User talk:Count Vlad III dracula

When you add to Users, series should be in italics. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:26, February 23, 2017 (UTC)

You added Alucard to Omnilock, series (Hellsing) should be in italics. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:18, February 23, 2017 (UTC)

Oh, OK, I didnt known it is troublesome. I would change that. unless your point was that he also shouldnt be there.

When you add to Users, series should be in italics. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, April 16, 2017 (UTC)

ok. I will remember it if I would ever edit again.

Italics (button on top in Edit, second from left with I), not "quotes". --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:56, April 17, 2017 (UTC)

shit. sorry, I thought you meant ".

When you add to Users, series should be in italics. Third warning. Two more and you're taking little timeout. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:44, April 21, 2017 (UTC)

there wasn't any place to put those in there.

Ithought that was a diferent type of editing.

You are welcome :) Imouto 14:44, May 4, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Arigato gosaimasu, Imouto tan.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 14:46, May 4, 2017 (UTC)

Into already existing Gallery?

As I use only Source to Edit I can't really tell how to do things outside it, in Source it's obvious as the whole thing is in text. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:11, May 22, 2017 (UTC)

yeah, I want to add pictures to some of the already existing gallerys, but every time I try it doesn't work.

do you know someone who know?

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 16:19, May 22, 2017 (UTC)

When you post, add the Signature-link (button on top, tenth from the right, looks like writing) at the end of your message. I'm not answering to anyone who doesn't do so.

Mostly crime against good taste. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:27, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

I dont think I understand exactly...

isn't the point of sadism embodiment IS fro it to be as such?

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 14:31, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

You really need to ask? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:16, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

ok...

I saw someone did something like that on another picture there, so I don't really understand the problem, but ok.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 18:25, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

So? That has nothing to do with it. Its still a valid power based on the capabilities.

If we only added powers based on the applications that exist the on the power itself, then 90% of the pages would be empty.SageM (talk) 19:04, June 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

You can still have the almighty science page without adding into it the dual warping. Just let in there any power who can be obtain by this omnipotent science manipulation (which is essentially every science manipulation power exist, which have no connection to magic), and you would have a full page of applications. I mean, seriously, name me five applications which are nesseserly in the applications of this power which have something to do with magic, so they don't qualify (except for dual warping). If there aren't that much, then there is no real problem to just remove that. Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 19:45, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Meta concept manipulation can be achieved through science manipulation, as you manipulate the concepts of science, and as such, you can manipulate irrational things as you manipulate the fundimntal principles of science. Omniphysics manipulation isn't manipulate all kinds of physics.i don't see any connection to magic and physics manipulation. Omnifience, again, it's can easily be achieved through biological transformation and concept manipulatin

Sci-fi is essentially imaginary advanced science. Again, what is it have to do with magic?

Transcendent science is science on a divine level. Still, it's science. Not magic.

Omnipotence is not an application. It's the resolt.

I don't see how almighty link must be through magic.

The same with almighty assection.

Almighty object manifestation is seems to me pretty obvious as something who connect to science manipulation.

And ultipotence is Quite make sense, because it doesn't give you omniscience, so you would eventually be ultipotent if you wont have omniscience. But it's like stating omnipotence, which does not even there, so i have no idea why you mentioned that one.

Science magic accendensy posses in it almighty magic, almighty science, and even fucking 'pataphysics manipulation. Dual warping posses something which on its basic posses those things. And how can you say it have nothing to do with magic and then say it's like programming reality in fantasy/imaginary means and normal/rational means like how you would program a computer, and still doesn't get it have to do with magic??? Fantasy, do you have a better way to explain fantasy then magic?

Yes, I said science magic accendensy posses almighty magic and almighty science.

I did read all of them, and trust me when I say I have a LOT of complains about them. Metaphysics and 'pataphysics does not even considers as physics, so I have no Idea why they are there. Absolute wish can be achieved through Science manipulation. Just build a machine who warp reality, and bam, you've got an absolute wish. Or do you think I am wrong about that one? I never understanded how the hell science magic accendensy is part of transcendent science, it made no goddamned sense, it's essentially a power inside A power, inside a power, inside the first power. How is that even possible?

