User talk:CrystalStorm51

Yeah, why?RnR (talk) 02:32, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Burn is a manga series created by Camilla d'Errico. Quite a fun read.RnR (talk) 02:35, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help on the titanium page!TheKaiwind (talk) 00:27, May 3, 2013 (UTC)TheKaiwind.

and that sounds good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 15:10, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

what do you mean, by "focus"? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:43, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, part of me thought you meant something on the line of a combo of Enhanced Vision and Sense Focusing; gaining super vision by focusing it on one eye XD

but I'm honestly unsure about this... Gabriel456 (talk) 01:00, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Multi-Directional Vision pretty much covers it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:39, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

no, that hasn't been done before, as far I'm aware Gabriel456 (talk) 18:35, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

sure, but be clear of the differences between it and luck Gabriel456 (talk) 18:46, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

I just don't know
 * 1) eh...
 * 2) I'm honestling having a hard time distinguishing the two. I mean, "mimic movement" alone is used alot in AMM. Though there is the limit of being able to do what is already possible...

Gabriel456 (talk) 20:39, January 20, 2016 (UTC)

Very unlike Adoptive Muscle Memory and very much silly power, but doable. Have fun, but do try to find users. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:48, January 20, 2016 (UTC)

Already exists-Coincidence ResistanceSageM (talk) 02:02, January 21, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Ask Kuo about comparing the two powers and see what he thinks.SageM (talk) 02:30, January 21, 2016 (UTC)SageM

There's bit overlap but I'd say it's doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, January 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) that honestly sounds more like an action, in my opinion...
 * 2) Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:08, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

The only possible example I can think of is Faerie from Seiken Densetsu 3, whenever she decides to hide inside someone they are protected from fate and thus their personal futures remain unseen while she uses them as a host.

Thats really the only example I can think of.SageM (talk) 03:35, January 22, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Protected By fate? Sorry I thought you were talking about from fate. In that case the list is even smaller, since I am not certain if this character even counts as a user, Cid of the Lufaine from Dissidia: Final Fantasy, he is supposedly protected by fate as Shinryu can not kill him without ending the cycles which is the exact opposite of what he wants. though this is pretty much going by word of mouth, since I haven't played the game personally so I can't be completely certain whether or not its true.SageM (talk) 04:09, January 22, 2016 (UTC)SageM

yes, and all I'm not sure about it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:09, January 23, 2016 (UTC)

Disaster Negation pretty much does the same thing.SageM (talk) 23:13, January 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Gabriel456 (talk) 01:09, January 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Storm Negation, go for it
 * 2) go for it
 * 3) -shrug-

whoops didn't see SageM's message. Yeah, doesn't Disaster Negation fit that already? Gabriel456 (talk) 01:11, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Absolute Force Manipulation capabilities-

"They can turn a tornado into a gentle breeze, bring a raging tsunami to a halt or annihilate an continent simply by slamming ones palm into the earth, provided the user understands the natural forces required for continental destruction. User can bring all supernatural powers and activity in the area to a complete standstill by denying them all the force they rely upon to function"

Already exists as an application of this power.SageM (talk) 01:21, January 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

nah, better to go with your original idea, to get rid of them entirely. Gabriel456 (talk) 01:21, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

I meant, go for Storm Negation, with your original idea of both calm and stop storms Gabriel456 (talk) 01:25, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Disaster covers quite a bit more than storm, but storm is broad enough power to be usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

I think Wing Manifestation is enough. I mean, it doesn't even say how much wings the user can manifest, after all Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 23:22, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

not that I'm aware of Gabriel456 (talk) 02:15, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 02:21, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

Soul Anchoring Gabriel456 (talk) 18:01, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

re: Aerial Mode
Great minds think alike, I suppose. Smijes08 (talk) 03:44, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

no, I don't think so Gabriel456 (talk) 16:27, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, thought I replied. Guess I closed the tab before I actually finished sending. derp.

Yeah go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 16:42, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. If it is about that bank robbery last week at Wells Fargo, I had nuthin' to do with it. :-P. But yeah, go ahead. Maxoflas (talk) 01:31, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

To be honest, that sounds familiar. And, you know, as much as it would be fun to be one, but I am not an admin. So, why ask me? :-D. Maxoflas (talk) 01:40, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

Oh. Well, good luck, bruh. I don't know if you should create the power or not. *Shrug*. But, Flamer, why did you come to me instead of any body else? I am just a novice at this. :-P. Maxoflas (talk) 01:47, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

I don't think it is a bad idea, I just think that it sounds familiar or similar to another power. Maxoflas (talk) 01:59, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 16:24, January 30, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 16:36, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Sure
 * 2) -shrug-

Bit too specific and essentially covered by Elasticity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:59, January 30, 2016 (UTC)

The first one sounds like a good counter to Friction Manipulation. Go for it

As for the other two...."eh" -shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 22:26, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 22:45, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:09, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) sure
 * 2) -shrug-

You need to work on the details/description/Capabilities (check Wikipedia for factor for example, add link), but doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:24, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

done Gabriel456 (talk) 01:07, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 01:24, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

Chemical Creation is usable, others are either already covered by other powers or too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, February 4, 2016 (UTC)

Because they are effective on against only very singular, definite situation/power.

That said, of the powers/effects you mentioned Psychic Shield pretty much covers all supernatural/mental effects and technically speaking might give some resistance against even normal seduction/beauty. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:03, February 6, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:41, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Morale Augmentation is already covered by several powers.

Aura Adhesion is Variation of Power Bestowal. If you make that power make it Aura Bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Check Support Powers/Support Powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:59, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Why should we have those? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:44, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Who knows. Apparently people just aren't interested making them. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Every power is judged by same standards. Suggest something usable and you can do it, if not it's same deal as with every other power that isn't fit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Popularity I/M I allow, fame is essentially PI. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:24, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Too close to each other. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:23, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Headlessness - usable, remember to add it into Head Liberation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Don't answer this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Preferably not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:43, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

That might work. Got users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:40, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

You'll need to explain it well in Capabilities, but have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:30, February 26, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 21:36, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

good god, I thought you were going somewhere else with that...XD

Do you mean like, unaffected as in immunity to the effects? (I.e, smoke can't choke you). Essentially providing an immunity to powers like Gas Manipulation and Miasma Emission? Just need to be clear here Gabriel456 (talk) 21:51, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

then I don't see the point of the power. At-least with the liquid one, a sufficient amount could hold someone back (not the user, obviously).

Though I may be wrong, but I don't see how the gas does the same...Gabriel456 (talk) 21:56, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

I just thought that's what you meant by the power: to move through any gas substance easily, without being affected by it, and able to see through it, etc.

I don't know, maybe I just made it overly-complicated. Might as well call it "Gas Immunity" by that point...gah Gabriel456 (talk) 22:01, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, go for it. Might fit better, to be honest Gabriel456 (talk) 22:03, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Still no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:53, March 1, 2016 (UTC)

Difficulty Reduction - I have very vague memory that we have something like that. I won't swear to it, but...

Action Concentration - Energy Concentration is defined as "focus one's energy into any certain point of their body or object", so that covers it already. Might need to make it clearer tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:37, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Well, give it a try. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Considering how many powers we have and that I might have read it once few years ago? Not a glue. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:57, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Omni-Focus - Nigh Omniscience/Omniscience

Idea Blocking - I think there's something that prevents target thinking/doing things... one of Telepathy I think.

