Talk:Ultimate Erasure/@comment-3075077-20180808014940/@comment-24053170-20181115195712

It just does.

Your trying to understand and draw some form of context out of something that is literally beyond any explanation or even any hope of one.

another way to put it is is based on the Tao-

The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name.

Here is some more info-

"One is the "eternal Tao" (which cannot be named or explained) and the other "Tao" seems to exist in space and time (and can be named and explained). The eternal Tao is beyond existence and cannot be named or fully understood, while the other Tao exists and can be known. The eternal Tao is infinite; the other is finite. The eternal Tao is formless; the other is formed. The eternal Tao is transcendent; the other is immanent. The other "Tao" is an attempt to describe the "eternal Tao" in human terms; but such effort can never express the eternal Tao fully."

Its the same way for Ayin.

You can't explain it, and any explanation wouldn't really cut it.

All I can say, is to accept it as it is. And just leave it at that....