Talk:Author Authority/@comment-7050565-20170912225509/@comment-29564364-20170921234151

@Nekron2 Welp. Your whole seven paragraphs spread across seven replies of you blabbing about fictional characters being fictional characters and real people being real people show that you completely missed the point I was making because I never argued that real people had fictional powers nor that fictional character could become real people, on top of it being completely irrelevant in defending your position that Omnilock, Origin Transcendence and Non Created Physiology users are unaffected by Author Authority.

My argument goes as follows: over the verse and characters depicted in the work of fiction they appear in as the transfictional author of said work of fiction.
 * Premise 1: All users of Omnilock, Origin Transcendence, Non Created Physiology and Fourth Wall Breaching are fictional characters.
 * Premise 2: Fictional users of Author Authority have the same authority
 * Premise 3: A transfictional author's authority over the verse and characters depicted in their work of fiction is total and absolute, affecting even users of Omnilock, Origin Transcendence, Non Created Physiology and Fourth Wall Breaching.
 * Conclusion: Therefore, users of Omnilock, Origin Transcendence, Non Created Physiology and Fourth Wall Breaching are affected by Author Authority.

When I asked SageM to name a single non fictional user of Omnilock, I was challenging him to disprove my first premise, not claiming that real people could be have Omnilock. When I said that a fictional character would have to transcend fiction to escape the author's control, I was attacking SageM's statement that users of Origin Transcendence had transcended the Author's control by pointing out that that would go against the definition of a fictional character, not claiming that fictional characters could actually transcend fiction and become real.

Now, instead of strawmanning me into an entirely different position that is completely irrelevant to the matter at hand it would be nice to see you try and refute my actual argument that I presented above.