User blog comment:Cursed warrior 343/Nex/@comment-30766268-20170507124435/@comment-30766268-20170507142708

That kind of idea is interesting, but making someone who's power is simply to become stronger as long as the enemy is strong, wont really helkp in the omnipotent argument. I mean, it's like trying to enforce rules on someone who's power is to control the rules. it just doesn't work.

granted, there are ways this lpot can go well, but I doubt it would be with such a power.

for example, i am writting now a story.

I still didn't came to that part in the story yet, but at some point I am going to present omnipotent beings from all the omniverse, such as the presence, and TOAA, and stuff, and to make the MC become one and surpass all the other omnipotent beings, and making that on all of that, two massivly beings, one is a meta anti-god named dracula, and the other is a patapotent being called ankseram, watch (they do a horrible job in that, which lead into the doomsday).

so, in the way I am doing so, i explain that ni the term of omnipotence as infinite power, and how it can work by making it with bigger infinitys, and using the inaccesible numbers such as Teta, and go to the higher, rulesless states, such as 0=1, which is the patapotence.