Didn't saw the magic transcendence and omni magic in there, thanks for mentioNing.

If you don't want to argue, I am fine with that, but in this wikia there are to many holes In powers, and it really confusing at first, and annoying later. Is it too much to ask to just making order in everything? Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 21:33, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

That's sounds like a pretty lame excuse to let it be so messy. What kind of wikia is it if all the pages are mixed up? There is a reason why a lot of people are confused here in the comments sections. Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 21:41, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Even in the most irrational and ireasonable chaos, order always found. Apply logic to fiction is not what I ask though, what I ask is to apply order to the so called order. This is a wikia. Be whatever it is it's content, it's still a wikia. It suppose to be ordered, no matter how ireasonable her content is. Why is that TF sounds weird to you? Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 22:11, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

If you're going to argue about religion, then you're going to get your account temporarily banned, that's all I can say. ChocolateElemental (talk) 14:21, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

ana all I have to say is that it's not an argument of religon, it's about simple facts about how the character is writen.

let's assume he is not real, and let's concider him as a fictional character for this matter.

point me for ONE point in the bible when God was all about forgiveness and love, and didn't solved any of his problems by smiting the person who was responsible for the situation.

If you can point for me about a single point in the bible that happened, I would leave this argument, and won't have any problem with that.

but if you can't, it means to begin with it's something which based on nothing.

It's like saying in that case omnipotent beings have weakness to chees.

why?

who cares, I just decided that.

If there is no proof about a characteristic of a character, then you can't use that on that character.

that's all I'm saying.

What does "Megaverse" cover ? From my understanding, "Multiverse", "Verse" and "Fictional Continuity" are all synonymous. DYBAD (talk) 20:56, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

dimension - a spesific amount of space, considered as a saparate realm from other realms (kind of a vague explanation).

universe - essentially a dimension, just on a colosal level of space. billions of galaxys can exist in a universe. the diference between dimension and universe is usually simply the size.

multiverse - a group of universes who create together a verse. parellal dimensions/universes exist in the multiverse.

megaverse - a group of multiverses. as exchange to the multiverse, between the diferent multiverses in the mega verse there isn't really needed any similarity, while in the multiverse all universes share a lot of imagination.

omniverse - all fiction and existance. DC, Marvel, Image, LOTR, Star Wars, DBZ, the real world we live in, you'r mind, every thought of yours. the omniverse is everything. every singal thought of you'rs is an entire universe of it's own, with you as the omnipotent God-Creator of this world. every story, every fan-fiction, EVERYTHING is in the omniverse.

too put it on a cosmic like hierarchy, here it is:

dimension=planet/star (doesn't really matter for this point

universe=solar system

multiverse=galaxy

megaverse=galaxy cluster

omniverse=the entire universe.

does it makes it clear enough?

there was never, there isn't, and there would never be a valid, non fan-fictional character who would have any omniversal level powers, and in fact, even those which are fan-fictional have the least power on others, because all they can control are imaginery copy's created by their creator, and in any way could actually control something omniversally.

manndrax, being put as the picture of omniversal destraction, is invalid, as he planed on destroying the DC megaverse.

The glory can control simply over all the realms in the doctor who verse.

It's called omniverse simply because until recently, when the term omniverse has been established as the collosal amount of EVERYTHING, people used it to simply refered to all their fiction, all the diferent dimensions they created.

corrently, omniverse is not valid to this. omniverse now is all and everything, without considering who it's belong too.

don't hate me for that, I did not invented that bullshit.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 21:57, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome ^ ^ I realized something was off during a discussion on the chat, and decided to update the definition so it would properly reflect its "screw-logic Omnipotence" core spirit. DYBAD (talk) 00:06, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

thank you for that

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 00:15, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

I made Nex's Arch Nemisis: Lastuis CerbexCursed warrior 343 (talk) 23:19, August 1, 2017 (UTC)

Misspelling. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:19, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

ok.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 18:23, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Neither of them are users.
Neither Toshiro nor Gray can manipulate the concept of ice, they are limited to Esoteric Ice Manipulation only. So don't add them again.SageM (talk) 23:09, August 23, 2017 (UTC)SageM

after gray took away from invel his magic, he was able to use normal, demonic, and conceptual ice magic.

toshiro is capable in his new bankai to manipulate conceptual ice as well.

why can't he?

