixated Position - figure out better name (Fixed Position? Movement Negation?) and include user too, with Limitation that User may be limited to affecting themselves or others. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:52, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like an application of Warping Speed or Isoportation. I know that Almighty God Thor from A Certain Magical Index, doesn't physically move when he attacks, instead of physically moving, the world moves around him to put him in place where he can win.SageM (talk) 20:32, September 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Possibly.SageM (talk) 21:01, September 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Its possible. though I think Hyper Rotation and Spinning Inducement cover that power better.SageM (talk) 00:58, September 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

The idea of move in place is gunny, i liked it. L12345 (talk) 01:58, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

1. go for it.

2. Sounds a bit silly, in my honest opinion. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:55, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

That's just my opinion. You'll have to wait and see what Kuo says about it  Gabriel456 (talk) 22:08, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

Figure better name and have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Well as i said the road's create potential such as giving someone flame manipulation or flightZimnias (talk) 20:34, September 9, 2015 (UTC)Zimnias

Getting way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Weakness of what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

If that weakness would include manipulating/removing it, Property Manipulation covers that one.

Chemical Immunity - we have powers that cover some parts of chemicals, but not the whole. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:49, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:25, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Because.

Optical Phenomena - you mean manipulating what people see? That's Illusion Manipulation.

Liquid Merging - go for it. I think we're missing Gas Merging too... --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

I see. So, i created it. Let's just say, or could say we both thought of it. WHICH WE DID!

Spine Rip.

Your right. No complaints. But thank you. Sega Fro (talk) 16:58, September 10, 2015 (UTC) Ω

Interesting. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Its interesting.SageM (talk) 21:52, September 10, 2015 (UTC)SageM

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:15, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Health Swap - already have something very similar.

Angular Vision - too specific.

not be knocked unconscious - sounds usable but I think some powers may already cover this. Not sure tho'. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Which one? We definitely have something that does this to health.

No. But check if we have anything that causes technology to stop working. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:05, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Health Swap

Have fun with technology stopper. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:20, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Well, whatever. Have fun with that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:57, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Sleep Healing - I'm pretty sure we have something that does that, or something similar.

Significance Manipulation - we have Rarity Detection and Rarity Sense, so going that line...

Potion Manipulation - bit too specific.

Tranquility/Serenity Manipulation - when the inspiration hits, finding User could also be nice. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

hey flamestreak., i think i have a user for that Significance Manipulation you is planning to do, the character can assess (and thus, manipulate) the worth of anyone and anything. L12345 (talk) 04:50, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Name it Rarity (whatever).

I must have been remembering Hibernation... go for it.

Nah for both.

Incidentally, powers with no Users are not common. Talking about your last power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because rarity is the closest thing for significance we have here. You can ignore them no foul, just thought you might want to use/link/know existing powers that have some connection to your idea.

Might as well go ahead and make Reflex Manipulation while you're at it. We don't have that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:17, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

They are at the least Associations to each others, but you might want to check if Users can actually do those things before adding them to FM.

I think that Contaminant Immunity pretty much covers that idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:54, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:27, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

hey flame, that Picture Manipulation you is planning to do would be a Sub-Power of Camera Manipulation right? L12345 (talk) 02:30, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

So a Application at least? L12345 (talk) 03:40, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Covered by Conditional Invulnerability.

Way too specific. And you asked this from G. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Line for both powers, first line about first power, second about second. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:43, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

don't have sure, but it's a little strange and funny power indeed. L12345 (talk) 01:12, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

don't have sure, we need to see Kuopiofi's opinion. L12345 (talk) 01:35, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

i think drywall manipulation is too specific, but i think Plaster Manipulation could work. L12345 (talk) 01:41, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Reflex Dampening - you mean extends reflex time, making them slower? Tho' you could make it power that allows manipulating the reflex speed in general...

Plaster Manipulation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

No, I said that if you're thinking about making power to slow reflexes, you might as well go the whole length and add power to speed them up as well. Do what you will.

You need to ask? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:54, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

power manipulating rings - Ring Creation/Ring Empowerment got anything to do with that? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

And it does what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:34, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Hey Flamerstreak !

"Pattern" is a rather vague concept. What would "Pattern Manipulation" be like ? DYBAD (talk) 21:29, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

I understand what "pattern" is, I mean what would its manipulation look like in practice ? DYBAD (talk) 22:00, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

So it essentially increases and decreases predictability ? "Predictability Manipulation" seems more suited then, and easier to understand. DYBAD (talk) 22:10, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

I read your messages between each other and I agree with DYBAD that "Predictability Manipulation" may be a more suitable name with Pattern Manipulation in "Also Called". But that's just my opinion.

Other than that, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:35, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

you're welcome! Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late answer, I got highly distracted for a moment. "Predictability Manipulation" with "Pattern Manipulation" as Also Called sounds good to me, just gotta clarify the capabilities so readers may easily understand what the power is and how it works. DYBAD (talk) 00:08, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

I...have no idea, to be perfectly honest Gabriel456 (talk) 00:08, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 00:18, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Arrangement Manipulation is probably best Gabriel456 (talk) 00:58, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

are you sure that isn't Reactive Adaptation? Gabriel456 (talk) 21:49, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

make it a variation of RA and I think it's good Gabriel456 (talk) 21:53, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 21:57, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Variation of Reactive Adaptation, essentially to RA what Adaptive Power-Level is to Superior Adaptation.

DYBAD (talk) 22:49, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Looks like its rightful place in the Superpower cosmology. DYBAD (talk) 23:35, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

I don't mind at all Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

That's already in the also called for Supernaturally Dense Tissue Gabriel456 (talk) 01:05, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't happen to me, so no idea. If it's still problem, you might want to contact Community Central (top bar Request => Staff Help) and report bug. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, September 18, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:47, September 25, 2015 (UTC)

13b. Give the pic real name, no random string of numbers/letters. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, September 26, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 13:37, September 27, 2015 (UTC)

any difference from Fusionism or Amalgamation? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, September 28, 2015 (UTC)

go for itGabriel456 (talk) 23:59, September 28, 2015 (UTC)

You didn't create that page....
Never mind, you just listed the wrong power.SageM (talk) 22:23, October 1, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 00:38, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

that doesn't seem like a power. That sounds more like a mechanism in using powers, how they use them but it doesn't sound like a power in itself Gabriel456 (talk) 22:56, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

What can it do? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:00, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:06, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 15:41, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

I liked them. L12345 (talk) 20:02, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

I'd say you should think the powers through before considering their creation, often enough a nice-sounding potential ability tends to be relatively empty in practice and/or too abstract to be truly relatable/interesting. Best thing would be to consider their potential applications, and how to structure them into a coherent whole with a distinctive style, that would make them spontaneously attractive to the readers (basically all the awesome things you could do with it built around an original core concept). DYBAD (talk) 02:05, October 7, 2015 (UTC)

It was probably just a spelling mistake or such ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 02:46, October 7, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Pepper... why you ask when you know the answer?

Psionics - I think we may have something similar. Not certain tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:35, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Solar Energy Absorption. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. Got User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:27, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 17:37, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:14, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

mind explaining the difference? Gabriel456 (talk) 02:20, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

Alright. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:56, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

Good, and you? L12345 (talk) 22:46, October 15, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific, plus we had something pretty similar and it got deleted. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:36, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

Did we talk about this at some point? if so, I don't remember so I don't remember the reason.. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:33, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

maybe you should take your question to Kuopiofi. He'd probably have the answer to your question better because at the moment, I don't.

If he signs off on it, then go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 21:53, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

I Liked it, it's a power that i actually think i have. L12345 (talk) 23:10, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

Been some time now, but I honestly don't remember when exactly. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 18:58, October 19, 2015 (UTC)

to be perfectly honest, I'm on the fence about this one.

Take it to Kuopiofi and see what he says about it. If he gives the go ahead, then...well, go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 19:15, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

sounds good to me. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:31, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

I think it'd go under Enhanced Balance or Enhanced Dexterity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:54, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

Nothing is wrong with it...
Nothing is wrong with your power except for the fact that it doesn't have an official user. Find one and bring proof and I'll leave your page alone, okay? Truth 20:40, October 20, 2015 (UTC) Truth™

Says who?

I'm not doing anything

None that I see Gabriel456 (talk) 21:11, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:13, October 21, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:07, October 21, 2015 (UTC)

Please explain? Gabriel456 (talk) 19:41, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:48, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:42, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

go for it.

Wish I could help on the name, though. Nothing comes to mind, however Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, October 23, 2015 (UTC)

just so I understand, you mean it has physical effects, right? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 01:11, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

There are quite a few powers that cover that, but since I can't have coffee this morning I'm not in shape to find them for you... -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:56, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

sub-power of lethal dose?
A sub-power of Lethal Dose? since it decides whats lethal and what isn'tSageM (talk) 20:58, October 27, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:04, October 27, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:07, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 22:38, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

I personally don't see a problem with it. Then again, I just undid two silly edits, and based on the comments, I'm beginning to think deleting it may be the best choice if all it does is cause trouble... Gabriel456 (talk) 01:41, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Yo Flamestreak. Care to help me with developing powers and increase my knowledge?Sega Fro (talk) 02:01, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thanx. However, some powers that i think up of, i say it on the Chat, i get criticized and judge about how im stupidly making powers and how my ideas are dumb. Sega Fro (talk) 02:08, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but your page is just causing too much problems, especially for me so I'm deleting it.

I apologize, but I can't handle this crap at the moment. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:08, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

But in the future, to avoid situations like this, please think of better powers. It'd probably be for the best.. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:12, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Other than those trolling comments, two separate users made a page called "Touching", no doubt in response to your page, as it was completely nonsensical.

But honestly, I'm not in the mood to deal with this, as mentioned before. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:16, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding Gabriel456 (talk) 02:20, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

sounds like a sub-power of Restoration. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:02, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

give it a better description and go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:04, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

sounds good to me.

Though honestly, I was talking about the opening statement. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:25, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

It's my fault really, I misunderstood.

I mean the opening to power, like "the power to (insert description)". I thought that's what you meant by "to exist in reality".

my bad, sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 23:29, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure. Maybe you should ask DYBAD and get his opinion on it. Gabriel456 (talk) 00:07, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

sounds like a sub-power of Preservation, go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:28, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:33, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Flamer. Do you have a user thats Valid? Sega Fro (talk) 23:23, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for the Compliment. Sega Fro (talk) 23:26, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:01, November 5, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:11, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

Relativity Manipulation
Hi. Description of your power is wrong. Either you should change it's name to "Theory of Relativity Manipulation", because it doesn't manipulate relativity but Einstein's Theory of relativity, or change it's description so it would control the concept of relativity (that would be similar to Perspective Manipulation, as human is small compared to elephant, so it would make him small).The_Omnipotent_One (Dreamer) (talk) 22:27, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

err...kinda on the fence about that.

