User talk:CrystalStorm51

Yeah, why?RnR (talk) 02:32, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Burn is a manga series created by Camilla d'Errico. Quite a fun read.RnR (talk) 02:35, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help on the titanium page!TheKaiwind (talk) 00:27, May 3, 2013 (UTC)TheKaiwind.

Already covered by other powers and way too narrow. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:34, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Please add signature next time. I could ques who wrote, but I've hunted the writer few times from Recent Activity and that isn't fun, so generally I only give one warning before ignoring all contacts from same writer.

Disguise Mastery covers it already, might need some expanding though.

It's a bit subjective concept, and frankly there are some powers that go way beyond the line but are kept because they are Silly Powers. Basically it's a power that could as easily be dealt by adding a line or two into some other power: a new Limitation, Variation that only differs by single detail or something similar. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:20, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

well thats nice to know

Decided to return the favor by editing your gravitational adaption page.TheKaiwind (talk) 00:44, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

You'd asked me why I did that, this way you know the reason already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:20, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

That was deleted because we already have Energy Duplication Gabriel456 (talk) 22:37, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Wrath Aura
There is already a Wrath Aura, and Anger Aura conflicts with this. (CNBA3)(talk)

hey do you want to keepm your right to remain anoymous. If so then go to my blog "Bringing Back the Right To Remain Anonymous   and give a simple yes.

Phase Manipulation
Mind adding the power in question next time, trying to remember which one of the all I checked/edited isn't that easy.

My bad, I remembered that Cycle Manipulation did this, we do have the policy of removing repeat pages.

That said, your page needs massive amounts of work, and since you made the page, you get the first shot. For one, most of the Applications could be as well mentioned in Capabilities: "from mental, social, evolutionary, etc phases" comes to mind as an example. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:15, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

event manipulation
yes. it could be like an absolute version of event manipulation. like an omniversal version. i say go for it dudeDr solar (talk) 03:22, January 1, 2014 (UTC)dr solar

I would believe so. RnR (talk) 05:28, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah go it.RnR (talk) 05:30, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

If your power is different enough from existing ones, I would say it's okay. But you should ask one of the admins if you're not sure, like Gabriel456. DYBAD (talk) 21:24, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 21:36, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

It's great, good job on it! Gabriel456 (talk) 23:06, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Gabriel456 (talk) 23:11, January 1, 2014 (UTC)

Good work ! Inspiring idea and well written page :) Simillar to Meta Probability but more restrictive (manipulation of events in existing realities, not redefinition of anything at any moment), which is good as it respects the integrity and rules of the story (more immersive) while shaping events to your liking. DYBAD (talk) 00:52, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 01:41, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

it's good, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 01:04, May 20, 2014 (UTC)

Class System
I'm not the creator of the power but no, I don't think it would work that way. Jobs in the way it's mentioned is referring to classes that are simply called 'jobs' in certain games, not actual jobs in real life. (MrTibTibs (talk) 02:07, May 23, 2014 (UTC))

I'm not sure (not my page), but my guess is that "Class System" only bestows roles/classes, and it is these classes that bestow the corresponding abilities (mage, warrior, priest, rogue, etc.).

I think that's already what Class System is about : bestowing "jobs" that grants "abilities".

er, what would it do, exactly? Gabriel456 (talk) 03:27, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 03:36, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

That seems like Probability Manipulation itself, or perhaps a negative use of Quality Manipulation. DYBAD (talk) 23:57, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

Discretely compromise the quality of the building to to be fall appart on its own. DYBAD (talk) 01:00, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

No real tie, just an alternate interpretation. DYBAD (talk) 01:28, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, its possible. if you watch the final season of the bleach anime, there is a character with a power called Jackpot Knuckle that manipulates probability, and makes parts of a building that shouldn't fall apart for a long time start to fall apart. So yes it is possible.SageM (talk) 02:17, January 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

yeah, pretty much. They can increase/decrease the likelihood of those things Gabriel456 (talk) 03:15, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, I got your message, sorry. Yes, Probability Manipulation would most likely cause that. Smijes08 (talk) 01:01, January 26, 2015 (UTC)

I did, but after all the questions I kinda lost interest ^ ^; DYBAD (talk) 02:06, January 27, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Sure. As long as such a circumstance is possible in a situation. Even if the chance is unbelievably low, a user of Probability Manipulation can make it so the bottle will stay in place by increasing the chance of it doing so.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 21:08, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

I think you should ask the one who made Probability Manipulation Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Um... I guess so.

If it is a likely phenominon, the users of this ability can increase and decrease the likelyhood of such a thing happening (beyond the capacity of any normal person can, anyway). Erebus Elysium (Replacement Account) (talk) 16:17, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

It isn't the wind the user is controlling, it is how effective the wind is against the resisting object the user controls. Erebus Elysium (Replacement Account) (talk) 16:27, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Sure! what? --CNBA3 (talk) 00:41, February 2, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Probability Manipulation is the manipulation of outcomes or events of possibilities and what is most likely.

Ex. You have a stake knife slicing through a thick metal bar and you manipulate the outcome to make it so you can cut it.--CNBA3 (talk) 01:42, February 2, 2015 (UTC)

For the first part, yes, that's exactly it. As for the outcome question...I have absolutely no clue Gabriel456 (talk) 17:58, February 5, 2015 (UTC)

No worries. ^^SageM (talk) 04:09, February 10, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It manipulates the likelihood of something happening, whether by reducing or increasing it. The user can start chain-reaction that ends up with the result they want or otherwise cause something they want to happen happen in future. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:42, February 10, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not Gabriel456 (talk) 02:34, February 11, 2015 (UTC)

Alphabetical order please. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:27, February 11, 2015 (UTC)

You didn't go for probability (which includes luck), you went for luck (either good or bad) which is part of PM. I think you might be interested about Luck Energy Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:34, February 14, 2015 (UTC)

Bit like what Black Cat (Marvel) does? That'd be luck Field. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:59, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

Might as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:04, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

The first part, yes I think so. No clue about the second part Gabriel456 (talk) 01:33, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

It's possible, since they merge with it Gabriel456 (talk) 12:16, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

Response
The use would still be able to move even if the user merges with an inanimate object because the user still possesses their own features such as legs.

