Also, It's pretty STRANGE how nobody talks about these powers When They are powers TO BE FEARED like even The Strongest of beings would Fear this (not omnipotence of course), How could ya'll Ignore these powers like they don't exist I say any mf with the maximum capacity of this powers, should be boot licked everywhere they go.
ALL POSTS
I think the problem is that both are expressions of omnipotence. So on one hand, you may be right, but on the other, what exactly stops an Omnipotent being from killing themselves if they so desired?
@Reality25 what you said there I'll have to disagree, When it Erases everything it means everything including totality, and life forms, and idk who told you that but erasure is not painless.
@Doodlewuzhere91 that's the conflicting problem here, the power talks about putting asunder to totality but what would TE embody when all of that is null.
@Fallen221 i wanna say it's a paradox, but i guess logically it is an exception. If an omnipotent being is the totality, and they destroy that totality, then what remains is not itself the old, but i guess can be viewed as a new totality, separate from the old totality in the same manner as the omnipotent being is from existence as a concept in whole.
Basically," the old totality which i embody has been destroyed, therefore what is left of me is a new totality to create" kinda deal
@Doodlewuzhere91 Omnipotent being is from existence?
Well yes, if you subscribe to that line of thought. Basically existence itself is paradoxical and therefore requires the existence of an absolute power or omnipotent being. However, on the contrast, while existence is contingent on the existence of an omnipotent being, they themselves will forever persist and have persisted long before and after "existence" as a concept came to be, as is necessary for existence to come to be. Thus, while an omnipotent being can embody this existence, or totality as i understand it, they themselves can persist beyond it's existence, and can very easily create a new totality
Then again, this entire argument hinges on the idea that there's no way for somebody to embody totality without being omnipotent.
@Doodlewuzhere91 "Existence itself is paradoxical" You only think that because paradox exists within the mind.
The Omnipotent is essentially the source of all things without its divine nature sustaining it, existence would not be.
Fair
And yeah that's the point I'm trying to make, just unnecessarily long winded. Effectively I'm just saying omnipotents are excluded from 'totality' by function.
Well I would agree with you right there, unlike the bullshit on the totality embodiment page :)
What do you think?