On one hand it may work, but on another, it may be enough to start all that crap that happened days ago all over again... Gabriel456 (talk) 14:35, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, I just don't want to risk another incident like that again.. Gabriel456 (talk) 15:19, November 7, 2015 (UTC)


 * p Gabriel456 (talk) 15:45, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

isn't that pretty much Enhanced Agility or Enhanced Athleticism? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:12, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

I just don't know. They seem pretty close to me...Gabriel456 (talk) 00:21, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

yeah, that could work. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:30, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Another user for Filtered force fields is Onslaught from marvel comics.SageM (talk) 00:38, November 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Foreign forces removal, various adaptations, various immunities, purification, etc.SageM (talk) 00:48, November 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Several immunities will work, such as contaminant, poison, fire, sound, radiation, photokinetic, water, etc. Since the field would filter out those elements it would count as immunity.SageM (talk) 01:33, November 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 16:35, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

sureGabriel456 (talk) 16:38, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Bold text== Not sure.... ==

Not sure, better check with DYAD and Kuo first.SageM (talk) 23:22, November 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Sorry about that, I'm just busy writing a page right now, and still kinda at work ^ ^; DYBAD (talk) 03:32, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

As I just mentioned, I'm busy writing a page of my own right now. DYBAD (talk) 03:48, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Kuopiofi isn't online at the moment, the fastest way right now is to paradoxically show some patience ;)

DYBAD (talk) 03:56, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

What about the much higher probability that I'm done before he gets online ? DYBAD (talk) 04:02, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

In a few minutes ;) Which is most likely the shortest wait. DYBAD (talk) 04:05, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

See Kuopiofi for confirmation, but I believe it is indeed too crazy to escape deletion ^ ^; DYBAD (talk) 04:13, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

So basically ability to act/attack normally without having solid structure that would allow that normally? Remember to add it to powers that already use that concept, like Amorphous Physiology and have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:45, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Just TEACH ME THE SECRET!!! Dude, you should be featured on the main page if you havent already. You make unique and supreme powers! Just how do you come up with these? By the way, can you make Weakness Physiology/Form for me? Its the power to transform into a persons weakness when in their pressence. Thanks Sega Fro (talk) 14:22, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

That honestly sounds more like an action than a power in itself Gabriel456 (talk) 15:40, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

Still an action, not a power. Even then, it sounds like an action made by a user of Enhanced Speed or something.Gabriel456 (talk) 16:20, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

Luck Absorption (it has Luck Theft in the also called) Gabriel456 (talk) 16:45, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

Well, we have over 6,000 pages, it's difficult to know for sure if your idea is already taken/covered by another.

I guess, I don't know.. Gabriel456 (talk) 16:55, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 17:02, November 11, 2015 (UTC)

User for the power your thinking of...
The user of the power your thinking of is Ray-ManSageM (talk) 21:36, November 11, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Nah, just living my life -_- DYBAD (talk) 00:27, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

I...really have no opinion. Gabriel456 (talk) 03:33, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

I just don't. I really can't give you a straight answer on this. sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 03:40, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

You mean like Rayman? TV Tropes call it Raymanian Limbs but I think that name is bit too series specific to use.

Figure out what to call it and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:13, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

That's pretty much Limitation for Organic Constructs. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:08, November 13, 2015 (UTC)

Added. Really have to wonder why it isn't there yet, should have been pretty obvious.

Actually we might use Levels on Explosion Manipulation, starting from small ones to ending to level you're thinking... EM doesn't really have any definitions/limits to how big explosions it manipulates, so defining those might be a good idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:21, November 13, 2015 (UTC)

Levels of EM, yes.

Cosmic EM, let's have a rain-check for that one at the moment. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:04, November 13, 2015 (UTC)

Wait and see. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:01, November 13, 2015 (UTC)

As with all Levels, star from the minimum and since you already know the top already add that. Then you just add two to four more levels between those two that are of roughly equal/meaningful and go for it.

Sorry if this isn't very clear, I'm still bit tired and describing what I mean to say isn't exactly flowing... --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:29, November 14, 2015 (UTC)

Not really
Not really.SageM (talk) 02:37, November 15, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It happens when it happens.

Word. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Word used.

There's a reason Magic Power is on Invisibility's category. That means don't. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:06, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Nothing but the word in use. They are synonyms. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:10, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Make it Transmutation Manipulation to get more out of it. You can do the lesser thing later. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:21, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Oh, that'd be usable. Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:21, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

As it is Variations of Climbing and Brachiation is variation of that... well, it's pretty close I'll have to say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:13, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Isn't that just massively oversized Light Generation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:20, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

what is it? Gabriel456 (talk) 18:37, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

I...have no idea, exactly, to be perfectly honest Gabriel456 (talk) 18:41, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

-sigh- I really don't know. I'm sorry. This is difficult for me to fully approve, but at the same time, equally difficult to deny. Honestly on the fence.

Sorry for being generally unhelpful, by the way... Gabriel456 (talk) 19:10, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

Still basically over-sized generation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:21, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

Check how the various dates and times are defined in Calendar Empowerment and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:25, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

Perfect counter to Constriction and powers that could cause said effect? (i.e, Rope Manipulation). Sounds good. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 01:41, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Well, we have Trap Manipulation and few variations to it already, so have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, November 19, 2015 (UTC)



Something like pulling yourself up from swamp by your own braid like Baron Munchhausen did? Have fun, tho you need to give pretty good explanation/description. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:05, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

Flamer, it has been brought to my attention of your recent power idea. You know, Self Telekinesisis. Unfortunately, Tactile Telekinesis covers your idea. So, nice try. Best of wishes

Azrael, the King of Death (talk) 22:57, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

Your idea.
Virtual Particle Manipulation is somewhat similar to your idea. as it manipulates imaginary/unreal particles.

If you do make the power then Accelerator would be a user. since in his awakened angel state he can manipulate imaginary vectors.SageM (talk) 23:17, November 19, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 23:28, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

Trick with Transmutation.

Telekinetic Combat. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:51, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

Bloodlessness/Ultraviolet Vision have fun.

Already a power I am planning to make.
Thats a power i am already working on, Property Lock.SageM (talk) 20:29, November 21, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Curiosity. You've been suggesting quite a few ideas and I've okayed more than few, but lost the count of how many of those you've done already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:59, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

Every power you have thought of I already did....
Every power you have thought of so far I already made or plan to make. ^_^SageM (talk) 21:07, November 21, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Material Swapping and Property Transference.SageM (talk) 21:15, November 21, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 21:25, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

I don't think there is, actually Gabriel456 (talk) 22:48, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

-sigh- great, I think it's happening again... Gabriel456 (talk) 22:58, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Gabriel456 (talk) 23:02, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

Probably be best Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

I'm really not sure about that. not 100% denying it though, mind you, just unsure...Gabriel456 (talk) 20:04, November 22, 2015 (UTC)

Freedom or some of it's sub-powers I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:36, November 22, 2015 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 21:44, November 22, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not Gabriel456 (talk) 23:32, November 22, 2015 (UTC)

Might as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

Do that power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:44, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

Counter Power
Is it possible for the user with this said power to gain allot of abilities all at once to counter another opponent's said powers that are about to be countered? ToxicHolyGrenade (talk) 18:02, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

yes, and I'm not sure about it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:08, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

I think Flash Step covers that already, since it would allow the user do that. Gabriel456 (talk) 22:12, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

It seems to imply it, at least (I don't know, I can't make any sense out of it) but that still sounds like a limit if that's the only difference between them Gabriel456 (talk) 22:22, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

man, I don't know. All I know is that your power seems to be covered by that. (not only that, Enhanced Speed and all higher levels of it...) Gabriel456 (talk) 22:44, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry for that. It's just that you're asking me difficult questions that I don't know the answers to... Again, I apologize for my outburst and I'll try to cool off.. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:01, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

I. If the user gains a nemesis power only once, how will the user switch to another nemesis power to counter the opponent's other abilities?

II. Is it possible for the user with Power Opposition to gain Power Immunity, Power Reflection, Power Negation, or Power Erasure to counter other's abilities?

Sorry if I was bothering you. ToxicHolyGrenade (talk) 00:14, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

this is closest match I can find....
This is the closest possible match to what your describing-

Real World EnforcementSageM (talk) 00:53, November 24, 2015 (UTC)SageM

yeah, I'm fine Gabriel456 (talk) 02:54, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

Figure better name and example, peak human is real world limit.

Various Teleportation/travel/transportation/speed related powers have same effect. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

You need to work at the description a bit, and it's sub-power of Superpower Manipulation, but as far as I can see, yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:22, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

Covered by Momentum Manipulation I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:20, November 25, 2015 (UTC)

Point. Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:53, November 25, 2015 (UTC)

Welp, we do have few tongue powers and similar powers dealing with other body-part, but I think it's getting bit too specific. How about expanding the idea to ability to sharpen/have sharp part of body? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:26, November 26, 2015 (UTC)

Indeed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:55, November 26, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too focused I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, November 27, 2015 (UTC)

Object Possession gets pretty close and I have this feeling that we have something that does this to objects, but for the life in me can't remember what it was. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:07, November 27, 2015 (UTC)

I think Unnoticeability covers that concept. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:56, November 27, 2015 (UTC)

Sealing --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:39, November 28, 2015 (UTC)

Doable, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:00, November 28, 2015 (UTC)

Fairytale Shifting. Tell me how you like in the vommentsK Gouki (talk) 23:36, November 28, 2015 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 00:50, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:07, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

We already have Professions for both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:34, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Explosive Proficiency --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:42, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Another way saying proficiency. There aren't many of them, so they might as well be renamed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:52, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Trickster

No, and please don't ask about them. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:54, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

What? History Intuition? Encyclopedic Knowledge covers that.

Expand that to Science Intuition and you have something. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:17, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

While one or two specific powers wouldn't be that bad, experience has proved that if you give one change we'd end up having power for every single possibility... --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:27, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Still waiting game. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:01, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

I don't know about the first. Explain the second one a-bit. My previous edit, I realized it sounded too much like Wound Transferal Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Still unsure about Egg Imprisonment, but as for the second one, if you can show enough differences between it and Wound Transferal, then go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 23:26, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Organic Imprisonment --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:06, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

Work --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:10, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

Mainly check over from someone elses PoV. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:38, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

"Force" being defined as? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:52, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

You'll need to explain what you mean by forces when you make this power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:07, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

Can't remember but don't. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

Yup. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:39, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

I must admit that there's something familiar on that description. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:52, December 2, 2015 (UTC)

I think I gave you time limit for how long I wait for you to get to working on it before deleting. At least that's how I usually do.

