Talk:Omnilock/@comment-32440156-20171224174942/@comment-31951741-20171224200009

Nekron, we had finaly perfected this Omnilock page but you would not let you're biased veiw point go, (and I know your biased about it because you or nekron1 had made another account called perfect omnilock, AND I KNOW ITS ONE OF YOU, he speaks and uses the SAME arguments as you two, im not a fool.) and kept nagging kuo utill he just gave in to humor you, congratulations. 2 words were taken off and you blew up, and TBH lesser users (like I said before) make no sense with omnilock, the entire reason they are immune to just about everything is because they exist outside of those things, as in EVERYTHING.

So Nekron let me ask you how a lesser user of Omnilock would work? *​gasp* could it be that they don't reside outside of something, even if its only one thing?! exactly, thats the only other explanation. with this logic your using you could say that a user of spatio-temporal lock+Reality Sepration+Isolation=omnilock but just a lesser version because they would exist outside of most things but not everything. see how that logic of lesser users is flawed (at least for this power)? and the thing is Absolute Access is basically a perfect counter to Omnilock as there is no boundary or limit to what they can access with that power, as its very simple, they would be able to access the "somewhere" that a user of omnilock would be. TBH they would be able to access just about every user of this power.