Talk:Nonexistence/@comment-32122220-20181002092025/@comment-32440156-20181007122951

Also, in my inference the nonexistence which I and DYBAD are talking about is probably the state which remains after the entire totality including nothingness itself is erased/destroyed. So, according to me when nonexistence is used against a user of nonexistent physiology it transforms them into this specific nonexistence essentialy erasing them.

Also,following the same logic when nonexistence is used against an embodiment of nonexistence then nonexistence(the one which I described above) itself is changed such that it doesn't have any embodiment essentially erasing even an embodiment of nonexistence.

Also, I stand with others that as absolute destruction is the destruction counterpart of nonexistence, nonexistence is much more superior to absolute destruction in any and every aspect.