Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171003142429/@comment-29564364-20171030195543

@Nekron2 First, I already told you that my argument is not based on the demonstration of a Author Authority user defeating an Omnilock user. It's based on the following premises: If you're not going to attack any of those three statements, you're just wasting our time and energy on a straw man of my argument that you built yourself.
 * 1) All fictional characters are part of their respective work of fiction;
 * 2) Author Authority users have the same authority over the work of fiction they appear in as the writer of said fiction;
 * 3) The writer's authority over their work of fiction is total and absolute, overwriting even the likes of omnipotent power users.

May I remind you that not one event can occur in a story without the writer's, and by proxy the Author's will? A user of Authority Manipulation couldn't usurp Author Authority unless the Author willed it in the first place. And even if they were to allow it, the Authority Manipulation user would just become the new conduct for the writer's will, a.k.a the new Author. The power of Author Authority would have been merely transferred, not defeated. My argument still stands with all the weight it always had.