Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30160565-20171230205913/@comment-31951741-20180116171622

I never thought that the "Couter Omnipotence" we speak of was another Omnipotent, that was just some random suggestion you came up with that is still flawed, the law of non-contradiction doesn't have to apply nor not apply, if 2 beings can assert their will over the other being without their consent their not Omnipotent no matter what way you try to work around it, ITS JUST COMMON SENCE (they can break that law all they want, it means nothing the outcome of how this works is still the same). it was supposed to be another power that could counter Omnipotence, not Omnipotence VS Omnipotence (which is impossible, like, its basically a rule of Omnipotence that you cannot beat it, that's the sence I was taking about with Omnilock, not with "another" Omnipotent being, but some new impossible power)

Also your limited human understanding of an impossible situation like this and how to beat it would​ have you thinking "Well why not just put something of the same type up against the "Singular" Omnipotent being AKA another Omnipotent being" but that just dosen't work, whether you believe in creation or evolution you have to admit that humans are not capable of understanding ANYTHING​, because apparently we are THE GREATEST RACE TO EVER EXIST which is just mindless arrogance at that point and is (from what I see) how you see things, thinking we could outsmart a being like God if he does exist: "Besides it's clearly not the case since we were the ones who conceptualized it in the first place." You cannot say that for ​ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY​ because most of history WAAAAY back in time has been frogotten throughout the mellenia, and some things may have not been passed down, so you don't know if God said to someone that he is "Omnipotent" and explained what it meant: WE JUST DON'T KNOW, so you need to stop stating things like you know it for utter sureness.