Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25235588-20190312083513/@comment-34497523-20190324214439

Nekron2 wrote:

well, who said metapotence cant have the knowledge to defeat an omniscient?

As I said before defeating a Metapotent is like defeating an Omnipotent. If a metapotent cannot defeat an Omnsicient that means it has a limit which isnt possible. So, you're basically saying that an Omniscient defeats an Omnipotent which cant be more false. Let me spell it out.

Omniscience - The power to '''know absolutely anything and everything infinitely. By knowing absolutely everything about something, one can understand every counter''' available for that certain something, thus being unable to be defeated by said subject.

Metapotence is not true omnipotence, it may not have limits but it is vastly inferior to omniscience. Omniscience is the totality of knowledge everywhere and can be described as the mind of "god" or omnipotent knowledge.

In your examples your listing characters and other such nonsense, they won because thats how the creator of that story wanted  it to play out. At face value omniscience beats every other power simply because it knows more. An all knowing being is defeated or killed for one of two reasons. A: they were only Nigh Omniscience or B: allowed it to happen for some reason only they can comprehend.

In the simplest terms the knowledge and comprehesion of how such "All powerful" abilities work is known by an omniscient being and can therefore replicate, exonerate, and dominate any and all opposition.