Talk:Quantum Foam Manipulation/@comment-4856791-20191204092047

Im sorry to say this SageM but I do disagree with your definition of omnipotence. The idea that something cannot be understood or beyond human comprehension is nothing more but a form of special pleeding. (A) Tao based on what I red can actually be anything that can be both logical and ilogical at the same time, it can be anything you can and you can't think of. I just don't buy into such an idea so I  did keep doing some research and encountered a very nice argument about the word omnipotent. I have derived my own definition of the word and I don't expect anyone to agree with me but nonetheless let me say it here. So my own definition of the word omnipotent is that it is a word, idea or title used to describe anything that has the properties agreed upon by humans as the ability to become completely unbeatable by anything and everything logical or philosophical usually used to justify and protect a fictional entity from logical form of defeat. It's just another form of saying the character is completely impossible to defeat. It is beyond any reasoning period. No more arguments, thats it! The ultimate end of reason. The ultimatum of every people defending a specific fictional character and that to me is completely unfair within the realms of logic and reason. That is why I am so against to such an idea. Here is a video I watched that may give you an insight on how ridiculous such a concept really is. Caution because it argues against the property of a specific deity you may be familiar with.

[[1]]