Hello everyone, I wanted to ask what people think it means to transcend life and death. If life and death were inapplicable to something/unbound by them, would you see it as transcending life and death and do you think for something to die it must have lived? If you said yes, then say we have a rock, the rock is not alive and so cannot be dead, making both inapplicable to it, so would the rock transcend life and death under this logic? If no please tell me why.
Or is the true answer beyond our comprehension?
.Do you define anything not alive as dead? So regardless of whether it has lived or not, if it's not alive it is dead and if it is dead it is not alive, even inanimate objects and such? If you said yes, then that would mean the rock is dead, so what would going beyond life and death or the concept being inapplicable to something in this case mean? Would something like this just be beyond our comprehension? it would have no sentience,awareness, conciousness and the opposite of everything here so what would something beyond all this be? What would it be like? My last question is should something transcendent of life have attributes that something with the attribute of life have? Like immortality and regeneration are both properties of living/life, so should something beyond them still have such attributes? You could think of it like if something is beyond space-time and dimensionality, then should any attribute of space-time apply to it?
Of course, life and death interests you and your favourite power involves both, so I'll do the honours @Neosaiyan7 . Anyone else I didn't list but is interested, please come join.
@BlackSupergenius @NineSix96 @GoldenPizza17 @Necropolis00 @Jack em all @Abdalla1234 @Keefdreewill @SuperPimp80 @Heartless Frost @TheDevil7777 @Fallen221 @Scarlet king999 @Omni-Defiance @Heartz13 @EtherealMystic @Ludwigkoopa7000 2.O @Ludwigkoopa6000 @Cameron Washington @Izumi023 @Richardbewild