Distraction Ignorance - bit too specific I think. Maybe expand the idea somewhat. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Something like Selective Invulnerability but less complete defense. Might be too similar to SI tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:53, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Should there be? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:16, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

well, i liked it, definitively a power i would like to have, it would be very helpful, since i get distraced to easily. L12345 (talk) 21:03, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Getting the effect without cause? Interesting idea, figure out a name to it and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, that was name and not just description? Have fun then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:56, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

of course, what is it? L12345 (talk) 20:57, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

well, i'am unable of thinking on many expecific aplications, but maybe Paradox Inducement?, since making something happen without a cause is a Paradox by itself. that power would also be a Sub-Power of Causality Manipulation. so maybe you could get something from there. L12345 (talk) 21:10, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Looks like shit. And by shit, I mean DA' SHIT!That was a compliment....Maxoflas (talk) 02:14, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

Da' shit means that I like. But, anyway, I just still want to know, why do you come to me for my......judgement? I know you may wanna get my opinion, but I'm not an expert. I'm good at technology, art, and robbing banks! Thank you for the conversation, though. Maxoflas (talk) 03:59, March 9, 2016 (UTC)

You'll need to explain it pretty well and there's one combat power that does something similar, but otherwise have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember it, but I'm pretty sure it's on Enhanced Combat Variations and main pic is B from Naruto. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:55, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

Simply Prehensility might work best. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:05, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

We already have powers that allow simultaneous activity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember the names, which is mite annoying as I Edited one of them few days ago... There's at least two powers that allow user to perform several actions simultaneously, but I don't remember if there were Limitations on that... --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:57, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

No. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

Way too specific... -_- You have interesting mind. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, March 21, 2016 (UTC)

For both.

And it seems to be pretty wide spread on this site actually, we get the most of the wall/outside the box ideas for powers... --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, March 21, 2016 (UTC)

Trunk Protrusion/Media Embodiment usable

Spell Mimicry/Tail Elongation not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:36, March 25, 2016 (UTC)

Infectious Blast/Disease Suppression - have fun.

Microscopic Universe Creation - way too specific and covered by Universe Creation.

Chemical Reaction Immunity - in what way? Details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 6, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, April 6, 2016 (UTC)

Ammunition Redirection - we may have something like this...

Matter Dematerialization - dematerializing would make things unexciting instead of abstract.

Ability Cloning - something like this exist.

Nebula Generation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

If you remember Mythbusters trying to make bullets curve as they tested some film (Kari was pregnant at the time), the main pic is from that film. Can't remember if it was exactly the same thing, but there's certainly some connection. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Deadly Surface - we have something like this, can't remember the name or find it, but both ice/cold and fire have variations.

Adaptation Negation - didn't someone make something like this one pretty recently? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Strange, I'm pretty sure it was rather regent... Problem with the site this big, things start to blur together.

Puzzle Manipulation - doable.

Light Imprisonment - go for it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:52, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

You think about that.

State Manipulation - that needs some serious expansion/explanation in capabilities. Possibility.

Eternal Weather Inducement - expand the idea bit and you might get something. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

Well, that too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:58, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

And few other things. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:19, April 21, 2016 (UTC)

Durability Concentration - Armor Concentration maybe. Might be bit too close to Selective Invulnerability.

Malfunction Inducement - needs more descriptive name but doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, April 29, 2016 (UTC)

So you define the zero point for both as today? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:52, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Make it so the starting point is current civilizations state instead of the modern one and you have something useful, expecting starting point to be here and now is way too self-centered to use. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:09, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. Have you considered doing Night Manipulation too? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Ask after I've got time to read it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Might as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:19, May 10, 2016 (UTC)

Prayer granting already exists- Holy Gift.SageM (talk) 03:35, May 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Beginning Embodiment also exists already- Origin Embodiment.SageM (talk) 03:53, May 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Matterlock Manipulation - pretty pointless, no

Undead Summoning - doable, but I think that's last specific summoning I allow

Climate Empowerment - doable

Electricity Transferal - too specific

Adhesive Attacks - way too specific

Mind Consumption - details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Mind Consumption - Don't we have something like that...

Matterlock - describe matter from outside of the universe or Reality. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Wouldn't FMM cover it then? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:40, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Intangibility is one of the Applications, so... --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:00, May 15, 2016 (UTC)

Evolution Acceleration- ProgressionSageM (talk) 02:25, May 16, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Angle Manipulation is bit too specific, other are usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

"Artifact" is pretty unspecified thing. What do you mean by that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too close to Object Manipulation I think. New Limitation I added should cover that one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:47, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

-shrug- no idea, to be honest Gabriel456 (talk) 16:54, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

I say too specific is. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Hat Empowerment - No.

Symbol Manipulation - possibility, but Literary Manipulation Techniques cover much of it.

Jewelry Manipulation - bit limited but go ahead.

Physical Law Transcendence - covered already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:39, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

King of Cool
YeahCoolCat123450 (talk) 23:39, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

It's Good
Observing how we have Embodiment Creation, I can see an "embodiment of embodiments" being added to our list of powers. Embodiment Manipulation has some potential and could be a prospective addition to this wiki. It has a green light from me. CoolCat123450 (talk) 00:04, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, i actually even have users for it, Calypso, Dione and Rhea from VC, they created and have control over lesser embodiments of what they herselves represents (Sea, Sky and Earth respectively). L12345 (talk) 00:51, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, most times he is. L12345 (talk) 01:04, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

maybe you could ask him why L12345 (talk) 01:17, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

It's essentially indirect Reality Warping/Nigh Omnipotence by manipulating the Embodiments. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

Mind Storage: already have something that does this. Can't remember name...

Collective Strength: team-based powers might cover this already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Bond Empowerment is the most obvious example, Team Combination is more broad idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Got Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Curiosity mostly, just wanted to know if someone had that idea before us.

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:36, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Use the total beauty idea and remember that manipulating doesn't mean just increasing the thing but also reducing it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:40, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

Invulnerability Bypassing: Invulnerability Negation

Reversal: I think may have something like this...

Stabilility Inducement: have fun.

Energy Storage: Covered by various powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Dream Projection: Doable. Link to Psionic Image Projection and Memory Projection? There's at least one more but i can't find it...

Timelessness: basically Temporal Reload. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Change the name and you can go on. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:58, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

You already have 30 pages waiting, why hoard more every day? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I know. I have few pages just waiting the inspiration to do them... and few I need to figure out what I was planning when I wrote them down. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:20, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Can't remember what was talked about back then, but it ended up being so close Environmental Manipulation that I rolled them together. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:08, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

And when you create a a page, add the link to the pages it's sub-power, Variation, etc. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:09, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

I think Obstacle Manipulation gets pretty close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:20, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know, to be honest. Ask Kuo about it. if he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 17:18, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

of course, what power is it? L12345 (talk) 23:55, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

don't see why not, hard would be to find users i think. L12345 (talk) 23:58, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

already exists.
Physical Plane Manipulation and Physical Plane Lordship already do that.SageM (talk) 00:00, May 25, 2016 (UTC)SageM

The Physical Plane encompasses all environments. So there is no actual difference between the two powers. Meta Environment control would mean controlling the physical plane.

If it just controls environmental physics then you should just call it environmental physics control, not meta environment control, as its not the same thing.SageM (talk) 00:17, May 25, 2016 (UTC)SageM

for me i think it's fine, but ask kuo about it of course. L12345 (talk) 00:56, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Urban Manipulation is Variation of Environmental Manipulation already. Might need to clear things bit so it's obvious environment includes more than nature. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

What? Making new page? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:26, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Reality Warping? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:57, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Possibility, but check if there are other powers that do the same. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

All things considered, I'd say Physical Plane Manipulation covers this one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:46, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

it seems to be a fine power to me. L12345 (talk) 00:45, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

You want to make power to manipulate alternate Universes when Universal Manipulation does that to one user is on and Multiversal Manipulation them and quite a few more verses? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:59, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

Just saying that making power that only covers verse that isn't yours is bit limited. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:27, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

In that case it is MM.

You'll have to remind me about what Possibility Manipulation does. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:38, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

Not sure of all the mechanics of it, but usually powers that are confined to a single series/verse are considered specific, such as a physiology that only exists in one series or a type of power that can't be found in any other series(like the kissing magic from Yamada and the Seven Witches, or the the Trigger power from World Trigger).

For more details its probably better to ask the admins.SageM (talk) 03:52, May 30, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Go for it.

Reality Recreation and Dream Replication need explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun with all of three. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. But I don't know any users.SageM (talk) 23:30, May 31, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Sounds like it would be the opposite of this power- Selective Elimination.SageM (talk) 01:30, June 1, 2016 (UTC)SageM

And the point of this would be? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

I think there's AD&D spell that allow something similar.

Usable, but needs good explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

Fetal Manipulation - too specific.

