User talk:CrystalStorm51

Yeah, why?RnR (talk) 02:32, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Burn is a manga series created by Camilla d'Errico. Quite a fun read.RnR (talk) 02:35, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help on the titanium page!TheKaiwind (talk) 00:27, May 3, 2013 (UTC)TheKaiwind.

and that sounds good to me Gabriel456 (talk) 15:10, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, part of me thought you meant something on the line of a combo of Enhanced Vision and Sense Focusing; gaining super vision by focusing it on one eye XD

but I'm honestly unsure about this... Gabriel456 (talk) 01:00, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Your idea would be usable if you expand it to Community Manipulation, tho I'm not sure if we have power that already covers it. Civilization Manipulation might get close but isn't really it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:57, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

When it says community, does it say what species/civilization/technology level you need to have, hmm...? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:04, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't it just be the Combination of Planetary Lordship and Limited Life Lordship? or just Planetary Lordship (lordship would mean you have absolute control over the planet and everything on it) ? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:06, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Planetary Lordship would grant you absolute control over the planet and everything on it, that includes all life forms and civilizations as well, since civilizations are on the planet as well. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just Unknown Inducement?SageM (talk) 02:04, August 17, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Both are bit too far on the specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

eh, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 11:01, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Inducement for Uncertainty Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:24, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:39, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

the perfect power for personal trainers. if you're planning to do it, i think that the wii fit trainer from Smash Bros is an user. Tsubasa16 (talk) 20:44, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i don't really remember, i think it's because all of her/his powers are exercise-based, even energy spheres out of exercise. though i think you should look into it to see if she/him fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:07, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

i think so, but i don't have sure, again, i think you shoud research and see if she fits. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:22, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:49, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Attack Switching - that's just doing it without any powers.

Continuous Charging - Juggernaut Momentum --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Piercing Beam Emission --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:00, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

So the powers build-up would be independent of what happens to User? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:51, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Could be Technique of Infinite Energy. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:13, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

eh for the first two, but for the third, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 21:03, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Try to think better name for starters. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Got a name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:27, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering that the power is about charging the power and not attacking, Charging Reliability? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:21, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:37, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Call it Clinging/Continuing Damage or something like that and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:59, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

don't know about the last two, but could you expand on the first? Gabriel456 (talk) 00:12, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

I think so. Go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 00:29, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that one of your powers? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:50, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

And you want to make power for those that don't use specified methods... --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Is it really worth it? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:31, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

What you do with your own pages (hint) is pretty much your own business. As long as you don't change it into something totally different. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Have fun, if it doesn't make sense someone Edits it again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Edit. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:05, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

er...-shrug- Gabriel456 (talk) 21:37, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

well, isoporation specifically needs the user to teleport to acheive that effect, so i don't really have sure. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:43, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

yeah, like i said, isoporation needs to teleport to achieve that effect, while the power you're thinking does not need to. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:48, August 20, 2016 (UTC)

Oh right, now I remember. It was too close to Unrestricted Movement. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:44, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Well, it's restored. Edit it to what you want. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

50/50 on this. Take it to Kuo and get his opinion on it. If he signs off, go for it. Gabriel456 (talk) 23:11, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Liberation - too limited, try something that is opposite to Binding

Facing Redirection - too specific

Scientific Projection - usable

Meta Physical Law Manipulation - Law Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:59, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Sincerely, Freedom manipulation seems strange, since if you control freedom and free beings, than it's not really freedom anymore, and technically, the opposite to SM would be literally not manipulating anyone at all, it's not like that would be a power. the closer to an opposite to SM is Control Imunity and/or Freedom. Tsubasa16 (talk) 07:51, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

actually,i believe that that ``Liberation´´ power you is thinking of is pretty much Control Negation, which is the power to negate control over others, essentially liberating them from their subordination. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:34, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

something like Self-Sustenance Inducement? i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:42, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

like make someone be independent from anyone to do anything they need or something like that? if so, i think it's fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:45, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

"Releasing" sounds bit clunky, but the only other options I can think is "Freeing".

Independence Inducement - details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:46, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Most of that sounds like power bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:53, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Soo...basically Reality Warping. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:49, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Solar Negation/Lunar Negation - doable.

Multi-Perception - don't we already something like this? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:32, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

I'd say yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:12, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Charged Attack Multiplication - what? split single attack into multiple ones?

Charge Storage/Holding - too specific

Architecture Recreation - way too specific

Island Adaptation - depends on what kind of island it is, so better covered by already existing adaptations --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Not a bit. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:37, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"The user can summon a stream of endless waves (ranging from hundreds to thousands to millions) of objects like blades, bullets, energy blasts, etc., around their target to bombard them from all sides with no hope of escape. Users most likely have a complex strategy and pattern to confuse their opponent and limit their movement." not just bullets, nothing about speed. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:54, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't. It simply does the effect without explaining what happens on the background. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:08, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Had time to think about this a bit and we could use lesser version of Bullet Hell. Maybe something up to dozens bullets, possibly with Limitation that they aren't unleashed on the same time but in waves...

Not sure that we don't have something close, but I can't remember one.

Would Multi-Hit Strike cover the melee side for you? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:41, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Ask if he has ideas how to do it.

I think that power that does both distance and physical attacks might get too confusing, but perhaps some sort of superpower manipulation... --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:24, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

"Charging Shot"? -shrug- I don't know a good name for that, unfortunately Gabriel456 (talk) 20:03, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

if you want a "go", sure, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 21:42, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Power Charcing or lesser version of Bullet Hell? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Or Bullet Hell lite, as I call it. Have fun. :) --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:59, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, that doesn't sound very doable. sorry Gabriel456 (talk) 11:04, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

never hurts. And you're welcome  Gabriel456 (talk) 11:14, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

er...probably not Gabriel456 (talk) 16:12, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

if you want to Gabriel456 (talk) 16:18, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

sure, I mean Gabriel456 (talk) 16:19, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Covered by Sphere Manipulation I think, as there's no size limit on it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:38, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Closest existing one to otherwise overly specific power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

probably not the first, but for the second, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 10:48, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Environment Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:10, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

Going way too specific now... --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:19, August 27, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think it is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:20, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

also, i think that Replication Awareness is a better name for it. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:25, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Cosmic Space Manipulation already exists.

go for all Gabriel456 (talk) 15:33, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

you're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 15:36, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Enhanced Condition with time-limit? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:37, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific as such. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:17, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Gabriel456 (talk) 10:33, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) go for it
 * 2) Stardust Manipulation?
 * 3) -shrug-

Compact Star Manipulation might be best Gabriel456 (talk) 12:00, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

sure Gabriel456 (talk) 12:06, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Redo Effect - don't we have this? I'm pretty sure it's come up at some point...