--CNBA3 (talk) 03:06, March 13, 2015 (UTC)

That depends of the 'verse. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:45, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead and ask, and I'll try my best to answer Gabriel456 (talk) 02:34, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not. I don't see a reason why they couldn't merge with smaller objects Gabriel456 (talk) 02:42, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

It's alright, and you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 03:21, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not Gabriel456 (talk) 02:15, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

The first one sounds abit like Equality, but the second may be doable.Gabriel456 (talk) 02:43, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

Returned, put some work on it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:00, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

No his/her/etc. use they/them/etc. Add Categories. Alphabetical order on powers. Cut the infobox/first description smaller, Capabilities is where you tell what the power does in detail, those two are for short description.

That enough? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:13, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

i only changed the:Anything to Any Object.since you put it as a sub-power of object manipulation,and because of what is writted on the capabilities,it's only about objects,not anything. L12345 (talk) 00:21, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

it is interesting,although i think you should change the name to fit more to being a sub-power of object manipulation,since part manipulation it's to vague L12345 (talk) 00:58, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

If it wasn't, I'd done something to it. Might need rephrasing, but someone gets around to do that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:11, May 12, 2015 (UTC)

the infobox name was wrong,it was writed Ancestral Evocation, so i Replaced the Ancestral with Descendent. L12345 (talk) 01:57, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

it is a cool power L12345 (talk) 02:00, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

Alphabetical order on powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:46, May 17, 2015 (UTC)

well,technically,depending of the user,i think it is possible make a opponent have that kind of weakness. L12345 (talk) 00:06, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Yes, this power is to give their targets' weaknesses, they can apply a weakness to their powers, their physical forms, etc.--CNBA3 (talk) 01:08, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

I really have no idea about that, never thought of it before.. Gabriel456 (talk) 15:36, May 20, 2015 (UTC)

i think it most likely depends of the user L12345 (talk) 02:42, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

any relation to Centrifugal Force Manipulation?

Otherwise, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 01:00, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

Your idea...
There is already a power like the one your thinking of. Hyper Rotation.SageM (talk) 01:07, June 3, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go ahead if there's enough differences between it and HR Gabriel456 (talk) 01:45, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

Considering that Sound Manipulation is one of the Applications, what do you think? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:50, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

Pretty sure that wasn't me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:27, June 4, 2015 (UTC)

Your page
Your page was deleted by Twinklebeast. You can easily find out who deleted what by looking at the deletion log by going to See All Activity on the recent wiki activity page.SageM (talk) 22:47, June 4, 2015 (UTC)SageM

All it does is manipulate the spin direction, that is all it does, so no. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 01:34, June 5, 2015 (UTC)

I suppose you can. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 01:37, June 5, 2015 (UTC)

As in  go ahead try and do it, if it doesn't fit I'll tell you why it doesn't fit and remove it. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 01:41, June 5, 2015 (UTC)

That's actually pretty good question... returned. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:41, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

hey flame,actually i have a user for that Aurora Manipulation you is planning to do. L12345 (talk) 02:10, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

it is from VC,like that one i put on your Pyrotechnic Manipulation. L12345 (talk) 02:48, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

sorry,i don't understant what you said,what do you mean with that? L12345 (talk) 03:28, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

well,i don't know,i think that is because i like to much the game,because i love things like mythology and gods,and since on there have a lot of gods and sacred animlas/monsters from several different mythologys i really like that,and i also like that thing of angels and demons,ans since on there it puts all together,make me really like the game. L12345 (talk) 04:04, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Depends on what it does. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

So basically manipulation of what Aurora Generation creates? Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

ah,this is because VC is a Japanese Card Game,so obviously all the cards are in Anime Style,and on there,all cards are female (even the ones that are male gods on the normal mythology,are goddess on the game,that is another think i like on it) L12345 (talk) 23:55, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

well,she is not a god or anything like that,she is the maiden of eternal darkness,and enemy of light that blots out the sun,and as you can see on her cad image,she can manipulate auroras L12345 (talk) 00:02, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Experience Manipulation
Pretty Much.SageM (talk) 22:39, June 14, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Yes. And can I say: When you make powers, can you try to at least find one user. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 01:44, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 02:05, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

what is it? Gabriel456 (talk) 14:33, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

I mean absolutely no offense, but the manipulations are kinda getting ridiculous. We really don't need a manipulation power of every obscure thing in the universe. Again, no offense intended, sorry if I sound aggressive.

Other than that, Invulnerability Negation sounds good to me. I think it's valid enough for its own page Gabriel456 (talk) 14:43, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

You're quite welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 14:56, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

no, sorry, I have no idea Gabriel456 (talk) 15:15, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

Depends on what I'm supposed to do. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:31, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

Gabriel pretty much said it above. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:38, June 17, 2015 (UTC)

What is it?
Sure, what is it?SageM (talk) 22:31, June 17, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I guess, though I suggest asking gabriel and kuopiofi first.SageM (talk) 22:40, June 17, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Yeah I did.SageM (talk) 02:31, June 18, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Can you explain it to me? TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 13:37, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

Well if it's a variation of energy attacks, I am sure it could work. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 13:54, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

Well if it works. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 14:00, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

Manipulation" and
What is "Ice Dust Manipulation" and "ATP Manipulation"? TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 21:56, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Well, do you have at least one valid user for each power? I guess they could work, as long as they don't conflict with other powers. And remember, before you make powers, they need to have a valid user or users. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 22:09, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

ATP Manipulation - I think that's bit too specific. We've got powers that deal with organic life and life-force, let's leave it there. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:35, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Power focused to single molecular structure. How's that not specific?

