Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-36227321-20181129211133/@comment-24729606-20181211023624

While I, in turn, can see why you (with all due respect) might be confusing transcendence for a tenth dimension being there is only crucial difference. A transcendent being (however powerful they may be) only transcends boundaries. A tenth dimension being (which I must reiterate my uncertainty about whether using the term being is even appropriate for such things) is simply EVERYTHING from EVERYWHERE in the multiverse/omniverse in one. to put it another way science has long sought a single Grand Unified Theory that will describe, explain, and elucidate the entire universe. If such a thing were one day discovered that would be transcendent knowledge (because it even example phenomena that at the time of its discovery were unknown). But if a Grand Unified Theory existed that could explain phenomena outside our universe then that would be a step towards tenth dimensional knowledge. Unfortunately such a formula (if such a thing even exists at all) would virtually without doubt be so complicated, paradoxical (because the laws of physics we are familiar with will no doubt differ from universe to universe), and esoteric that even the most illuminated mind would mind it maddening to explain that its discovery would be very nearly pointless. If I have failed to explain myself well than it is because I am drawing on examples of a grand scale to symbolize the concepts I am attempting to elucidate and not out of any desire to confuse, dishearten, or disenfranchise anybody.