Angular Attacks - too specific as this, we might have something that allows powers/attacks be guided.

Trade-Off Power/Build-Up Attack - too specific --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:51, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

You're just throwing anything/everything to get something stick at this point, aren't you...

Take some time to breath and work on those powers that are already approved. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Let's put those into back-burner. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:59, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Ask again after you're coherent enough to judge do you want to try again. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

honestly, not sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:34, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

sure.

I think Miracle Performing pretty much covers that Gabriel456 (talk) 00:13, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

wouldn't that Holy Technology power be Transcendent Science? or rather an sub-power of it? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:19, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

could you expand? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:06, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

Warp Manipulation - usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:47, September 8, 2016 (UTC)

Keine Kamishirasawa (Touhou Project) can create/change history in Hakutaku form, so she would be user for Past Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:54, September 8, 2016 (UTC)mber 23, 2016 (UTC)

Limbs and any other part of the User, neck and torso in other words. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:28, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:22, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

personally, I can't see why regular IA can't do any of that. I mean, the years of training (even thousands of years) is pretty redundant, with IA already being able to understand things instantly, and I don't see why it couldn't do intricate things and dangerous fears...and I don't see how defying physics plays a part in this, but again, don't see why regular IA can't.

But that's just my opinion on the matter Gabriel456 (talk) 13:20, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

that could work Gabriel456 (talk) 14:18, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

sorry, i haven't saw your nachricht yet, i think the power is fine. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:31, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

I'd go with length, as height would refer only the full length of the body and this includes also partial changes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:32, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

if I understand you correctly, it's essentially Skill Adaptation? A non-superpower verison of Reactive Adaptation? If so, it could work.

That is, if I'm understanding you correctly XD Gabriel456 (talk) 15:17, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

I've had Psychic Energy Attacks on my To Do list for quite some time, but I never seem to get around doing it. Have fun.

Same to shrinking limbs, tho you need to figure better name. I think we have a power that allows user to pull their head down like turtles, but I can't remember the name... --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:40, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

Works for me. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:57, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 14:02, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:23, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

uh, what? could you explain a bit more? "Factual things that are untrue". Isn't that contradictory? (I just woke up so I might be a little slow) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:04, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

kinda still sounds like Lie Manipulation to me. But if you can expand upon the differences, go for it (I've been wrong before, I might add) Gabriel456 (talk) 15:37, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

You mean Manipulate in the sense of Reality Warping or Dimensional Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:51, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

I'd have to say it'd be Limitation version to both of those powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:59, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

Visibility Manipulation: not a bad idea, tho name is bit goofy

Fertility Manipulation/Compound Fusion: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:44, December 2, 2016 (UTC)

Perceptibility could work, tho that hints towards being more than visible. Bit more on the line of Imperceptibility. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:18, December 9, 2016 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:33, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

aside Physical Deformation? Form Manipulation and maybe Mutilation. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:25, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

Source Negation sounds like its to specific a power. you may want to try to expand it to include more.SageM (talk) 02:32, December 19, 2016 (UTC)SageM

Circular Constructs: no

Tracking Diversion: covered by various powers already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:45, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Primordial Energy Generation: we don't even have Primordial Energy Manipulation.

Lake/River Creation: Water Body Creation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:20, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering PFM is described bit more than just primordial, more like what comes before even those... I honestly don't know if something like that can be created. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:42, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Considering the RFM's description, yes. Remember to remove PEM from Also Called if you do tho. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:11, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

the only things that come to mind is that the user could develop computer/hacking skills when needed, or something as simple as plumbing skills.

That's all I got, sorry for not being more elaborate Gabriel456 (talk) 14:42, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

second might be doable, but isn't the first essentially God Mode? Gabriel456 (talk) 02:19, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Hypercompetence --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:05, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Bit on the narrow side, but usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:04, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

well, i think so. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:49, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Neither is really doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:03, December 24, 2016 (UTC)

Expand that to Efficiency Manipulation and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Habitability Inducement- Environmental Field Projection or Terraforming.SageM (talk) 22:37, December 31, 2016 (UTC)SageM

also, since i'am already talking to you, do you have any ideas of aspects of fate/destiny? it's because i'am planning to do an Destiny Aspect Manifestation and have only three aspects (Inevitability, Beginning and End) but i need some more. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:33, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

related to chance? well, i think Possibility might count as an aspect. the problem is that i'm limited to use  aspects that are already powers here. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:48, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

yeah, i think Possibilites would fit as: no matter if it is impossible or possible, if you're destined to do it, you WILL do it.

well, what would that power would be? Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:54, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think it's fine then. though you should ask Kuo first. Also, maybe Purpose as an aspect of fate? since the purpose of anything is determinated by fate. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:02, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, if you want to. i was thinking on using the Manipulaition power instead, but if you want to do the embodiment of it..... Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:08, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Purpose Manipulation already exists, so Purpose Embodiment might be a valid power.SageM (talk) 23:10, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

oh, sorry, i forgot, was would it do? Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:13, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think the other name ( All-Terrain Mobility. )is more suitable. also,  it would be a sub-power of unrestricted moviment i believe. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:22, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I was busy with something else.