Not hurt, just pointless. And it'd open door for making pages for every "interesting" molecular structure there is. Take that from someone who's seen that happening. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Monetary Manipulation covers that and more. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:19, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

That'd be Variation. If you can find actual User have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:32, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

If the only thing they can do is using coins as bullets, then no. If they can, for example, use those coins to create effects similar to Attack Powers, then I'd say yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:15, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

No. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:29, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

coins
In what way?SageM (talk) 22:25, June 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Not really. Sorry.SageM (talk) 22:41, June 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

None that i can remember,Sorry,if i remember or find some user,i will tell you. L12345 (talk) 22:57, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Yes. As long as it's referenced properly so people can look up where the power was used.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 14:47, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

yes L12345 (talk) 13:35, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

essentially,yes,you can do pretty much anything you want,as you is controling and can decide everything that is happening,like i said before:``you could also make anything you to happen to happen now,in a reality-warping like away.´´ L12345 (talk) 14:25, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

It's a pretty different kind of power,i liked it. L12345 (talk) 23:40, July 2, 2015 (UTC)

The power looks good. TheTwinkleBeast (talk) 02:17, July 3, 2015 (UTC)

It's fine. Erebus Elysium (Replacement Account) (talk) 02:21, July 4, 2015 (UTC)

Unrestricted Movement
Maybe, not really sure. Since its more about absolute freedom of movement under any/all conditions and in any environment. Its basically the ultimate version of Flowmotion.SageM (talk) 02:45, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Haven't decided yet. I am going to let Kuopiofi check it out before I decide whether or not to add Absolute Speed.SageM (talk) 02:48, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Not quite flight, but it does allow air walking and air dashing.SageM (talk) 03:53, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Basically, though Kuopiofi may decide otherwise.SageM (talk) 04:00, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It says right under the capabilities- "They can move with complete ease on land, air, water or anything else."

If you combine air dashing/walking together with complete freedom of movement it allows you to perform aerobactics.SageM (talk) 23:40, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Well, its definitely interesting....SageM (talk) 23:43, July 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Aside of being essentially "cause damage by being rude"? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, July 7, 2015 (UTC)

Aerokinetic Immunity does much the same.

Closest to it would have been Elemental Negation dealing with air, but I remembered wrong that we had it. Could you care to give a try doing Air Negation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, July 7, 2015 (UTC)

Since wind is movement of air, that's pretty much given. If you check various air sub-powers, techniques, etc. you'll notice that they usually use air/wind as definition.

That should answer both questions. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:17, July 7, 2015 (UTC)

It's a good power,Liked it. L12345 (talk) 00:12, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

In Enhanced Strength Limitations: "May damage environment/other people without meaning or noticing.", if someone doesn't have this one, then they already do what you took whole page to explain. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

I don't think we have that yet (then again, we do have a ton of pages). So go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 01:55, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

gravity defiance
Added the Jet-Bootsu from xiaolin showdown as a known object. since it lets you ignore gravity.SageM (talk) 02:59, July 9, 2015 (UTC)SageM

That'd be sub-power of Unrestricted Movement and Speed Swimming. Go ahead, but remember to add into Limitations that it may be limited to certain types of liquids, like water or magma. And that unless User has immunity to the effects of the medium they're moving in, they're in trouble. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:37, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

Have you considered doing Direction Manipulation or something like that? Because that sound like personal variation of that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:04, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

Good point actually. Maybe make that Isoportation into ability to manipulate personal vectors... --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:00, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

That could work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:41, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too close I think, maybe shift wording of SM a bit to make it contain deception too? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:42, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Could be Association, check some of the Variations/Techniques that affect the user only instead of area. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:11, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:57, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

sounds good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 23:37, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Your idea
I think there is already two powers on this site resembling the power your talking about-

Manifested Attacks and Copy-Cat Attack.

Just thought you should know.SageM (talk) 23:40, July 11, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Actually there are three powers already like your idea, but I don't remember the name of the third one.SageM (talk) 23:52, July 11, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Manifested Attacks and Copy-Cat Attack.SageM (talk) 23:58, July 11, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Interesting idea.SageM (talk) 00:07, July 12, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I guess....SageM (talk) 00:12, July 12, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Yes, just go ahead and make the power. you don't need to keep asking me ^^SageM (talk) 01:24, July 12, 2015 (UTC)SageM

it's interesting,i liked it. L12345 (talk) 02:20, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

Personally, I'd say that it's too close to Tactile Telekinesis. But if you can find enough differences, then it could work but in my opinion, they sound too similar to each other Gabriel456 (talk) 13:41, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

I don't know, I guess but that still sounds like Tactile Telekinesis. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:44, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

yes Gabriel456 (talk) 13:48, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 13:53, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

I think the whole object can be manipulated. As for the other question, I really don't know Gabriel456 (talk) 16:28, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

yeah. Well, so long as it's on the same surface as the user, as mentioned in the capabilities. Gabriel456 (talk) 16:34, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, and you haven't bothered me Gabriel456 (talk) 16:40, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

Yes,i liked it. L12345 (talk) 19:22, July 13, 2015 (UTC)

it's okay,you haven't bothered me. L12345 (talk) 19:28, July 13, 2015 (UTC)

looks good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 00:21, July 15, 2015 (UTC)

It's alright Gabriel456 (talk) 00:36, July 15, 2015 (UTC)

Read it again, those were moved up on the first sentence in Capabilities. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:52, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

hey,i want to ask to you,what do you think about the new power i made? L12345 (talk) 15:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

i'm glad you liked it.thanks. L12345 (talk) 15:09, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

That would definitely go to the "way too specific" category. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:30, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

Mainly because we'd be deluged under more and more specific ones. There's a reason why we've deleted every gem/jewel Variation aside of Diamond after all, and there has been few tries. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:25, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

Basically when it goes too much into details, yes. In all honesty, judging what goes too specific is something like deciding what is art, you know when you see it but explaining isn't easy.

