Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38863616-20190319183618/@comment-26256072-20190323045234

DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: You're completely forgetting that Omnipotence is all powers to an unlimited degree, so that means it has all those logic defying powers to begin with.

I don't know who told you that doing the 'illogical' is something defined by logic, but you're wrong.

Ironically, you're the one who has not made a counter-argument. I'm not forgetting that at all. You are misunderstanding what I said.

There is no empirical basis for "defying logic". The ability to defy logic is a thought experiment: we suppose that somebody can do it, and then follow the logical implications of that power. Illogic can only exist within a logical, hypothetical framework, because it doesn't really exist.

One could make the argument that, since Omni-level powers transcend logic, we cannot use logic to infer their properties; however, that would mean that we cannot assign to Omnipotence "all powers to an unlimited degree", because we have no logical basis on which to do this. (Remember, of course, that Omnipotence is a made-up concept to begin with, and has no properties beyond those we give it.)

You've also failed to address my central point: that all Omni-powers, in their true forms, must concentrate in a single user in order to work properly. Everything else is tangential, so explicitly refute that point or forfeit the debate.