Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-26429591-20170613035456/@comment-29375707-20170618192954

Well, I agree with you in part, and disagree elsewhere. For one thing, the only thing that questions logic about omnipotence is the principle of noncontradiction, and this principle serves to question the validity of an argument, but it is extremely failed in reality. We can see this in computation, in quantum physics, in self-referencing, and in dialetheism, and this has become much more evident since the advent of paraconsistent logic. We ourselves can violate the principle of non-contradiction, and if we can, a transcendental being can. The scholastic/classical/thomist view of omnipotence is very beautiful, but fails to regard the principle of non-contradiction as absolute, it in fact isn't.