I'd say yes. User could make thing so stable that it's essentially immobile. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:41, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

Well, by making target less stable, yes. Bit tricky thing to do tho', I'd think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Expand that idea to 'Surfing' or 'skating' the matter/energy without board or skates and you have something we need, that's last of the Matter Surfing Applications. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:53, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

If you're talking about the Matter Surfing idea I pointed to you, yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:57, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Which one sounds the better to you, just add the other one to Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:01, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Enhanced Sliding
Lamy does nothing but slide. Her power is the Sliding Curse after all. she can slide on anything for as long as she wants. And sugarboy slides across the ground as his method of travel, and he does it even faster then a magic cycle.SageM (talk) 00:13, July 20, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Judgement Manipulation
The power allows you to make any/all judgements or decisions about anything, and decide what will happen to the target. here are some examples-

1. Decide/judge whether or not you are allowed to love or be together with someone

2. Decide/judge whether or not you are allowed to have, keep or use any abilities/powers.

3. Decide whether or not someone is allowed to live or die, and decide if they will be sent to an afterlife or be reincarnated.

4. Decide whether or not someone gets chosen to do something or has to stay behind.

and etc.

It has many possible uses, the user can judge, and decide or deny anything.SageM (talk) 03:17, July 20, 2015 (UTC)SageM

The target has no say in the matter, once the target has been judged they are automatically effected by the power.SageM (talk) 03:23, July 20, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Basically. Only users of Freedom would be immune.SageM (talk) 03:28, July 20, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Lesser version of Fortress Physiology? Sounds interesting, do you Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

That should do, go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:11, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

it's cool,i like the idea of being able to store something in your own body. L12345 (talk) 00:58, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Got a User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:32, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Sure, what is it?
What is it?SageM (talk) 22:41, July 21, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It could use more information. check with gabriel and kuopiofi first, they might be able to suggest some more info you could use.SageM (talk) 22:50, July 21, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I read your message to SageM but I'm afraid I don't know any users for your power. I'm sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 22:56, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

yes Gabriel456 (talk) 23:23, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

No, sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 23:54, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Its ok.SageM (talk) 00:42, July 22, 2015 (UTC)SageM

looks good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 01:01, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:29, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

of course,what is it? L12345 (talk) 23:00, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

well,you is talking about harihara,goddess of creation and destruction? L12345 (talk) 23:18, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

well,maybe.creation is considered a beginning,and destruction an end, that's actually why one of the also called of creation and destruction embodiment is called The Beginning And The End,that's why i putted her on it. L12345 (talk) 23:23, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

Possibly,but let me ask,how it differ from origin manipulation? L12345 (talk) 23:25, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

well,actually,if i don't mistake,there is a difference between beginning and origin,origin is from where something came from,while beginning is the start of something,so they are kind of differents,so i think that it would work.well,that Rebirth Inducement seems fine to me. L12345 (talk) 00:02, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

ok. L12345 (talk) 01:03, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

yeah,i liked it,it only needs to change harihara description a little to fits more with her description on Conclusion Dominance. L12345 (talk) 01:08, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

Good point, restored. But notice that it isn't environment. Sub-power of War Manipulation more likely. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:16, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Yes. Since it's psychically-based, the user can manipulate an entire object or just the portion they intend by the standards of their own levels of concentration. The user can control the way an object moves by the movements of their limbs, but this is not always necessary. That depends on the user's own skill.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 19:12, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

We're getting way too many of these modes...

Sure. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:00, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

Stamina
Age in his Nodos form as Bellcross from Heroic Age is the only one I can think of.SageM (talk) 22:20, July 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I think that's allowed, yes. . Gabriel456 (talk) 02:41, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

sorry,but i don't know any user of a power like that. L12345 (talk) 15:39, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:24, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

In combination with Enhanced Balance. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:38, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

of course. L12345 (talk) 01:39, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

it's cool. L12345 (talk) 01:50, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

well,maybe,but you should ask an admin first. L12345 (talk) 01:57, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific and I think Unrestricted Movement and Travel Mode pretty much cover that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

That's a bit more like it, but there might still be overlap with powers above. Maybe lesser version of them? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:20, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

What Enhanced Condition is to Supernatural. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Are we talking about something that normal human could do by dislocating their joints or something like turning into elastic matter? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:51, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Check Enhanced pages for basic form and I think there's page about parkour on TVTropes, so check that for ideas. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:57, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Of course Gabriel456 (talk) 00:37, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

it's cool,liked it. L12345 (talk) 01:48, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

I think it's pretty cool, but you word of advice you may need to study your power first. Other then that it's pretty cool.Dragon-Fox 7 (talk)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 03:01, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Are we talking about something that normal human could do by dislocating their joints or something like turning into elastic matter? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

So basically what you could d with normal human physiology, if on higher level. Wouldn't Enhanced Flexibility, Enhanced Dexterity and few others do the same? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:00, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Would it include ability to dislocate joints? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:23, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

So, just fighting or also moving without problems? --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:04, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why not Gabriel456 (talk) 23:23, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Go on then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, July 29, 2015 (UTC)

Its ok, but it could use some work.SageM (talk) 03:19, July 30, 2015 (UTC)SageM

falling from great heights.
Yes, Kaidou the Beast from the latest chapter of One Piece.SageM (talk) 23:36, July 30, 2015 (UTC)SageM

If you're talking about a page for it, I don't think so. But Invulnerability and Enhanced Durability pretty much covers that. if not, sub-power of both.

