Talk:Absolute Strength/@comment-32122220-20181128182734/@comment-31951741-20181216193931

Of course, people wanna keep talking about his "feats" and how "HE CAN'T BE LIMITLESS HE HASN'T BEATEN GODS YET-" but what they don't get when it comes to something like infinite strength is that the user would always be able to pull off a strength feat bigger then the last endlessly for obvious reasons, there's no LIMIT, so you can't keep throwing a growing finite amount of challenges for him to overcome and, if he really does have bottomless strength, expect him to lose at some point in a battle of physical strength.

Basically what I'm saying is that- "Strength feats" cannot prove if someone has Absolute Strength or not because of the fact that it would be measured by the feat which no matter how great, would always be finite compared to a larger feat of strength then itself- and then a larger one then that, and then a larger one- AND AN EVEN GREATER FEAT OF- ect. Proving it a total fallacy in this sense.