Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-24975288-20140809171550/@comment-5265497-20140812093620

"Not denying anything but adding factual evidence" Just using one scan to override what every other scan shows is denying evidence. " 1st if you read it was to see which side was better Good Or Evil so again you failed at this argument." Yeah, except that this is exactly what I was talking about. First of all, he should know all points of history to know everything about the benefits and flaws of morality and immorality and not have to design a test to show it, and most of all, he shouldn't even have to run that test if he already knows the end result of the process so the whole event was essentially superfluous considering his omniscience.