Talk:Omni-Manipulation/@comment-4714517-20180315062428/@comment-32360249-20180401015220

I read via the page & how the power is preformed. My argument is if a character does not actually display this ability, or if the character listed is not actually classified or stated using this ability exactly what support does it have? Nate Grey is described using Psychokinesis so how is he Omnikinetic? Because a term is made to I guess "better" describe an already existing ability, then my initial statement was true, Omnikinesis can be an alternate title for Psychokinesis. But is this actually power referenced, no. Anything beyond matter that is moved telekinetically is in fact done psionically. Firestarter psionically manipulates flames; Carrie telekinetically tosses a chair across the room. Iceman psionically manipulates temperatures to create ice. Nate Grey telekinetically pulls dust particles together, & psionically bends the light around them to create a 3D Holographic construction. This page is extending the use of Telekinesis, but Telekinesis even in its greatest form as seen by Jean Grey has never accomplished of these feats with her telekinesis, nor has Nate...so with lack of support, & the power already existing & being defined I am just not sure why this term exist. I am really not a fan of misleading information.

Don't get me wrong, I do like this Wiki, it gives me insight about a lot of character I seek info on when it comes to abilities, BUT misleading information defeats the purpose. Like, I am getting rebuttals, but none actually attempted to believe or reason with me. Abilities described here, with lack of knowledge, support, & reason, leaves room for plenty debates coming from people who actually know about the superpower. If a creator says a character is "Telekinetic" then that character here should be listed as a "Telekinetic," respectively, not “Omnikinesis”. We cannot make up powers to create better categories for characters, especially when it is such a broad term, like this one. You can elaborate, but it's not fair to mislead others by making up terminology & vaguely describing it. It's credibility that you lose, because without a valid character, clear description, & general example what proof does the power carry. As an Admin I'd hope you understand, & respect that. I would not go to a Marvel, DC, or Naruto Wiki & expect false or misleading characters, terms, or powers by the means & defense of a fanboy.