If you mean a specific user from media surviving a fall like that, I have no clue Gabriel456 (talk) 23:39, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

As I said, I don't think so.Gabriel456 (talk) 23:42, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Just add it as a sub-power of Enhanced Durability, Invulnerability and Supernaturally Dense Tissue Gabriel456 (talk) 23:45, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

Fall immunity is extremely specific version of Impact Immunity, way too specific.

Slithering is returned. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:24, July 31, 2015 (UTC)

as far as I'm aware, fanon powers are allowed as long as they're  sensible enough. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:23, August 4, 2015 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 00:31, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Yep Gabriel456 (talk) 01:05, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

yeah Gabriel456 (talk) 03:02, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Fauna Energy Manipulation - Interesting idea, do you know any users? DC does have something like that, but do they actually manipulate the animal energies? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

That actually sounds pretty cool. We have a lot of animal-based pages, but not one where you control the energy of animals. SDPanthera (talk) 15:22, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Are there others? I think it was brown or red, like they Green. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:40, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Green and Red.

Don't know. Don't care. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:52, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Not sure, we might have it already....
Not sure, we might already have a power like that. Ask gabriel or kuopiofi first.SageM (talk) 23:14, August 5, 2015 (UTC)SageM

We don't have it yet, so I don't see why not Gabriel456 (talk) 23:42, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Looks good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 00:29, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

stellar ring creation
RIngs and hoops are types of discs. so anything along those lines really.SageM (talk) 03:36, August 6, 2015 (UTC)SageM

There's no need to go so specific powers.

Isoportation/Personal Vector Manipulation - How long ago that was and what was is about? Remember that as admin I do quite a bit work and trying to remember everything I've said just doesn't work.--Kuopiofi (talk) 18:44, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

They are essentially same thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:55, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Whether you teleport on place to shift which way you face or do it by switching your vectors, the effect is exactly same. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:58, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Its interesting.SageM (talk) 00:29, August 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:32, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

It manipulates how active things are. That's pretty specific thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

As in: Attraction and Repulsion as separate powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

It's option. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:20, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

You mean like Storybook Mimicrys Immersive-Variation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:37, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

it's interesting, i am surprised that we don't already have it before. L12345 (talk) 01:34, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun with Book Jumping.

Battery Manipulation - no.

Chemical Emission - make that Chemical Creation and don't do any more Emissions, use Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:27, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine Precision - no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:54, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine Precision? Dexterity. And too much nitpicky thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:02, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 20:38, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Implosion Manipulation - that's pretty specific.

Book Manipulation - covered by Literary Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:17, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:25, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

Fine, do your page. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:34, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:42, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

As in bells, including all the variations that are mentioned on the links on the bottom of the page? Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:43, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

Similar power to your idea
Similar power to your idea- Maximum Concentration Capacity.SageM (talk) 01:41, August 12, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Please no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because it isn't power. It's description of action. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

What is concentration? Mental action.

I have vague memories that we have something like multitasking already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because it allows one to use that concentration in ways that are otherwise impossible.

Those seem to be about mental ability, without being able to do things. Might as well do that multitasking. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:05, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

Concentration is bit tricky thing, since you're balancing between making it essentially description to what normal concentration is and MCC. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:49, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

I thought you were planning to do lower powered version than MCC? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:41, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:57, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

heck if I know. Maybe you should send a message to Kuo, and see what he says (it'll be awhile though...I think he's usually off by this time) Gabriel456 (talk) 23:00, August 12, 2015 (UTC)

That's going to be tricky one, especially explaining the powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

If you can pull it out, go for it. Just don't be surprised if there's lot of editing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:55, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

hey, i think i have a user for that Constellation Manipulation you is planning to too, she is the Fallen Angel of the Cygnus Constellation, and as such, can manipulate it. L12345 (talk) 17:24, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

I actually thought that at some point. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:46, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

Might want to check Enhanced Combat if there's something similar just in case. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:52, August 14, 2015 (UTC)

Go on then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 03:29, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

it's cool, i would like to be able to do several tasks at the same time. L12345 (talk) 21:45, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Give it a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:26, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Not really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:58, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Map Manipulation - interesting. Go on. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:48, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

Path Manipulation - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:37, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

your power
Interesting and different.SageM (talk) 21:41, August 18, 2015 (UTC)SageM

you're welcome. L12345 (talk) 22:46, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

For the future reference: if there's no explanation given it's the exactly same reason I've been telling to you quite often: too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Transformation Mimicry - and that would do... ? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Interesting. Variation of Power Replication? Got User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:27, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:46, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Nope. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:14, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Both sound usable, go for it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:17, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Contract Nullification. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Cartoon Mimicry - make that Cartoon Physiology and you got something, just mimicking what cartoon does won't cut it.

Lateral Locomotion - covered by several powers, most obviously Telekinesis. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:15, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Word Manifestation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:05, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Invisible Wall Generation - Go with Force-Field Wall Generation, that's the same idea but wider application.

