Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30160565-20171230205913/@comment-33246115-20180104142913

If the omnipotent is fictional, then the one depicting it is the author. It's up to the author to make sense of that. Thing is, he can't.

If there were two omnipotent beings they'd more likely just be aspects of eachother, and therefore would not fight eachother.

I was in a RP which had three omnipotents, Grey, Black, and White, however all three of them were mere individual personalities of the same mass entity that represented Yin-Yang and the mixture of both. This made sense as Grey, Black, and White were basically just vessels of the omnipotence itself, therefore they were all one singular entity. Because of this they could fight eachother and win against eachother as they were just three vessels of one being, that being calling the shots of which aspect one. It was also implied these ancient entities were deathless, and that 'death' as humans would see it was merely an act of partial cosmic suicide, so some form of change could take place.

But if you got Kami Tenchi and Khaos/Chaos and threw them in the same reality continuity one of them would have to be less than the other, otherwise they'd both be nigh omnipotent, unable to do everything, as they are unable to win the fight. Doesn't matter if we can't depict it, if they can't win, they're clearly not omnipotent.

This is why omnipotents are enclosed to their respective cosmologies, because that only makes sense.

And this is why things such as Suggsverse are absolute cancer.

Omnipotence: All-Powerful

ALL

If there is something above you, by definition, you are not All-Powerful.

When I imagine the Omniverse I think of an infinite stream of cosmologies inter-connected but equally separate from eachother, some ruled by all-powerful beings and some not, with an unspoken rule that these omnipotent beings are not to fight eachother, for it would revoke their status.