Talk:Causality Reversal/@comment-26946502-20150831171108

Oke so I don't really get it (yes I know I'm stupit ;) ) but I think it is one of these two

1, if you were to kill someone with this ability then you could for example dicide to have him killed with a knife. The moment you use this ability the person you wanted to kill dies of an knife wond (effect B) but the knife is nowhere to be found then 2 minuits later, after he has pasted on, you strike him with a knife at that exact spot (cause A) Reversing them literaly.

2. If you were to kill someone with this ability than you could for example dicide he should die at 13:00. The moment you use this ability this death is set in stone (Effect B). no matter what happens the person will die at 13:00. So there will automaticly be a cause which is not set in stone but has to happen in order to cause the death. meaning that effect B is already dicided before the cause revercing them metaphorically. (a little bit like death note only it would have other uses too)

I'm conflicted between these two because of two things

1 "The event looks completely normal to onlookers" that would inply that reasing 2 is the right one as everbody can see somebody being staped even though there isn't a knife in the 1ste one and that wouldn't look normal to me.

2 but by the Gallery we have "Gae Bolg reverses causality so it pierces the target's heart before he throws it"   which would imply reasoning 1 instead because ther is no spear.

Could somebody tell me if either of them is right.

PS: Sorry for my bad english