Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-26993961-20170601153518/@comment-29375707-20170601180003

by definition, omnipotence should also contain the power to have no powers at all? As the "power to have no power"? This isn't a power. It is like saying "the act of not performing acts" or "the state of not having been". After all, if it were a power, it means that it has a power, so it is not "having no power".