Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30137764-20161023004736/@comment-30137764-20161023030603

Wait I'm confused, I've seen many people on this particular forum ask questions about powers. But you did not approach them, what in particular makes my topic any different? It seens straightfoward "Questions and Answers" it's not a recap it's just simply asking about the limitations of absolute access if it is good or bad. This is no different then someone saying "Metapotence bs Omnipotence".

What's the point of a questions and answers forum if you can't even ask a question about a confusion you have about an ability? I guess my concern is, what exactly is the point of this forum? Is it a questions and answers forum or is this a Vs Forum? Because people ask about a particular ability role all the time and they are fine but somehow mine is different. I already elaborated that this is not a recap post.

The question was "shouldn't an absolute access being forgo the limitations of being unable to access other locations because thsy are accessing them? Or is it another issue" It was a question. That I kindlu wanted an answer to or possible discussion. But the way you word it makes the entire concept of a "Questions and Answers" forum onscure, never have I had a problem like this on other wikis so why is this one so different? Because it seems rather unjust and selective on personal reasons of what is a "proper question" and what is not when the forum headline makes no such distinction.

If what I'm saying is a blog post than multiple other topics jere are practically blog posts as well. But they get proper answers. Blog posts are more analytical and this is simply a question. Otherwise what determines a blog post is quite "broad" from your explanation.

I did not know you created ot but that has nothing to do with my question being asked. In fact you did not answer it all you basically dimissed it as a blog post even though I asked a legitimate question on a question and answers page. I must sincerely say that this is unjust whether you created it or not means people can't still make questions about it? In fact if someone else came and answered my question and we had a discussionvit would still follow Q&A guidelines. It would not violate anything yet you insist it does saying that I essentially recapped when the "recap" was a sentence and ignored the question of the second portion. Again you didn't even answer my question.

Essentially what kinds of "questions" can be asked on a "question and answers" page that does not dictate what can be asked. Especially since I can"t write a blog about something I do not know... Which is why people come and ask on this forum yes? Because if someone can easily answer it why did you choose to not answer it and engage in discussion if it was a simple answer? All I did was ask a question about absolute access so what is the problem?