Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-26429591-20170613035456/@comment-31492050-20181230223303

I will copy the text that responds very well to the paradox I had typed in a discussion. First text

First, Omnipotence is an Attribute that transcends literally everything, to logic, and humans. It makes no sense to use human means to analyze omnipotence, since these attributes transcend absolutely everything. But it is possible to believe whether it exists or not. But if it's to be used, you have a right way to do it. Applying something that can analyze divine perfection. Second, every Almighty has all the divine attributes including the infinite, that is, that God is INFINITE, NOT LIMITED and NOT LIMITABLE, that is, there is no limit, so that God has no limits,There is no logic to limit God, being that e is the attributes themselves, that is what the divine simpliciadde says.I ask you, does the literal infinite have a limit? If so, then why is it infinite?, remembering that God is the infinite itself, and this kind of infinite goes beyond a simple numerical infinity..

Third, I bet you are using classic / trivial logic to analyze the omnipotence attribute. Which is a big mistake for several reasons. classical logic is limited even for us humans, porting we created several kind of logic, such as Paraconsistent Logic(and paraconsistent logic excludes the principle of non-contradiction), intuitionist logic etc. Now let's go to the proofs that classic logic is quite limited. there is something called true paradoxes, that is, they really exist in real life. Among them is the paradox of the liar(and also has the enhanced versions, so it has not been refuted).there is something called true paradoxes, that is, they really exist in real life. Among him is the paradox of the liar (and also has the enhanced versions, so it has not been refuted).There are even paradoxes in mathematics, such as the paradox of russel.

Even after all this, you can point out that omnipotence is contradictory, so it is impossible to exist, right? WRONG. Electro, Foton are subatomic particles, and s one of its many characteristics is that they are particles and waves. Omnipotence is impossible to exist because it is something contradictory, so why do these "particles" exist?. "translating" the wave / particle duality into our reality, we have the schrödinger cat . At one particular event, the cat is alive and dead at the same time. this is a way of knowing how absurd an electro and a photon in quantum physics is.

The obvious, an omnipotent transcends up to logic, and can not be limited by it, because of the infinity attribute.

Fourth, With all this true / real paradox, it would be impossible to analyze with classic / trivial logic. Then it was created the paraconsistent logic

If you analyze omnipotence with paraconsistent logic, logic may be possible even within logic. And out of curiosity, It was decided at the first congress of logic and religion that God is a Paraconsistent Being(PDF file).

Now if neither Logica nor the universe says that omnipotence is impossible to exist and even in the universe there are contradictory "objects" and even in mathematics the paradox exists. And they are still real things in our world. Why would omnipotence be impossible? Please, I ask you to prove it with sources. Whether omnipotence exists or not, this I can not really prove, because it is the same to prove the existence of God himself, something that is impossible for obvious reasons. Thank you

Second text

​​​​​The problem is in using a logic that is very limited and uses to limit God (a being that has infinite as one of the attributes).

God was said to be a being a paraconsistent being, by the Congress of Logic and Religion. because this logic excludes the principle of non-contradiction and therefore refutes the paradoxes.

another argument. he is using logic to limit a being that is beyond logic, which is already flawed from the beginning. I still argue with logic, showing how omnipotence could exist even within the area of logic. I still argue using logic, showing how omnipotence could exist even within the area of logic. Logica serves only to validate some argument, but does not say whether it is true or not, how much more rules how things should be. Several things in the universe defy logic, it will not be a concept with extreme limitations that prevent omnipotence from existing.

All bases for this paradox were refuted as absolute. If you think it was not, then prove that this is absolute even to God and refute the cases I quoted in the first text (including subatomic particles , paradox of russel., liar's paradox, and paraconsistent logic . which refutes classical logic and the principle of non-contradiction,the schrödinger cat .), all these cases refute the principles of the paradox of the stone, if in the Universe already has "things" that refutes, por que God  would not be beyond mere paradoxes?, remembering that there is a huge difference between trivial paradox, and paradox dialetheims( dialetheims(dialetheims shows several contradictions that exist in the real world, and I repeat is not because something has a contradictory feature that will not exist). here we can see uses forparaconsistent logic, being that it is fundamental for high-level artificial intelligence(PDF File) Thank you and good morning Thank you and good morning