Action Reaction Manipulation - possibly usable but I'm not sure if we have powers that cover this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say so. Capabilities could be expanded bit to reflect the extend of power too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say both are bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:43, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Goes on the specific side again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:22, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

Magnitude Matching - nah.

Dimensional Confinement - Binding on level where it's pointless.

DNA Infusion - this would do... what?

Radiation Removal - expand that to removing radiation from any/everything and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:52, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

That sounds more like some sort of power infusion. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

That's the part you're interested? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:52, June 4, 2016 (UTC)

Nope to all three.

You got new name, any reason? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:47, June 5, 2016 (UTC)

Desire Manifestation, Malnutrition Inducement, Backlash, Fatigue Immunity: too specific.

Elemental Perception: perceive part is covered by Elemental Detection --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

Connection Manipulation - Bond Manipulation

Magic Induced Powers - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:23, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

The non-relationship part is mentioned on the second section of Capabilities, so it could be Edited/expanded bit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

As said, really could use some Editing/expanding... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:13, June 7, 2016 (UTC)

Surface Transmutation: too specific and essentially Limitation to Transmutation

Digital Erasure: possibility, bit more details.

Simple Machine Manipulation: bit too specific.

Change Reversal: ? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:45, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

For Change Reversal - this would also include changes done by supernatural means.

Digital Erasure - usable.

Feralness Manipulation - too specific.

Spatial Replication - we may have something similar, don't think it was about space as such but close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:39, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:24, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

There are several powers along those lines, though the one I can think of right off the top of my head is Remolding.SageM (talk) 00:38, June 13, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Not that I can remember, interesting idea... --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, June 13, 2016 (UTC)

Possibility, but needs better/clearer description. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:06, June 14, 2016 (UTC)

Supernova Inducement and Star Destruction.SageM (talk) 01:58, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

If it doesn't involve a star then its not considered a supernova, just a regular explosion. Supernova only happen with exploding stars, nothing more and nothing less.

You need to consider the logic here before you make a statement like that.

Also supernovae only happen with truly large stars, mini novae are impossible by the very nature of the universe. stars that aren't big enough for novae go through whats called a red giant phase instead.SageM (talk) 02:04, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Isn't that just Attack Modification?SageM (talk) 02:34, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Organ Relocation, Symbiotic Connection and Hyper Connection.

Looks like were starting to run out of good ideas.... ^^;;;SageM (talk) 02:42, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

I will be content if we ever manage to reach 10,000 powers. though thats at least another 3 or 4 years to go before we even get that far.... ^^;;;SageM (talk) 02:48, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

A few valid users for galaxy mimicry-

Some versions of Space Monsters(Gunbuster and Diebuster)

Various Luma's (Super Mario Galaxy)

Enjoy.SageM (talk) 02:58, June 23, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Artificial Brain - nah.

Brain Creation - usable.

Horror Manipulation - nah.

Galaxy Mimicry - nah.

Theory Manipulation - bit too theoretical. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make something on that area, why not go for Genre Manipulation?

Reality Perception allows you to see things as they truly are. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:30, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Variation of Daydream Manipulation perhaps?SageM (talk) 00:08, June 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

It sounds more like an extension of what Dream Manipulation does already rather then a separate power...SageM (talk) 00:57, June 24, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Basically Dream Manipulation focused on past dreams. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

From dreams? Closest would be Subjective Reality, Oneiric Creation does some of that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

As far as the description goes, yes. There's nothing that says otherwise. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:37, June 24, 2016 (UTC)

You mean evil? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Lie Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:36, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Unreality Manipulation may not be the best/most descriptive name, but it's something we don't have. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:33, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say only if the user can make the unreal affect what's real/reality. If nothing else, associations Gabriel456 (talk) 23:50, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

You asked that from Gabriel, he answered already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:22, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

Physics Lordship sounds a lot like Physical Plane Lordship or Omni-Physics Manipulation. both of which give you complete command over the laws of physics.SageM (talk) 21:59, July 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Sorry I didn't see the message until now, since I was busy with other edits. ^^

The other one seems fine, two users I can think of immediately for it are The Abh from Crest/Banner of the Stars series and straight cougar from S-CRY-ed.SageM (talk) 22:06, July 4, 2016 (UTC)SageM

1. go for it

2. -shrug-

Gabriel456 (talk) 16:12, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I saw your comment to Kuo, and I wanted to point out that Mental Replication already exists: Mental Mimicry. and I think that Power Transferal is what you're thinking of Gabriel456 (talk) 15:16, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 15:24, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Inertial/Force Defiance - covered by Inertialess Body I think.

Attribute Exchange - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Well, have fun then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:59, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 00:10, July 7, 2016 (UTC)

The Abh (Crest/Banner of the Stars), Straight Cougar (S-CRY-ed), Kaito (UQ Holder), Nike (Air Gear)

I think there are a few other users. But I don't remember what series they are from.SageM (talk) 00:38, July 7, 2016 (UTC)SageM

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 18:49, July 12, 2016 (UTC)

Sense of Strength and Status Reading.SageM (talk) 22:28, July 12, 2016 (UTC)SageM


 * 1) -shrug-


 * 1) sure

Gabriel456 (talk) 18:04, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just Surface Manipulation?SageM (talk) 18:35, July 13, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Earth Manipulation/Environment Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:57, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Your idea would be usable if you expand it to Community Manipulation, tho I'm not sure if we have power that already covers it. Civilization Manipulation might get close but isn't really it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:57, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

When it says community, does it say what species/civilization/technology level you need to have, hmm...? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Power Restoration already exists. Tsubasa16 (talk) 17:16, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

We already have that Power Restoration. I suggest finding a different name, and be clear on the differences between the two. Gabriel456 (talk) 17:22, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 17:29, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Go for it, it's your power Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Your welcome, but what's it do anyway Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Impressive, so is that like a sub-power of Environment Manipulation ??? Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Amazing, good luck it Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

20. When you make powers that are sub-powers, techniques, Variations, etc. of some other power, add them to those pages. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:01, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:32, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

honestly..."eh". Check with Kuo, and if he signs off, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 13:17, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Go for the Adhesion Manipulation and you have something.

I think we have something like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:38, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Indeed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:41, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

The problem is the page already exists- Valley Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:06, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Valley Manipulation Capabilities-

"User can create, shape and manipulate the valleys and everything in them, including all the aspects of the valleys, from the purely physical ones and also mythical/conceptual ones. Valleys are elongated lowlands between ranges of mountains, hills, or other uplands, often having a river or stream running along the bottom. Very narrow, deep valleys cut in resistant rock and having steep, almost vertical sides are called canyons or gorges."

the page exists.SageM (talk) 23:07, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Point. The problem with nearly 8000 powers is that you can't remember all of them and even less all the details. I added CG to VM. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

first two, -shrug- but as for the third, I think a better title is in order, but it may be do-able Gabriel456 (talk) 14:49, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

1. sure

2. eh..-shrug- sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 21:02, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Impact Immunity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:43, July 18, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. Might be expandable tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

Imperceptibility, among other things says "They can't be touched or perceived, by smell, touch, vision, hearing, etc and give off no heat, auras or energy, leave any evidence of their presence, yet the space they occupy has no lack of it. To all senses, the user does not exist." Maybe something on those lines.

Just a thought, tho. I honestly have no idea how'd it work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 15:40, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Evasion Mode: no.

Automatic Tasking: possibility.

Speed Tasking: no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:20, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Please... --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:42, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Making Mode after another for every single thing is really getting old fast. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:55, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Thing is that there are actually some good ideas every now and then, it's just that they're so rare... -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:05, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Complete Mimicry might work Gabriel456 (talk) 22:42, July 22, 2016 (UTC)

Cosmic Event Empowerment - doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:39, July 23, 2016 (UTC)

Probability Merging/Splitting - possibility but both need good description.

Rest... not really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Not a one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Past/Future Energy Manipulation - Past Manipulation/Future Manipulation/Time Manipulation?

