@Neosaiyan7 thank you 💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿

@Neosaiyan7 That is the most pathetic statement I've ever heard, science is the study of creation, God is the creator, not the creation, and even so, who said there isn't proof of God? What you are looking for it ain't proof but some famous scientist showing you a picture of God, that is why you are limited to knowing who God is, If a builder is proof of a Builder, a painting is proof of a painter, because neither of them or anything else of that matter can be created by itself no? It doesn't just pop up in thin air out of nothingness, so if all of this is a proof of something, then what makes creation a proof of? take a wild guest. You see because of your simple-minded thinking and ignorance you fail to see the bigger picture right in front of you, it's like you are looking through a microscope at a part of a painting and saying "Is this it, where is the rest?", if it is "so easy" to master theology as you said, then you would have had irrefutable proof that God exists, and not just any God The Creator of the Universe and The one whose word is the Bible. So I say this again what have you not found Christ? since you claim to be a master at theology because to me you seem to have rather failed than to master anything at this point.

@BlackSupergenius I fail to see what's funny but at the same time since you state you wholeheartedly agree with him, the same paragraph applies to you, but frankly I think your response would be rather nonsensical.

I honestly have to agree with @Fallen221 on this one

The absence of scientific evidence for God's existence doesn't necessarily negate the possibility of His reality. Science operates within the confines of empirical observation and measurable data, focusing on the tangible aspects of the natural world. However, the concept of God often transcends these measurable parameters, residing in the realms of faith, philosophy, and personal introspection. Questions related to purpose, morality, and the origin of the universe fall outside the traditional purview of scientific investigation. While science illuminates our understanding of the natural world, the absence of concrete empirical proof doesn't conclusively dismiss the potential existence of a higher power. The question of God's reality is a nuanced, subjective matter, intertwining personal beliefs, spiritual experiences, and interpretations of existence beyond the current scope of scientific exploration. Dismissing the idea of God based solely on a lack of scientific evidence oversimplifies the complexity of this philosophical and metaphysical discourse.

@GoldenPizza17 Spirituality is not a highly subjective or diverse concept there is no other defintion that would be classified as spiritual than what it already is, so stop blowing the word out of proportion. what different cultures, religions and philosphical tradition offers is different means of spirituality, meaning they go about it in there own way but it's still the same spirit. The Spiritual realm is not interconnected with God so idk howyou reach to that, God created the spritual realm and creation is a signature of the creator so everything of the spiritual sense is still from the one domain, but it simply differes in who it's from The forces of evil or God. God or the devil it's that simple and whether you like it or not its how it is there is no in-between.

Once again, You don't know what spirituality is, your first point has no basis on the argument here, a scientist or philosopher can't tell you whether or not the universe as a connection to the spirit realm, beacuse the literally cannot study it, what they do is go about it in a more carnal manner, and of that same notion science is more on the physical, philosophy would be more attune to having an inkling to what the spiritual is, but beacuse they would think carnally at sometimes they wouldn't even realise. even plato's concept of forms inadvertedly describes what the sprirtual realm entails that forms is the thing that gives meaning to the defintion in the physical, that's literally what the sprirtual realm is described as well. "whatever is bound on earth(the physical) is bound in heaven(the spiritual) whatever is lose on earth is lose in heaven." so in other words they are not far of from seeing the truth of it. and again everything is a direct reflection of God.

Your second point is weak there isn't much to be refuted, God is eternal and beyond time the spirit realm is within the presence of God who is once again Eternal. The spiritual does not exist in time so it all leaves the question where is it? take a guess.

God(The father) is a Spirit meaning he is invisible none can behold him, however there is the (God the son) who took upon himself the physical aspect and dwelt amongst his creation. so you making such assertion without much of a reference or a proof it rather faulty.

Once again your claim about God is a sprirt is often understood as metaphorical is weak and not true. and AGAIN! you don't know what spirituality is to make such a claim. Humans can't grasp the ways of the spirits nor spirtual understanding without the wisdom from God through his word, so once again that argument is weak and a lie and further you seriously don't understand what spirituality really is. so you trying to use fancy words or attempt to sound intellectual really doesn't give your argument any valid points, you have a long way to go if you think such tatics would work on me.

@Neosaiyan7 Your statement towards what you said to Black, i'll show you why you should retract it and humble you (this is not said in a offsensive way) it's a long way before you possess great knowledge.

@Ogtea also to answer your original question to your post the answer is Eternity.

@Fallen221 Omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence, which go beyond the confines of a spiritual existence. The idea of God as a creator and sustainer of the universe implies a level of sovereignty that surpasses the traditional understanding of spiritual entities. In theological discussions, the nature of God is often explored in terms of divine attributes, including justice, mercy, and wisdom, which contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the divine. God is the cause of spirits he isn't a spirit because before everything was created nothing existed except God's Presence not a Spiritual Presence, God is God itself not a spirit.

