Talk:Absolute Violence/@comment-26973278-20190716051911/@comment-26973278-20190816212236

@ChocolateElemental

Minus the fact that this page didn't need to be documented, if you wanted to document a user, you could've just expanded the original page instead of making a carbon copy. Encyclopedias/wikipedias are about documenting things, not making carbon copy pages. If someone made an "original page" on a wikipedia/encyclopedia which was actually an already existing page, but with minuscule/unnecessary differences, it would get deleted since the original could be expanded. Inherently, this makes your logic flawed.

There's a fine line between similarity and plagiarism which you don't seem to understand. I agree that pages are pretty much public domain, but the page's creator does have a say in the matter on where the page leads to, as Kuopiofi mentioned above. It's not a competition either, and I never said that, I was saying get your own idea or expand upon mine, don't take my idea and make it your own. This page was practically already documented, because, as mentioned above, most of its users (literally one is missing) are already on the Enhanced Violence page and a good chunk of its content, like the associations, are practically the same as the original's. This page literally adds nothing in comparison to the original, it would make zero difference on the wiki if it didn't exist to begin with. This page solely exists to cause problems among the community.

There is inherently ownership to documentation because that's how patents work, of course wikipedias/encyclopedias don't have that, but pages don't happen without people putting in their own contributions to the page, not going off and making their own version of a page unless it's an actual variation, unlike this page. (i.e. Mechanical engineering is similar, but different to rocket engineering).

My critique may have been rude and bias, but what's wrong with that? It was biased because I have my own opinion and view of the page, not everything is seen on the fence, people have their opinions and there is nothing wrong with that. I came off rude because I was upset with the page, again, nothing wrong with having an opinion and emotions. Who are you to claim that you won't accept criticism because it doesn't fall under your criteria of "acceptable", it's not slander if its true, you're a hypocrite.