As for why it was deleted, you know as much as I. That wasn't regent thing and I end up deleting so many pages that remembering single ones reasons is beyond me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, December 3, 2015 (UTC)

Reply
No need to sorry or anything, as you didn't do anything wrong.

I didn't put the "Note : All of these powers/abilities are NOT trademarked/protected or anything, so if you want to make them, go ahead, I don't mind" there for no reason. Copyrighting something that doesn't exist is silly anyway.

Have a good day ^ ^ --Morgan Paradise (talk) 22:39, December 3, 2015 (UTC)

Capabilities needs work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:17, December 4, 2015 (UTC)

Didn't you already ask me this a few months ago? I could swore you messaged me about something about Axis before..

maybe I'm confusing it for something else. Huh. Anyways, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:14, December 4, 2015 (UTC)

Take a look at other Capabilities and use them as guideline. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:44, December 5, 2015 (UTC)

I really don't know. By that, I'm on the fence about it... Gabriel456 (talk) 16:14, December 5, 2015 (UTC)

Can you please take a look at this? Go ahead and Comment on it!

http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:K_Gouki/Furax_Fottiti,_The_F-U_Embodiment K Gouki (talk) 16:48, December 5, 2015 (UTC)

While amusing, I think it's bit too much on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, December 5, 2015 (UTC)

so basically... A combination of DNA Replication and Mental Mimicry? Gabriel456 (talk) 14:31, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

Well, then I'm utterly confused on this.Gabriel456 (talk) 15:06, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

Barely, still somewhat confused. Then again, I did just wake up and haven't had coffee yet... so that may be why...-shrug-

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:17, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 23:33, December 7, 2015 (UTC)

Not sure about that, to be honest. Maybe you should shoot that question over to Kuopiofi. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:54, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

While idea is usable (if more than silly), as is it's way too specific. Expand the concept to include other kinds of beings/animals. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:20, December 8, 2015

"The user can precisely control their movements and muscles" --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:21, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Then add it to Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:27, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Welp, that cleared it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:06, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Added option for multiple tails to Tail Manifestation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:13, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Response
I do not know where the page went but the purpose of that power is to exactly match one's body movements to oneself or another where they move exactly the same as the other.--CNBA3 (talk) 21:34, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Yeah, I thought I did but I don't know what happened.--CNBA3 (talk) 21:41, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 23:41, December 8, 2015 (UTC)

Reach Mode
Because its not really a separate/unique power, its just a different definition/name for limb extension. In fact thats pretty much all it is.SageM (talk) 01:18, December 9, 2015 (UTC)SageM

done Gabriel456 (talk) 01:31, December 9, 2015 (UTC)

1. To be honest, that sounds like we could just put that in Replication's capabilities as an advanced technique than a separate power. 2. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:07, December 10, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not. nothing on it at the moment implies that it can't...

But if there's really a big enough difference, go for it. Probably be best  Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, December 10, 2015 (UTC)

eh, doesn't really sound good to me, to be perfectly honest Gabriel456 (talk) 04:23, December 12, 2015 (UTC)

Well, it's just spinning and flipping. I don't see how it'd be a good idea. Plus, I'm sure we have some pages already that has those as a small bit of their capabilities as it is... Gabriel456 (talk) 04:32, December 12, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but it still doesn't sound good enough to be a page. Gabriel456 (talk) 04:36, December 12, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:13, December 13, 2015 (UTC)

a certain user.
We were talking about the user, Gabrielsmith. He has repeatedly ignored warnings from both admins and doesn't use brackets when adding entries to the various pages. and he continues to do so even after being banned. So it was best that he be removed from the wiki as a user.SageM (talk) 02:52, December 14, 2015 (UTC)SageM

^ exactly what SageM said Gabriel456 (talk) 02:55, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

exactly right. Gabriel456 (talk) 03:00, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

Are you talking purely cosmetic differences? Random or as chosen by User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:09, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

Then it's be combination with Power Randomization. No need to add one more combination. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:21, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

Then make power that allows conscious changes and Limitation that makes them random. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:45, December 14, 2015 (UTC)

Isn't that pretty much covered by Telekinesis Immunity?

and even then, it should only affect telekinesis, not powers that simulate it so GM should still affect them, since it's using gravity, after all. Just my opinion on that Gabriel456 (talk) 18:11, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Expand that to pure Evasion which would allow dodging all forms of attack and you got something. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:36, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

1. Isn't that essentially Earth Generation? I don't see why that doesn't cover it, if the user focuses on the user's feet, after all.

2. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:24, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

sorry I thought you meant land as in literally earth. my bad. Expand on those examples, and go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:30, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

I think that may be best as an also called, but it's up to you Gabriel456 (talk) 21:31, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

Some users for Land Creation
Hi, some users for Land Creation-

Hohenheim from Full Metal Alchemist Brotherhood(he creates a path of the buried land that sits atop a poisonous water source).

Michiyuki-byakko from Horizon In The Middle of Nowhere- has the power to control/create paths, which basically means it can create solid land to walk on no matter where it is, even if its in the sky.

there you go.SageM (talk) 21:48, December 19, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Demonic Vessel...
Sadly no, since it was hard enough to find a user for Divine Vessel, and I really don't know any demons and hosts that fit the same qualifications that divine vessel does. Since a user of divine vessel is not merely possessed, but the god and the host act and behave as one person. And its not really in any demons nature to do the same as they prefer to have complete control instead.SageM (talk) 01:04, December 20, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 14:48, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

It wasn't me.
I only posted the user and the gallery, I didn't post the deletion category.SageM (talk) 01:02, December 22, 2015 (UTC)SageM

A variation of this?
Dimensional Transformation, a variation of Environmental Transformation?SageM (talk) 20:02, December 28, 2015 (UTC)SageM


 * 1) go for it. A combo of Dimensional Travel and Shapeshifting sounds pretty good.
 * eh, not sure about that. Take it over to Kuopiofi and see what he thinks. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:35, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

I'd say it's too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

go for both.

perhaps "Strength Limitation", a sub-power or variation of Limitation Inducement? Gabriel456 (talk) 22:48, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

that'd work Gabriel456 (talk) 23:04, December 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Isn't that pretty much covered by Enhanced Reflexes/Supernatural Reflexes? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

oh, I apologize. I misread your statement. I thought you said just doing it super fast, not in the style of causality. (you should name it like that, instead of causal, just pointing it out, I think that's what confused me).

Name it Causality Reflexes, and go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:48, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Planetary Duplication - too specific.

Physical Law Destruction - compare to Physical Disruption? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Might as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:08, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Entropy
Its the power to utilize the maximum unused energy inherent in any/all systems. Once entropy is reached a state of total equilibrium occurs as no more energy can be used for any purpose. Think of it terms of a battery, a battery contains a specific amount of energy that can be used and eventually you use up all the energy in the battery, once that happens you have to get rid of it, unless its a rechargeable, but even a rechargeable can only be used so many times before entropy sets in and it can't be used again.

Entropy is the end point for anything and everything, it focuses on the total energy available in any system. the ultimate example of entropy in action is the Heat Death of the Universe.

Entropy is a state that is always increasing, meaning that no matter what happens entropy will always win out in the end.SageM (talk) 23:06, December 31, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Because its not even a power, and there is no such thing as negentropy. all systems have the same amount of energy inherent in them, nothing can change that fact. so making a power like that is pointless. The power is either usable or it isn't, its as simple as that.... So that power would serve no purpose.SageM (talk) 23:29, December 31, 2015 (UTC)SageM

The concept is inherently flawed, as negative entropy is an impossibility. I looked it up and it doesn't say anything about the description you were talking about to gabriel. all its taking about is trying to waste only the least amount of energy as possible, it doesn't say anything about using only the usable energy in a system. thus your idea is pointless to begin with.

So the power your talking about doesn't actually exist.SageM (talk) 23:47, December 31, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It wasn't just crazy, the whole power idea you thought of was flawed, what you described to gabriel and what it actually is were completely different things that had nothing to do with each other. thats why I said that.SageM (talk) 23:58, December 31, 2015 (UTC)SageM

No harm done. As for Entropy Acceleration it might be possible, but check with Kuo first before you do.SageM (talk) 00:32, January 1, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, January 1, 2016 (UTC)

go for all Gabriel456 (talk) 14:16, January 1, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 19:37, January 1, 2016 (UTC)

13. When you add new pictures, try to find ones that aren't thumbnail-sized: if possible at least 300px wide ones. Especially as main picture the smaller ones get blurry.

20. When you make powers that are sub-powers, techniques, Variations, etc. of some other power, add them to those pages. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:17, January 2, 2016 (UTC)

Hyper Running doesn't sound really fitting, in my opinion. but then again, I don't have a better name for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:44, January 2, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:17, January 2, 2016 (UTC)

that'd work Gabriel456 (talk) 22:12, January 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * eh, not sure, to be honest...
 * 1) Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:55, January 3, 2016 (UTC)

well,i know a user for that Ground Swimming power you is planning to do, Senor Pink from One Piece. L12345 (talk) 16:09, January 3, 2016 (UTC)

You mean in any solid matter or just earth? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:30, January 3, 2016 (UTC)

I think closest example would be earth gliding from AD&D/Pathfinder. Make it include all solid matter and Variation of Intangibility and it's a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, January 3, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 22:11, January 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it. Although you are going a bit overboard with these "walking" powers, if you don't mind my saying so.
 * 2) We already have that: Reversed Effect

yeah, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:25, January 4, 2016 (UTC)

creating buildings? it already exists....
Create buildings? it already exists- Fortification Creation. it also overlaps with City Creation as both imply the creation of buildings.

Semi-invulnerability- Injury Immunity or Enhanced Durability.SageM (talk) 23:29, January 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Actually if you do some research fortification creation is pretty much the one power used in all the building related pages. so yes, it implies its all kinds of buildings being created.

Might want to try something else instead.SageM (talk) 23:42, January 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Life Link, Symbiosis, Symbiotic Connection, Hyper Connection or Bond Manipulation are the closest possible examples I can think of.SageM (talk) 01:22, January 5, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Mental Augmentation - doable.

Shape Restoration - covered by Physical Restoration.

Metabolism Deceleration - doable.

Physical Distruption - basically Healing with special effects.

