Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-3075077-20161023114858/@comment-3075077-20161025121155

Mike Snow34 wrote:

Vitorriq wrote:

Mike Snow34 wrote: 1. I would say yes; but there are exceptoons such as Illogical Oriented power or beings are real but can forgo truth.

2. Well as in number one, what is true typically dictates what is real. However just like two things glued together, this can separate. Such as controlling fiction which is false but real.Reality and Logic can turn the impossible into reality.This happens because logic is based on mental condition and perception of a being and that differs from species to species. Same with reality. Reality is subjective and Truth can yet cannot be. Forvexample Almighty Law is truth that cannot be gone against. Yet inverse-omnipotence and illogical are real but falsehood anomalies of reality.

I hope I answered your questions though. It is a bit confusing but anything you want me to elaborate on I will gladly do that

Well, what means Illogical Oriented power or beings?

Some beings have an existence that defies logic. Such as Amortal beings or paradoxes. Paradoxes are only oaradixes because they are anomaies of reality. Any anomaly in reality is a paradox or are classified as something else entirely such as being omnipotent, transcendesce, anti-god, etc of course saud beings hokd the power to rectify being one.

Logic relies on mental precepts in order to function, I like to think of it as a tree. At the base is almighty law, the potentiality lordship for all there is and what can absolutely not be denied. Logic that can never be altered such as more than one Omnipotent being or "All is God, God is all". The branches are the encapsulating variations of logic and the leaves are the perception of the logic itsekf. What is definedcas illogical is what defies these 3 logic thresholds.

1. If more than one omnipotent existed that would be a massive Illogical fallacy (this does not apply to an omnipotent who, by their own power is using omnifarious means)

2. If something defies the logic stabding branches such as encapsulating logic of the universe such as a universal truth thatcsays that no man can fly. But there is a flying man. That would be an illogical fallacy because universal truth holds that no man can fly. That does not make the truth false but mereky that there is an illogical fallacy.

3. People have perceptions of what is logical and what is not. That's why they are leaves becayse they fall off easiky and vary widely yet they all perciece in a similar way but are on different branches. If a human being believes that an Omnipotent does not exist but an Omnipotentvreveals himself, this is illogical only to that hunsn being until he corrects his or her own logic. This applies to mainly all beings subject to perception.

As you can see what is logical and what is illogical is based off of what illogical beings and power such as illogical world creation where nothing makes sense, contradict. Mainly we talk about the branches, the Universal law contradiction that determines what is illogical. But the leaves can dictate that too, but since perception is relative and constantly subject to change not much emphasis is placed on it. Thus the branch and trunk are mainstream, the alpha reality's law, they are not subjective as they are universal law. Any contradiction is deemed Illogical until it is fixed or the paw adjusts to the illogical fallacy to make it logical. About other thing. Hey, man, I have a question.

1- A being who is omnipotent, automatically is Absolute? Why?