<div class="quote"><i>
<p>ANDROMADA wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Mike Snow34 wrote:
<div class="quote">
<p>Niarobi wrote:
I could argue and say Metapotence is beyond Omnipotence. It would take a lot of explaining, and I also think a separate page should be made for Patapotence, because it is above Metapotence.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>That's redundant. Not all meta powers need a pata variant. Can you imagine pata power manipulation? It does not exist because it is redundant. With metapotence you already break all laws just because you can even unknown laws. Unlike metaphysics and pataphysics. Pataphysics is an actual thing but that does not mean all metapowers should have a pata counterpart.
</p>
</div>
<p>It is listed within
Metapotence that it is a supreme version of
Pataphysics Manipulation and also called Patapotence in the "also called" section. You are arguing for something that is redundant.
</p>
</div>
<p>Wait was that for me or niarobi?
</p>