Teleportation Possession - have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Hello Flamerstreak ! I'm awaiting Kuopiofi's answer, I need to understand his reasons. DYBAD (talk) 01:53, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

So it wasn't just me XD Thanks for your honesty ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 02:27, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

I think we have something like that already... don't quote me on that, but it sounds bit too familiar. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Cephalopod Physiology pretty much covers that one. You could add Variation where User is nothing but head tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Just add Head Physiology and say that User is completely head with not even vestigial body. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:46, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Hey again, Flamerstreak ! As we thought, Teleporting Possession is way too close to Possessive Teleportation to stay. Sorry for the disappointment, and good day to you all the same. DYBAD (talk) 06:42, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Oh no its totally fine don't worry about it. I just was filling in pages I felt were needed. No worries at all. QueenNamina (talk) 08:08, August 23, 2015 (UTC)

Supernatural Speed, Absolute Speed and Supersonic Flying cover that already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:31, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Covered by Architecture Manipulation.

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Number Projection - interesting idea, tho bit limited. Can you think how to expand it? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:12, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Usable ideas, but I meant with letters (no ideas how that'd work, maybe style of writing, what the words means, etc.) or something else. In Warhammer orc constructs that are red go faster because they think they should, as for an example. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:25, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Maybe something on the lines that the appropriate word (maybe even sentence) to the situation, the more effective it is. Alphabet is only one of the letter systems after all. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:25, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

The appropriate word/sentence part? For example using words that describe what the situation is and/or how you want to change it, with the power/effect being greater the better user describes the situation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:41, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Yep. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:41, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

That'd be Skin Manipulation and Skin Constructs. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:17, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Well, if by Prehensile Skin you mean making the skin to stretch and extend from the body to manipulate/attack, that's well worth doing and Sub-power of Skin Manipulation.

Compass Sense - ability to know which way is north/specific direction?

Celestial Light Manipulation - name might be confused with Celestial Manipulation. How exactly would "light from the heavens" be "otherworldly afterlife light"?

I think you might want to check Esoteric Light Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:34, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Prehensile Skin - have fun.

Compass Sense - remember to add it into Compass Physiology. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:21, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

No, thats not the species I was talking about, the species has lots of excess skin that they can control in various ways.SageM (talk) 01:58, August 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Transition Manipulation: Explanation
Transition manipulation is the power to manipulate all transitions, the process by which something transfers from one state into another. here are some examples- Day into Night, Life into Death, Solid into Liquid into Gas, Conscious into Unconscious, etc etc. Existence is full of transitions and this power allows you to manipulate all of them. Anything that transitions in any way you can control and manipulate. Even powers have transition states. Just take a look at all the powers on this wiki and think of how many of them have transition states.

Does that help explain it?SageM (talk) 07:51, August 25, 2015 (UTC)SageM

I think that was never really addressed, as it would depend on the alphabet used. Roman alphabet alone has several versions in use, check here for the various differences. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:26, August 25, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:02, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

Good idea, can't believe no-one has done that yet. Got a name/Users? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:29, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

i just removed a :And. from here:alter the shape and of beings and objects L12345 (talk) 23:59, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

i liked it, i think it would be funny to change the shape of thing and persons. oh, and also, what do you think bout the last power i made? Solar And Lunar Embodiment. L12345 (talk) 00:05, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Specific doesn't always mean it's sub-power of something, it's mostly that it's too narrowly focused on certain area/thing. --Kuopiofi (talk) 03:31, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

That goes into the pointless category. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:04, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Expand that to using sound to generate the effect and you got a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:23, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Wouldn't Time Acceleration already cover that? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Oops, that was supposed to be Flash-Forward, that's more what you were thinking? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:15, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

I'd say F-F covers it pretty much, tho it could use some expanding itself. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:22, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Some level of special effect/Limitation at best, I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:26, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

You mean like being able to blend in with animals, making them think User as one of their own? That'd be doable, but check first if there's anything similar already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:30, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Reincarnation doesn't really mention anything about when the User is reborn, so I added Limitation that covers preincarnation among other possibilities. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:45, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Make that Orb/Spherical Shield or something like that, allowing the user to create spherical shield/defense/wall/whatever of energy/matter around themselves and have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:27, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Well, we do have Egg Manipulation, might be bit misleading... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:43, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Just keep it in broader form, making it egg-only version would be way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:23, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

SdM isn't limited to stardust, it's all "remnants of cosmic substances". --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:23, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

That's pretty specific power, maybe some variation of Temporal Rewind. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:55, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

Something like that, I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:16, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

That isn't enough? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:05, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Travel Manipulation - sounds more like Movement than Travel. Connected to Vector Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Yes, why not. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Torque Manipulation - either we have something similar or I'm remembering from TV tropes... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:49, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

All right. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

It is a little hard to understand the power, but i liked it. L12345 (talk) 22:12, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

hey flamerstreak, wouldn't that Virtual Reality Manipulation you is thinking of not the same that Virtual Warping? L12345 (talk) 22:52, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

oh, ok then. and also, users for that Afterlife Manipulation you is planning to do probably are Deities of Afterlife from mythology, right? L12345 (talk) 23:14, September 6, 2015 (UTC)

Afterlife Manipulation - fine, go ahead.

VRM - several powers get close to it already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Why don't you take a look at it, prove if I' remember right or wrong.

Because none has done it yet. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:13, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

CM - I think we have something like that. Pretty close at least.

Fixated Position - figure out better name (Fixed Position? Movement Negation?) and include user too, with Limitation that User may be limited to affecting themselves or others. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:52, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like an application of Warping Speed or Isoportation. I know that Almighty God Thor from A Certain Magical Index, doesn't physically move when he attacks, instead of physically moving, the world moves around him to put him in place where he can win.SageM (talk) 20:32, September 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Possibly.SageM (talk) 21:01, September 7, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Its possible. though I think Hyper Rotation and Spinning Inducement cover that power better.SageM (talk) 00:58, September 8, 2015 (UTC)SageM

The idea of move in place is gunny, i liked it. L12345 (talk) 01:58, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

1. go for it.