Inner Voice - conscience as power? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:12, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

How'd they be different from Time Energy Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:23, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:12, July 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) I feel like we have that already, but I'm not entirely sure.. But I'm probably wrong on this. Make it, but I'll probably delete if I do end up finding it.
 * 2) Go for it
 * 3) I guess, but I hope this ends soon. It seems like this new "link" thing will be the new trend now

Getting bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, July 28, 2016 (UTC)

Are what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:02, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

And? You want to make a powers for those? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:20, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Manipulations or something else? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:27, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Rural Adaptation - covered by the closest wild Adaptation I think.

Lava Immunity - possibility.. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:58, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Adaptations that aren't Urban, for example someone on area that was plains before being turned into farm would have Plains Adaptation.

Rural Creation - usable.

City Weathering - expand that to Erosion Manipulation and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:18, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Absolute Selling- too specific.

Certainty Inducement/Clothing Shifting- don't we have something like these already? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Certainty Inducement - Impossibility Inducement/Possibility Inducement?

Clothing Switching - Edited Suit Up a bit, that make it clearer? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:00, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun then.

Check Probabilistic Equilibrium while you're at it, Association? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:25, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Gear/Equipment Manipulation - too vague

Wakefulness Manipulation - too specific

Periodic Element Creation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:24, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

A user for position manipulation- Rias Gremory (Highschool DxD) using the Castling technique via the evil pieces.SageM (talk) 20:18, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:30, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

What do you think? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:37, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

it already exists
Enhanced Restoration already exists- Restoration Augmentation.SageM (talk) 21:07, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Quality Enhancement and Efficacy Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:04, August 3, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Bit of all of those.

It was getting really close to midnight so I wasn't exactly on my best there... --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, August 4, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 15:30, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Don't we already have that? I feel like we do
 * 3) Accelerating Regeneration. Even if it's effects others, I think Healing Augmentation covers that as well
 * 4) go for it

eh, I honestly can't remember. I might be confusing it for something else, anyways Gabriel456 (talk) 00:20, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Boundary Removal is pretty close to 4th wall destruction.SageM (talk) 00:24, August 5, 2016 (UTC)SageM

TM - on the specific side.

AS - that's pretty much opposite by being too open... -_-; --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:56, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Could explain it a bit better, but I think I got the gist of it. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:38, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

We're really getting quite a few those soul-powers... Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:12, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 21:35, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Effect Transferal may sound better
 * 2) -shrug-
 * 3) Not sure

Storage Negation- Anti Storage.SageM (talk) 01:04, August 6, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Dark Matter Mimicry users- Photino Birds from Xeelee Sequence and Kakine Teitoku from A Certain Magical Index.SageM (talk) 01:07, August 6, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Detached Fusion - ...what?

Personality Splitting - you mean causing personality split/Divided Mind on oneself/others?

Dark Matter Mimicry - tricky one, as to my knowledge the best data we have about DM is essentially guesses. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 6, 2016 (UTC)

Detached Fusion - see if you can find better name and figure how to explain it better.

Personality Splitting/Dark Matter Mimicry - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, August 6, 2016 (UTC)

Game Creation - have fun

Game Adaptation - needs ability to enter any game first, do we have that?

Spiritual Nonexistence - Soullessness --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

Which is why I wondered if we have that for all games, Electronic-Media Jumping does it to electronic games. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:37, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

uh...-shrug-. I'm not sure. Messgae Kuo about it, and if he signs off, go for it. I'm just not entirely sure myself Gabriel456 (talk) 15:10, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

all I can muster is a "eh"...Gabriel456 (talk) 14:52, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Natural Pouch/Pouch Protrusion - figure better name and have fun.

Music Generation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:10, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Shadow Consumption already exists- Shadow Absorption.SageM (talk) 03:18, August 9, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Card Transmutation - usable

Purpose Bestowal/Birth Manipulation - bit too specific/abstract

Essence Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

As long as you remember to change the links using the old link, go ahead. Remember to note why you changed the name in Comments so people know why it happened.

We may need new Essence page to deal with both versions too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Use Special:Whatlinkshere to find where the links for the old page-name are and then just Edit them to the new one. Remember to change them to the new alphabetical order afterwards. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:53, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Essence Manipulation - sounds good.

Simulation Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:23, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

isn't that essentially Lie Manipulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:03, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

eh Gabriel456 (talk) 15:26, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

if you can really detail the differences, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 15:29, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Ok, well, here is what I think you should at to the page, applications: Simulation Creation, Tactical Strategist, Thought Manipulation, Enhanced Knowledge and intuition aptitude. Associations: Future Manipulation, Event Manipulation, Phenomena Manipulation, and Probability Manipulation. I hope that helps with starting things.--CNBA3 (talk) 18:52, August 9, 2016 (UTC)

Resply
Sure, why not.--CNBA3 (talk) 02:44, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

No, simulations are what you think of or create, not something as an illusion.--CNBA3 (talk) 03:12, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

Sure. Sounds like Supernatural Properties Manipulation could be an application (in that the user can control what the charm does?) Gabriel456 (talk) 14:56, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

hey, i have an user for your Magical Charm Manipulation, Talisman from Valkyrie Crusade, she is the goddess of curses and charms. Tsubasa16 (talk) 14:59, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

No worries, it was a valid answer in both cases ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 20:52, August 10, 2016 (UTC)

Strange, I'm pretty sure I clicked the signature that was under those before C&C...

"How exactly does one enter a game?" - ? Where'd that come from? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

By touch most likely, playing them as with jumanji would definitely work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:56, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

for the first two, go for it. As for the third, not sure Gabriel456 (talk) 13:58, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

Power You Wanted Help On
What's the power like? I don't know much about it. Or anything but the name, really.

GZilla311 (talk) 22:47, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

I'll have to think about it. You check around to make sure there isn't another like this? Not saying there is, but I often have that problem myself.GZilla311 (talk) 23:02, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not entirely sure. This one seems to be rather different than usual ones I've seen (usually I go into closer examination of one element such as fear or melancholy or even corruption itself), so I am unsure how to work with it.

I'm sorry, but I don't know how much I can help. Thank you for considering me, but I simply do not know how much I can help you.

GZilla311 (talk) 23:38, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Reality Warping? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

just asking, would the power you is thiking of be an Sub-power of Present Manipulation (since you said it only affects the Present)? Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:01, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Not really, the power is seems fine to me, aside of it being the perfect sub-power to PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:08, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Could work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

and also, if you have any problem finding users, just use the ones from PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 05:36, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:43, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

well, by what i understood, the user can control situations, PM and Reality Warping are much more than that, so i don't think they are the same thing at all. That's why i think is is an suitable sub-power to PM. Tsubasa16 (talk) 11:44, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Few Limitations and it's a same thing... --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:56, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Had to go back to check what you originally wrote, I remembered your description somewhat wrong. From description it seems mostly like Probability Manipulation with specific attention on Possibility Manipulation and some Certainty Inducement thrown in. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:26, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Looks like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:09, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Well, by what he said, it is like the mix of several powers, but it's not like we do not already have several powers that are that same thing, and by what he said, it would be the same as Probablilty Manipaltion, but i don't think so, PM would allow the user to manipulate the probability of something happening in that situation, not the very situation itself (what Situation Manipulation would do) and PM is limited to things that are possible (the possibility of a given event must be above 0% to cause it and less than 100% to prevent it ), and i think that SM manipulation could do even what is not possible, i believe (i'am right?) . Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:41, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

already exists
Vision Projection- Shared Vision and Vision Manipulation.SageM (talk) 03:19, August 14, 2016 (UTC)SageM

well, ok then. Tsubasa16 (talk) 03:24, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Also there is this power as well- Visual Linking.SageM (talk) 04:31, August 14, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Vision Projection - Shared Vision

Embodiment Mimicry - no.

Stage Skipping - ...aand?

Vantage Creation - way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:49, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Extra Life Bestowal - we might have something similar, but otherwise usable

Life Repulsion/Life Attraction - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:17, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 13:09, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

er, I don't know to be honest. Shoot them over to Kuo, and if he signs off on them, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:56, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

Well, care to explain the power to me? Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:41, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Well, it seems fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:49, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Also, you forgot to put your signature on your message to kuopiofi. Tsubasa16 (talk) 02:58, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Both go on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:42, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 11:21, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Constant Inducement - You mean causing things continue the way they were on the moment this power was used? Might be interesting if it isn't just that instant this was induced, ball bouncing non-stop, someone being forced to repeat short sequence of events... There's AD&D spell that causes something like this for a sort while, I think it was repeating same round over and over.

