User blog comment:DYBAD/Character Sheet/@comment-24955665-20180330070013/@comment-4867780-20180331090202

What would we disagree on ? Now, that has to be the most challenging question so far XD

I built Lawrence's philosophy and policy as the best possible compromise I could come up with between desires and ideals within the specific context of his transcendent nature, so disagreeing with him on his outlook or way of life seems a logically impossible task ^ ^;

Like some people, I could blame him for not being more proactively benevolent to worlds in need, but that would be because I am part of a world in need myself, and thus empathize with fictional ones and everything they would stand to gain from it - in other words : mere self-interest tactically disguised as morality.

If I were in his place, I wouldn't feel any obligation to help, especially within the Omniversal scope of the character that makes any pursuit of the greater good a laughably meaningless endeavor (the eternal drop in the infinite ocean). So much like him, I would only protect and improve the worlds I personally care about for the sake of present and future relations here.

Lawrence and I aren't the same person, since he is infinitely greater on every conceivable level and more incorruptible than any human could ever hope to be. But I could reasonably be the original human whose merging with the shard gave birth to Lawrence, in other words the basic foundation of his human personality.