Army Creation - I think we have something like that already... but don't quote me on that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:25, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

Army Creation - Check if there is something like that already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:49, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

Is there power that only creates armies or something similar, yes or no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:02, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

After a bit of thinking, I'd say you can create the Army Creation as it isn't just creating the people (Life Creation/Sapient Race Creation), but also their equipment (Weapon Creation/Object Creation). --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:08, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:59, January 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) That sounds like Augmentation, just in another name and wording to be perfectly honest...though I might be misreading again. I do know a user though: God from Supernatural, as he promoted Castiel from a regular angel to a Seraphim after he resurrected him
 * 2) go for it. I even have a user: Malefor from the Legend of Spyro games; he made necklaces from magic that tethers Spyro and Cynder in the third game, forcing them to keep close together (until they defeat him, of course)

eh, that doesn't sound like a good idea to me, if you want my honest opinion. I think it may be best to leave that covered by Hiearchy Control... Gabriel456 (talk) 22:11, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

if you want Gabriel456 (talk) 22:14, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

spinning combat
Isn't that just pretty much just bodily rotation manipulation or hyper rotation?SageM (talk) 05:14, January 7, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Capabilities of bodily rotation manipulation-

"User can manipulate all bodily rotations, including spinning, turning, rolling, etc., allowing them to move their body in any way or direction, allowing to escape any hold, dodge any attack, and even avoid damage from any fall by spreading out the impact. They can rotate/turn several different parts of their bodies at the same time in different directions, allowing them to confuse others as to what they will do next.

They can also apply bodily rotation to attacks, making their attacks unpredictable and hard to avoid and/or block."

Thats pretty much spinning combat to a T, as its just a combination between spinning attack and spinning defense.SageM (talk) 05:19, January 7, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

Nope, completely forgot about it. Tho now that you reminded, I'd say it's a no. bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:44, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

sorry for the late reply. Thought I did before I left... I apologize

No, I don't think anyone has done Function Inducement before. Though, in my opinion, it'd probably be best to  make that as a Manipulation than Inducement. Gabriel456 (talk) 14:10, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 14:19, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

crap, forgot about Purpose Manipulation, to be honest. (hey, there's thousands of pages!) Gabriel456 (talk) 14:54, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

that..doesn't make much sense, to be honest. I mean, the capability you gave doesn't really match the name at all... Gabriel456 (talk) 22:11, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

So, pretty much an advanced version of Knowledge Replication? not sure about the second one (in terms of creating it, I don't think anyone has done that before) Gabriel456 (talk) 22:22, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 22:30, January 7, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) -shrug-
 * 2) isn't that covered by Floortilting? (it says it can also be achieved through Spatial Manipulation)
 * 3) Go for it. We already have pages like Angel Creation, Demon Creation, Deity Creation and Animal Creation. So I don't see a problem Gabriel456 (talk) 22:17, January 13, 2016 (UTC)

I see. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:32, January 13, 2016 (UTC)

I have very vague memories of something similar, but don't quote me on that one. Could have been some other site too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

That's bit worrisome... have you been so busy you forgot about it?

Preferably not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:39, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Polite way saying no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:50, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, all I can muster is "eh"...Gabriel456 (talk) 18:59, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

I think Electrolytic Blood pretty much covers that Gabriel456 (talk) 23:29, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

only on those things alone (Soul Distribution, Power Sharing) but not all at once. So that could work Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

20. When you make powers that are sub-powers, techniques, Variations, etc. of some other power, add them to those pages. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:07, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 17:33, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Could you elaborate?
 * 2) -shrug-

I understand. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 17:48, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

There are few powers that have roughly same results. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:20, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

Power Borrowing? --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:12, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

Hmmm... usable. Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:27, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

Deity Connection- Transcendent Connection.SageM (talk) 01:31, January 17, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Hey I heard about your deity connection power and I think it would be a great addition to the site.


 * 1) We have Divine Conduit and Divine Communication, but not connection. go for it
 * 2) isn't that pretty much covered by Motor-Skill Manipulation? I mean, I think a user of thank can achieve that. (in fact, Eric Doyle of heroes has done it.) Gabriel456 (talk) 02:54, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

oh, didn't see that. think it would. My bad.

and that sounds good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 15:10, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

what do you mean, by "focus"? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:43, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, part of me thought you meant something on the line of a combo of Enhanced Vision and Sense Focusing; gaining super vision by focusing it on one eye XD

but I'm honestly unsure about this... Gabriel456 (talk) 01:00, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Multi-Directional Vision pretty much covers it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:39, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

no, that hasn't been done before, as far I'm aware Gabriel456 (talk) 18:35, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

sure, but be clear of the differences between it and luck Gabriel456 (talk) 18:46, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

I just don't know
 * 1) eh...
 * 2) I'm honestling having a hard time distinguishing the two. I mean, "mimic movement" alone is used alot in AMM. Though there is the limit of being able to do what is already possible...

Gabriel456 (talk) 20:39, January 20, 2016 (UTC)

Very unlike Adoptive Muscle Memory and very much silly power, but doable. Have fun, but do try to find users. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:48, January 20, 2016 (UTC)

Already exists-Coincidence ResistanceSageM (talk) 02:02, January 21, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Ask Kuo about comparing the two powers and see what he thinks.SageM (talk) 02:30, January 21, 2016 (UTC)SageM

There's bit overlap but I'd say it's doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, January 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) that honestly sounds more like an action, in my opinion...
 * 2) Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:08, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

The only possible example I can think of is Faerie from Seiken Densetsu 3, whenever she decides to hide inside someone they are protected from fate and thus their personal futures remain unseen while she uses them as a host.

Thats really the only example I can think of.SageM (talk) 03:35, January 22, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Protected By fate? Sorry I thought you were talking about from fate. In that case the list is even smaller, since I am not certain if this character even counts as a user, Cid of the Lufaine from Dissidia: Final Fantasy, he is supposedly protected by fate as Shinryu can not kill him without ending the cycles which is the exact opposite of what he wants. though this is pretty much going by word of mouth, since I haven't played the game personally so I can't be completely certain whether or not its true.SageM (talk) 04:09, January 22, 2016 (UTC)SageM

yes, and all I'm not sure about it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:09, January 23, 2016 (UTC)

Disaster Negation pretty much does the same thing.SageM (talk) 23:13, January 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Gabriel456 (talk) 01:09, January 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Storm Negation, go for it
 * 2) go for it
 * 3) -shrug-

whoops didn't see SageM's message. Yeah, doesn't Disaster Negation fit that already? Gabriel456 (talk) 01:11, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Absolute Force Manipulation capabilities-

"They can turn a tornado into a gentle breeze, bring a raging tsunami to a halt or annihilate an continent simply by slamming ones palm into the earth, provided the user understands the natural forces required for continental destruction. User can bring all supernatural powers and activity in the area to a complete standstill by denying them all the force they rely upon to function"

Already exists as an application of this power.SageM (talk) 01:21, January 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

nah, better to go with your original idea, to get rid of them entirely. Gabriel456 (talk) 01:21, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

I meant, go for Storm Negation, with your original idea of both calm and stop storms Gabriel456 (talk) 01:25, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Disaster covers quite a bit more than storm, but storm is broad enough power to be usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

I think Wing Manifestation is enough. I mean, it doesn't even say how much wings the user can manifest, after all Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 23:22, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

not that I'm aware of Gabriel456 (talk) 02:15, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 02:21, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

Soul Anchoring Gabriel456 (talk) 18:01, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

re: Aerial Mode
Great minds think alike, I suppose. Smijes08 (talk) 03:44, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

no, I don't think so Gabriel456 (talk) 16:27, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, thought I replied. Guess I closed the tab before I actually finished sending. derp.

Yeah go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 16:42, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. If it is about that bank robbery last week at Wells Fargo, I had nuthin' to do with it. :-P. But yeah, go ahead. Maxoflas (talk) 01:31, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

To be honest, that sounds familiar. And, you know, as much as it would be fun to be one, but I am not an admin. So, why ask me? :-D. Maxoflas (talk) 01:40, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

Oh. Well, good luck, bruh. I don't know if you should create the power or not. *Shrug*. But, Flamer, why did you come to me instead of any body else? I am just a novice at this. :-P. Maxoflas (talk) 01:47, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

I don't think it is a bad idea, I just think that it sounds familiar or similar to another power. Maxoflas (talk) 01:59, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 16:24, January 30, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 16:36, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Sure
 * 2) -shrug-

Bit too specific and essentially covered by Elasticity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:59, January 30, 2016 (UTC)

The first one sounds like a good counter to Friction Manipulation. Go for it

As for the other two...."eh" -shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 22:26, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 22:45, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:09, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) sure
 * 2) -shrug-

You need to work on the details/description/Capabilities (check Wikipedia for factor for example, add link), but doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:24, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

done Gabriel456 (talk) 01:07, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 01:24, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

Chemical Creation is usable, others are either already covered by other powers or too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

Because they are effective on against only very singular, definite situation/power.

That said, of the powers/effects you mentioned Psychic Shield pretty much covers all supernatural/mental effects and technically speaking might give some resistance against even normal seduction/beauty. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:03, February 6, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:41, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Morale Augmentation is already covered by several powers.

Aura Adhesion is Variation of Power Bestowal. If you make that power make it Aura Bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Check Support Powers/Support Powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:59, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Why should we have those? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:44, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Who knows. Apparently people just aren't interested making them. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Every power is judged by same standards. Suggest something usable and you can do it, if not it's same deal as with every other power that isn't fit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Popularity I/M I allow, fame is essentially PI. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:24, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Too close to each other. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:23, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Headlessness - usable, remember to add it into Head Liberation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Don't answer this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Preferably not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:43, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

That might work. Got users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:40, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

You'll need to explain it well in Capabilities, but have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:30, February 26, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 21:36, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

good god, I thought you were going somewhere else with that...XD

Do you mean like, unaffected as in immunity to the effects? (I.e, smoke can't choke you). Essentially providing an immunity to powers like Gas Manipulation and Miasma Emission? Just need to be clear here Gabriel456 (talk) 21:51, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

then I don't see the point of the power. At-least with the liquid one, a sufficient amount could hold someone back (not the user, obviously).

Though I may be wrong, but I don't see how the gas does the same...Gabriel456 (talk) 21:56, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

I just thought that's what you meant by the power: to move through any gas substance easily, without being affected by it, and able to see through it, etc.

I don't know, maybe I just made it overly-complicated. Might as well call it "Gas Immunity" by that point...gah Gabriel456 (talk) 22:01, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, go for it. Might fit better, to be honest Gabriel456 (talk) 22:03, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Still no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:53, March 1, 2016 (UTC)

Difficulty Reduction - I have very vague memory that we have something like that. I won't swear to it, but...

Action Concentration - Energy Concentration is defined as "focus one's energy into any certain point of their body or object", so that covers it already. Might need to make it clearer tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:37, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Well, give it a try. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Considering how many powers we have and that I might have read it once few years ago? Not a glue. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:57, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Omni-Focus - Nigh Omniscience/Omniscience

Idea Blocking - I think there's something that prevents target thinking/doing things... one of Telepathy I think.

