Talk:Absolute Death Inducement/@comment-1760947-20140524042334/@comment-11326848-20140524045612

That's not a universal law, it's a stupid assumption you made to simplify things. A terrible cook can become better, but if he lacks the drive to do so and does not try, he won't. The laws of reality in works of fiction are not necessarily the same and just because one is different, it does not mean the others will follow. By definition, yes, an immortal who can die, is not really an immortal. In this wiki, however, it's acknowledged that the dominance of one Omni/Absolute powers (such as Unavertable Death) over another (such as Absolute Immortality) is based on the author's decision. Just because one creator decides immortals can die in his work, it does not mean the idea of immortality itself is rendered nonexistent in every other work. In addition, we're talking about works of fiction, where logic does not need to apply. Quantum tunneling could mean absolute shit in fictional worlds.

Omnipotence is the sole exception of Unavertable Death? It's clearly stated Amortal users would be unaffected. Besides, Omnipotent users aren't an exception because they have a death-defying ability (that would be the variant called Complete Arsenal), they'd be an exception because they're all-powerful.