Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-27077671-20190305011653

Well the proof was already given. You may choose not to read if you left, but I can repeat if you or anyone else want to know:

Nothing says powers cannot have limitations. The fact that you are saying "we can't" is double standards. All you have done was repeated your stance that you think a power can defeat omnipotence. That's Argument by Repetition fallacy, look it up.

Well even if you could define it, beings still can claim freedom just like in reality. And become able to resist Omnipotence.

Claiming freedom doesn't mean jack unless it's actually the power Freedom, in which even that is subject to omnipotence. Let me see you jump off a skyscraper and have your 'freedom' save you from gravity. This is the second time you've made an argument without putting any proof behind it. Prove it or lose it.

I'm going to quote you: "It can't exist as a power except than in universes that are logically broken and closed" You're literally trying to limit omnipotence to logic despite not refuting my facts on all the other logic based abilities. Omnipotents aren't meant to be in versus matches to begin with.

And your last paragraph does nothing to prove your point at all, smh. This is literally Unity. You wanna try to get philosophical with this mess? Boom. Do some reading.

.

.

.

and for your final comment about the whole slavery analogy? Yes, that is exactly what I meant. It is super easy to make an argument against slavery. And don't even try to make the example sound like that to begin with. If anything it should sound like: Person A makes an argument. '''Person B makes an counterargument. Person A debunks the counterargument.''' Person B whines and complains. Person A won the argument.

You missed two important steps there.