Distraction Ignorance - bit too specific I think. Maybe expand the idea somewhat. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Something like Selective Invulnerability but less complete defense. Might be too similar to SI tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:53, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Should there be? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:16, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

well, i liked it, definitively a power i would like to have, it would be very helpful, since i get distraced to easily. L12345 (talk) 21:03, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Getting the effect without cause? Interesting idea, figure out a name to it and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, that was name and not just description? Have fun then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:56, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

of course, what is it? L12345 (talk) 20:57, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

well, i'am unable of thinking on many expecific aplications, but maybe Paradox Inducement?, since making something happen without a cause is a Paradox by itself. that power would also be a Sub-Power of Causality Manipulation. so maybe you could get something from there. L12345 (talk) 21:10, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Looks like shit. And by shit, I mean DA' SHIT!That was a compliment....Maxoflas (talk) 02:14, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

Da' shit means that I like. But, anyway, I just still want to know, why do you come to me for my......judgement? I know you may wanna get my opinion, but I'm not an expert. I'm good at technology, art, and robbing banks! Thank you for the conversation, though. Maxoflas (talk) 03:59, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

You'll need to explain it pretty well and there's one combat power that does something similar, but otherwise have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember it, but I'm pretty sure it's on Enhanced Combat Variations and main pic is B from Naruto. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:55, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

Simply Prehensility might work best. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:05, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

We already have powers that allow simultaneous activity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember the names, which is mite annoying as I Edited one of them few days ago... There's at least two powers that allow user to perform several actions simultaneously, but I don't remember if there were Limitations on that... --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:57, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

No. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

Way too specific... -_- You have interesting mind. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, March 21, 2016 (UTC)

For both.

And it seems to be pretty wide spread on this site actually, we get the most of the wall/outside the box ideas for powers... --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, March 21, 2016 (UTC)

Trunk Protrusion/Media Embodiment usable

Spell Mimicry/Tail Elongation not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:36, March 25, 2016 (UTC)

Infectious Blast/Disease Suppression - have fun.

Microscopic Universe Creation - way too specific and covered by Universe Creation.

Chemical Reaction Immunity - in what way? Details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 6, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, April 6, 2016 (UTC)

Ammunition Redirection - we may have something like this...

Matter Dematerialization - dematerializing would make things unexciting instead of abstract.

Ability Cloning - something like this exist.

Nebula Generation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

If you remember Mythbusters trying to make bullets curve as they tested some film (Kari was pregnant at the time), the main pic is from that film. Can't remember if it was exactly the same thing, but there's certainly some connection. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Deadly Surface - we have something like this, can't remember the name or find it, but both ice/cold and fire have variations.

Adaptation Negation - didn't someone make something like this one pretty recently? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Strange, I'm pretty sure it was rather regent... Problem with the site this big, things start to blur together.

Puzzle Manipulation - doable.

Light Imprisonment - go for it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:52, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

You think about that.

State Manipulation - that needs some serious expansion/explanation in capabilities. Possibility.

Eternal Weather Inducement - expand the idea bit and you might get something. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

Well, that too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:58, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

And few other things. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:19, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

Durability Concentration - Armor Concentration maybe. Might be bit too close to Selective Invulnerability.

Malfunction Inducement - needs more descriptive name but doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 29, 2016 (UTC)

So you define the zero point for both as today? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:52, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Make it so the starting point is current civilizations state instead of the modern one and you have something useful, expecting starting point to be here and now is way too self-centered to use. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:09, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. Have you considered doing Night Manipulation too? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Ask after I've got time to read it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Might as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:19, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Prayer granting already exists- Holy Gift.SageM (talk) 03:35, May 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Beginning Embodiment also exists already- Origin Embodiment.SageM (talk) 03:53, May 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Matterlock Manipulation - pretty pointless, no

Undead Summoning - doable, but I think that's last specific summoning I allow

Climate Empowerment - doable

Electricity Transferal - too specific

Adhesive Attacks - way too specific

Mind Consumption - details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Mind Consumption - Don't we have something like that...

Matterlock - describe matter from outside of the universe or Reality. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Wouldn't FMM cover it then? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:40, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Intangibility is one of the Applications, so... --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:00, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Evolution Acceleration- ProgressionSageM (talk) 02:25, May 16, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Angle Manipulation is bit too specific, other are usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

"Artifact" is pretty unspecified thing. What do you mean by that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too close to Object Manipulation I think. New Limitation I added should cover that one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:47, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

-shrug- no idea, to be honest Gabriel456 (talk) 16:54, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

I say too specific is. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Hat Empowerment - No.

Symbol Manipulation - possibility, but Literary Manipulation Techniques cover much of it.

Jewelry Manipulation - bit limited but go ahead.

Physical Law Transcendence - covered already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:39, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

King of Cool
YeahCoolCat123450 (talk) 23:39, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

It's Good
Observing how we have Embodiment Creation, I can see an "embodiment of embodiments" being added to our list of powers. Embodiment Manipulation has some potential and could be a prospective addition to this wiki. It has a green light from me. CoolCat123450 (talk) 00:04, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, i actually even have users for it, Calypso, Dione and Rhea from VC, they created and have control over lesser embodiments of what they herselves represents (Sea, Sky and Earth respectively). L12345 (talk) 00:51, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, most times he is. L12345 (talk) 01:04, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

maybe you could ask him why L12345 (talk) 01:17, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

It's essentially indirect Reality Warping/Nigh Omnipotence by manipulating the Embodiments. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

Mind Storage: already have something that does this. Can't remember name...

Collective Strength: team-based powers might cover this already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Bond Empowerment is the most obvious example, Team Combination is more broad idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Got Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Curiosity mostly, just wanted to know if someone had that idea before us.

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:36, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Use the total beauty idea and remember that manipulating doesn't mean just increasing the thing but also reducing it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:40, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Invulnerability Bypassing: Invulnerability Negation

Reversal: I think may have something like this...

Stabilility Inducement: have fun.

Energy Storage: Covered by various powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Dream Projection: Doable. Link to Psionic Image Projection and Memory Projection? There's at least one more but i can't find it...

Timelessness: basically Temporal Reload. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Change the name and you can go on. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:58, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

You already have 30 pages waiting, why hoard more every day? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I know. I have few pages just waiting the inspiration to do them... and few I need to figure out what I was planning when I wrote them down. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:20, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember what was talked about back then, but it ended up being so close Environmental Manipulation that I rolled them together. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:08, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

And when you create a a page, add the link to the pages it's sub-power, Variation, etc. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:09, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

I think Obstacle Manipulation gets pretty close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:20, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know, to be honest. Ask Kuo about it. if he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 17:18, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

of course, what power is it? L12345 (talk) 23:55, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

don't see why not, hard would be to find users i think. L12345 (talk) 23:58, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

already exists.
Physical Plane Manipulation and Physical Plane Lordship already do that.SageM (talk) 00:00, May 25, 2016 (UTC)SageM

The Physical Plane encompasses all environments. So there is no actual difference between the two powers. Meta Environment control would mean controlling the physical plane.

If it just controls environmental physics then you should just call it environmental physics control, not meta environment control, as its not the same thing.SageM (talk) 00:17, May 25, 2016 (UTC)SageM

for me i think it's fine, but ask kuo about it of course. L12345 (talk) 00:56, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Urban Manipulation is Variation of Environmental Manipulation already. Might need to clear things bit so it's obvious environment includes more than nature. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

What? Making new page? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:26, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Reality Warping? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:57, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Possibility, but check if there are other powers that do the same. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

All things considered, I'd say Physical Plane Manipulation covers this one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:46, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

it seems to be a fine power to me. L12345 (talk) 00:45, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

You want to make power to manipulate alternate Universes when Universal Manipulation does that to one user is on and Multiversal Manipulation them and quite a few more verses? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:59, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

Just saying that making power that only covers verse that isn't yours is bit limited. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:27, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

In that case it is MM.

You'll have to remind me about what Possibility Manipulation does. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:38, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

Not sure of all the mechanics of it, but usually powers that are confined to a single series/verse are considered specific, such as a physiology that only exists in one series or a type of power that can't be found in any other series(like the kissing magic from Yamada and the Seven Witches, or the the Trigger power from World Trigger).

For more details its probably better to ask the admins.SageM (talk) 03:52, May 30, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Go for it.

Reality Recreation and Dream Replication need explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun with all of three. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. But I don't know any users.SageM (talk) 23:30, May 31, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Sounds like it would be the opposite of this power- Selective Elimination.SageM (talk) 01:30, June 1, 2016 (UTC)SageM

And the point of this would be? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

I think there's AD&D spell that allow something similar.

Usable, but needs good explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

Fetal Manipulation - too specific.

Action Reaction Manipulation - possibly usable but I'm not sure if we have powers that cover this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say so. Capabilities could be expanded bit to reflect the extend of power too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say both are bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:43, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Goes on the specific side again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Magnitude Matching - nah.

Dimensional Confinement - Binding on level where it's pointless.

DNA Infusion - this would do... what?

Radiation Removal - expand that to removing radiation from any/everything and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:52, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

That sounds more like some sort of power infusion. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

That's the part you're interested? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:52, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

Nope to all three.

You got new name, any reason? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:47, June 5, 2016 (UTC)

Desire Manifestation, Malnutrition Inducement, Backlash, Fatigue Immunity: too specific.

Elemental Perception: perceive part is covered by Elemental Detection --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

Connection Manipulation - Bond Manipulation

Magic Induced Powers - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:23, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

The non-relationship part is mentioned on the second section of Capabilities, so it could be Edited/expanded bit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

As said, really could use some Editing/expanding... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:13, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

Surface Transmutation: too specific and essentially Limitation to Transmutation

Digital Erasure: possibility, bit more details.

Simple Machine Manipulation: bit too specific.

Change Reversal: ? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:45, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

For Change Reversal - this would also include changes done by supernatural means.

Digital Erasure - usable.

Feralness Manipulation - too specific.

Spatial Replication - we may have something similar, don't think it was about space as such but close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:39, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:24, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

There are several powers along those lines, though the one I can think of right off the top of my head is Remolding.SageM (talk) 00:38, June 13, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Not that I can remember, interesting idea... --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 13, 2016 (UTC)

Possibility, but needs better/clearer description. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:06, June 14, 2016 (UTC)

Supernova Inducement and Star Destruction.SageM (talk) 01:58, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

If it doesn't involve a star then its not considered a supernova, just a regular explosion. Supernova only happen with exploding stars, nothing more and nothing less.

You need to consider the logic here before you make a statement like that.

Also supernovae only happen with truly large stars, mini novae are impossible by the very nature of the universe. stars that aren't big enough for novae go through whats called a red giant phase instead.SageM (talk) 02:04, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Isn't that just Attack Modification?SageM (talk) 02:34, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Organ Relocation, Symbiotic Connection and Hyper Connection.