Physique Replication - Doppelgänger Morphing --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:26, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Needs to define how long cycle it can repeat, and some serious explanation in Capabilities, probably Limitations to deal with how long it works, etc. That said, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:40, August 15, 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) isn't that essentially Autopilot? if not, sub-power
 * 2) Expand, please?
 * 3) go for it  Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

eh, not sure about any of those, to be honest.Gabriel456 (talk) 10:57, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Dimensional Blast - usable

Multiple Voices - usable but very silly, hope you have users

Logic Defiance - pretty sure we have this, can't remember name

Inability Inducement - covered by existing power, can't remember this either. Some problems in Edit for some reason... --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:58, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

We already have Mindshifting  Gabriel456 (talk) 20:46, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:00, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, not sure... -shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 23:33, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't it just be the Combination of Planetary Lordship and Limited Life Lordship? or just Planetary Lordship (lordship would mean you have absolute control over the planet and everything on it) ? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:06, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Planetary Lordship would grant you absolute control over the planet and everything on it, that includes all life forms and civilizations as well, since civilizations are on the planet as well. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just Unknown Inducement?SageM (talk) 02:04, August 17, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Both are bit too far on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

eh, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 11:01, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Inducement for Uncertainty Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:24, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:39, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

the perfect power for personal trainers. if you're planning to do it, i think that the wii fit trainer from Smash Bros is an user. Tsubasa16 (talk) 20:44, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i don't really remember, i think it's because all of her/his powers are exercise-based, even energy spheres out of exercise. though i think you should look into it to see if she/him fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:07, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i think so, but i don't have sure, again, i think you shoud research and see if she fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:22, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:49, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Attack Switching - that's just doing it without any powers.

Continuous Charging - Juggernaut Momentum --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Piercing Beam Emission --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:00, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

So the powers build-up would be independent of what happens to User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:51, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Could be Technique of Infinite Energy. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:13, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

eh for the first two, but for the third, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:03, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Try to think better name for starters. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Got a name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:27, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering that the power is about charging the power and not attacking, Charging Reliability? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:21, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:37, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Call it Clinging/Continuing Damage or something like that and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:59, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

don't know about the last two, but could you expand on the first? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:12, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

I think so. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:29, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that one of your powers? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:50, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

And you want to make power for those that don't use specified methods... --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Is it really worth it? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:31, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

What you do with your own pages (hint) is pretty much your own business. As long as you don't change it into something totally different. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun, if it doesn't make sense someone Edits it again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Edit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

er...-shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 21:37, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

well, isoporation specifically needs the user to teleport to acheive that effect, so i don't really have sure. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:43, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, like i said, isoporation needs to teleport to achieve that effect, while the power you're thinking does not need to. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Oh right, now I remember. It was too close to Unrestricted Movement. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:44, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Well, it's restored. Edit it to what you want. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

50/50 on this. Take it to Kuo and get his opinion on it. If he signs off, go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:11, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Liberation - too limited, try something that is opposite to Binding

Facing Redirection - too specific

Scientific Projection - usable

Meta Physical Law Manipulation - Law Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Sincerely, Freedom manipulation seems strange, since if you control freedom and free beings, than it's not really freedom anymore, and technically, the opposite to SM would be literally not manipulating anyone at all, it's not like that would be a power. the closer to an opposite to SM is Control Imunity and/or Freedom. Tsubasa16 (talk) 07:51, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

actually,i believe that that ``Liberation´´ power you is thinking of is pretty much Control Negation, which is the power to negate control over others, essentially liberating them from their subordination. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:34, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

something like Self-Sustenance Inducement? i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:42, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

like make someone be independent from anyone to do anything they need or something like that? if so, i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:45, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

"Releasing" sounds bit clunky, but the only other options I can think is "Freeing".

Independence Inducement - details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:46, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Most of that sounds like power bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:53, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Soo...basically Reality Warping. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:49, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Solar Negation/Lunar Negation - doable.

Multi-Perception - don't we already something like this? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:32, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:12, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Charged Attack Multiplication - what? split single attack into multiple ones?

Charge Storage/Holding - too specific

Architecture Recreation - way too specific

Island Adaptation - depends on what kind of island it is, so better covered by already existing adaptations --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Not a bit. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:37, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"The user can summon a stream of endless waves (ranging from hundreds to thousands to millions) of objects like blades, bullets, energy blasts, etc., around their target to bombard them from all sides with no hope of escape. Users most likely have a complex strategy and pattern to confuse their opponent and limit their movement." not just bullets, nothing about speed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't. It simply does the effect without explaining what happens on the background. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:08, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Had time to think about this a bit and we could use lesser version of Bullet Hell. Maybe something up to dozens bullets, possibly with Limitation that they aren't unleashed on the same time but in waves...

Not sure that we don't have something close, but I can't remember one.

Would Multi-Hit Strike cover the melee side for you? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:41, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Ask if he has ideas how to do it.

I think that power that does both distance and physical attacks might get too confusing, but perhaps some sort of superpower manipulation... --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:24, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"Charging Shot"? -shrug- I don't know a good name for that, unfortunately Gabriel456 (talk) 20:03, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

if you want a "go", sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 21:42, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Power Charcing or lesser version of Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Or Bullet Hell lite, as I call it. Have fun. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:59, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, that doesn't sound very doable. sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 11:04, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

never hurts. And you're welcome  Gabriel456 (talk) 11:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

er...probably not Gabriel456 (talk) 16:12, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

if you want to Gabriel456 (talk) 16:18, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

sure, I mean Gabriel456 (talk) 16:19, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Covered by Sphere Manipulation I think, as there's no size limit on it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:38, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Closest existing one to otherwise overly specific power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

probably not the first, but for the second, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 10:48, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Environment Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:10, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Going way too specific now... --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:19, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think it is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:20, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

also, i think that Replication Awareness is a better name for it. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Cosmic Space Manipulation already exists.

go for all Gabriel456 (talk) 15:33, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 15:36, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Enhanced Condition with time-limit? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:37, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific as such. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:17, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 10:33, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Stardust Manipulation?
 * 3) -shrug-

Compact Star Manipulation might be best Gabriel456 (talk) 12:00, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 12:06, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Redo Effect - don't we have this? I'm pretty sure it's come up at some point...

Angular Attacks - too specific as this, we might have something that allows powers/attacks be guided.

Trade-Off Power/Build-Up Attack - too specific --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:51, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

You're just throwing anything/everything to get something stick at this point, aren't you...

Take some time to breath and work on those powers that are already approved. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Let's put those into back-burner. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:59, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Ask again after you're coherent enough to judge do you want to try again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, not sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:34, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

sure.

I think Miracle Performing pretty much covers that Gabriel456 (talk) 00:13, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't that Holy Technology power be Transcendent Science? or rather an sub-power of it? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:19, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

could you expand? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:06, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

Warp Manipulation - usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:47, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

Keine Kamishirasawa (Touhou Project) can create/change history in Hakutaku form, so she would be user for Past Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:54, September 8, 2016 (UTC)mber 23, 2016 (UTC)

Limbs and any other part of the User, neck and torso in other words. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:28, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:22, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

personally, I can't see why regular IA can't do any of that. I mean, the years of training (even thousands of years) is pretty redundant, with IA already being able to understand things instantly, and I don't see why it couldn't do intricate things and dangerous fears...and I don't see how defying physics plays a part in this, but again, don't see why regular IA can't.

But that's just my opinion on the matter Gabriel456 (talk) 13:20, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

that could work Gabriel456 (talk) 14:18, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, i haven't saw your nachricht yet, i think the power is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:31, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

I'd go with length, as height would refer only the full length of the body and this includes also partial changes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:32, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

if I understand you correctly, it's essentially Skill Adaptation? A non-superpower verison of Reactive Adaptation? If so, it could work.

