Talk:Anti-God/@comment-33797416-20190416222734/@comment-32440156-20190506104247

See, Omnipotence has multiple acceptance all around the world and what SageM is saying is our definition of Omnipotence. This site has a specific definition and criterio of Omnipotence which may/may not be accepted by other wikias and/or groups. For example in ben 10 franchise Alien X is described as Omnipotent but by our standards he is barely nigh Omnipotent. Similarly, Chakravartin from Asura's wrath is also regarded as Omnipotent but once again by our standards, he is weak Nigh Omnipotent being. This is because the standards of Omnipotence is different everywhere.

These are our standards of Omnipotence-

1) The user can do everything including things that are beyond logic. 2) The user is absolutely invincible and completely perfect in all possible and impossible ways. 3) The user is Omniscient and Omnipresent, if not then the user is Ultipotent 3) Finally, the user is "above all" and has no equal. If there is an equal to the user then user was never Omnipotent to begin with even if the previous criterias are fulfilled.

This is our stance on Omnipotence and if a being doesn't fit even if one criteria then too that being isn't considered Omnipotent by our standards ,no matter how many other sources claim that the said being is Omnipotent. This is reason why even Azathoth who is revered as one of the strongest beings in entirety of fiction is only Ultipotent by our standards. Also, everything I said is not only written in the Omnipotence page itself but also written in the very Rules of the wikia.

So, no matter whatever link you send which claims that "there are more than one Omnipotent being in this faith...", by our standards, there will always be only One Omnipotent being in per faith/fiction and if in any faith there are two or more top God's of equal power, then by our stance on Omnipotence, that faith has no Omnipotent being.