I suppose you could consider him a user of that.SageM (talk) 23:49, January 2, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Honestly, not sure about that.... Maybe shoot it over to Kuo, see his opinion on it. If he signs off on it, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 16:00, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Isn't that just Non-Corporeal Form?SageM (talk) 02:00, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Form Shattering?SageM (talk) 02:04, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:23, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Point, have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:48, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

It already exists- Absolute Law Manipulation.SageM (talk) 19:49, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

"How is Absolute Life Manipulation instead? I mean, we have CrystalStorm51 (talk) 19:56, January 4, 2017 (UTC), do we not? It could deal with all forms of life, including those in the form of concepts, objects, non-corporeal beings and the like."

? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Universal Lordship?SageM (talk) 20:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Whatever, go ahead with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:53, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Reality.SageM (talk) 23:06, January 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Isn't that just Probability Computation?SageM (talk) 03:53, January 5, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:45, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i can't think of any other than like Death Prevention (by delaying the future were someone die). Tsubasa16 (talk) 18:48, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

well, i may actually change the name of Future Acceleration to Future Order Manipulation, since i ended up making it more of to control when the future will happen rather than just accelerating it, so i think Future Delay will end up being a sub-power of it rather than opposite. Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:09, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

it's ok Gabriel456 (talk) 19:49, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Check the EM for the power that fits closest what you're thinking about.

Surface Manipulation?SageM (talk) 18:57, January 6, 2017 (UTC)SageM

if you want to try, go for it, I guess Gabriel456 (talk) 23:31, January 6, 2017 (UTC)

Idea Theft: try Idea Manipulation first. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:29, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure about  Auto Completion, Accumulation and Orbit Inducement, but the rest seem doable. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:32, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Didn't you ask me this before? I could've sworn I approved it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:50, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Huh. I could swear I saw those before. Must be mixing things up. If so, my bad :p

But yeah, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 19:53, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic Completion or Automatic Tasking - either could work.

Accumulation, Mass Gathering or Accretion, or Matter Gathering - not really there...

Orbital Inducement, Orbital Creation or Orbital Aura, or Orbital Shield - maybe just Orbit or something like that, you're simply getting stuff rotating around target after all.

Check Dictionary/synonyms for ideas.

That's Creation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:16, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Try to figure something for it. Maybe expand the search bit, what is the power about on the basic level and then try to see how to summarize it on few words.

Aggregation works for me, others could work on Also Called. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:41, January 9, 2017 (UTC)

I got nothing, sorry.

But in any case, isn't Existence Manipulation effectively the opposite of Nothingness Manipulation? Gabriel456 (talk) 15:21, January 9, 2017 (UTC)

oh, sorry, i haven't.

well, aside Pregnancy Inducement, i can't think of any. Tsubasa16 (talk) 11:03, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Apocalypse Aspect Manifestation/Apocalyptic Force Physiology?

Environmental or Adaptation Mode - don't we have this?

Ethnicity Manipulation - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:56, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

That's what I was remembering. Does that look like what you're thinking? --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:32, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:01, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

none.SageM (talk) 21:48, January 10, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Not that I know. Might want to expand it to all forms of waters edge/front. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:04, January 11, 2017 (UTC)

Coast Manipulation - doable.

Blessing Manipulation - doable.

Blessing Creation, Blessing Empowerment, Blessed Physiology and Blessed Body - there's good idea and there's beating good idea to death with rock, no. --Kuopiofi (talk) 02:42, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

well, since you will do the blessing manipulation, i will wait you do it for me to do the blessing embodiment, also, a user for your power would be the very main image of the blessing inducement power. Tsubasa16 (talk) 03:16, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Yes I do. Otherwise I wouldn't have suggested it to kuo.SageM (talk) 05:58, January 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Cushion Manipulation/Button Manipulation - way too specific.

Bilocation/Multilocation - Replication? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:52, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

Doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:26, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

sorry, i didn't, well, you could use some applications from the Blessing Embodiment. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:13, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

Record Manipulation - too specific

Coast Creation - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:30, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

At the moment I can't think of any other then possibly event order manipulation and event rearrangement, but you can probably find some if you look through the non fighting powers category.

sorry I can't offer more then that.SageM (talk) 02:13, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Oh wait, Sorry but you can't make it. As its already a power on here.SageM (talk) 02:15, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Automatic Tasking.SageM (talk) 02:18, January 14, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Badge Empowerment: might be usable if you expand the concept...

Carpet Manipulation/Umbrella Manipulation: too specific

Crime Inducement: usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:35, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Something like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:45, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Thoughtlessness - pretty sure we have something like this.

Automatic Completion - needs better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:59, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

You're skipping from the start to finish without the action, those don't really reflect that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:09, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Sounds more like you're skipping the whole thing really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:41, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Rejection/Denial - as in?

GC - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:28, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Reject/denial? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

That is doable, tho I hope you have users. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:02, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

It already exists- Uncertainty Manipulation and Pataphysics Manipulation.SageM (talk) 23:10, January 15, 2017 (UTC)SageM

well, i think it's fine, indeed i think i might have a user, a character that has ``the power of the unknown´´. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:43, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think that Uncertainty Manipulation would work as application, i have no sure about Pataphysics though, as it deals specifcally with, well, physic. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:52, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Pain and Mental ideas seem doable, but the Cause ideas need to be expanded, if indeed different from Causality Manipulation.Gabriel456 (talk) 23:52, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

also, Unknown manipulation wouldn't be covered by Uncertainty Manipulation, as unknown and uncertain are two different things, Uncertain would mean questionable, undecided, while Unknown would be Not identified, ascertained, or established. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:58, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Actually Uncertainty Manipulation is also called Unknown Warping, so yes it also manipulates the unknown.SageM (talk) 00:00, January 16, 2017 (UTC)SageM

eh, honestly, it sounds like it's covered by Uncertainty Manipulation. I mean, your description pretty much sounds the same as UM. At-least to me, that is... It even has "Unknown Warping" in the Also Called, which is essentially just another word for "Manipulation".

