Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5693502-20191005130202/@comment-43971197-20191006033655

Arquetion wrote: I know what I said, it's just that it seems unfair that they are judging and giving a verdict on the new bureaucracy when it is just beginning with its new position.

I don't talk about you Bydad since you are a bit more reasonable than other people who criticize the new bureaucrat without giving it a chance. It's DYBAD, adn thank you ^ ^

Well, we can't deny that Sage has a huge history of unnecessary arguments and edit wars with others users, so we can't reasonably blame them for being real iffy about the notion of him being in charge of the Wiki.

If it was a one-way decision, I would honestly agree with them. Too big a risk to take if there is no way out later.

Thing is, that's not the case. The revolutionary uproar right now can be done all over again anytime. No deadline.

So why not give it a chance first, and see how it plays out ? Seems much fairer this way, and we can afford it.

I just don't get the panicky feelings and critical urgency flaring up everywhere. It's not a now-or-never situation.