Talk:Anti-God/@comment-33797416-20190416222734/@comment-33797416-20190513142812

"Yeah I have the guts to say that you don't understand Anti-god because you simply don't. The first line of capabilities say that the user is "primordial void". Now send me a screenshot where it is written that Rex Mundi is a primordial void."-If i don't then what about the dumbfuck that put nekron, amatsu mikaboshi and the scarlet king as users. Watch yourself. I have already told you that the wikipedia page for catharism states that rex mundi is the evil version of god. Back off.

"Omnibenovalence isn't a necessary condition for MD. You are trying to tell me that Chakravartin is Omnibenovalent? I don't have words to describe this and wouldn't try to. I ignore this."-I never said he was omnibenevolent, but neither is he malevolent. He understands the neccessity for Balance, which is the least possible thing any MD should have.

"The very link you send me about Omnipotence says that the synonym of Omnipotence is all-powerful."-Sooo...

"Also, I removed Ultipotence because I directly undid your previous edit." Omnipotence means tthe user also has omniscience, and this page suggests that most anti gods bend more towards true ignorance.

"The last thing about Omnipotence. Can your dictionary definition answer this question- " If Omnipotence means unlimited power, can an Omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that not even he can lift it? If not then that being isn't Omnipotent, if yes then too the said being is not Omnipotent as he cannot lift the stone he created".This is called the Omnipotence paradox. This is there in the very Wikipedia link you send me and I am damn sure that you didn't read any of the history or etemology written on the page. It is due to this and numerous other paradoxes that Omnipotence has a special status and philosophy and fiction alike has multiple viewpoints on the power. No one is overcomplicating thing, it's just the dictionary definition is too vague and gives rise to paradoxes.So, nearly all fictional continuities have different viewpoints of Omnipotence. The Ben 10 franchise defines someone as powerful as the celestasapians as Omnipotent, Marvel defines beings who are as strong or stronger than Galactus as Omnipotent (use the marvel wikia) and similarly we also have a viewpoint on Omnipotence. So, due to the vagueness of the dictionary definition, Omnipotence has a special status and this word has been debated over 1000 of years which in turn gave rise to numerous interpretations of the term."-Thats nice and all, but you still have not told me how you reached the conclusion that there can only be one omnipotent being. Don't hide behind marvels skirts when its obvious they don't even know its definition.