I could be wrong, but that's just my opinion. I just can't see the difference Gabriel456 (talk) 00:01, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

He says it covers just because it has that name in also called? just remove it from there, the power is to manipulate the uncertain, as i said, Uncertain and Unknown are different things, though they are related. Uncertain would mean questionable, undecided, while Unknown would be Not identified, ascertained, or established. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:05, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

well, like i said before ( i think i did) they do share some similar meanings, but that doesn't make them the, for example,  one of the menaings of destruction is end, and yet i don't think Destruction and Conclusion Dominance are the same power. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:18, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

well, if you don't what to make a separete power, you could maybe change the page a little, as it needs to be more detalied about it if it wants to include the unknown, as Unknown is more specfically about what is Not Know or Understandable, while the page says more specifcally about Unknown is more specfically about what cannot be percepted.

well, that might would work. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:23, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Foreign Energy Manipulation/Foreign Material Manipulation/Exotic Matter Manipulation?SageM (talk) 00:31, January 16, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Vector Manipulation? I mean, that pretty much does what you're describing. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:36, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

eh, I guess.Gabriel456 (talk) 18:38, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Change it to Direction Manipulation and you have something usable.

That'd be Vector Manipulation... --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:46, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Spatial Direction Manipulation or Direction Manipulation could work, check how direction is defined on Wikipedia and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:58, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Getting too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:00, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Supernatural Flexibility - usable.

Other, too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:33, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Both are doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:23, January 19, 2017 (UTC)

these mode powers are starting to get a bit out of hand now...But sure, I guess

But Weapon Destruction, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 18:46, January 19, 2017 (UTC)

If you decide to make an Absolute Flexibility page I have a valid user for it, Bogey Woods from Toriko, he is literally so flexible that he can actually lodge himself inside of living things....including people!SageM (talk) 23:35, January 20, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Have fun with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:14, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

request
Welcome CrystalStorm51, listen umiałbyś can help me in a certain situation, dotyczyco sections called obsession ... I do not know how to properly formulate the application on the fact that the possession person or vessel as is possessed may sometimes undergo slight changes in physical or something that can to appear on it.

However, I am on this first.

My point here is that, taking as an example obsession with physical changes may, for example, change eye color as was the case during the fight Kurosaki Ichigo Byakuya Kuchiki, when he was wounded and lost consciousness of his inner Hollow took control it was clear that during the formation of the mask changed or eyes. Will you help me formulate it well to add that according to this section.

Gabriel456 (talk) 00:58, January 22, 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) That's Healing Factor Nullification
 * 2) go for it

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 02:57, January 22, 2017 (UTC)

go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 22:23, January 23, 2017 (UTC)

Plenum Manipulation: basically Matter Manipulation

Area Shifting: go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:49, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Aside Kind Manipulation these are usable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, January 25, 2017 (UTC)

Glitch Inducement/Glitch Manipulation - usable but might need better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

Malfunction is close. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:05, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

I have a few other powers to work on first, so probably after I make those.SageM (talk) 00:56, January 28, 2017 (UTC)SageM

sorry, i haven't. well, both look fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 13:36, January 28, 2017 (UTC)

Intrametal Transmutation - no, not interested getting power for for transformation inside groups which is guaranteed to follow that.

Social Attraction - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:19, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

sorry, i don't think i know a user for it, but it certainly seems to be an application of Directional Lordship. Tsubasa16 (talk) 08:48, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

I don't remember exactly, I would have to look it up again in the history before I could give you an answer.SageM (talk) 00:28, February 1, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Vector Manipulation?

Consequence Creation/Consequence Removal - doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:47, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

And it'd be still mostly about matter. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:46, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Nice work
Neat powers you've created. Sorry I did not get back to you about Spatial Direction Manipulation. Very cool power. Glad to see you could include Palkia. The only figure I could think of including would be Twilight Sparkle of MLP: FIM. She used gravity magic to invert her and Spike so they would slide up on the underside of an upward winding staircase as if they were sliding down. Anyways, you make some interesting powers, but I find it fun to try and find users. Good luck and take care.Kusarigama (talk) 13:41, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Link/Connection Manipulation- Bond Manipulation.SageM (talk) 01:00, February 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Clone Perception: too specific.

Quality Manipulation: usable

Link Manipulation: use Connection Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:28, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:54, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

go aheadSageM (talk) 22:48, February 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Can't remember a thing about that, repost? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:08, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Doable but needs good explanation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:45, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Or something as descriptive. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:55, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Omni-Communication? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:16, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:38, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Your missing the point of Ommi-Communication, its not just living things, its the power to communicate with ANYTHING, organic and inorganic, living and non living. it covers the ability to communicate with anything that exists.SageM (talk) 05:47, February 17, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Besides, inorganic telepathy wouldn't be a variation of omni-communication, since it already covers every form of communication by its very definition. it would merely be a sub-power of it. And since its already covered by Omni-Communication its not really a new power idea either.SageM (talk) 06:01, February 17, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Needs better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:33, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, as long as you can find better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:43, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Way too clunky, try checking synonyms. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:15, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Layer Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:35, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Remember to add Layer Reinforcement and Layered Durability. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:42, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Your choice. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:30, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

That's quite a mouthful. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:52, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

both your new powers ideas could be applications to Oath Manipulation, since the users can control the rewards for the contract being fulfilled and the punishments for breaking them (Punishment Manipulation could also be a application if not sub-power of Law Manipulation for the same reason) also, a user for PM could be Nemesis. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:59, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

from Greco-Roman Myth. Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:08, February 28, 2017 (UTC)

Don't we have something similar? I have vague memories about something like that... --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:42, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

How would it connect to Challenge Creation, Quest Manipulation or Reward Granting? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:56, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Could be combined into one power as reward doesn't mean just positive gains, but otherwise go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:12, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Your choice really, I just feel they're basically two sides of the same coin. Opposite powers if you go with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:13, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

well, maybe wish granting? (by granting a wish as a reward) Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:32, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Satellite Empowerment: expand that to Technology Empowerment and you got a deal.

Inertial Synching: Isn't that Inertialess Body? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:13, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Basically opposite to Acceleration Resistance? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:22, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Might want to find better/more descriptive name and you need to give very good description to what it does, but otherwise have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:26, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

How exactly is it different from this?
How exactly is it different from Inertia Negation?SageM (talk) 21:58, March 4, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Altered Physics: what exactly would Altered Mathematics have to do with this?

