So could path to victory be considered a sub- power of game theory? To "win" in game theory, you typically aim to achieve the best possible outcome for yourself, given the choices and potential strategies of other participants, true or not?
@LimittlesRealm 'unimaginable', not so much as doing the impossible but doing what all that is possible. PathtoVictory and NashEquilibrium both relying on 'winnings solution' is what make it compatible as a concept.
