Talk:Omnipotence/@comment-33584477-20190131140129/@comment-31492050-20190202032722

On the second topic, there were more explanations (I apologize for my mistake). Ah two interpretations of omnipotence. 1-An omnipotent can do absolutely everything and transcends logic. 2. An Almighty can do all that is logically possible. The first does not need to speak much, now the second, who argues generally uses classical logic in favor, but not only does this logic exist, if it is argument within logic God can still do things contradictory is just paraconsistent logic. Even with the paraconsistent logic I do not agree with the second interpretation, for it says that logic itself is as great as God (Being God All Transcendent) and "she" escapes from the paradox of the stone but does not respond, and is contradictory with own meaning of omnipotence, this interpretation attempts to change the meaning of omnipotence to escape the paradox.