That’s faulty logic since it isn’t something that the omnipotent being can’t do, it’s something that another being cannot do
Omnipotence isn't a completely logical power it's also irrational.
Exactly. It is the irrational power to do anything, have infinite power, etc.
No, and anyone who says otherwise don't know what they're talking about.
No matter how many times questions like this are asked, someone else asks again...
Well, if we’re to go the literal route, no. But we could go the philosophical/paradoxical route and say that yeah sure, Omnipotence can be defeated by omnipotence. Sorta like- if an omnipotent can create a rock they can’t lift, they aren’t omnipotent, but if they can’t create a rock they can’t lift then they also aren’t omnipotent.
Nah. No power can beat Omnipotence unless the Omnipotent prefers to be defeated or on the same level as someone else. That's the only way Omnipotence is getting ”defeated”. Again, it's just the user saying so, cuz otherwise it's absolutely impossible.
Unless another omnipotent appears, then it’s a veritable spitting contest of who is more omnipotent, but only one of them can be omnipotent fully - it’s a paradox of a question lmao
What do you think?