Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-3075077-20161019120540/@comment-24729606-20161021011153

I can understand why you would say all this but I feel I must point a few things things something out. Firstly I would just like to point out that omnipotence merely means one is all powerful. But that does not mean that one can influence everything. Now if the omnipotent being was omnipresent as well than that would not be the case. Secondly I would like to point out that omnipotence does not necessarily extend beyond a single universe. If it did then the being would have no need to recreate a destroyed universe they could merely alter an existing one to mirror the destroyed one. Thirdly I have read all those articles at various points and while they were all fascinating I would just like to point out that they only describe abilities the either culminate in, are part of, or lead to omnipotence. Those abilities impart something akin to omnipotence but none would result in true omnipotence let alone one that would facilitate universal recreation.