Talk:Logic Manipulation/@comment-24053170-20180627040943/@comment-36525220-20180809183335

“One can answer [the Fermi Paradox] by saying intelligence is very rare, but then it needs to be tremendously rare. Another possibility is that intelligence doesn’t last very long, but it is enough that one civilization survives for it to become visible. Attempts at explaining it by having all intelligences acting in the same way (staying quiet, avoiding contact with us, transcending) fail since they require every individual belonging to every society in every civilization to behave in the same way, the strongest sociological claim ever. Claiming long-range settlement or communication are impossible requires assuming a surprisingly low technology ceiling. Whatever the answer is, it more or less has to be strange.”

With that being said; nothing is sacred/true, everything is permitted? If logic is considered something sacred or truely unmanipulative, then if it has nothing to do with..."nothing", it therefore is a falacy. Logic is purely subjective anyways. I can understand if it's a necessity for something like a ruler to measure where the limit is, but with the concept of Infinity around, it pretty much debunks Logic. What's left is Moral and how interactions with moral are. This pretty much sums up...life?