Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-17698791-20151122201435/@comment-28898344-20151126014636

There have been incidents of him abusing power off of the chat. Let's see, DYBAD has been known to delete comments that he doesn't like. And they're not even harmful ones, just some criticism directed towards his character.Multiple instances of this when he's argued with Grand and Cat on Lawrence's pages. IF they comments are even there at all.

And if these talk page messages between him and Kuopiofi are anything, he's shifting the power of our vote over to mods on the chat. I even have a direct quote:

Perhaps I can help ? I am the primary concerned after all, and wouldn't mind skipping further backstabbings if it isn't too much to ask. And there's a reason decisions in Wikis are entrusted to a select few (administrators and moderators) answering to a higher authority (Bureaucrat), rather than letting the very vague and unreliable "everyone" do whatever they want just because of numbers. On this regard, Iron and Natsu's opinion would definitely be enlightening. DYBAD (talk) 02:39, November 23, 2015 (UTC)

What he says here is reminiscent of how an oligarchy would operate. Like a totalitarian tyrant. And Ironindri and Imouto-tan (two chat mods who were made so by DYBAD) have an obvious bias for DYBAD. He knew they had a bias for him. His sophistry seems to know no bounds.