Talk:Omni-Creator/@comment-25716369-20170428053635/@comment-30766268-20170429002144

Indeterminacy is a good example for that.

let's say omnipotence and metapotence are beyond logic, and are infinite forces. but what level of infinity? there are infinite^infinite^all eternity^whatever can you think off, and that's only going to be 1/infinity from what you would need to get into the unobtanable nomber of epsilon. and what is there forethere? I think the problem with omnipotence is that it put the line of infinite power, while there are so many infinitys, which everyone bigger then the other, which rise the question of "is it possible there would be two omnipotent beings, both unquestionable omnipotent, and yet one would over power the other?". the answer is yes. it is possible, simply because of how many diferent infinitys there are. Also, every nigh-omnipotent force is omnipotent in universe, untill someone who pose a chaleng to him appear. For example, omniarch is an in universe omnipotence. and something like author athority is also an in universe omnipotence, who have no effect on anything outside his creation. so the diference between omniversal omnipotent and in universe omnipotent need to be done. but it still leave the possibility for two omnipotent being to fight, and that one of them would win. so what I think is as such:

patapotence would be the menifistation and the embodiment of pataphysics,  Indeterminacy, and omnipotence, and would essentially would be the point where you simply stop count. this would be the unachivable point in every respect and regard, which is above consepts like infinity, and stuff. it would be epsilon, or possibly the higher state, but it would be a point where you cant really keep counting foewords, or it would just be usless. the patapotent would be essentially like a joke in the face of the conspets of infinity, and omnipotence, because that is pataphysics. it essentially a wonderful gag.

did I said that clear enough?