Talk:Omniscience/@comment-35836648-20180627175452/@comment-30766268-20180629002336

1. you can't really say that this is only my way of thinking about it, and then give me as an example how it works in ONE story.

this is not how it's being defined.

2. concept=idea.

the idea of principle can be manipulated via concept manipulation, as principle is a concept.

the concept of principle is "a fundamental source or basis of something".

again.

we are in a loophole here.

a principle is a concept.

principle manipulation will allow you to manipulate the principles each concept is made of, and constracted by.

and concept manipulation allow you to manipulate every abstract concept, every word, every idea, such as principles.

by the definition of the concept principle, it is a concept.

you can't even say this sentance without saying it is a concept.

again, this is a loophole.

at the level of those things, it's just overlaping.

a concept constract a principle, constracting a concept, constracting idea, constracting a principle, constacting whatever.

an argument of that kind will never bear fruits because of the fact they overlap in such a way.

to end this whole thing, here is the first line in the wikipedia page "Principle":

"A principle is a concept or value that is a guide for behavior or evaluation."

A principle is a concept or value that is a guide for behavior or evaluation.

a principle is a concept.

it is a concept defining and constracting other concepts.

there is no other logical way of looking into that.

disagreeing at this point is disagreeing with the definition of those words, of those CONCEPTS.

the concept of concepts and the concept of principle.

a concept is WAY too of a broad term.