(The use of "direct/directly" in this discussion is to show that some Absolutes are localized and unidirectional, implying they can be dodged and avoided, but if caught in the effect of one, you have no means of countering or surviving if you yourself do not posses the proper [indirect] counter to that effect. The use of [indirect] here is the show that more than likely the opposing force does not posses an absolute counter to the effect, canceling both abilities or locking them in a paradox.)
I've been looking around a lot and have noted that most Absolute powers all feature at least one limitation that fundamentally changes the power from being Absolute. The problem with this is that the title of Absolute grants a value of infinity to the said power. These powers can't be directly overcome. Only Omnipotence can superceed them and oppress them, but clearly the people who've made these pages fail to understand this.
A good example is Absolute Immortality. Despite the title of Absolute, a limitation exists where one with "Immortality Negation" can possibly overcome this power. However, this is impossible. Absolute Immortality in being absolute cannot be removed by any means other than Omnipotent intervention, and while one may argue an Absolute Negation ability could remove it, there in lies a paradoxical issue. Absolutes cancel each other out or get stuck in an infinite cycle of countering one another. The only real method of directly dealing with these abilities is through omnipotent application. Absolute Attack for instance cannot overcome Absolute Defense, and Absolute Defense can never overcome an Absolute Attack. Absolute is an infailable law of the universe only capable of being broken by one of Omnipotent standing, and its imparative that everyone understand this. Absolutes cannot be defeated, or overpowered in any direct manner without omnipotence.