Propulsionless/Motionless Mobility: several powers get close enough to make this copy. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:13, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

That'll work. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:22, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Your page "Technology Empowerment" has been deleted, at your request.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:58, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome ;)

Death horseman94 (talk) 22:07, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Way too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:01, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Environmental Awareness: call it Nature Awareness and go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:16, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Certainly, I have removed the page for you.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:46, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

No problem!

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:53, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Expand Inertia Negation and it's done. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:46, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

It deals with that, just expand it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:54, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

Inertial Adaptation - doable.

Predator Instinct/Prey Instinct --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, March 9, 2017 (UTC)

Efficient Motion: doable

Non-Damaging Force: pretty sure we have this already. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:54, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty similar I'd say. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:11, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Gaseous Mobility: pretty pointless really.

Water Current Negation: call it Current Negation and go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:26, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:02, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

At the point gas would impede movement, you're essentially talking about liquid.

Unless you're talking about wind movement. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:28, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

You're talking speed and air-resistance? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:37, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Is there really gases that would affect movement on normal human speeds?

Anyway, usable so go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:18, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure, maybe.SageM (talk) 01:14, March 13, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Go with Instinct instead of Urge and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:08, March 13, 2017 (UTC)

Sequence Manipulation: doable

Problem Manipulation: Answer Manipulation?

Self-Animation: bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:14, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

I meant was there connections/similarities. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:25, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Associations then. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:12, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Associations of each other. -_- --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:18, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead with that.

Sounds clunky. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:04, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Yes.

Association. At best. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:18, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Petrification = turning something into stone, literally. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:29, March 14, 2017 (UTC)

Well, for Problem Manipulation i would say Calamity Inducement (making things worse). Sequence Manipulatio could be an Application of Future Order Manipulation, by controlling the sequence of the future. i but i can't think to any application to it. Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:10, March 15, 2017 (UTC)

I would say it'd be the same, but the page does specifiy absorbing kinetic energy to do it, so it could work. And name it as you wish, I honestly can't find a better name myself Gabriel456 (talk) 17:07, March 15, 2017 (UTC)

Hyper Bouncing: related to Double Jump?

Unimpaired Activity/Problem Inducement: doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:37, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

Well, go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:06, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

Hey can you help me out with something?

Recently I made my first power and everything seems going smoothly except there is a single problem that bothers me quite a bit.

When I go to categories to see where my power is, it does not show a thumbnail/picture but a bunch of text and I was curious how I can fix that, do you know how? If so please tell me and if you want to check it out yourself the power is Card Magic

Thanks, looking forward to your response ^^ CrabHermit (talk) 01:25, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

Say for example you go to the http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Card-Based_PowersCategory, You would find Card Magic in there but it does not have a picture popping up there, just a bunch of text. That is the problem I'm currently dealing with. CrabHermit (talk) 01:30, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, Thanks for atleast trying to help out ^^ CrabHermit (talk) 01:33, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

I liked it, it's the perfect power of a Zombie/Undead, no matter what you do to them, they will continue coming after you like nothing happened (unless you somehow completely disable them) Tsubasa16 (talk) 23:21, March 17, 2017 (UTC)

So basically acct/work/do thing´gs normally regardless on how the user tilts regarding down? Doable but name is ´n't really descriptive.

Drop the part about enhanced senses tho, not really connected. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:44, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

None of them really clicks. Position Adaptation maybe? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:23, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:11, March 18, 2017 (UTC)

Magical Liquid Manipulation: too specific

Plant Intuition: Agriculture Intuition?

Weakness Augmentation: doable

Feather Fall/Lightweight Movement: try to figure better name but usable idea. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:06, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Plant Intuition is doable.

Feather Fall, any connections to Gliding? --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:12, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Feather Fall doable--Kuopiofi (talk) 16:49, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Enhanced Twisting Speed: how about ability to twist any part of body, expanded form of 360-Degree Neck Rotation.

Physical Force Negation: doable

Axis Shifting: so, Self-Axis Manipulation... why? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:43, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

It could be interesting power and I'm pretty sure there are users too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:52, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

That would be essentially Enhanced Speed and it Levels combined to it. It could be mentioned (speed of rotation depends of Users overall speed or something?) but it isn't really the main thing of the power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:35, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

Instead?

Pretty specific one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:34, March 22, 2017 (UTC)

Too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:52, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

It's still there, using the power into yourself or others/objects has the same effect of making them easier to move.

I couldn't really think better way to say what I meant, so it isn't really obvious. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:05, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Daydream Empowerment: doable

Magic Inducement: Magic Bestowal? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:20, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Selective Portals, Reality Searching, Constant Manipulation: doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:24, March 24, 2017 (UTC)

That and it'd basically been "RW... with telekinesis". --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:28, March 24, 2017 (UTC)

Telekinetic Precision: too specific

Selective Inertia: usable

Rotational Combat: use Spinning Combat, we have Spinning Attack and Spinning Defense. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:57, March 25, 2017 (UTC)

it seems fine to me. Tsubasa16 (talk) 22:51, March 25, 2017 (UTC)

We already have Vibration Negation.SageM (talk) 10:18, March 26, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Meta Existence Manipulation: Multiversal Manipulation/Omniverse Manipulation?

Symbol Manipulation: may be covered by Literary Manipulation Variations.

Weight Negation: Weight Reduction

Attack Calling: Strength Calling is Variation of Enhancement Calling is Variation of Power Bestowal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:58, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

So a form of Existence Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:26, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:50, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:13, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Gravitational Immunity- Gravity Defiance?SageM (talk) 17:04, March 27, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Personal realms, dimensions, spaces, or planes either belonging to or owned by others or were once owned by others basically.SageM (talk) 02:55, March 28, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Extra Life Theft: Life Addition

Mental Regeneration: Mental Regeneration

Rank Creation: doable

Semisolid Manipulation: Gel Manipulation?

Unreality Manipulation: define where the line between real/unreal goes? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:00, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Note that it's gel and "jelly-like" for a reason, does that cover what you're thinking?

