User blog comment:Cursed warrior 343/Nex/@comment-30766268-20170507124435

DYBAD. nope. thats the point.

omnipotence, by definition in this wikia, is "having limitless power". now, I owuld add to that "to have all powers in existance, which are all at limitless level", if you would like, because that's explain that better. now, as Holokami said, omnipotence is like aleph null. this is an inaccseseble power, who you can't reach to from below, no matter what. but. what is there above aleph null? a lot, actually. if you take a power set of aleph null in aleph null in aleph null, ect, if you would repeat for example aleph null^aleph null for infinite times, you know where you would reach? epsilon not. and if you would do that fomr infinite times, you know where you would get? aleph 1. do al of that for infinite times and you would reach to aleph 2. now, repeat that infinite times for infinite times, and you would eventually reach to aleph infinity, or, aleph (aleph null). that way you go on and on, untill you understand there is some inaccesible nomber you just can't reach to, no matter how many power sets of aleph null you make.

Teta.

and you know whats funny? Teta is the point logic breaks. after teta? yeah, there is more. to being with, you can't reach aleph null. and everything beyond it is immposible to reach to. aleph null is the inaccesible of all finite numbers. Teta? this is the inaccisible of infinity itself. and after that there is more. the biggest things ever made by math, are superhuge, 10-13, and 0=1. these are the biggest things in math, things you can't even say are infinite, nor inaccesibles, since they are inaccesible for the inaccesible of infinity. and that is where patapotence is. omnipotence is aleph null. possibly more. but as it is infinite/limitless power, it's bound by the inaccesible, as it can never reach to that, to the point which is beyond everything. that's why it's OMNIpotence. omni=all. this is what beyond everything. the one who can do all can never reach to what is beyond all.

as such, by definition, patapotence would be greater the omnipotence.

also, the concept of omnipotence was wrong to begin with, as even god in religous is not really omnipotence, as stated in the bible there are things he can't do, and that he is defenely the farest thing from being kind and omnibelovent.