Furthermore, certain philosophical perspectives challenge the idea of God as merely a spirit. Philosophers like Thomas Aquinas, for example, argue that God is the ultimate cause of all things, including the material world, suggesting a metaphysical reality that transcends the spiritual plane. Additionally, some theological traditions emphasize the personal nature of God, portraying a relational aspect that extends beyond the characteristics typically associated with spiritual entities.

In summary, the understanding of God as more than just a spirit is deeply rooted in various religious and philosophical traditions. Concepts such as the Holy Trinity, divine attributes, and the creator-sustainer role of God contribute to a nuanced perspective that surpasses a simplistic characterization of God as solely spiritual. Different theological frameworks provide rich and diverse dimensions to the nature of God, challenging the notion of a singular, narrowly defined spirituality. Your opinion doesn't and won't really change my mind as it's pretty low informative.

Expanding on the complexity of understanding God beyond a mere spirit, it's essential to delve into theological explorations that introduce further dimensions to the divine nature. The idea of God as presented in some mystical traditions goes beyond traditional spiritual conceptions, emphasizing a direct, experiential relationship with the divine. Mystical experiences, often described as encounters with the ineffable or the divine presence, suggest an immediate connection with God that transcends the boundaries of mere spirituality.

Moreover, some philosophical perspectives question the limitations of language and human understanding in capturing the essence of God. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant argue that the nature of God is beyond the scope of human cognition, challenging the idea that God can be neatly categorized as a spirit within the confines of linguistic or conceptual frameworks.

Additionally, the theological concept of immanence and transcendence contributes to a more nuanced understanding of God. Immanence refers to God's presence within the created world, suggesting a closeness to humanity and the material realm that goes beyond a distant, purely spiritual existence. This perspective implies that God's influence permeates all aspects of reality, challenging a reductionist view of God as merely a spirit detached from the material world.

In summary, the exploration of God's nature extends into mystical experiences, philosophical considerations of linguistic limitations, and theological reflections on immanence and transcendence. These perspectives collectively contribute to a rich tapestry of understanding that surpasses a simplistic characterization of God as solely a spiritual entity, inviting a deeper exploration of the divine's multifaceted nature.

And, aren't you the authority on everything? Your attempt to dismiss differing perspectives and belittle others is truly impressive. Your mastery of arrogance and condescension is unmatched. Maybe one day you'll discover that true intellectual discourse involves respecting diverse opinions rather than attempting to invalidate them with your apparent superiority complex. And to be honest i'm going to say it again you seriously need more info than that I was never trying to trick you, you're just all bark and yap and you're even a hypocrite too. Keep reaching for those intellectual heights, but be careful not to trip on your own misplaced sense of certainty. And another thing "If you think you know it all, you're a fool for sure, real survivors learn wisdom from others"-Proverbs 28:26 think twice before insulting others because of your opinion. Imagine you and your friend are looking at a drawing. You might see a cat, but your friend sees a dog. Now you say "No, only my view is right; yours is wrong." Instead, it's better to say, "Hmm, I see a cat, but you see a dog. Let's talk about why we see it differently." It's about respecting and trying to understand each other's points of view, even if they're not the same as yours. Both of you have different perspectives, right? Now let me make this CLEAR I will not respond since this argument is now over and I already said the main meaning of this post. So there is no reason I should be here arguing with random people who joins arguments after they are done. go on and keep talking but it still won't even change my mind even a single. But I even gotta admit I do adore your opinion. I have never ever said anything bad to you until now; and I even acknowledge one of your "proofs" if you actually read my proofs above. that god is a spirit, but I am still not going to change my mind. in fact I may not know about spirituality but at least I know respect for sure. We all got our own opinions anyway how about we try to keep it that way time to unfollow this post.

I didn't choose to study theology, I didn't mark myself with high results, therefore I don't need or want to believe in God, and God comes in mysterious ways, he doesn't need to be seen as he can work without a physical form or being noticed. I don't have to be aware of God for him to exist, I never interfere with him and he may never trouble me directly, as he tests followers in any way. Therefore he is a spirit, the holy spirit.

To be honest, I shouldn't have cared about this, I'm not religious, why should I bother. Yes I hope there is afterlife and God because I want good things happen to me, but do I accept they don't exist, I do, and that's probably why I won't ever have God's presence in anytime, but I can be optimistic about it. It does or does not matter if God does or doesn't exist, because I care about mankind more about than God, and good reason to stick with people I know. But also God was sort of evil at the time.

Same thing but different idk why I cared to inform @TheDevil7777 when I could've just minded my business same thing with somebody too.