Actually I asked how you define the difference. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:54, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

How you define the difference between real/unreal? What belongs to which? --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:04, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Remember to define it well and have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:51, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Mythic Soul: and the point would be? They aren't that much different from humans.

Purpose Removal: doable

Area Transmutation: Terrain Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:59, March 30, 2017 (UTC)

Elemental Soul/Radiation Negation - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:30, March 30, 2017 (UTC)

Avatarism: better name and explanation

Limit Reinforcement: Law Inducement

Physics Adaptation: overly specific

Zero Point Energy Generation: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:51, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Idea has some merit, but explanation/presentation is terrible. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:58, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Got better name? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:17, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Opportunity Sense works. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:33, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Not really, no. Gabriel456 (talk) 19:29, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

well, i believe it would be something similar to Indirect Concept Manipulation, as instead of controlling the concepts yourself, you would control the embodiments to control it for you. well, also not all embodiments are concepts or extremely powerful, some might just be embodiments of places and objects. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:28, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

well, you could, though i think you should ask kuo's permission again and explain why. Tsubasa16 (talk) 21:40, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

I think the best would be to think the power through beforehand, rather than start it on a vague idea. Like, "opportunity" in which sense(s) ? What forms would it take in practice ? What would be its core possibilities and limits ? What would be the clear distinctions from similar powers ? What special perks/edges would it offer that other power users don't have ? What kind of character types would the ability lead to ?

All these questions are essential to shape the power into something one, and notably to figure out beforehand if it has sufficient logic, usefulness and uniqueness to make it a success, and justify a page of its own.

DYBAD (talk) 11:27, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Rank Promotion: doable

Effect Multiplication: see Quantity Manipulation

Beginning Inducement: this would do what? in practical terms.

Concept Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:21, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Event Manipulation, especially Event Rearrangement.

Beyond concept would be Unreality Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:33, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

well, i think so. Tsubasa16 (talk) 15:24, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

have fun. Gabriel456 (talk) 17:49, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Avatar Manipulation
This is as crazy and brilliant a power as they get. Never would have thought of it. If one can control reincarnations, life and death cycles and spirituality, why not avatars? Very cool and original. Kusarigama (talk) 12:04, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

I'll have to go with way too focused with this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:44, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Only working on one power isn't enough? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:58, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Wish is singular concept. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:56, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

Planetary Life Force Manipulation: related to Ley Line Manipulation?

Accelerated Mind Development: sub-power of Accelerated Development

Shock Inducement: shock as in electricity or scaring them?

Surface Generation: as in Platform Creation or Surface Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:23, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

Planetary Life Force Manipulation: doable

Accelerated Mind Development: doable

Shock Inducement: isn't that Fear Inducement?

Surface Manipulation: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:38, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if that is really worth it, but meh... go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:48, April 5, 2017 (UTC)

don't normal Motion Manipulation already does that? Tsubasa16 (talk) 00:06, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Phenomenon Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:34, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Description Manipulation = Definition Manipulation?

Enhanced Attack/Defense - doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

So basically Limitation to Definition Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty sure we don't have that, so have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:18, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

Wallrunning Limitation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:37, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

May not be able to run on totally vertical surfaces. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:56, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Isn't that basically Evolution Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:22, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Manipulating/causing/removing Reactive Adaptations? Just environment feels bit limited. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:40, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

"Manipulating/causing/removing Reactive Adaptations?" --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:41, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Then you can go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:58, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Mark Manipulation - too specific.

Ceiling/Floor Manipulation - if you can think one word to cover those both on page-name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:01, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

Action Manipulation: define action

Stage Manipulation: too specific.

Form Creation: Category:Forms? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:13, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Action: doable but needs good explanation

Form Creation: too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:01, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Could use better name, but doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:00, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Trance Manipulation: too specific

Life Manipulation: strictly on life and not life-force?

Spatial Perception: doable tho name is bit clunky

Anchored Essence: doable but needs better name --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, June 10, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:12, June 10, 2017 (UTC)

Nutrient Manipulation: too specific

Physics Negation: doable

Knowledge Sense: make it Knowledge Intuition so it allows user to intuit either the right answer or way to find it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:58, June 11, 2017 (UTC)

New Articles
Hey there. Sorry I didn't get back to you. Been busy. Action Manipulation is very interesting. Almost seemed to generalized to define. Been actually trying to find users for your Spatial Perception page. Cool stuff.

Hi, I'm wondering if you created the "multitasking" image? I am working with a professor who would like to use the image in a book she is writing, so I'm trying to track down the owner. Please let me know, thanks!

Logan.glasenapp (talk) 03:15, June 14, 2017 (UTC)

Dependency Transcendence - Limitation Transcendence/Weakness Removal?

Inertia Generation - doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:30, June 17, 2017 (UTC)

Passageway Manipulation - doable

Room Manipulation - pretty much covered by Wall Manipulation/Floor & Ceiling Manipulation

Objectivity Manipulation - I think that we have something that pretty much covers this... --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:34, June 18, 2017 (UTC)

Would the Room Manipulation include just the room or also everything in it, like furniture?

Objectivity Manipulation - go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:42, June 18, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:47, June 18, 2017 (UTC)

New powers
Very interesting. What made you think of adding these? Were they compliments to Wall Manipulation and Floor & Ceiling Manipulation?

Alternate Self Mimicry - find a better name and go ahead

Multi-Rotation - needs better explanation

Motion Condition Immunity - bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:52, June 19, 2017 (UTC)

It's pretty much Discomfort Immunity. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:33, June 19, 2017 (UTC)

Id Manipulation/Superego Manipulation - combine them into Jungian Archetype Manipulation

Stimulus - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:15, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

Simpler if you go with just Psyche Manipulation and drop the JAM, for the PM see here. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:25, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

Essentially covered by various other powers. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:30, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

Room Creation: doable but bit frivolous really.

Movement Creation: ?

Lethal Mode: doable

Robotic Entity Manipulation: figure better name and you have a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:20, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

WAY too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:17, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

I meant the page needed a slight clean up, for example the categories were placed in the actual page instead of their separate box. I sorted most of it myself.

