Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-27077671-20190227195625

The orange duck 42 wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: Retrorge wrote: The orange duck 42 wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: The orange duck 42 wrote: Retrorge wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: Retrorge wrote: Yeah, I also think that omnipotence is the strongest power available. POWER, not ability. If you take the word ability into consider, omnipotence is the second best ability. Omnivastance, as I told you, is using not only power, but also knowledge and presence. If you knew everything what happens in existence, we might also know omnipotence's weakness. But we can't, since we AREN'T omniscient. An omniscient person would know what an omnipotent person would do next, how he'd do it, and how to tackle it. There is no major difference between 'power' and 'ability' for you to even claim either of the two are different and can make your made-up term better than omnipotence. In fact, by viewing omniscience as a power, it only puts it under the omnipotence branch.

To quote Holokami, "if you think you've grasped something like omnipotence, then you haven't grasped it at all. " An ability is an entire category. Powers go in it, and nothing other than omniotence is the best power. If you take the other two categories in abilities, i.e. knowledge and portation, then when all  of them combined can give the best ability possible. Imagine being able to control all the 3 best powers in existence (omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence), and trying to fight a person with only omnipotence. YOU'D win, since you'd have infinite knowledge of how to defeat that person. Even if he does kill you, you come back in literally NO TIME since you're Omnipresent. You'd have enough knowledge to know how to kill him. And since this omnipotence is just fiction, we can defeat it by using our T.V. remotes. If the power to defeate it is held in our t.v remotes, does that mean Author authority is better? Or mabey it would be viewer embodyment. omg, do you not understand that every ability listed and not listed in this wiki, as well as everything boundlessly beyond that, is already in omnipotence? yes, Omnipotence has all the powers on this wiki, but something like Author authority has omnipotence, thus having all the powers on this wiki. this also goes for metapotence, logic defiaince, Omnicreator, and a few others as well. so now I think the anwer to the original question is.........

'''nothing beats Omnipotence, but some things are equal with it. '''

Of cource, all arguments on this thread have been logical soooooo

LOGIC DEFIANCE FOREVER

you can't argue against logic defiance because arguments are based in logic. That"s what I'm trying to say. omnipotence is still on the equality with other powers like omniresence and omniscience, but just try to COMBINE all of them. Try to imagine them like numbers, Omnipotence, Omnipresence, Omniscience, are 1s. while Omnivastance is 2. Since the three powers are all equal, if all of them fight with each other, it'll cancel out. since [(Omnipotence-Omnipresence)+(Omnipresence-Omniscience)+(Omniscience-Omnipotence)]=[(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)] = 0+0+0 = 0. But any of them with omniotence will die out. as 2-1=1 See, you should just stop because you don't even know what omnipresence nor omniscience is. Omniscience just knows everything, omnipresence is just being everywhere, they in no way, shape, or form stack up to omnipotence at all.

The fact that you try to limit omnipotence to numbers in the first place is why you fail. very true. Omnipresance and omnisentience were NOT any of the powers I was refuring to.

the powers I refure to are things likea absolute arsonal, which has EVERY power, efectivly being omnipotent. the only thinys that can equal omnipotent beings are omnipotent themselves. some powers grant omnipotence. Omnicentience does not. Omnipresence does not. that is why Omnivastience has not been added. because it is just omnipotence. Quoting myself: "Having Every Power =/= omnipotence, that's just complete arsenal." "Omnipotence has every power on the 'absolute unsurpassable scale'. That's what you fail to comprehend."

And it's omniscience, not omnisentience. And no, some powers grant nigh omnipotence, a virtual omnipotence, something that is practically omnipotent, nothing truly makes you omnipotent unless you're omnipotent from the start. So again, you're trying to limit omnipotence in a sense just so you can get your madeup term to be true.