2. Sounds a bit silly, in my honest opinion. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:55, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

That's just my opinion. You'll have to wait and see what Kuo says about it  Gabriel456 (talk) 22:08, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

Figure better name and have a go. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:18, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Well as i said the road's create potential such as giving someone flame manipulation or flightZimnias (talk) 20:34, September 9, 2015 (UTC)Zimnias

Getting way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Weakness of what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

If that weakness would include manipulating/removing it, Property Manipulation covers that one.

Chemical Immunity - we have powers that cover some parts of chemicals, but not the whole. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:49, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:25, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Because.

Optical Phenomena - you mean manipulating what people see? That's Illusion Manipulation.

Liquid Merging - go for it. I think we're missing Gas Merging too... --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:50, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

I see. So, i created it. Let's just say, or could say we both thought of it. WHICH WE DID!

Spine Rip.

Your right. No complaints. But thank you. Sega Fro (talk) 16:58, September 10, 2015 (UTC) Ω

Interesting. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:44, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Its interesting.SageM (talk) 21:52, September 10, 2015 (UTC)SageM

No to both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:15, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Health Swap - already have something very similar.

Angular Vision - too specific.

not be knocked unconscious - sounds usable but I think some powers may already cover this. Not sure tho'. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Which one? We definitely have something that does this to health.

No. But check if we have anything that causes technology to stop working. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:05, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Health Swap

Have fun with technology stopper. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:20, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Well, whatever. Have fun with that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:57, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Sleep Healing - I'm pretty sure we have something that does that, or something similar.

Significance Manipulation - we have Rarity Detection and Rarity Sense, so going that line...

Potion Manipulation - bit too specific.

Tranquility/Serenity Manipulation - when the inspiration hits, finding User could also be nice. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:38, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

hey flamestreak., i think i have a user for that Significance Manipulation you is planning to do, the character can assess (and thus, manipulate) the worth of anyone and anything. L12345 (talk) 04:50, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Name it Rarity (whatever).

I must have been remembering Hibernation... go for it.

Nah for both.

Incidentally, powers with no Users are not common. Talking about your last power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Because rarity is the closest thing for significance we have here. You can ignore them no foul, just thought you might want to use/link/know existing powers that have some connection to your idea.

Might as well go ahead and make Reflex Manipulation while you're at it. We don't have that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:17, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

They are at the least Associations to each others, but you might want to check if Users can actually do those things before adding them to FM.

I think that Contaminant Immunity pretty much covers that idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:54, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:27, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

hey flame, that Picture Manipulation you is planning to do would be a Sub-Power of Camera Manipulation right? L12345 (talk) 02:30, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

So a Application at least? L12345 (talk) 03:40, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Covered by Conditional Invulnerability.

Way too specific. And you asked this from G. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Line for both powers, first line about first power, second about second. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:43, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

don't have sure, but it's a little strange and funny power indeed. L12345 (talk) 01:12, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

don't have sure, we need to see Kuopiofi's opinion. L12345 (talk) 01:35, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

i think drywall manipulation is too specific, but i think Plaster Manipulation could work. L12345 (talk) 01:41, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Reflex Dampening - you mean extends reflex time, making them slower? Tho' you could make it power that allows manipulating the reflex speed in general...

Plaster Manipulation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

No, I said that if you're thinking about making power to slow reflexes, you might as well go the whole length and add power to speed them up as well. Do what you will.

You need to ask? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:54, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

power manipulating rings - Ring Creation/Ring Empowerment got anything to do with that? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

And it does what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:34, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Hey Flamerstreak !

"Pattern" is a rather vague concept. What would "Pattern Manipulation" be like ? DYBAD (talk) 21:29, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

I understand what "pattern" is, I mean what would its manipulation look like in practice ? DYBAD (talk) 22:00, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

So it essentially increases and decreases predictability ? "Predictability Manipulation" seems more suited then, and easier to understand. DYBAD (talk) 22:10, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

I read your messages between each other and I agree with DYBAD that "Predictability Manipulation" may be a more suitable name with Pattern Manipulation in "Also Called". But that's just my opinion.

Other than that, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:35, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

you're welcome! Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late answer, I got highly distracted for a moment. "Predictability Manipulation" with "Pattern Manipulation" as Also Called sounds good to me, just gotta clarify the capabilities so readers may easily understand what the power is and how it works. DYBAD (talk) 00:08, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

I...have no idea, to be perfectly honest Gabriel456 (talk) 00:08, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 00:18, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Arrangement Manipulation is probably best Gabriel456 (talk) 00:58, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

are you sure that isn't Reactive Adaptation? Gabriel456 (talk) 21:49, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

make it a variation of RA and I think it's good Gabriel456 (talk) 21:53, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 21:57, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Variation of Reactive Adaptation, essentially to RA what Adaptive Power-Level is to Superior Adaptation.