Looks like were starting to run out of good ideas.... ^^;;;SageM (talk) 02:42, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

I will be content if we ever manage to reach 10,000 powers. though thats at least another 3 or 4 years to go before we even get that far.... ^^;;;SageM (talk) 02:48, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

A few valid users for galaxy mimicry-

Some versions of Space Monsters(Gunbuster and Diebuster)

Various Luma's (Super Mario Galaxy)

Enjoy.SageM (talk) 02:58, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Artificial Brain - nah.

Brain Creation - usable.

Horror Manipulation - nah.

Galaxy Mimicry - nah.

Theory Manipulation - bit too theoretical. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make something on that area, why not go for Genre Manipulation?

Reality Perception allows you to see things as they truly are. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:30, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Variation of Daydream Manipulation perhaps?SageM (talk) 00:08, June 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

It sounds more like an extension of what Dream Manipulation does already rather then a separate power...SageM (talk) 00:57, June 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Basically Dream Manipulation focused on past dreams. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

From dreams? Closest would be Subjective Reality, Oneiric Creation does some of that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

As far as the description goes, yes. There's nothing that says otherwise. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:37, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

You mean evil? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Lie Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:36, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Unreality Manipulation may not be the best/most descriptive name, but it's something we don't have. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:33, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say only if the user can make the unreal affect what's real/reality. If nothing else, associations Gabriel456 (talk) 23:50, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

You asked that from Gabriel, he answered already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:22, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

Physics Lordship sounds a lot like Physical Plane Lordship or Omni-Physics Manipulation. both of which give you complete command over the laws of physics.SageM (talk) 21:59, July 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Sorry I didn't see the message until now, since I was busy with other edits. ^^

The other one seems fine, two users I can think of immediately for it are The Abh from Crest/Banner of the Stars series and straight cougar from S-CRY-ed.SageM (talk) 22:06, July 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

1. go for it

2. -shrug-

Gabriel456 (talk) 16:12, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I saw your comment to Kuo, and I wanted to point out that Mental Replication already exists: Mental Mimicry. and I think that Power Transferal is what you're thinking of Gabriel456 (talk) 15:16, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 15:24, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Inertial/Force Defiance - covered by Inertialess Body I think.

Attribute Exchange - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Well, have fun then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:59, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 00:10, July 7, 2016 (UTC)

The Abh (Crest/Banner of the Stars), Straight Cougar (S-CRY-ed), Kaito (UQ Holder), Nike (Air Gear)

I think there are a few other users. But I don't remember what series they are from.SageM (talk) 00:38, July 7, 2016 (UTC)SageM

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 18:49, July 12, 2016 (UTC)

Sense of Strength and Status Reading.SageM (talk) 22:28, July 12, 2016 (UTC)SageM


 * 1) -shrug-


 * 1) sure

Gabriel456 (talk) 18:04, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just Surface Manipulation?SageM (talk) 18:35, July 13, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Earth Manipulation/Environment Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:57, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Your idea would be usable if you expand it to Community Manipulation, tho I'm not sure if we have power that already covers it. Civilization Manipulation might get close but isn't really it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:57, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

When it says community, does it say what species/civilization/technology level you need to have, hmm...? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Power Restoration already exists. Tsubasa16 (talk) 17:16, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

We already have that Power Restoration. I suggest finding a different name, and be clear on the differences between the two. Gabriel456 (talk) 17:22, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 17:29, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Go for it, it's your power Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Your welcome, but what's it do anyway Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Impressive, so is that like a sub-power of Environment Manipulation ??? Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Amazing, good luck it Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

20. When you make powers that are sub-powers, techniques, Variations, etc. of some other power, add them to those pages. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:01, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:32, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

honestly..."eh". Check with Kuo, and if he signs off, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 13:17, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Go for the Adhesion Manipulation and you have something.

I think we have something like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Indeed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:41, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

The problem is the page already exists- Valley Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:06, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Valley Manipulation Capabilities-

"User can create, shape and manipulate the valleys and everything in them, including all the aspects of the valleys, from the purely physical ones and also mythical/conceptual ones. Valleys are elongated lowlands between ranges of mountains, hills, or other uplands, often having a river or stream running along the bottom. Very narrow, deep valleys cut in resistant rock and having steep, almost vertical sides are called canyons or gorges."

the page exists.SageM (talk) 23:07, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Point. The problem with nearly 8000 powers is that you can't remember all of them and even less all the details. I added CG to VM. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

first two, -shrug- but as for the third, I think a better title is in order, but it may be do-able Gabriel456 (talk) 14:49, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

1. sure

2. eh..-shrug- sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 21:02, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Impact Immunity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:43, July 18, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. Might be expandable tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

Imperceptibility, among other things says "They can't be touched or perceived, by smell, touch, vision, hearing, etc and give off no heat, auras or energy, leave any evidence of their presence, yet the space they occupy has no lack of it. To all senses, the user does not exist." Maybe something on those lines.

Just a thought, tho. I honestly have no idea how'd it work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 15:40, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Evasion Mode: no.

Automatic Tasking: possibility.

Speed Tasking: no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:20, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Please... --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:42, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Making Mode after another for every single thing is really getting old fast. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:55, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Thing is that there are actually some good ideas every now and then, it's just that they're so rare... -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:05, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Complete Mimicry might work Gabriel456 (talk) 22:42, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Cosmic Event Empowerment - doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:39, July 23, 2016 (UTC)

Probability Merging/Splitting - possibility but both need good description.

Rest... not really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Not a one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Past/Future Energy Manipulation - Past Manipulation/Future Manipulation/Time Manipulation?

Inner Voice - conscience as power? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:12, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

How'd they be different from Time Energy Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:23, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:12, July 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) I feel like we have that already, but I'm not entirely sure.. But I'm probably wrong on this. Make it, but I'll probably delete if I do end up finding it.
 * 2) Go for it
 * 3) I guess, but I hope this ends soon. It seems like this new "link" thing will be the new trend now

Getting bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, July 28, 2016 (UTC)

Are what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:02, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

And? You want to make a powers for those? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:20, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Manipulations or something else? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:27, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Rural Adaptation - covered by the closest wild Adaptation I think.

Lava Immunity - possibility.. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:58, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Adaptations that aren't Urban, for example someone on area that was plains before being turned into farm would have Plains Adaptation.

Rural Creation - usable.

City Weathering - expand that to Erosion Manipulation and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:18, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Absolute Selling- too specific.

Certainty Inducement/Clothing Shifting- don't we have something like these already? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Certainty Inducement - Impossibility Inducement/Possibility Inducement?

Clothing Switching - Edited Suit Up a bit, that make it clearer? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun then.

Check Probabilistic Equilibrium while you're at it, Association? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:25, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Gear/Equipment Manipulation - too vague

Wakefulness Manipulation - too specific

Periodic Element Creation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:24, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

A user for position manipulation- Rias Gremory (Highschool DxD) using the Castling technique via the evil pieces.SageM (talk) 20:18, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:30, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

What do you think? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:37, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

it already exists
Enhanced Restoration already exists- Restoration Augmentation.SageM (talk) 21:07, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Quality Enhancement and Efficacy Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:04, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Bit of all of those.

It was getting really close to midnight so I wasn't exactly on my best there... --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, August 4, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 15:30, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Don't we already have that? I feel like we do
 * 3) Accelerating Regeneration. Even if it's effects others, I think Healing Augmentation covers that as well
 * 4) go for it

eh, I honestly can't remember. I might be confusing it for something else, anyways Gabriel456 (talk) 00:20, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Boundary Removal is pretty close to 4th wall destruction.SageM (talk) 00:24, August 5, 2016 (UTC)SageM

TM - on the specific side.

AS - that's pretty much opposite by being too open... -_-; --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:56, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Could explain it a bit better, but I think I got the gist of it. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:38, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

We're really getting quite a few those soul-powers... Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:12, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:35, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Effect Transferal may sound better
 * 2) -shrug-
 * 3) Not sure

Storage Negation- Anti Storage.SageM (talk) 01:04, August 6, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Dark Matter Mimicry users- Photino Birds from Xeelee Sequence and Kakine Teitoku from A Certain Magical Index.SageM (talk) 01:07, August 6, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Detached Fusion - ...what?

Personality Splitting - you mean causing personality split/Divided Mind on oneself/others?

Dark Matter Mimicry - tricky one, as to my knowledge the best data we have about DM is essentially guesses. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 6, 2016 (UTC)

Detached Fusion - see if you can find better name and figure how to explain it better.

Personality Splitting/Dark Matter Mimicry - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, August 6, 2016 (UTC)

Game Creation - have fun

Game Adaptation - needs ability to enter any game first, do we have that?

Spiritual Nonexistence - Soullessness --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

Which is why I wondered if we have that for all games, Electronic-Media Jumping does it to electronic games. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:37, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

uh...-shrug-. I'm not sure. Messgae Kuo about it, and if he signs off, go for it. I'm just not entirely sure myself Gabriel456 (talk) 15:10, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

all I can muster is a "eh"...Gabriel456 (talk) 14:52, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Natural Pouch/Pouch Protrusion - figure better name and have fun.

Music Generation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:10, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Shadow Consumption already exists- Shadow Absorption.SageM (talk) 03:18, August 9, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Card Transmutation - usable

Purpose Bestowal/Birth Manipulation - bit too specific/abstract

Essence Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

As long as you remember to change the links using the old link, go ahead. Remember to note why you changed the name in Comments so people know why it happened.

We may need new Essence page to deal with both versions too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Use Special:Whatlinkshere to find where the links for the old page-name are and then just Edit them to the new one. Remember to change them to the new alphabetical order afterwards. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:53, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Essence Manipulation - sounds good.

Simulation Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:23, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

isn't that essentially Lie Manipulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:03, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

eh Gabriel456 (talk) 15:26, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

if you can really detail the differences, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:29, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Ok, well, here is what I think you should at to the page, applications: Simulation Creation, Tactical Strategist, Thought Manipulation, Enhanced Knowledge and intuition aptitude. Associations: Future Manipulation, Event Manipulation, Phenomena Manipulation, and Probability Manipulation. I hope that helps with starting things.--CNBA3 (talk) 18:52, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Resply
Sure, why not.--CNBA3 (talk) 02:44, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

No, simulations are what you think of or create, not something as an illusion.--CNBA3 (talk) 03:12, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

Sure. Sounds like Supernatural Properties Manipulation could be an application (in that the user can control what the charm does?) Gabriel456 (talk) 14:56, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

hey, i have an user for your Magical Charm Manipulation, Talisman from Valkyrie Crusade, she is the goddess of curses and charms. Tsubasa16 (talk) 14:59, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

No worries, it was a valid answer in both cases ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 20:52, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

Strange, I'm pretty sure I clicked the signature that was under those before C&C...

"How exactly does one enter a game?" - ? Where'd that come from? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

By touch most likely, playing them as with jumanji would definitely work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:56, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

for the first two, go for it. As for the third, not sure Gabriel456 (talk) 13:58, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

Power You Wanted Help On
What's the power like? I don't know much about it. Or anything but the name, really.

