Talk:Anti-God/@comment-33797416-20190416222734/@comment-32440156-20190513140913

The last thing about Omnipotence. Can your dictionary definition answer this question- " If Omnipotence means unlimited power, can an Omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that not even he can lift it? If not then that being isn't Omnipotent, if yes then too the said being is not Omnipotent as he cannot lift the stone he created".

This is called the Omnipotence paradox. This is there in the very Wikipedia link you send me and I am damn sure that you didn't read any of the history or etemology written on the page. It is due to this and numerous other paradoxes that Omnipotence has a special status and philosophy and fiction alike has multiple viewpoints on the power. No one is overcomplicating thing, it's just the dictionary definition is too vague and gives rises to paradoxes.

So, nearly all fictional continuities have different viewpoints of Omnipotence. The Ben 10 franchise defines someone as powerful as the celestasapians as Omnipotent, Marvel defines beings who are as strong or stronger than Galactus as Omnipotent (use the marvel wikia) and similarly we also have a viewpoint on Omnipotence. So, due to the vagueness of the dictionary definition, Omnipotence has a special status and this word has been debited over 1000 of years.