Talk:Perspective Manipulation/@comment-5296722-20130101113809/@comment-5296722-20130103043858

Thats your opinion, an opinion known as philisophical skepticism. Rene descarte argued that all knowledge did not originate from the senses using deduction to come to his conclusions. Renes "I think there for I am" statment meant that  someone does not need to use their senses to determine that they exist, thought alone proves ones existance.

David hume on the other hand developed bundle theory which says that nothing is beyond the realm of sensory imput going so far as stating that your own existance is in fact an illusion, directly contradicting descartes cogito ergo sum.

The issue is pointless to argue over anyway. If rene is right it only means that a user of this power cannot make 2+2=fish only the human interpretation of 2+2 would equal fish the true meaning would still be 2+2=4, basically the mathmatical principle is unassailable. If hume is correct then this power would outstrip all others including NE and true omnipotence since the only thing that truely would exist is bundles of sensory information and this power would control the bundles, therefore giving the user absolute control of all existance. The effects would be the same only the process would be different.