Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30737595-20170404140029/@comment-29375707-20171029212004

In all the examples you have used, they acknowledge but ignore. Suggsverse for example considers that a character can transcend omnipotence. But from the point that omnipotence has been transcended, there is indisputable proof that it was not real omnipotence. The meaning of the word does not depend on the author, but on semantics.

I wanted to send a link from my post just for now, that I can not continue because I'm busy with academic work. Tomorrow I'll be back.

w:c:vsbattles:User blog:Kevyn Souza/Omnipotence: A Bit of Philosophy