Talk:Indeterminacy/@comment-29564364-20171007135629/@comment-6299840-20171125003638

I know you didn’t explicit state that but I was making a point. To be clear I responded because your OP states Omniscients are basically stupid because they just know without performing any task to get to an answer. What I’m trying to get across to you is it is impossible for an Omniscient to be stupid and you can not be smarter than one. The game of semantics your playing with knowledge and intellect will not change that. There is indeed a difference between the two but that difference is not relevant to this argument. In fact it actually works to my favor not yours. Your saying an Omniscient can’t reason that is false they would still be fully capable of reasoning. If they know that there is no intelligent life in universe a but there is in universe b and they are asked where to send this universe busting bomb I’m quite sure they could reason to send it to universe a. Also just because they don’t do any work you say they cant explain reasoning which is a total non sequitur. They would still be able to explain. What do you think teaching is? Teachers have already acquired the knowledge they teach us but the whole point is they can explain it to us so we understand.

Also the definition of intelligence is the ability to acquire knowledge and skills. So whether born with it or acquired an omniscient has all knowledge. So omniscience is the highest level of intelligence. It’s even right there in the also called (Preeminent Intelligence). You have acquired all knowledge and all skills. You said you can be smarter than Omniscience I am saying this makes no sense because omniscience is as smart as it gets. Honestly I thought this was clear. Just like you can not be stronger than omnipotence.