Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-38425291-20190212034417/@comment-38085702-20190226105213

The orange duck 42 wrote: Retrorge wrote: DeathstroketheHedgehog wrote: Retrorge wrote: Yeah, I also think that omnipotence is the strongest power available. POWER, not ability. If you take the word ability into consider, omnipotence is the second best ability. Omnivastance, as I told you, is using not only power, but also knowledge and presence. If you knew everything what happens in existence, we might also know omnipotence's weakness. But we can't, since we AREN'T omniscient. An omniscient person would know what an omnipotent person would do next, how he'd do it, and how to tackle it. There is no major difference between 'power' and 'ability' for you to even claim either of the two are different and can make your made-up term better than omnipotence. In fact, by viewing omniscience as a power, it only puts it under the omnipotence branch.

To quote Holokami, "if you think you've grasped something like omnipotence, then you haven't grasped it at all. " An ability is an entire category. Powers go in it, and nothing other than omniotence is the best power. If you take the other two categories in abilities, i.e. knowledge and portation, then when all  of them combined can give the best ability possible. Imagine being able to control all the 3 best powers in existence (omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence), and trying to fight a person with only omnipotence. YOU'D win, since you'd have infinite knowledge of how to defeat that person. Even if he does kill you, you come back in literally NO TIME since you're Omnipresent. You'd have enough knowledge to know how to kill him. And since this omnipotence is just fiction, we can defeat it by using our T.V. remotes. If the power to defeate it is held in our t.v remotes, does that mean Author authority is better? Or mabey it would be viewer embodyment. That T.v Remote thingy was just a joke man.