Talk:Metapotence/@comment-32440156-20171001063903/@comment-29564364-20171002173532

«Well no matter whatever argument you put forward omnipotence is stronger than author authority.» So basically, you're going to ignore any argument that disagrees with your opinion? Way to debate, kid! Well... That's what you've been doing since the beginning anyway. You haven't even tried to refute my argument even once without using a logical fallacy. I even told you what you had to do in order to disprove it.

«No one except for you are saying that author authority is more powerful than omnipotence. Besides only admins can change omnipotence page and even if you try to cange it the whole wikia is going to stand aginst it.» That's demonstrably false. There are people who will agree with me and anyone with an account can edit pages.

«And from where does that general consensus comes?» You would know if you bothered to read my previous reply. I'm done repeating myself.

«Besides an author can control only his verse but omnipotence can control entire fiction. You have just misinterpreted author authority.» The irony in that statement is so thick that I could slice it with a knife. You are the one who keeps misinterpreting and misrepresenting my argument because I never argued that users of Author Authority could affect other verses. Both fictional Authors and Omnipotent characters are restricted to their own uni/multi/verse.

«Omnipotence is not only considered as the strongest power by me but by most renowned authors,religious people and most people of the wikia.» That's an appeal to popularity fallacy. It's not because a proposition is accepted by a large number of people that it's true. Simply because many children believe in Santa Claus doesn't mean that Santa Claus actually exists.