Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-38564645-20190305003032

ZAVAZggg wrote: How exactly? And how are you so sure when we haven't seen any real evidence of said higher powers? It doesn't matter the higher powers, whether they exist or not. Omnipotent, anything, I don't care. What matters is me is myself. As long as it is not "End", you can defeat Omnipotence. What you are always talking about is Omnipotence in an "Ended" universe. If Omnipotence exists in a verse, it doesn't mean it's is "Ended".

"End" means that things are absolutely resolved, and no change can happen. One power then can be supreme over others. Before that, anything can be challenged, even Omnipotence.

ZAVAZggg wrote: P.S. I would have responded to your other post, but it's so nonsensical as an argument that I just can't process it enough to make a valid or coherent counterpoint. Oh you silly mortal. You mortals always discard better arguments as nonsense while indulging in your own fallacies.

You can't define a power as including relation to others. It's not a fricking power. It's not a power at all if it defined as unable to be resisted in the way you do. It's "End". Please leave your fallacy.