He was able to freeze a concept.

that's seems enough for me.

Toshiro didn't freeze anything, Gerad was totally immune to his power. It only looked like he was frozen.

Toshiro never had the power to freeze concepts, if he did then the series would have ended right there. He froze energy yes, but thats not the same thing as freezing concepts.

And Gray cannot freeze concepts or even manipulate conceptual ice.

Neither one are users, and they never were.SageM (talk) 23:23, August 23, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Also if gray truly had the power to manipulate conceptual ice, then he could have easily defeated Acnologia without any help. But he can't.

Gray is limited to ice make magic and ice devil magic. Thats all he has and all he ever had.

Please don't make stuff up thats not true.SageM (talk) 23:27, August 23, 2017 (UTC)SageM

gray couldn't use this on acnologia from a very simple reason.

it's MAGIC!!!

and except for a nakama x machina bullshit, no magic works on acnologia, as proved when even a space time magic wasn't able to do anything to him.

who makes things up?

toshiro froze gerard's sword, and at the same time froze it's ability to return the damage to the oponent.

when he froze gerard, you can see it was painful for him.

but you know what, let's say he doesn't have that.

but to say gray doesn't have after saying invel have is pretty stupid.

invel himself said it.

the reason why grey was able to beat him was because he molded invel's ice with his own, making invel's magic part of his own magic. that way he also combained his ice devil slayer magic and invel's ice magic together and beat him up.

Read the fairy tail wikia on gray, he really doesn't have that power.

And toshiro can only freeze matter and energy, he can't freeze concepts or other conceptual properties. If he truly could then he would have been able to defeat Gerad's Miracle power. In fact he would have been able to defeat Yhwach or all of the other vandenreich if that truly was the case.

Nobody defeated Gerad, because they couldn't. He was only beaten via power absorption as nothing else could hope to kill him.

Toshiro does not have this power and he never did. Also freezing light is not the same as freezing a concept, plus light can be frozen at absolute zero if its successfully trapped first, so its not really an example either.

And Gray's powers are clearly listed on the Fairy Tail wikia and he never had or gained invels powers. He merely manipulated the Ice Kamui of Invel, which was weak against maker magic. He never actually manipulates conceptual ice at any point during the fight with him or any point afterward. Also if he truly could manipulate conceptual ice, then why didn't he use it against Zeref instead of risking using the Iced Shell again?SageM (talk) 23:58, August 23, 2017 (UTC)SageM

fine.

I personally think they coulify, considering the fact grey did molded his magic, and considering hitsugaya was able to freeze the ability of his sword.

as hitsugaya said "I froze you'r hope". he practically froze one of the aspect of the power of the miracle.

also, why didn't he then just froze gurard?

maybe because he couldn't use it anymore?

at the point he first activated it, it was clear as day it won't last very longer.

after gurard was insinirated by senbonzakura, he was barely able to even stand.

and while runing away from gurard, which turned o that... thing, I kind of doubt he could have freezed yhwach.

basically, to me it's seems like they can coulify in that page, but if you disagree, then I don't really have any word in that, don't I?

13b. Give the pic real, descriptive name, no random string of numbers/letters or image, file, etc. This is for making the pic easier to find, so name of the User, power, etc. is ideal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:20, September 22, 2017 (UTC)

oh...

that was a picture I saved long ago, and called it that way.

I didn't even noticed the name, I just uploaded that that way...

sorry...

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 13:31, September 22, 2017 (UTC)

Anu pic needs to be changed.
I reverted the picture of Anu you uploaded because it changed the one from Omni-Embodiment which is not the Anu from Diablo.

If you wish to use that picture your going to have to upload an entirely new one. So don't change it back again.SageM (talk) 21:41, October 1, 2017 (UTC)SageM

I reuploaded your picture of Anu with a different name so you don't change the original one back-

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/powerlisting/images/1/16/Anu_1.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20171001214905

Please use this picture for your blog instead, as the one on Omni-Embodiment is not meant to be changed.

thanks for your time.SageM (talk) 21:52, October 1, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Oh, OK, sorry...