Death horseman94 (talk) 10:07, June 21, 2017 (UTC)

Aerosol Manipulation: figure out better name and go ahead.

Alloy Manipulation: too specific

Boundary Bypassing: we don't have anything like this yet?

Furniture Creation: go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:59, June 22, 2017 (UTC)

Still cleaves bit too close to specific side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:12, June 22, 2017 (UTC)

I think you need to check Wikipedia, dictionary and synonyms for that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:35, June 22, 2017 (UTC)

Bugger. Try to figure out something descriptive... --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:50, June 22, 2017 (UTC)

Mirage Manipulation: too specific

Cosmic Event Manipulation: all parts of it are covered by several powers

Universe Absorption: go with Astronomical Object Absorption and you got a deal. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:35, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

That's a toss-up between Season Manipulation and Holiday Manipulation, depending on which way you look at it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:04, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Mineral Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:11, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Earth Manipulation --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:15, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Soil Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:27, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Sure Gabriel456 (talk) 19:29, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Honestly it just is covered in so many ways. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:46, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:12, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Motion Mimicry: as in when it happens or learn to do the motion?

Momentum Storage: doable

Existence Intuition: doable, tho you need to explain why intuition instead of sense/detection

Ambience Manipulation: too specific

Ritual Manipulation: doable --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Silly but interesting. Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Special:Whatlinkshere, but you find it from the rules page as well. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:27, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

To be blunt, I don't know.Gabriel456 (talk) 17:53, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Reply
They had similar enough applications and capabilities to be the same page.

Imouto 22:43, June 24, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Actually all of the users on Speed Accumulation does exactly that. So no need for momentum store when speed accumulation covers both motion and speed. Imouto 23:26, June 24, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Skating: not sure if we have power that doese this but it's at least mentioned as part of existing power.

Motion Inversion: might have better name but doable

Consequence Inducement: ?

Special Effects Manipulation: I'd say existing powers more than cover this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, June 25, 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:21, June 25, 2017 (UTC)

See above. --Kuopiofi (talk) 09:12, June 25, 2017 (UTC)

New Power
Is there a difference between Motion Mimicry and Miming? Based on some observations, they seem pretty similar.

Don't we have something like this? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:38, June 25, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:14, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:16, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

You might want to consider making it Acceleration Manipulation. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:26, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

So it does, didn't even remember that one. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:52, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

Doable. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:56, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 22:03, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

Hyper Acceleration is very cool. Upon seeing it, I almost immediately thought of a user. Kusarigama (talk) 01:03, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Kuiper Belt Manipulation: bit of rephrasing and ABM would cover that too

Accelerated Thought Frequency: I think we have powers that cover that

Cloud Walking: Air Walking Limitation

Video Trapping: expand to other digital media --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:21, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Modify ABM to include all rocks in space. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:52, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Bit too specific I think. --Kuopiofi (talk) 14:58, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Eldritch Manipulation: any relations to Eldritch Magic?

Literary Intuition: details? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:04, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Eldritch Manipulation - doable

Literature Intuition - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:09, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty sure the existing powers cover this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:02, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:35, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Just with items or while for example riding a horse?

Could use better/more descriptive name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:56, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Meh, doable but not really that interesting. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:00, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Try explaining that gain without using spring analogues. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:01, June 29, 2017 (UTC)

I mean repeat the explanation from your first post without using spring as basis. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:12, June 29, 2017 (UTC)

It is an interesting, slightly confusing article. Neat, though. Kusarigama (talk) 04:38, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Right Manipulation: Law Manipulation?

Adhesive Combat: bit too specific I think

Underground Sense: Seismic Sense? --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:42, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Right Manipulation: Reward Manipulation

Underground Sense: Find better name. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:03, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Let's try that again: Reward Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:00, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

(eyeroll) Any connections between those two? --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:01, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

At this point, what ever. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:25, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Wasn't really bother, just completely forgot where we were. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:30, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Sure. Gabriel456 (talk) 13:21, June 30, 2017 (UTC)

Association Manipulation: doable but needs good explanation

Escher Effect: sub-power of Illogical Maze Creation

Population Augmentation: Fertility Inducement? --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:54, July 1, 2017 (UTC)

Associations at least. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:07, July 1, 2017 (UTC)

Yes. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:56, July 1, 2017 (UTC)

Surface Running: Wallcrawling

Athletic Combat: Ninjutsu

Weightlessness Negation: too specific

Condition Restoration: Restoration --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:35, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

Surface Running - still feels too specific, but whatever.

Athletic Combat - have you watched ninja-combat? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:08, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

Fine, go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:38, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

eh, not sure about that one, tbh. Gabriel456 (talk) 11:55, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

Attack Concentration- Attack Compression.SageM (talk) 23:40, July 3, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Also Omni-Lingualism is lingual intuitionSageM (talk) 23:50, July 3, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Revolution Manipulation: Nothing to do with social upheavals?

Durability Concentration: expand that to other things that body and you have something usable

Alien Intuition: doable

Automatic Telekinesis: that's Limitation "may have to concentrate"

Randomization: Chaos Inducement --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:24, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

Just a bad joke really. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:10, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

Usable but name is bit misleading. You know how many obvious jokes German Physiology gets... --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:25, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

Armors, objects (making weapon more durable when someone tries to break it), vehicles (before hitting something), etc. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:41, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

I'd have to say that's too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:13, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

Which did what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:23, July 4, 2017 (UTC)

That's pretty specific.

Compound Manipulation: didn't you ask about this once already?

Equid Manipulation: doable but bit pointless

Game Creation: too specific.

Enhanced Wits: expand and rename --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

CM - doable

EW - accelerated mental abilities in general, allowing faster thinking, reactions, etc.: there's bit time between sensing something, getting it to the part of brain that actually does something to that knowledge, getting it to part that does what is needed and then acting. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:28, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

Bead Manipulation: Sphere Manipulation includes "spherical objects of any sizes and material", so bit of expansion there would cover this.

