Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-7737174-20130402211149/@comment-25780089-20150703071348

Antvasima wrote: Well, thank you for being so reasonable, although given that there are several definitions of omniverse around, and one of them includes all of fiction and reality, I personally find the term inappropriate, but that is just me.

I also have no idea how different supremely infinite/omnipotent beings compare to each other, as different fictions have their own rules and are seldom precisely quantified. I mean, technically Kami Tenchi could be, say, "ten trillion and one infinite-dimensional", and another omnipotent be "ten trillion and two infinite-dimensional", but how could we, the readers or viewers, possibly know the difference. And it wouldn't be important to the story in the first place. I don't like that definition of omniverse either, it just simply can't exists except by blind belief which of course we can't take serious. I also find the difference between tier 1-A and 0 really strange, although I do see it and understand it. Also for anything being "omniversal", shouldn't that automatically make it a tier 0? Also a "7 - 11 or whatever dimensional omniverse" (if you wanna take that definition) can't be under the chousin when the omniverse encomapases EVERYTHING. So an omniverse should be whatever number of dimensions is the highest in said verse whether 7 or boundlessly infinite