Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25283847-20180320005513/@comment-33246115-20180320152902

1) An author can make the claim that there are two or even an infinite amount of Omnipotent beings in their story. An author can also make the claim that their characters are by default stronger than another work of fiction's characters. An author can even make the claim that their character is beyond Omnipotent. Thing is, it doesn't work even with the author saying it does. By definition the Omnipotent character is fundamentally above all others, the second there is something stronger or equal to them, they are NOT Omnipotent. It's pure semantics here.

2) An Omnipotent being is not by default Omniscient or Omnipresent. Omnipotence, Omniscience, and Omnipresence are three inter-connected yet separate pieces. That is why you can have characters with infinite and endless raw power while still opting to not know everything and opting to be as non omnipresent as everyone else. Take Azathoth or The Beyonder as examples.

2) Personal rules can mean pretty much anything. Yes, these rules can be broken. No, they are not limits.

3) As stated before the author can make the claim that there are 2 Omnipotents, however semantically speaking if there is something you cannot do you are not truly omnipotent as per the definitions given on this wiki. If say however, Mother of Existence and Gan were to duke it out with one another, the mere contents of such a battle (If both were serious about it) would be beyond definition or human comprehension.

4) Though omnipresence gives advantage in terms of locality and omniscience gives advantage in terms of knowledge, the omnipotent aspect remains by definition "above all". Therefore the fight itself remains beyond understanding.