Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-30160565-20171230205913/@comment-4675132-20180111045526

The problem with this question is it makes Omnipotence seem like it can be defined as one singular being or force so it can be countered with an equally defined being or force. What we are all saying is there cannot be a counter force to omnipotence because ominpotence in its own definition covers every possible force, condition, capability, and complexity. It simply is everything so if you do have a sigular definable "Omnipotent" being they would simply be a manifestation of an even greater, less definable, force.

Your question reads more like you are thinking of conceptual entities. There are plenty of conceptual beings that represent a single aspect of Omnipotence but even their counterparts are themselves just another opposite representation of Omnipotence (ie. life/death, order/chaos, time/space etc.)