I'll give a different name to the picture tomorrow, when I can... --Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 22:01, October 1, 2017 (UTC)

"jibril"? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:30, October 7, 2017 (UTC)

jibril, an anime character listed under absolute intelegence. she is that angel with the pink hair from "no game no life" in the gallery.

she posses a lot of knowledge, but nothing on an absolute level.

if she is considered as absolute intelegnce, then aizen and urahara easily takes the cake.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 15:50, October 7, 2017 (UTC)

13b. Give the pic real, descriptive name, no random string of numbers/letters or image, file, etc. This is for making the pic easier to find, so name of the User, power, etc. is ideal.

http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/File:7341b892516b6222ac1f8f7093afbd7c.jpg is deleted because we already have the same picture and duplicates are annoying. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:45, October 10, 2017 (UTC)

What?

I just uploaded that form the internet.

I didn't gave it any name.

I just saved it as it is.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 17:59, October 10, 2017 (UTC)

Ancalagon has never proven he is powerful enough
Except that Igneel and Acnologia have proven the reason they count.

All Ancalagon the Black has going for him his Dragon Fire. He literally has no other powers or skills that even come close to the level of a transcendent dragon. The only impressive thing he could do is destroy a ring of power, thats literally it. Nothing more.

Thats it, Unless you can find him performing some feat such as reality warping, other powers besides dragon breath, or something else that would be shown him being a transcendent level being. Then no, he doesn't count.

Acnologia is virtually unstoppable and has easily defeated characters who should have been his equal at least.

And Natsu using Igneels power was able to harm and nearly kill Zeref who is an Absolute Immortal. Not to mention that the second time Natsu used the Fire Dragon Kings power, Zeref was enhanced by Infinite Magic Power, and he still managed to defeat him. And remember that Natsu only gained the Fire Dragon King Mode after his encounter with Igneel, so it was in fact igneels power that did all that.

He was also able to briefly overpower Acnologia, which nobody else in the series could do. And even Natsu couldn't harm Acnologia without outside help.

Until Ancalagon does something similar, then he is not a user.SageM (talk) 23:36, November 3, 2017 (UTC)SageM

then one quesiton:

since igneel is considered a transcendent dragon, is that means that pre-time magic acnologia is also a transcendent dragon?

because if so, then the only thing that put the two of them as transcendent dragons is their immense physical strengh and fire breath.

and if that's the case, acnalagon, which his fire is so strong it might even destroy the one ring, and he was so massive that his fall crashed 3 mountains and caused an entire countinent to sink, would defentially be more coulify in the physical strengh term.

Also, We have no idea if natsu would have really been able to kill zeref with igneel's powers.

All we know is that he eventually defeated him via his nakama power.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 23:41, November 3, 2017 (UTC)

No, Ancalagon's breath would never be able to destroy the One Ring, and this was confirmed several times in-story and by Tolkien himself.

All Ancalagon could destroy with his dragon fire is one of the rings of power(in other words the rings given to the elves, dwarves and men).

No flame, no matter how hot could destroy the One Ring except for the fires of mount doom it was forged.

Ancalagon has never been a user, now or ever.SageM (talk) 23:45, November 3, 2017 (UTC)SageM

ok.

Though the main damage done to zeref by natsu was with his nakama fist, and it wasn't the fire king flames, rather, as he said in himself, the fire of his emotions.

The same with acnologia, they beat him with this shitty kind of deus x machine.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 23:56, November 3, 2017 (UTC)

In fact the Lord of the Rings wikia itself states that Ancalagon wouldn't even be able to harm Sauron's Ring.

The only beings that could likely destroy Saurons Ring without the help of Mt. Doom are Eru illuvatar (As the supreme being it would be easy for him) and Aule (whose forging skills are the greatest in all of middle-earth and beyond, and who is the only being who greater then Sauron at forging. and thus could easily unmake the ring)SageM (talk) 00:03, November 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Actually it was the Fire Dragon Kings Flames, As it was the Fire Dragon King Mode he used to defeat Zeref. Read the FT wiki if you want proof.SageM (talk) 00:03, November 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

I believe a more valid source would be the manga and not the wikia, where they say it was the fire of his emotions.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 00:06, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

Not really. Since Natsu was in Fire Dragon King Mode when he fought Zeref that time.