Foreign Environment Manipulation: this isn't covered by Un-Usual Variations of Environment Manipulation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:27, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

For Bead Manipulation: point, go ahead.

For Foreign Environment Manipulation: have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:37, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

I might be able to assist with that question, and to me, Enhanced Cleverness sounds a lot like Enhanced Intelligence really.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:39, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, Enhanced Thinking Speed then sounds like Enhanced Reflexes. Though, thats just what I gather.

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:48, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

It seems to be covered by Accelerated Thought Process and other similar powers Imouto 22:31, July 5, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Enhanced Preparedness would cover making plans and so would tactical analysis. Infinite Creativity also would allow the same level of cleverness and it's already a Sub-power of Enhanced Intelligence. Imouto 22:44, July 5, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

I have to say that the point about ATP does have quite a bit backing it, even if it isn't exactly what you made. So maybe Editing/expanding ATP to cover those areas. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:17, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Pretty sure those are also covered by aspects of intelligence. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:12, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Enhanced Wisdom/Hypercognition? --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:47, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

You need better name and very good description/how it differs from those, but as far as I'm concerned it seems to be different enough for it's own power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 12:38, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Those could work, go for it Gabriel456 (talk) 12:44, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Adaptive Mind - I think we have powers that cover this

Rapid Decisiveness - too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:57, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead then.

"The user can process information at incredible speeds, allowing them to analyze and come to conclusions at an unprecedented rate." --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:13, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

You can make it clearer if you want. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:16, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, thats cool with me!

Death horseman94 (talk) 21:32, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I was busy at work for the past four hours, but I'm fine with Enhanced Wits 👍

Imouto 21:43, July 6, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Honestly, Enhanced Wits seemed a little silly to me. Still, it was creative. I like the Transmutation Manipulation and Adaptive Mind pages. Kusarigama (talk) 02:57, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

volatile nullification- Explosive NegationSageM (talk) 02:58, July 7, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Pocket Universe Manipulation: covered by Universal Manipulation

Enhanced Creativity: way too limited

Volatile Nullification: doable

Universal Expansion/Universal Contraction: combine these and you have usable power. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:19, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

There's nothing in UM that mentions about size of universe they manipulate.

Manipulation to Pocket Dimension Creation? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:01, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

Dimension is quite enough. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:46, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:58, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

You just descripted Enhanced Condition and upwards. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:30, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

See Levels in EC.

You descripted body that is better in every way. That's EC. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:45, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

As in Structure?

Not really, you're manipulating the dimensional pocket, not it's reality. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:13, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:28, July 7, 2017 (UTC)

Role Manipulation- Purpose Manipulation.SageM (talk) 04:07, July 8, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Development Manipulation: Evolution Manipulation/Uplifting

Rate Manipulation: too specific

World Manipulation: Population Control

Template/Model Manipulation: too specific

Limit Defiance: Freedom --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:32, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

From your first post: "World Manipulation: The ability to manipulate the world, not the planet itself, but humanity or any other sentinent species on a planet and their affairs".

Development Manipulation - possibility but needs good explanation.

Limit Defiance - pretty sure we have this, can't remember the name but I think it had Joker as the main pic. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:11, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

World Manipulation - I think we have something like this, it had Beyonder on the main pic...

Rule Bending? I think it's pretty close to what you're thinking. --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:48, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

I think what you're talking about is combination of Planetary Manipulation and Society Manipulation, that about right? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:59, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:19, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

Want Manipulation - as in just the emotion/need or also results?

Affinity Manipulation - bit too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:49, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:56, July 8, 2017 (UTC)

Lovelessness: Apathy

Unity Manipulation: too specific

Limit Manipulation: I think we have something like this.

Barrenness Inducement: make it ability to kill plants and rename.

Group Creation: Quantity Manipulation/Augmentation --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:41, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Honestly no clue, just a feeling that I've seen something like that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:10, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Have fun then, at least you found something useful. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:25, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Lovelessness - Seduction Immunity?

Group Creation - related to Infinite Supply?

Randomization - ... what? --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:07, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Randomization was several days ago so I didn't remember anything about it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:59, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead with both. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:17, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

volatile augmentation- Explosion Augmentation.

For future reference, we don't use the word volatile we use the word explosive or explosion.SageM (talk) 22:05, July 9, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Center of Mass Manipulation - doable

Destruction Manipulation - no Creation Manipulation?

Rigidification - find better and go ahead

Flaw Reduction - go ahead

Want Manipulation - asked, should get answer at some point. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, July 10, 2017 (UTC)

That can work too. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:20, July 10, 2017 (UTC)

Oh yeah

Desire Manifestation/Manipulation covers the power Want Manipulation. Imouto 22:04, July 10, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

I would be okay with Wish Manipulation. Imouto 00:19, July 11, 2017 (UTC)Imouto-tan

Line Manipulation: that's getting too specific.

Animation Manipulation: go ahead, tho name may be bit misleading

Class Manipulation: too specific

Wish Immunity: pretty much Reality Anchoring

Cartoon Form: don't we have this?

Wish Manipulation: go ahead --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:32, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

Cartoon Mode: doable

Line Manipulation: Shape Manipulation, or are you talking about Geometry Manipulation?

Class Manipulation: would they be different from your first idea? --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:14, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

Geometry Manipulation - doable

Group Manipulation - gets bit close to Society Manipulation

Elemental Conversion - connected to Energy Conversion? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:39, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

Going with this sites thinking, energy would be Variation od Elemental Conversion. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:07, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

Significance Manipulation: Rarity Manipulation?

Consciousness Manipulation: too specific.

Possibility Infusion: need good explanation but doable.

Radioactive Rain Generation: too specific. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:09, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

? means question, in other words what do you think about this (power) in connection to your idea. If I mean it covers the idea I say so. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:19, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

Uncosciousness Inducement - as in knocking someone out? I think we have that. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:20, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

(eyeroll) "what do you think about this (power) in connection to your idea" doesn't translate "this is your idea". If I mean it covers the idea I say so.

Unconsciousness Inducement - connections to Incapacitation Inducement/Jolt Inducement? --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:05, July 11, 2017 (UTC)