Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-7737174-20130402211149/@comment-5651818-20160103020504

Wow. This conversation is still going strong, huh? Oh well, might as well put my two cents in. So the general argument here is that there cannot be two OP beings in the same 'Verse as to do so would contradict the very definition of the power. Yet, another segment of your argument is that it is...illogical? So the power that is supposed to transcend all logic is at the same time bound by logic?

See this is why I hate conversations like these. People begin to contradict themselves. Mega, you stated that the person who wrote the article above had "absolutely no idea of what omnipotence is." Yet, they provided proof of their reasoning numerous times. Hell, there's a mathematical theory which supports the fact that some infinities are greater than other's (See Georg Cantor's Infinity Theory) which leads most to believe that power can't be monopolized unless it is within one's personal domain in which they possess ALL power and even that doesn't always work out.

There are at least five definitions of Omnipotence and you have to base your argument on one and not all of them at the same time. Some are bound by logic, others are not. Some are merely the most powerful in their respective verse. So, what I'm trying to say is that there, in theory, can be two OP beings in a single verse. As they have that infinite power within themselves and not the other way around.