GZilla311 (talk) 22:47, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

I'll have to think about it. You check around to make sure there isn't another like this? Not saying there is, but I often have that problem myself.GZilla311 (talk) 23:02, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not entirely sure. This one seems to be rather different than usual ones I've seen (usually I go into closer examination of one element such as fear or melancholy or even corruption itself), so I am unsure how to work with it.

I'm sorry, but I don't know how much I can help. Thank you for considering me, but I simply do not know how much I can help you.

GZilla311 (talk) 23:38, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Reality Warping? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

just asking, would the power you is thiking of be an Sub-power of Present Manipulation (since you said it only affects the Present)? Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:01, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, the power is seems fine to me, aside of it being the perfect sub-power to PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:08, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Could work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

and also, if you have any problem finding users, just use the ones from PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:36, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:43, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

well, by what i understood, the user can control situations, PM and Reality Warping are much more than that, so i don't think they are the same thing at all. That's why i think is is an suitable sub-power to PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 11:44, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Few Limitations and it's a same thing... --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:56, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Had to go back to check what you originally wrote, I remembered your description somewhat wrong. From description it seems mostly like Probability Manipulation with specific attention on Possibility Manipulation and some Certainty Inducement thrown in. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:26, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Looks like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:09, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Well, by what he said, it is like the mix of several powers, but it's not like we do not already have several powers that are that same thing, and by what he said, it would be the same as Probablilty Manipaltion, but i don't think so, PM would allow the user to manipulate the probability of something happening in that situation, not the very situation itself (what Situation Manipulation would do) and PM is limited to things that are possible (the possibility of a given event must be above 0% to cause it and less than 100% to prevent it ), and i think that SM manipulation could do even what is not possible, i believe (i'am right?) . Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:41, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

already exists
Vision Projection- Shared Vision and Vision Manipulation.SageM (talk) 03:19, August 14, 2016 (UTC)SageM

well, ok then. Tsubasa16 (talk) 03:24, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Also there is this power as well- Visual Linking.SageM (talk) 04:31, August 14, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Vision Projection - Shared Vision

Embodiment Mimicry - no.

Stage Skipping - ...aand?

Vantage Creation - way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:49, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Extra Life Bestowal - we might have something similar, but otherwise usable

Life Repulsion/Life Attraction - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:17, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 13:09, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

er, I don't know to be honest. Shoot them over to Kuo, and if he signs off on them, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:56, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Well, care to explain the power to me? Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:41, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Well, it seems fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:49, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Also, you forgot to put your signature on your message to kuopiofi. Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:58, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Both go on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:42, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 11:21, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Constant Inducement - You mean causing things continue the way they were on the moment this power was used? Might be interesting if it isn't just that instant this was induced, ball bouncing non-stop, someone being forced to repeat short sequence of events... There's AD&D spell that causes something like this for a sort while, I think it was repeating same round over and over.

Physique Replication - Doppelgänger Morphing --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:26, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Needs to define how long cycle it can repeat, and some serious explanation in Capabilities, probably Limitations to deal with how long it works, etc. That said, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:40, August 15, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) isn't that essentially Autopilot? if not, sub-power
 * 2) Expand, please?
 * 3) go for it  Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

eh, not sure about any of those, to be honest.Gabriel456 (talk) 10:57, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Dimensional Blast - usable

Multiple Voices - usable but very silly, hope you have users

Logic Defiance - pretty sure we have this, can't remember name

Inability Inducement - covered by existing power, can't remember this either. Some problems in Edit for some reason... --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:58, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

We already have Mindshifting  Gabriel456 (talk) 20:46, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:00, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, not sure... -shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 23:33, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't it just be the Combination of Planetary Lordship and Limited Life Lordship? or just Planetary Lordship (lordship would mean you have absolute control over the planet and everything on it) ? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:06, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Planetary Lordship would grant you absolute control over the planet and everything on it, that includes all life forms and civilizations as well, since civilizations are on the planet as well. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just Unknown Inducement?SageM (talk) 02:04, August 17, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Both are bit too far on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

eh, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 11:01, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Inducement for Uncertainty Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:24, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:39, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

the perfect power for personal trainers. if you're planning to do it, i think that the wii fit trainer from Smash Bros is an user. Tsubasa16 (talk) 20:44, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i don't really remember, i think it's because all of her/his powers are exercise-based, even energy spheres out of exercise. though i think you should look into it to see if she/him fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:07, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i think so, but i don't have sure, again, i think you shoud research and see if she fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:22, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:49, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Attack Switching - that's just doing it without any powers.

Continuous Charging - Juggernaut Momentum --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Piercing Beam Emission --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:00, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

So the powers build-up would be independent of what happens to User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:51, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Could be Technique of Infinite Energy. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:13, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

eh for the first two, but for the third, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:03, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Try to think better name for starters. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Got a name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:27, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering that the power is about charging the power and not attacking, Charging Reliability? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:21, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:37, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Call it Clinging/Continuing Damage or something like that and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:59, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

don't know about the last two, but could you expand on the first? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:12, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

I think so. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:29, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that one of your powers? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:50, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

And you want to make power for those that don't use specified methods... --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Is it really worth it? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:31, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

What you do with your own pages (hint) is pretty much your own business. As long as you don't change it into something totally different. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun, if it doesn't make sense someone Edits it again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Edit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

er...-shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 21:37, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

well, isoporation specifically needs the user to teleport to acheive that effect, so i don't really have sure. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:43, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, like i said, isoporation needs to teleport to achieve that effect, while the power you're thinking does not need to. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Oh right, now I remember. It was too close to Unrestricted Movement. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:44, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Well, it's restored. Edit it to what you want. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

50/50 on this. Take it to Kuo and get his opinion on it. If he signs off, go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:11, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Liberation - too limited, try something that is opposite to Binding

Facing Redirection - too specific

Scientific Projection - usable

Meta Physical Law Manipulation - Law Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Sincerely, Freedom manipulation seems strange, since if you control freedom and free beings, than it's not really freedom anymore, and technically, the opposite to SM would be literally not manipulating anyone at all, it's not like that would be a power. the closer to an opposite to SM is Control Imunity and/or Freedom. Tsubasa16 (talk) 07:51, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

actually,i believe that that ``Liberation´´ power you is thinking of is pretty much Control Negation, which is the power to negate control over others, essentially liberating them from their subordination. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:34, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

something like Self-Sustenance Inducement? i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:42, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

like make someone be independent from anyone to do anything they need or something like that? if so, i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:45, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

"Releasing" sounds bit clunky, but the only other options I can think is "Freeing".

Independence Inducement - details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:46, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Most of that sounds like power bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:53, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Soo...basically Reality Warping. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:49, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Solar Negation/Lunar Negation - doable.

Multi-Perception - don't we already something like this? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:32, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:12, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Charged Attack Multiplication - what? split single attack into multiple ones?

Charge Storage/Holding - too specific

Architecture Recreation - way too specific

Island Adaptation - depends on what kind of island it is, so better covered by already existing adaptations --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Not a bit. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:37, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"The user can summon a stream of endless waves (ranging from hundreds to thousands to millions) of objects like blades, bullets, energy blasts, etc., around their target to bombard them from all sides with no hope of escape. Users most likely have a complex strategy and pattern to confuse their opponent and limit their movement." not just bullets, nothing about speed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't. It simply does the effect without explaining what happens on the background. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:08, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Had time to think about this a bit and we could use lesser version of Bullet Hell. Maybe something up to dozens bullets, possibly with Limitation that they aren't unleashed on the same time but in waves...

Not sure that we don't have something close, but I can't remember one.

Would Multi-Hit Strike cover the melee side for you? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:41, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Ask if he has ideas how to do it.

I think that power that does both distance and physical attacks might get too confusing, but perhaps some sort of superpower manipulation... --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:24, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"Charging Shot"? -shrug- I don't know a good name for that, unfortunately Gabriel456 (talk) 20:03, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

if you want a "go", sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 21:42, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Power Charcing or lesser version of Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Or Bullet Hell lite, as I call it. Have fun. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:59, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, that doesn't sound very doable. sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 11:04, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

never hurts. And you're welcome  Gabriel456 (talk) 11:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

er...probably not Gabriel456 (talk) 16:12, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

if you want to Gabriel456 (talk) 16:18, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

sure, I mean Gabriel456 (talk) 16:19, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Covered by Sphere Manipulation I think, as there's no size limit on it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:38, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Closest existing one to otherwise overly specific power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

probably not the first, but for the second, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 10:48, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Environment Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:10, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Going way too specific now... --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:19, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think it is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:20, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

also, i think that Replication Awareness is a better name for it. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Cosmic Space Manipulation already exists.

go for all Gabriel456 (talk) 15:33, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 15:36, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Enhanced Condition with time-limit? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:37, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific as such. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:17, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 10:33, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Stardust Manipulation?
 * 3) -shrug-

Compact Star Manipulation might be best Gabriel456 (talk) 12:00, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 12:06, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Redo Effect - don't we have this? I'm pretty sure it's come up at some point...

Angular Attacks - too specific as this, we might have something that allows powers/attacks be guided.

Trade-Off Power/Build-Up Attack - too specific --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:51, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

You're just throwing anything/everything to get something stick at this point, aren't you...

Take some time to breath and work on those powers that are already approved. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Let's put those into back-burner. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:59, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Ask again after you're coherent enough to judge do you want to try again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, not sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:34, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

sure.

I think Miracle Performing pretty much covers that Gabriel456 (talk) 00:13, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't that Holy Technology power be Transcendent Science? or rather an sub-power of it? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:19, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

could you expand? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:06, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

how exactly is that different from Space-Time Manipulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:15, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

barely. But take it to Kuo. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:27, September 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) Don't know.
 * 2) How different is that from Creation? Gabriel456 (talk) 13:42, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Creation does far more than matter and energy, I must point out. It's to create anything from nothing, not just matter and energy. (I.e, souls, powers, universes, or even concepts.) so it's not really limited to matter and energy.Gabriel456 (talk) 14:03, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

I, personally, just can't see the difference, sorry.

But if you want to make a page for Event Creation, that might be doable. We don't have a page for it yet, as far as I know Gabriel456 (talk) 14:11, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

You can ask, but no promises. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:00, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Which ever way you want. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:13, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Sounds bit too specific to me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:39, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Kemetri D. Jackkson. The user that was complaining about Kuo all the time.SageM (talk) 18:50, September 7, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Kemetri Gabriel456 (talk) 18:50, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Indeed, a very good reason. Gabriel456 (talk) 18:55, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Reality Generation - isn't this Concept Creation?

Warp Manipulation - usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:47, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

That's Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:42, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

I think you might have stumbled into history/past creation...

Creating things so they have existed before user created them (this power would be grammatical nightmare) would be Omnificence but we don't have power that creates history, or at least I don't remember one.

