Talk:Nameless Existence/@comment-36118871-20180914171735/@comment-24729606-20200205023204

that could very well be the case. but on the other hand it might also be that there are no words that can adequately describe or convey what something is. But there is also the possibility that language (being a necessarily limited tool of communication based on comprehension) cannot convey some forms of information (also including written forms of language in general since despite their somewhat greater durability in comparison to the spoken word still retain the same limitations). I would cite examples but that would be setting oneself up for an impossible task because one would be attempting to describe that which is beyond our current language capabilities to explain. But that being said i can think of two examples of phenomenon that while not nameless are little more than names (dark matter and dark energy). We think that dark matter accounts for until 95% of the matter in the universe but because dark matter has properties divergent from normal matter its existence is (for the time being at least) theoretical. Dark energy is even more of an enigma because while it could be what regular energy is to regular matter it is entirely theoretical because like dark matter its properties are radically (one might almost say diametrically) divergent from normal matter. Who knows dark matter, dark energy, and anti - matter might end up being one and the same thing. That is entirely speculation but given that anti - matter is itself theoretical speculation is really all we can do on it for the time being.