That is, if I'm understanding you correctly XD Gabriel456 (talk) 15:17, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

I've had Psychic Energy Attacks on my To Do list for quite some time, but I never seem to get around doing it. Have fun.

Same to shrinking limbs, tho you need to figure better name. I think we have a power that allows user to pull their head down like turtles, but I can't remember the name... --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:40, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

Works for me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:57, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 14:02, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

uh, what? could you explain a bit more? "Factual things that are untrue". Isn't that contradictory? (I just woke up so I might be a little slow) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:04, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

kinda still sounds like Lie Manipulation to me. But if you can expand upon the differences, go for it (I've been wrong before, I might add) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:37, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

You mean Manipulate in the sense of Reality Warping or Dimensional Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:51, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

I'd have to say it'd be Limitation version to both of those powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:59, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

Visibility Manipulation: not a bad idea, tho name is bit goofy

Fertility Manipulation/Compound Fusion: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:44, December 2, 2016 (UTC)

Perceptibility could work, tho that hints towards being more than visible. Bit more on the line of Imperceptibility. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, December 9, 2016 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:33, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

aside Physical Deformation? Form Manipulation and maybe Mutilation. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:25, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

Source Negation sounds like its to specific a power. you may want to try to expand it to include more.SageM (talk) 02:32, December 19, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Circular Constructs: no

Tracking Diversion: covered by various powers already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:45, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Primordial Energy Generation: we don't even have Primordial Energy Manipulation.

Lake/River Creation: Water Body Creation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:20, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering PFM is described bit more than just primordial, more like what comes before even those... I honestly don't know if something like that can be created. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:42, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering the RFM's description, yes. Remember to remove PEM from Also Called if you do tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:11, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

the only things that come to mind is that the user could develop computer/hacking skills when needed, or something as simple as plumbing skills.

That's all I got, sorry for not being more elaborate Gabriel456 (talk) 14:42, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

second might be doable, but isn't the first essentially God Mode? Gabriel456 (talk) 02:19, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Hypercompetence --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:05, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Bit on the narrow side, but usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:04, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think so. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:49, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Neither is really doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:03, December 24, 2016 (UTC)

Expand that to Efficiency Manipulation and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Habitability Inducement- Environmental Field Projection or Terraforming.SageM (talk) 22:37, December 31, 2016 (UTC)SageM

also, since i'am already talking to you, do you have any ideas of aspects of fate/destiny? it's because i'am planning to do an Destiny Aspect Manifestation and have only three aspects (Inevitability, Beginning and End) but i need some more. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:33, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

related to chance? well, i think Possibility might count as an aspect. the problem is that i'm limited to use  aspects that are already powers here. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:48, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

yeah, i think Possibilites would fit as: no matter if it is impossible or possible, if you're destined to do it, you WILL do it.

well, what would that power would be? Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:54, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think it's fine then. though you should ask Kuo first. Also, maybe Purpose as an aspect of fate? since the purpose of anything is determinated by fate. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:02, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, if you want to. i was thinking on using the Manipulaition power instead, but if you want to do the embodiment of it..... Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:08, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Purpose Manipulation already exists, so Purpose Embodiment might be a valid power.SageM (talk) 23:10, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

oh, sorry, i forgot, was would it do? Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:13, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think the other name ( All-Terrain Mobility. )is more suitable. also,  it would be a sub-power of unrestricted moviment i believe. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:22, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I was busy with something else.

I suppose you could consider him a user of that.SageM (talk) 23:49, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Honestly, not sure about that.... Maybe shoot it over to Kuo, see his opinion on it. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 16:00, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Isn't that just Non-Corporeal Form?SageM (talk) 02:00, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Form Shattering?SageM (talk) 02:04, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Point, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:48, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

It already exists- Absolute Law Manipulation.SageM (talk) 19:49, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

"How is Absolute Life Manipulation instead? I mean, we have CrystalStorm51 (talk) 19:56, January 4, 2017 (UTC), do we not? It could deal with all forms of life, including those in the form of concepts, objects, non-corporeal beings and the like."

? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Universal Lordship?SageM (talk) 20:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Whatever, go ahead with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:53, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Reality.SageM (talk) 23:06, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Isn't that just Probability Computation?SageM (talk) 03:53, January 5, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:45, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i can't think of any other than like Death Prevention (by delaying the future were someone die). Tsubasa16 (talk) 18:48, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i may actually change the name of Future Acceleration to Future Order Manipulation, since i ended up making it more of to control when the future will happen rather than just accelerating it, so i think Future Delay will end up being a sub-power of it rather than opposite. Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:09, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

it's ok Gabriel456 (talk) 19:49, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Check the EM for the power that fits closest what you're thinking about.

Surface Manipulation?SageM (talk) 18:57, January 6, 2017 (UTC)SageM

if you want to try, go for it, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 23:31, January 6, 2017 (UTC)

Idea Theft: try Idea Manipulation first. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure about  Auto Completion, Accumulation and Orbit Inducement, but the rest seem doable. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:32, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Didn't you ask me this before? I could've sworn I approved it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:50, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Huh. I could swear I saw those before. Must be mixing things up. If so, my bad :p

But yeah, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:53, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic Completion or Automatic Tasking - either could work.

Accumulation, Mass Gathering or Accretion, or Matter Gathering - not really there...

Orbital Inducement, Orbital Creation or Orbital Aura, or Orbital Shield - maybe just Orbit or something like that, you're simply getting stuff rotating around target after all.

Check Dictionary/synonyms for ideas.

That's Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:16, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Try to figure something for it. Maybe expand the search bit, what is the power about on the basic level and then try to see how to summarize it on few words.

Aggregation works for me, others could work on Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:41, January 9, 2017 (UTC)

I got nothing, sorry.

But in any case, isn't Existence Manipulation effectively the opposite of Nothingness Manipulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:21, January 9, 2017 (UTC)

oh, sorry, i haven't.

well, aside Pregnancy Inducement, i can't think of any. Tsubasa16 (talk) 11:03, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Apocalypse Aspect Manifestation/Apocalyptic Force Physiology?

Environmental or Adaptation Mode - don't we have this?

Ethnicity Manipulation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:56, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

That's what I was remembering. Does that look like what you're thinking? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:32, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:01, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

none.SageM (talk) 21:48, January 10, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Not that I know. Might want to expand it to all forms of waters edge/front. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:04, January 11, 2017 (UTC)

Coast Manipulation - doable.

Blessing Manipulation - doable.

Blessing Creation, Blessing Empowerment, Blessed Physiology and Blessed Body - there's good idea and there's beating good idea to death with rock, no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 02:42, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

well, since you will do the blessing manipulation, i will wait you do it for me to do the blessing embodiment, also, a user for your power would be the very main image of the blessing inducement power. Tsubasa16 (talk) 03:16, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Yes I do. Otherwise I wouldn't have suggested it to kuo.SageM (talk) 05:58, January 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Cushion Manipulation/Button Manipulation - way too specific.

Bilocation/Multilocation - Replication? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:52, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

Doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:26, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

sorry, i didn't, well, you could use some applications from the Blessing Embodiment. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:13, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

Record Manipulation - too specific

Coast Creation - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:30, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

At the moment I can't think of any other then possibly event order manipulation and event rearrangement, but you can probably find some if you look through the non fighting powers category.

sorry I can't offer more then that.SageM (talk) 02:13, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Oh wait, Sorry but you can't make it. As its already a power on here.SageM (talk) 02:15, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Automatic Tasking.SageM (talk) 02:18, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Badge Empowerment: might be usable if you expand the concept...

Carpet Manipulation/Umbrella Manipulation: too specific

Crime Inducement: usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:35, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Something like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Thoughtlessness - pretty sure we have something like this.

Automatic Completion - needs better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:59, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

You're skipping from the start to finish without the action, those don't really reflect that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:09, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Sounds more like you're skipping the whole thing really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:41, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Rejection/Denial - as in?

