Talk:Omniverse Creation/@comment-4867780-20161110061733/@comment-4867780-20161110080503

"Nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything is transformed."

That's how the real world work, so it can be reasonably applied to fiction as well. Please stop affirming stuff as if they were proven facts, when it's so obviously not true ^ ^; "Creation" is just a mental construct, every single field of practical science ended up disproving it, so far the Law of Conservation has proven absolute.

So we have good reasons to assume it also applies on a greater scale of space and time, rather than the opposite. In this realistic perspective, the Omniverse would have always existed in one form or another, each state born from the previous one (see the quote), spanning endlessly in both the past and future.

And (global) creationism would just be a compensation mecanism born from our technical inability to go back a certain point in time (the Big Bang in our case, which is assumed by some to just a turning point of a pre-existing cyle : Big Bang => Expansion => Retraction => Big Crunch => Big Bang => Expansion => etc.).