Besides if you were paying attention he actually calls his attacks with the fire dragon kings name. Meaning that he was in fact using FDKM during that entire fight.

And it was Zeref that called the attack the flames of his emotions, not Natsu.

Zeref wouldn't really know were the power from those flames actually came from. He only thought it was the flames of emotion.SageM (talk) 00:13, November 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Zeref already knew at that point how the fire king flames feels like, after the first match with natsu.

but this time, those flames were able to, basically, "punch the god" out of him.

It was NOT the normal flames.

Even if they were used with teh fire king flames, that wasn't what eventually carb stomped zeref.

This is fairy tail.

You don't need to try to find a clever, or even a simple reason for why natsu won.

He won because nakama power.

When in fairy tail you see the enemy saying that this is the power of their emotions, they mean to that in a literal way, not a metaphorical one.

This si how zeref was defeated, how acnologia was defeated, and how many other villans were beaten up in fairy tail.

and even if you say these were ONLY igneel's flames, nothing more, nothing less, zeref addmited rigth afterwards that he would jsut heal from that, and it can't really kill him.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 00:19, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. The rules are clear. No real life examples allowed.

It would have been removed either way. All real life examples are removed regardless of who they are or even if they fit the power.

Thats just the way it works here. Sorry if you don't agree. The admins tell this to users all they time when they add real people to the list.

if you want to get blocked for breaking the rules then go right ahead. I am just trying to prevent that from happening.SageM (talk) 23:21, December 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

oh, ok.

I always thought it was just a thing that most users are fictional, so its more suitable.

Didn't knew there was a rule here that spesificly said that it is forbidden to use real life examples.

thoguh it's kind of sucks, considering the fact that this guy is pretty much the most badass person to ever actually live...

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 23:26, December 13, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah we do have a rule for it-

10a. No real life examples.

The rules of the wiki can be viewed from the main page, as that's where the link to it is.SageM (talk) 23:31, December 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

ok

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 23:33, December 13, 2017 (UTC)

Oh, Ok. I understand. Though I still don't see the need in that. After all, at the end of the day, they ARE omniscient, aren't they? Isn't that form of omniscience simply means they won't know what they don't want to know, so technically, they can know everything, but just chose not to? Because if so, then, at the end of the day, there is no real difference between the two forms of omniscience.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 20:44, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

13b. Give the pic real, descriptive name, no random string of numbers/letters or image, file, etc. This is for making the pic easier to find, so name of the User, power, etc. is ideal.

Also: really crappy pic, got anything better? --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:31, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

I honestly just saved it as it was. nothing more.

so then I would just give it a better name then...

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 15:18, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

I meant I own a copy of Anime and the Light Novels.

Its not that hard to understand. Thats what people usually say when they say they own something after all.SageM (talk) 20:59, February 15, 2018 (UTC)SageM

ok, sorry. for a moment there I understood from your sentence that you own this anime. like, as it's under your ownership.

I am sorry.

forget I asked, it was just me not understand something you said to someone else, and then I just burst in and asked...

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 21:01, February 15, 2018 (UTC)

how one can achieve absolute existence?Idan6487 (talk) 11:58, June 19, 2018 (UTC)

it varies:

one can achive absolute existance, by, say, ultimate understanding of science, allowing them to, via scientific methods, manipulate reality and existance and giving them absolute existance.

it can be via magic, ultimate magic giving yourself total control over oneself.

it can be a blessing from an omnipotent being.

in a sense, absolute existence is self omnipotence.

having complete control over your existance on every level imagineable, including conceptual level, to the point you are practically an omnipotent god, because you chose to be.

in real life there is no way to achive such a thing, but in fiction, again, you can achive it either as a result of almighty science/transcendent science, almighty magic/omni magic, a divine blessing, universial manipulation, or omniverse manipulation, omniverse embodiment, etc.

there is no coherent, solid, "easy" way to achive such a power, which is exactly why it is quite rare in fiction, and all of it's users are usually omnipotent gods.

hope it helped.

Count Vlad III dracula (talk) 12:23, June 19, 2018 (UTC)