Talk:Perspective Manipulation/@comment-5895842-20121230080141/@comment-4867780-20121231142300

Enough with the criticisms Kingsman, you are no les sturborn than I am. If you can't come up with anything good, then just admit it and come back when you're ready. It's DYBAD, by the way.

And who ever said that LM was the "canonical version of Omnipotence" ? Never saw anything even remotely looking like that anywhere. And "universally accepted" ? Now, you're blatantly indulging yourself ^ ^" This is all pure fanon interpretation, so it doesn't weight any more than my (very reasonable) analysis of BM's possibilities.

And Possible/Impossible and the likes are effectively "boundaries", not "excuses". And the feat issue again... Can/Cannot : pick whichever you want. What part of it isn't clear ? Oh wait, "excuses" again, right ? Nope. "Boundaries". You're the ones who are clearly looking for "excuses" to deny BM's obvious potential.

Anyway, in fiction writers can do whatever the hell they want. They will do anything for the sake of the story - whether it makes sense or not - so even feats are ultimately debatable (I personally saw quite a lot of ridiculous feats pulled straight from nowhere without any possible justification other than "because the plot says so").

Beside, concepts are subjective interpretations (basically the products of our imagination), while boundaries are objective existences (example : the boundaries separating our billions body cells). Hell, they even define concepts. Like, would there even be a logic to manipulate without the distinction logical/illogical ?

What we are doing here is confront viewpoints, so let's make as much sense as possible, and keep the "shut up" / "you suck" aggressive pointlessness in check.

Well, that was long ^ ^ But I did miss a lot, so it's alright.