Talk:Absolute Unarmed Combat/@comment-5693502-20180821223703/@comment-5693502-20180823230440

Ahahaha, that's my line !

Actually, you haven't actually explained anything, so let's get into it. You say, "the user is the pinnacle of hand-to-hand combat". Well done Arquetion, you understand the Absolute Unarmed Combat power. https://images.wikia.com/deviantserpent/images/2/23/Clap.gif

Since you understand this power so well, tell me: in regards to the Absolute Unarmed Combat power, how proficient is the user in terms of weapon wielding ? If your answer was #2, then you're talking about Absolute Combat. That much is very clear if you read the page.
 * 1) Not as good as they are at unarmed combat?
 * 2) Equally as good as they are at unarmed combat?
 * 3) Better than they are at unarmed combat?

If your answer was #3, then you're talking about a yet to be created power (which would probably be called something along the lines of Absolute Weapon Proficiency). Also, you'd be either delusional or inane.

If your answer was #1, congratulations, you've inadvertently agreed with my point.

Just being the pinnacle of unarmed combat does not automatically make one stronger than weapon wielders too. The same principle also works in reverse. If one is the pinnacle of both then my limitation obviously does not apply. But if you flip the scale one way or the other, my limitation becomes as clear as day. Not to mention, the keyword in the sentence is "may"; being able to defeated by a weapon wielder isn't a given thing, only a logical possibility.