Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-29521428-20190219111845/@comment-24729606-20190220195356

I admit this outercreational power scale (if such a nomenclature can be used for such power) is new to me but I would say that rather than being on an outercreational scale True Omnipotence would be one level below outercreational power. omnipotence means being all powerful but that is a contradiction because being all powerful is something nature does not allow. even the most powerful deities (those of the Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam for example) encounter problems with beings they brought into being (whether or not such problems were part of some grand plan is not a question I wish to get into for reasons of delicacy and the inflammatory nature of such discussions). but outercreational powers or power (as such a thing would almost by nature and/or necessity indivisible) would have no such vulnerability. in fact if I were to metaphorize outercreational and omnipotence I would do so as follows. regular knowledge is finite, limited, and imperfect but if such a thing as absolute knowledge (knowledge about which no doubt or confusion could exist) were possible then that would be outercreational knowledge. all this being said I feel it necessary to point out that power (however benevolent and well meaning its possessor may at first be) changes those in possession of it. having COMPLETE power would make anything one does with that power little more than a means of passing time without end and thus of such triviality that the act itself would be beyond futile.