GC - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:28, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Reject/denial? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

That is doable, tho I hope you have users. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:02, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

It already exists- Uncertainty Manipulation and Pataphysics Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:10, January 15, 2017 (UTC)SageM

well, i think it's fine, indeed i think i might have a user, a character that has ``the power of the unknown´´. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:43, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think that Uncertainty Manipulation would work as application, i have no sure about Pataphysics though, as it deals specifcally with, well, physic. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:52, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Pain and Mental ideas seem doable, but the Cause ideas need to be expanded, if indeed different from Causality Manipulation.Gabriel456 (talk) 23:52, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

also, Unknown manipulation wouldn't be covered by Uncertainty Manipulation, as unknown and uncertain are two different things, Uncertain would mean questionable, undecided, while Unknown would be Not identified, ascertained, or established. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:58, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Actually Uncertainty Manipulation is also called Unknown Warping, so yes it also manipulates the unknown.SageM (talk) 00:00, January 16, 2017 (UTC)SageM

eh, honestly, it sounds like it's covered by Uncertainty Manipulation. I mean, your description pretty much sounds the same as UM. At-least to me, that is... It even has "Unknown Warping" in the Also Called, which is essentially just another word for "Manipulation".

I could be wrong, but that's just my opinion. I just can't see the difference Gabriel456 (talk) 00:01, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

He says it covers just because it has that name in also called? just remove it from there, the power is to manipulate the uncertain, as i said, Uncertain and Unknown are different things, though they are related. Uncertain would mean questionable, undecided, while Unknown would be Not identified, ascertained, or established. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:05, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

well, like i said before ( i think i did) they do share some similar meanings, but that doesn't make them the, for example,  one of the menaings of destruction is end, and yet i don't think Destruction and Conclusion Dominance are the same power. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:18, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

well, if you don't what to make a separete power, you could maybe change the page a little, as it needs to be more detalied about it if it wants to include the unknown, as Unknown is more specfically about what is Not Know or Understandable, while the page says more specifcally about Unknown is more specfically about what cannot be percepted.

well, that might would work. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:23, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Foreign Energy Manipulation/Foreign Material Manipulation/Exotic Matter Manipulation?SageM (talk) 00:31, January 16, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Vector Manipulation? I mean, that pretty much does what you're describing. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:36, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

eh, I guess.Gabriel456 (talk) 18:38, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Change it to Direction Manipulation and you have something usable.

That'd be Vector Manipulation... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:46, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Spatial Direction Manipulation or Direction Manipulation could work, check how direction is defined on Wikipedia and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Getting too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:00, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Supernatural Flexibility - usable.

Other, too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:33, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Both are doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:23, January 19, 2017 (UTC)

these mode powers are starting to get a bit out of hand now...But sure, I guess

But Weapon Destruction, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 18:46, January 19, 2017 (UTC)

If you decide to make an Absolute Flexibility page I have a valid user for it, Bogey Woods from Toriko, he is literally so flexible that he can actually lodge himself inside of living things....including people!SageM (talk) 23:35, January 20, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Have fun with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:14, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

request
Welcome CrystalStorm51, listen umiałbyś can help me in a certain situation, dotyczyco sections called obsession ... I do not know how to properly formulate the application on the fact that the possession person or vessel as is possessed may sometimes undergo slight changes in physical or something that can to appear on it.

However, I am on this first.

My point here is that, taking as an example obsession with physical changes may, for example, change eye color as was the case during the fight Kurosaki Ichigo Byakuya Kuchiki, when he was wounded and lost consciousness of his inner Hollow took control it was clear that during the formation of the mask changed or eyes. Will you help me formulate it well to add that according to this section.

Gabriel456 (talk) 00:58, January 22, 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) That's Healing Factor Nullification
 * 2) go for it

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:57, January 22, 2017 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:23, January 23, 2017 (UTC)

Plenum Manipulation: basically Matter Manipulation

Area Shifting: go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:49, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Aside Kind Manipulation these are usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, January 25, 2017 (UTC)

Glitch Inducement/Glitch Manipulation - usable but might need better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

Malfunction is close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:05, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

I have a few other powers to work on first, so probably after I make those.SageM (talk) 00:56, January 28, 2017 (UTC)SageM

sorry, i haven't. well, both look fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 13:36, January 28, 2017 (UTC)

Intrametal Transmutation - no, not interested getting power for for transformation inside groups which is guaranteed to follow that.

Social Attraction - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

sorry, i don't think i know a user for it, but it certainly seems to be an application of Directional Lordship. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:48, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

I don't remember exactly, I would have to look it up again in the history before I could give you an answer.SageM (talk) 00:28, February 1, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Vector Manipulation?

Consequence Creation/Consequence Removal - doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

And it'd be still mostly about matter. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:46, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Nice work
Neat powers you've created. Sorry I did not get back to you about Spatial Direction Manipulation. Very cool power. Glad to see you could include Palkia. The only figure I could think of including would be Twilight Sparkle of MLP: FIM. She used gravity magic to invert her and Spike so they would slide up on the underside of an upward winding staircase as if they were sliding down. Anyways, you make some interesting powers, but I find it fun to try and find users. Good luck and take care.Kusarigama (talk) 13:41, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Link/Connection Manipulation- Bond Manipulation.SageM (talk) 01:00, February 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Clone Perception: too specific.

Quality Manipulation: usable

Link Manipulation: use Connection Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:28, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:54, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

go aheadSageM (talk) 22:48, February 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Can't remember a thing about that, repost? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:08, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Doable but needs good explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:45, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Or something as descriptive. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:55, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Omni-Communication? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Your missing the point of Ommi-Communication, its not just living things, its the power to communicate with ANYTHING, organic and inorganic, living and non living. it covers the ability to communicate with anything that exists.SageM (talk) 05:47, February 17, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Besides, inorganic telepathy wouldn't be a variation of omni-communication, since it already covers every form of communication by its very definition. it would merely be a sub-power of it. And since its already covered by Omni-Communication its not really a new power idea either.SageM (talk) 06:01, February 17, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Needs better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:33, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, as long as you can find better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:43, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Way too clunky, try checking synonyms. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:15, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Layer Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:35, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Remember to add Layer Reinforcement and Layered Durability. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:42, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Your choice. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:30, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

That's quite a mouthful. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:52, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

both your new powers ideas could be applications to Oath Manipulation, since the users can control the rewards for the contract being fulfilled and the punishments for breaking them (Punishment Manipulation could also be a application if not sub-power of Law Manipulation for the same reason) also, a user for PM could be Nemesis. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:59, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

from Greco-Roman Myth. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:08, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Don't we have something similar? I have vague memories about something like that... --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:42, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

How would it connect to Challenge Creation, Quest Manipulation or Reward Granting? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:56, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Could be combined into one power as reward doesn't mean just positive gains, but otherwise go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:12, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Your choice really, I just feel they're basically two sides of the same coin. Opposite powers if you go with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:13, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

well, maybe wish granting? (by granting a wish as a reward) Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:32, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Satellite Empowerment: expand that to Technology Empowerment and you got a deal.

Inertial Synching: Isn't that Inertialess Body? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:13, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Basically opposite to Acceleration Resistance? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:22, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Might want to find better/more descriptive name and you need to give very good description to what it does, but otherwise have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:26, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

How exactly is it different from this?
How exactly is it different from Inertia Negation?SageM (talk) 21:58, March 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Altered Physics: what exactly would Altered Mathematics have to do with this?

Propulsionless/Motionless Mobility: several powers get close enough to make this copy. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:13, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

That'll work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:22, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Your page "Technology Empowerment" has been deleted, at your request.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:58, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome ;)

Death horseman94 (talk) 22:07, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:01, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Environmental Awareness: call it Nature Awareness and go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:16, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Certainly, I have removed the page for you.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:46, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

No problem!

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:53, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Expand Inertia Negation and it's done. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:46, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

It deals with that, just expand it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:54, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

Inertial Adaptation - doable.

Predator Instinct/Prey Instinct --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, March 9, 2017 (UTC)

Efficient Motion: doable

Non-Damaging Force: pretty sure we have this already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:54, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty similar I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:11, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Gaseous Mobility: pretty pointless really.

Water Current Negation: call it Current Negation and go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:26, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:02, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

At the point gas would impede movement, you're essentially talking about liquid.

Unless you're talking about wind movement. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:28, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

You're talking speed and air-resistance? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:37, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Is there really gases that would affect movement on normal human speeds?

