Talk:Indeterminacy/@comment-25716369-20161022211433/@comment-25716369-20161022214447

Omnipotence Theory (Speculation): Generic Omnipotence declares a character within their work of fiction to be the supreme being. If Omnipotence is the final power, then what is the power of the author who writes the work of fiction? Naturally, they are the true omnipotent beings, but what about the characters implemented that are declared Omnipotent by the author? Who is the real supreme being here?

Take a work of fiction being controlled by an author. That author has absolute power over their work of fiction in every sense. They control what is and what isn't, what exists and what doesn't, and what happens and doesn't happen. Now imagine the what-if scenario of the world of the author being nothing more than another work of fiction being controlled by an author of a higher power. Every rule that applies in the first author's world would be because of the bigger author.

Continuing from that same ideology, what if the bigger author was also in a work of fiction being controlled by an even higher author? And then another world beyond that? This "Omnipotenception" would bedrock us from ever being able to grasp the final point in which the world just is. In that case, it is easy for one to assume that there would be an infinite amount of verses that scale atop of one another. Indeterminacy is the concept that there could be a final being beyond all others, but that being we would never know. A point where one can go no higher. There are no concepts beyond this because if there were, the user would already transcend them all. As such, their overall power, reason of existence, and place of being is utterly unknown.

That was the capabilities of the sort of "Super Indeterminacy" I was planning on typing up. Although, I've never actually looked into the Suggsverse myself.