Talk:Omniscience/@comment-34765736-20200209163943/@comment-24053170-20200209204355

The problem with your viewpoint is that Omnipotence is defined as being above-all, above everything and nothing.

Even things like logic, reason, common sense, definitions, principles, they all fail at what defines a being that is All-powerful.

contradictions and paradoxes mean nothing to the user.

Even if you transcended everything until the end of time, you still would never surpass omnipotence.

Because its not something that is defined as being attainable. Its something you have always had from the very beginning.

Transcendence means nothing. A user of Omnipotence could simply end the transcendence even before it started, or even change the way the user transcends so they get weaker then higher up they go.

The point is, with omnipotence there is no beyond or outside of it. Even if you say something is beyond it; its automatically and retroactively considered part of the original capabilities/definition.

Nothing has changed, and the user is still all-powerful.

Your labels are meaningless when it comes to this power. Even if you say you take things at face value, your arguing about something that is beyond and outside of context, experience or understanding.

it either is, or it isn't. That's how omnipotence is defined.