Keine Kamishirasawa (Touhou Project) can create/change history in Hakutaku form, so she would be user for Past Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:54, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

If you can describe them. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:26, September 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) er...don't know about that one
 * 2) Isn't that essentially covered by Temporal Reload? If not, be sure to expand the differences of it. Gabriel456 (talk) 20:44, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

I see. go for it, then Gabriel456 (talk) 21:00, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:19, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

Needs better explanation, but isn't that basically Enhanced Dexterity? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:26, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Wordy but possibly usable, could you try to compress the description and give it a name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, way too clunky. Can you think any similar actions/functions in real life? What those are called would be good place to start. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Speed Switching has promise but isn't quite there. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:29, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Still not quite it... Instant Shift is close. How would you describe the power in shortest possible terms? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:43, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Action... something? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:43, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Action Adaptation Might work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

"build up momentum". Isn't that essentially Speed Accumulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 13:40, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Well, I don't know. Shoot it over to Kuo, see what he thinks. if he agrees, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 14:01, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

they seem fine to me, i liked them. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:18, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

well, maybe Even Negation, by replacing and past event with another you created Tsubasa16 (talk) 01:25, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

maybe also Temporal Erasure, as creating an past event to replace another one would technically erase that time period, but aside that, i can't thing on anything else Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:39, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

eh, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 13:35, September 14, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 11:09, September 21, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:14, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Just the length of given body-part (or even all of the user) with no bendy/stretchy effect? Usable, got Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:02, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Not that i can remember. Tsubasa16 (talk) 13:25, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Demeter goes for the full size-increase, not just limbs. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:10, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

Limbs and any other part of the User, neck and torso in other words. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:28, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:22, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

personally, I can't see why regular IA can't do any of that. I mean, the years of training (even thousands of years) is pretty redundant, with IA already being able to understand things instantly, and I don't see why it couldn't do intricate things and dangerous fears...and I don't see how defying physics plays a part in this, but again, don't see why regular IA can't.

But that's just my opinion on the matter Gabriel456 (talk) 13:20, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

that could work Gabriel456 (talk) 14:18, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, i haven't saw your nachricht yet, i think the power is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:31, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

I'd go with length, as height would refer only the full length of the body and this includes also partial changes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:32, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

if I understand you correctly, it's essentially Skill Adaptation? A non-superpower verison of Reactive Adaptation? If so, it could work.

That is, if I'm understanding you correctly XD Gabriel456 (talk) 15:17, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

I've had Psychic Energy Attacks on my To Do list for quite some time, but I never seem to get around doing it. Have fun.

Same to shrinking limbs, tho you need to figure better name. I think we have a power that allows user to pull their head down like turtles, but I can't remember the name... --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:40, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

Works for me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:57, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 14:02, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

uh, what? could you explain a bit more? "Factual things that are untrue". Isn't that contradictory? (I just woke up so I might be a little slow) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:04, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

kinda still sounds like Lie Manipulation to me. But if you can expand upon the differences, go for it (I've been wrong before, I might add) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:37, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

You mean Manipulate in the sense of Reality Warping or Dimensional Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:51, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

I'd have to say it'd be Limitation version to both of those powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:59, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

Visibility Manipulation: not a bad idea, tho name is bit goofy

Fertility Manipulation/Compound Fusion: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:44, December 2, 2016 (UTC)

Hey Crystal, i wanted to say that, for users to your Fertility Manipulation power, you can use the users of Fertility Embodiment. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:29, December 2, 2016 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:34, December 3, 2016 (UTC)

The Aschen from Stargate Sg-1.SageM (talk) 20:53, December 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Crack Sealing - possible but really needs better name.

Immortality Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:16, December 8, 2016 (UTC)

Visibility Manipulation/Perceptibility Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:29, December 8, 2016 (UTC)

Is this about some old post I can't remember anymore or about something new? --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:33, December 8, 2016 (UTC)

Perceptibility could work, tho that hints towards being more than visible. Bit more on the line of Imperceptibility. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, December 9, 2016 (UTC)

Could work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:01, December 9, 2016 (UTC)

Touch-range Destruction. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, December 11, 2016 (UTC)

Both are usable, but send to me how you're planning to compress that quite long text of primamateria into usable page. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, December 13, 2016 (UTC)

well, maybe universe creation and universal manipulation. Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:54, December 13, 2016 (UTC)

i think that Universe Creation as application and Univesal Manipulation as Association. Tsubasa16 (talk) 20:01, December 13, 2016 (UTC)

Some sort of summary could be nice. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:49, December 14, 2016 (UTC)

Needs still work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

"create, shape and manipulate" is the obvious to the beginning. Rest of it feels bit clumsy too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Add the link to the page you're basing this power and have a go. It'll get edited if people don't like the wording. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:35, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Not really.SageM (talk) 00:31, December 16, 2016 (UTC)SageM

i think it is good. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:03, December 16, 2016 (UTC)

Dimensional Border Manipulation- Dimensional Exchange.SageM (talk) 22:00, December 17, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:09, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, but at least double check the dimensional powers category to make sure there isn't a power like it already.SageM (talk) 03:44, December 18, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Sonic Strike - Sound Infusion

Stress-Strain Manipulation - usable but needs better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:07, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:33, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

aside Physical Deformation? Form Manipulation and maybe Mutilation. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:25, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

Source Negation sounds like its to specific a power. you may want to try to expand it to include more.SageM (talk) 02:32, December 19, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Circular Constructs: no

Tracking Diversion: covered by various powers already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:45, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Primordial Energy Generation: we don't even have Primordial Energy Manipulation.

Lake/River Creation: Water Body Creation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:20, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering PFM is described bit more than just primordial, more like what comes before even those... I honestly don't know if something like that can be created. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:42, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering the RFM's description, yes. Remember to remove PEM from Also Called if you do tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:11, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

the only things that come to mind is that the user could develop computer/hacking skills when needed, or something as simple as plumbing skills.

That's all I got, sorry for not being more elaborate Gabriel456 (talk) 14:42, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

second might be doable, but isn't the first essentially God Mode? Gabriel456 (talk) 02:19, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Hypercompetence --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:05, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Bit on the narrow side, but usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:04, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think so. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:49, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Neither is really doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:03, December 24, 2016 (UTC)

Expand that to Efficiency Manipulation and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 16:23, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome, and merry christmas Gabriel456 (talk) 16:59, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:56, December 28, 2016 (UTC)

its fine with me.SageM (talk) 21:29, December 28, 2016 (UTC)SageM

of course.SageM (talk) 22:26, December 28, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:01, December 30, 2016 (UTC)

Feat Replication - essentially covered by various powers

Certainty Manipulation - Possibility Manipulation

Space Mode - too specific --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:35, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

Don't we have something like that...? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:14, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:18, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

7a. If you change the name, it's your job to change the links for that power. Use this to find the old links. Here and here. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:36, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

Seems kinda specific to me, to be honest Gabriel456 (talk) 19:47, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

That seems doable Gabriel456 (talk) 20:03, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

Knowledge Manipulation -Kuopiofi (talk) 20:27, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

Habitability Inducement- Environmental Field Projection or Terraforming.SageM (talk) 22:37, December 31, 2016 (UTC)SageM

1. Go for it

2.I think Corporealization already does that, since the description says other things as well as themselves.

Gabriel456 (talk) 17:03, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Please elaborate. Gabriel456 (talk) 17:41, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Sounds doable to me, go for it.Gabriel456 (talk) 17:53, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Perception Mode- Super-Sensory Mode.SageM (talk) 23:18, January 1, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Hypnotic Dance - bit too many hypnotic variations already.

Energy Form - Energy Physiology

Athletic Mode - doesn't something like this already exist? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:49, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Took bit of searching but I was thinking Sport Intuition. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:49, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

I'm aware of that, I simply remembered there was something similar but couldn't remember what it was/did. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:25, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Try something broader, just athletic is pretty limited. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:40, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:46, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 20:51, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

If you feel it's necessary, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:20, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

yeah i think that's a better name. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:28, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Yes.

also, since i'am already talking to you, do you have any ideas of aspects of fate/destiny? it's because i'am planning to do an Destiny Aspect Manifestation and have only three aspects (Inevitability, Beginning and End) but i need some more. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:33, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

related to chance? well, i think Possibility might count as an aspect. the problem is that i'm limited to use  aspects that are already powers here. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:48, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

yeah, i think Possibilites would fit as: no matter if it is impossible or possible, if you're destined to do it, you WILL do it.

well, what would that power would be? Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:54, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think it's fine then. though you should ask Kuo first. Also, maybe Purpose as an aspect of fate? since the purpose of anything is determinated by fate. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:02, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, if you want to. i was thinking on using the Manipulaition power instead, but if you want to do the embodiment of it..... Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:08, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Purpose Manipulation already exists, so Purpose Embodiment might be a valid power.SageM (talk) 23:10, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

oh, sorry, i forgot, was would it do? Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:13, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think the other name ( All-Terrain Mobility. )is more suitable. also,  it would be a sub-power of unrestricted moviment i believe. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:22, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I was busy with something else.

I suppose you could consider him a user of that.SageM (talk) 23:49, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Honestly, not sure about that.... Maybe shoot it over to Kuo, see his opinion on it. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 16:00, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

i have two users for you Explosive Attacks, Yoshikage Kira from Jojo via his stand Killer Queen and Oyecomova (also from Jojo) via his Stand Boku no Rhythm wo Kiitekure. Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:41, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

first one seems doable, not sure on the other two though. Gabriel456 (talk) 00:33, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

yeah, that could work. Choose whichever name you think is best, and go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:41, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

well, actually just to say, the power's idead seem to be very close of what Meta Luck does. Tsubasa16 (talk) 01:14, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Formlessness? Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:00, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Isn't that just Non-Corporeal Form?SageM (talk) 02:00, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Form Shattering?SageM (talk) 02:04, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Point, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:48, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

It already exists- Absolute Law Manipulation.SageM (talk) 19:49, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

"How is Absolute Life Manipulation instead? I mean, we have CrystalStorm51 (talk) 19:56, January 4, 2017 (UTC), do we not? It could deal with all forms of life, including those in the form of concepts, objects, non-corporeal beings and the like."

? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Universal Lordship?SageM (talk) 20:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Whatever, go ahead with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:53, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Reality.SageM (talk) 23:06, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Isn't that just Probability Computation?SageM (talk) 03:53, January 5, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:45, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i can't think of any other than like Death Prevention (by delaying the future were someone die). Tsubasa16 (talk) 18:48, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i may actually change the name of Future Acceleration to Future Order Manipulation, since i ended up making it more of to control when the future will happen rather than just accelerating it, so i think Future Delay will end up being a sub-power of it rather than opposite. Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:09, January 5, 2017 (UTC)