Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-32571505-20180309042305/@comment-29564364-20180328032216

DYBAD wrote: @ Alpha :

"It's not because other people's morality is governed by a set of ethics based on different values than yours that they are amoral."

Never said that. No, but you've heavily implied it across many comment sections and threads by qualifying the whole of humanity as amoral, which gives me the impression that you believe the values you base your morality upon to be the only valid ones and that all morals based on different values are as good as nonexistent. However, I sincerely hope that this impression is nothing more than mere impression that I would like you to correct if it ought to be. Technically, morality is objective, but it's the values we use as standards upon which we base it that are subjective. I, for one, value self preservation above (almost) all else, so I would consider it moral to throw a total stranger under a bus— a loved one, though? Not so much.— if it means I get to live another day, something which I infer from our previous interactions you would consider immoral, but it does not mean I completely lack morals (a.k.a. am amoral), it only means I am differently moral.

Though admitedly, a genuine morality that disregards "respect, freedom and happiness" seems somewhat contradictory. Again, a morality that is not based on the same values as you base yours on isn't any less genuine.

Sound closer to a brainwashing tool to further inhuman agendas, there has certainly been a number of those in human history. Is this an ad Nazium I see?

"I don't care about morality. Never had and never will."

There you have it ^ ^ It requires a nonexistent or at least very superficial understanding of morality for anyone to claim such a thing, which is why I highly suspect that ThaVoidWalker69 would claim otherwise if they had an actual understanding of it. Either that, or that their statement was referring to your morality, e.i. one that is based on values of respect, freedom and happiness.