Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171003142429/@comment-32056628-20171130182429

The term omnipotent has been used to connote a number of different positions. These positions include, but are not limited to, the following:
 * 1) An Omnipotent is able to do anything that it chooses to do.[1]
 * 2) A Omnipotent is able to do anything that is in accord with its own nature (thus, for instance, if it is a logical consequence of a deity's nature that what it speaks is truth, then it is not able to lie).
 * 3) Hold that it is part of a Omnipotent's nature to be consistent and that it would be inconsistent for said Omnipotent to go against its own laws unless there was a reason to do so.
 * 4) A Omnipotent can bring about any state of affairs which is logically or illogically possible for anyone to bring about in that situation.
 * 5) A Omnipotent is able to do anything that corresponds with iwhatever it wishes
 * 6) Every action performed in the world is 'actually' being performed by an Omnipotent, either due to omni-immanence, or because all actions must be 'supported' or 'permitted' by the Omnipotent.
 * 7) Omnipotence does not require a requirement nor proof of existance.