Talk:Omniscience/@comment-35836648-20180627175452/@comment-30766268-20180627205858

sage, again, that's the whole point.

I understand what you are saying, but this is standing as opposed to the whole concept of this power.

at this point, we are basically argueing about two powers which contradict each other, because one is to seperate everything, while the other is to be seperated from everything, so in theory, it should be seperated from the concept of seperation, and from the range of effect of the user of seperation.

as i said in my original answer, if it can somehow destory (or in that case, seperate) omnilock from the concept stand behind it, depends on the writer and setting, it should work on omnilock.

but then again, we are stuck in a corner, as omnilock is written to be immune for that.

by the way omnilock is being written and defined, it should be immune to seperation, even if seperation stands at the core of this power.

since we both pretty much repeat the same answer over and over again (both me and you sage), I think it is better if we would just agree that in theory, it could happen (seperation seperating omnilock), but from the way omnilock is written and defined, it shouldn't happen.

can we agree on THAT?

also, pokemonfan, yeah, you really need to stop spamming pages.

just stick to one at a time, and don't just post messages, reply them on the same comment chain.