Talk:Absolute Immortality/@comment-44743000-20200104204549/@comment-44743000-20200105035105

No, this absolute immortality isn't true if it can be nullified by omnipotence. Well, omnipotence can negate logic but you still use logic defining omnipotence as what can't be defeated by anything, including a power which is "negating logic". Well, I can say that true absolute immortality would disallow logic negation on itself (and disallow anything else which may lead to its nullification) and so it won't be below omnipotence and existing with an omnipotent being in one fiction would be a contradiction and it has to be dealt with like two omnipotent beings existing, not by placing the true absolute immortality below omnipotence. Yeah it may sound like it won't be omnipotence then but that's why I was saying it can't exist together with true absolute immortality. Either one exists, or the other exists. Saying both exist at the same time is like saying omnipotence can fail to do something, or the immortality isn't truely absolute. Or use the "result is incomprehensible" thing. Also obviously omnipotence includes true absolute immortality and it can do everything else too. What I'm saying is the level of absolute of true absolute immortality would be the same of omnipotence.