171 Votes in Poll
Everything you have said literally takes a shit on the definition of omnipotence.
"It is simply a being with every power"- You are confusing omnipotence with complete arsenal and omni manipulation. This is wrong.
The omnipotence paradox is literally the reason why its a power being logic. A paradox is generated by conflicting logical arguments, thus it is beyond logic.
Then again you said this is all your opinion so whatever I guess...
Dude, none of the limits you’ve said are actual limits. One of the basic definitions of omnipotence is the ability to do anything and have “all power” beyond all logic. Omnipotence is by very definition the single greatest power that can ever be conceived, there is no way to reach it, surpass it, or beat it. It’s not just having every power(that’s complete arsenal) it’s the ability to do anything, or nothing, or some illogical mixture of the two with no limits whatsoever even things that are completely impossible by very definition of them being(like making a square circle). While omnipotence doesn’t mean “impossible to kill” it is basically implied given how omnipotence makes you above literally everything else. Omnivastence is just people putting another name on omnipotence and saying it’s another power, like calling a shovel a spade, it’s the same thing
But as you said, opinions. Just reread the definition of omnipotence and see if that changes your mind, if not it’s your choice
I will point out that I'm using the literal definition of Omnipotent. Also, I do not consider Omnipotence or Omnivastance a power, rather I consider them a state: Omnipotent being an entity in a state where they have every power, and Omnivastance being an entity in a state where they have more than every power.
Um...go to the wiki page and read it again, it literally says “every power known and unknown”, they HAVE beyond every power
@Omnitra Literal dictionary definition: Omnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power and potential.
A state can be a superpower, I do not know where you get the idea that it isn't. A superpower is a trait that is expressed but does not occur in the natural world. Thus by definition omnipotence is a power.
"Omnipotent being an entity in a state where they have every power, and Omnivastance being an entity in a state where they have more than every power." - As the guy above said. Go and read the damn page, and actually do research before making assumptions about a concept that has already been discussed. Omnipotent beings have every power that exists and does not exist. That is all. This is not rocket science.
He’s right, omnipotent beings have any and all existing or not existing powers abilities etc and infinite unknowable more, including whatever you think is omnivastence has that omnipotence doesn’t
Thank you. I've said my part, if he/she continues I will merely watch.
I agree. That is a misinterpreted definition of omnipotence. Omnipotence isnt having every power. It is any power in existence or nonexistence, and all that is unknowable. An omnipotent could "make a merried bachelor" or "flarggle a snuffen". Even though these terms are contradictory or completely make no sense, an omnipotent being can just do it. No matter what. By definition, nothing can be beyond that.
My guys what do you guys think of impossiopence, for some reason it has omnipotent and true omnipotent added as a sub power and they can defeat omnipotent beings without them losing there status.
What do you think?