DYBAD (talk) 22:49, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Looks like its rightful place in the Superpower cosmology. DYBAD (talk) 23:35, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

I don't mind at all Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

That's already in the also called for Supernaturally Dense Tissue Gabriel456 (talk) 01:05, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't happen to me, so no idea. If it's still problem, you might want to contact Community Central (top bar Request => Staff Help) and report bug. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, September 18, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:47, September 25, 2015 (UTC)

13b. Give the pic real name, no random string of numbers/letters. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:06, September 26, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 13:37, September 27, 2015 (UTC)

any difference from Fusionism or Amalgamation? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, September 28, 2015 (UTC)

go for itGabriel456 (talk) 23:59, September 28, 2015 (UTC)

You didn't create that page....
Never mind, you just listed the wrong power.SageM (talk) 22:23, October 1, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 00:38, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

that doesn't seem like a power. That sounds more like a mechanism in using powers, how they use them but it doesn't sound like a power in itself Gabriel456 (talk) 22:56, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

What can it do? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:00, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:06, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:50, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

go for both Gabriel456 (talk) 15:41, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

I liked them. L12345 (talk) 20:02, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

I'd say you should think the powers through before considering their creation, often enough a nice-sounding potential ability tends to be relatively empty in practice and/or too abstract to be truly relatable/interesting. Best thing would be to consider their potential applications, and how to structure them into a coherent whole with a distinctive style, that would make them spontaneously attractive to the readers (basically all the awesome things you could do with it built around an original core concept). DYBAD (talk) 02:05, October 7, 2015 (UTC)

It was probably just a spelling mistake or such ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 02:46, October 7, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Pepper... why you ask when you know the answer?

Psionics - I think we may have something similar. Not certain tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:35, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Solar Energy Absorption. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:40, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

Have fun. Got User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:27, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 17:37, October 9, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:14, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

mind explaining the difference? Gabriel456 (talk) 02:20, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

Alright. go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:56, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

Good, and you? L12345 (talk) 22:46, October 15, 2015 (UTC)

Bit too specific, plus we had something pretty similar and it got deleted. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:36, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

Did we talk about this at some point? if so, I don't remember so I don't remember the reason.. Gabriel456 (talk) 21:33, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

maybe you should take your question to Kuopiofi. He'd probably have the answer to your question better because at the moment, I don't.

If he signs off on it, then go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 21:53, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

I Liked it, it's a power that i actually think i have. L12345 (talk) 23:10, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

Been some time now, but I honestly don't remember when exactly. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 18:58, October 19, 2015 (UTC)

to be perfectly honest, I'm on the fence about this one.

Take it to Kuopiofi and see what he says about it. If he gives the go ahead, then...well, go ahead Gabriel456 (talk) 19:15, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

sounds good to me. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:31, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

I think it'd go under Enhanced Balance or Enhanced Dexterity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:54, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

Nothing is wrong with it...
Nothing is wrong with your power except for the fact that it doesn't have an official user. Find one and bring proof and I'll leave your page alone, okay? Truth 20:40, October 20, 2015 (UTC) Truth™

Says who?

I'm not doing anything

None that I see Gabriel456 (talk) 21:11, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:13, October 21, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:07, October 21, 2015 (UTC)

Please explain? Gabriel456 (talk) 19:41, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:48, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:42, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

go for it.

Wish I could help on the name, though. Nothing comes to mind, however Gabriel456 (talk) 23:40, October 23, 2015 (UTC)

just so I understand, you mean it has physical effects, right? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:57, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 01:11, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

There are quite a few powers that cover that, but since I can't have coffee this morning I'm not in shape to find them for you... -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:56, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

Already exists
Already exists- Endless Attack.SageM (talk) 21:39, October 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

whoops, I didn't see SageM's message above. It seems that power is what you're thinking of Gabriel456 (talk) 22:12, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

Nope its the same exact power, if you read the capabilities the attack and damage continues until the user decides to stop the attack.SageM (talk) 22:33, October 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Endless attack and continual damage are one in the same. if the user is still taking damage after an attack that means there still being attacked. thus it is the same power.SageM (talk) 22:37, October 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

Its the same power, there is literally no difference. It will just be deleted if you make it.SageM (talk) 22:39, October 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

It still wouldn't matter, its just to similar to it. either DYAD or Kuo would just delete it after comparing the two. I hate to say it, but there is no way you could phrase it that wouldn't make it sound the same as endless attack.SageM (talk) 22:47, October 26, 2015 (UTC)SageM

with both of you making valid points, I'm having a very hard time agreeing with either...Gabriel456 (talk) 23:06, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

what is it? Gabriel456 (talk) 23:08, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

Not that I'm aware of, no.Gabriel456 (talk) 23:13, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

yeah, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:16, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

sub-power of lethal dose?
A sub-power of Lethal Dose? since it decides whats lethal and what isn'tSageM (talk) 20:58, October 27, 2015 (UTC)SageM

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:04, October 27, 2015 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:07, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 22:38, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

I personally don't see a problem with it. Then again, I just undid two silly edits, and based on the comments, I'm beginning to think deleting it may be the best choice if all it does is cause trouble... Gabriel456 (talk) 01:41, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Yo Flamestreak. Care to help me with developing powers and increase my knowledge?Sega Fro (talk) 02:01, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thanx. However, some powers that i think up of, i say it on the Chat, i get criticized and judge about how im stupidly making powers and how my ideas are dumb. Sega Fro (talk) 02:08, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but your page is just causing too much problems, especially for me so I'm deleting it.

I apologize, but I can't handle this crap at the moment. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:08, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

But in the future, to avoid situations like this, please think of better powers. It'd probably be for the best.. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:12, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Other than those trolling comments, two separate users made a page called "Touching", no doubt in response to your page, as it was completely nonsensical.

But honestly, I'm not in the mood to deal with this, as mentioned before. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:16, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding Gabriel456 (talk) 02:20, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

sounds like a sub-power of Restoration. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:02, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

give it a better description and go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 23:04, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

sounds good to me.

Though honestly, I was talking about the opening statement. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:25, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

It's my fault really, I misunderstood.

I mean the opening to power, like "the power to (insert description)". I thought that's what you meant by "to exist in reality".

my bad, sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 23:29, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure. Maybe you should ask DYBAD and get his opinion on it. Gabriel456 (talk) 00:07, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

sounds like a sub-power of Preservation, go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:28, November 3, 2015 (UTC)