Anyway, usable so go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:18, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure, maybe.SageM (talk) 01:14, March 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go with Instinct instead of Urge and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:08, March 13, 2017 (UTC)

Sequence Manipulation: doable

Problem Manipulation: Answer Manipulation?

Self-Animation: bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:14, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

I meant was there connections/similarities. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:25, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Associations then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:12, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Associations of each other. -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:18, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead with that.

Sounds clunky. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:04, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Yes.

Association. At best. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:18, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Petrification = turning something into stone, literally. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:29, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Well, for Problem Manipulation i would say Calamity Inducement (making things worse). Sequence Manipulatio could be an Application of Future Order Manipulation, by controlling the sequence of the future. i but i can't think to any application to it. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:10, March 15, 2017 (UTC)

I would say it'd be the same, but the page does specifiy absorbing kinetic energy to do it, so it could work. And name it as you wish, I honestly can't find a better name myself Gabriel456 (talk) 17:07, March 15, 2017 (UTC)

Hyper Bouncing: related to Double Jump?

Unimpaired Activity/Problem Inducement: doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:37, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

Well, go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:06, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

Hey can you help me out with something?

Recently I made my first power and everything seems going smoothly except there is a single problem that bothers me quite a bit.

When I go to categories to see where my power is, it does not show a thumbnail/picture but a bunch of text and I was curious how I can fix that, do you know how? If so please tell me and if you want to check it out yourself the power is Card Magic

Thanks, looking forward to your response ^^ CrabHermit (talk) 01:25, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

Say for example you go to the http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Card-Based_PowersCategory, You would find Card Magic in there but it does not have a picture popping up there, just a bunch of text. That is the problem I'm currently dealing with. CrabHermit (talk) 01:30, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, Thanks for atleast trying to help out ^^ CrabHermit (talk) 01:33, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

I liked it, it's the perfect power of a Zombie/Undead, no matter what you do to them, they will continue coming after you like nothing happened (unless you somehow completely disable them) Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:21, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

So basically acct/work/do thing´gs normally regardless on how the user tilts regarding down? Doable but name is ´n't really descriptive.

Drop the part about enhanced senses tho, not really connected. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:44, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

None of them really clicks. Position Adaptation maybe? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:23, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:11, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Magical Liquid Manipulation: too specific

Plant Intuition: Agriculture Intuition?

Weakness Augmentation: doable

Feather Fall/Lightweight Movement: try to figure better name but usable idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:06, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Plant Intuition is doable.

Feather Fall, any connections to Gliding? --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:12, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Feather Fall doable--Kuopiofi (talk) 16:49, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Enhanced Twisting Speed: how about ability to twist any part of body, expanded form of 360-Degree Neck Rotation.

Physical Force Negation: doable

Axis Shifting: so, Self-Axis Manipulation... why? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:43, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

It could be interesting power and I'm pretty sure there are users too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:52, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

That would be essentially Enhanced Speed and it Levels combined to it. It could be mentioned (speed of rotation depends of Users overall speed or something?) but it isn't really the main thing of the power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:35, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

Instead?

Pretty specific one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:34, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:52, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

It's still there, using the power into yourself or others/objects has the same effect of making them easier to move.

I couldn't really think better way to say what I meant, so it isn't really obvious. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:05, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Daydream Empowerment: doable

Magic Inducement: Magic Bestowal? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:20, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Selective Portals, Reality Searching, Constant Manipulation: doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:24, March 24, 2017 (UTC)

That and it'd basically been "RW... with telekinesis". --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:28, March 24, 2017 (UTC)

Telekinetic Precision: too specific

Selective Inertia: usable

Rotational Combat: use Spinning Combat, we have Spinning Attack and Spinning Defense. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:57, March 25, 2017 (UTC)

it seems fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:51, March 25, 2017 (UTC)

We already have Vibration Negation.SageM (talk) 10:18, March 26, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Meta Existence Manipulation: Multiversal Manipulation/Omniverse Manipulation?

Symbol Manipulation: may be covered by Literary Manipulation Variations.

Weight Negation: Weight Reduction

Attack Calling: Strength Calling is Variation of Enhancement Calling is Variation of Power Bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:58, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

So a form of Existence Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:26, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:50, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:13, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Gravitational Immunity- Gravity Defiance?SageM (talk) 17:04, March 27, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Personal realms, dimensions, spaces, or planes either belonging to or owned by others or were once owned by others basically.SageM (talk) 02:55, March 28, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Extra Life Theft: Life Addition

Mental Regeneration: Mental Regeneration

Rank Creation: doable

Semisolid Manipulation: Gel Manipulation?

Unreality Manipulation: define where the line between real/unreal goes? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:00, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Note that it's gel and "jelly-like" for a reason, does that cover what you're thinking?

Actually I asked how you define the difference. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:54, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

How you define the difference between real/unreal? What belongs to which? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:04, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Remember to define it well and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:51, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Mythic Soul: and the point would be? They aren't that much different from humans.

Purpose Removal: doable

Area Transmutation: Terrain Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:59, March 30, 2017 (UTC)

Elemental Soul/Radiation Negation - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:30, March 30, 2017 (UTC)

Avatarism: better name and explanation

Limit Reinforcement: Law Inducement

Physics Adaptation: overly specific

Zero Point Energy Generation: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:51, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Idea has some merit, but explanation/presentation is terrible. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:58, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Got better name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:17, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Opportunity Sense works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:33, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Not really, no. Gabriel456 (talk) 19:29, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

well, i believe it would be something similar to Indirect Concept Manipulation, as instead of controlling the concepts yourself, you would control the embodiments to control it for you. well, also not all embodiments are concepts or extremely powerful, some might just be embodiments of places and objects. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:28, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

well, you could, though i think you should ask kuo's permission again and explain why. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:40, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

I think the best would be to think the power through beforehand, rather than start it on a vague idea. Like, "opportunity" in which sense(s) ? What forms would it take in practice ? What would be its core possibilities and limits ? What would be the clear distinctions from similar powers ? What special perks/edges would it offer that other power users don't have ? What kind of character types would the ability lead to ?

All these questions are essential to shape the power into something one, and notably to figure out beforehand if it has sufficient logic, usefulness and uniqueness to make it a success, and justify a page of its own.

DYBAD (talk) 11:27, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Rank Promotion: doable

Effect Multiplication: see Quantity Manipulation

Beginning Inducement: this would do what? in practical terms.

Concept Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:21, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Event Manipulation, especially Event Rearrangement.

Beyond concept would be Unreality Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:33, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think so. Tsubasa16 (talk) 15:24, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

have fun. Gabriel456 (talk) 17:49, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Avatar Manipulation
This is as crazy and brilliant a power as they get. Never would have thought of it. If one can control reincarnations, life and death cycles and spirituality, why not avatars? Very cool and original. Kusarigama (talk) 12:04, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

I'll have to go with way too focused with this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Only working on one power isn't enough? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:58, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Wish is singular concept. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:56, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Planetary Life Force Manipulation: related to Ley Line Manipulation?

Accelerated Mind Development: sub-power of Accelerated Development

Shock Inducement: shock as in electricity or scaring them?

Surface Generation: as in Platform Creation or Surface Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:23, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

Planetary Life Force Manipulation: doable

Accelerated Mind Development: doable

Shock Inducement: isn't that Fear Inducement?

Surface Manipulation: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:38, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if that is really worth it, but meh... go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:48, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

don't normal Motion Manipulation already does that? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:06, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Phenomenon Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:34, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Description Manipulation = Definition Manipulation?

Enhanced Attack/Defense - doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

So basically Limitation to Definition Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty sure we don't have that, so have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:18, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

Wallrunning Limitation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:37, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

May not be able to run on totally vertical surfaces. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:56, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Evolution Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Manipulating/causing/removing Reactive Adaptations? Just environment feels bit limited. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:40, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

"Manipulating/causing/removing Reactive Adaptations?" --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:41, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Then you can go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:58, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Mark Manipulation - too specific.

Ceiling/Floor Manipulation - if you can think one word to cover those both on page-name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:01, June 6, 2017 (UTC)