User blog comment:The 2nd Existential Seed/The Crying Child/@comment-29564364-20170423170649/@comment-26429591-20170424142021

I do not have the time or Patience to explain why that comparison is ridiculously false. Actually, I do. This isn't a joke character in the slightest. I am not going above Omnipotence, as Omnipotence in general cannot be surpassed, no matter how contradictory it gets. Deus Ex Machina, I agree, in my works, that is what she essentially represents. But, I will NOT have Matthew being compared to such an pathetic piece of work. No imagination, it is literally just made to be overpowered, not unique, no creativity. It's over the top, but only because I use things most have never thought of using. Matthew is an piece that combines all of the creativity I have in me, but at the same time, uses concepts never explored fully within fiction itself. So please, be thoughtful before EVER comparing Matthew to an work of Suggs AGAIN.