Talk:Indeterminacy/@comment-29564364-20171007135629/@comment-6299840-20171220194933

Huh you just can’t admit when your wrong. First when I used strength you knew the context so bringing up the fact that it is not the same in fictional settings makes no sense.

Second I truly am keeping this one short. T.H.O.T.O explained in a way that not even your semantical games could get in the way of and you simply reply he is changing the definition of Omniscience. No that would be you. You seem to think of Omniscience as this simple observatory power. They just know everything without the ability to understand and reason. That is false. T.H.O.T.O was right Omniscience has always encompassed understanding and wisdom. Like he said you are just caught up on the all knowing part.In the applications of Omniscience what do you see? Absolute intelligence and Absolute Wisdom are there. You are the one who does not understand this and you are the one changing the definition of the power.

Third I think you realize this and simply do not want to admit it. Most of your rebuttals to my points were really just statements so you can say you addressed them without really saying anything that countered them. Finally on Knowledge and intelligence there is a correlation between the two. For example the more intelligent you are the more knowledge you have. In this case even though the converse is something that does not necessarily follow it can be proven to be true. You can also say the more knowledge you have the more intelligent you are. They are linked. Just like how an omniscient is literally given knowledge without acquiring it in the way you would like the same can be said for their wisdom and intellect. I don’t know what is so hard to understand about this.