Talk:Definition Manipulation/@comment-31908363-20180705100710

Isn't a definition a description of the meaning of something? Shouldn't this simply just enable the user to manipulate its interpretation, which is done by manipulating interpretating systems? How does it enable the manipulation of identity? Isn't information (such as physical, cognitive or binary info) the identity (or rather, specification) of something? Shouldn't that, in a similar manner to prob. control, enable complete control over everything and anything in existence?

Sorry for all of that rambling, its just that i don't think this ability shouldn't logically enable control over identity (the basis of an entity's existence), it should logically only enable control of interpretation. Sure, this can be used to produce illusions and also control knowledge to some extent, but other than that i am confused.