75 Votes in Poll
I never said any of that.
But then your acting like a fire-user wouldn't just burn it again. Instead of standing there doing nothing.
@FeRNdawg626 Well, most of the people here... 🤷♂️
@GoldenPizza17 The point I'm trying to make is that it wouldn't be as simple as "melt the ice"
🤷♂️
@Meta-Magician Besides of fire melting ice, fire has more versatility.
They can manipulate fire in different ways more specifically, creating explosive bursts, creating intense heat, or igniting their opponents in flames.
How could one apply these powers to increase one's rizz?
@GoldenPizza17 "Besides of fire melting ice, fire has more versatility.
They can manipulate fire in different ways more specifically, creating explosive bursts, creating intense heat, or igniting their opponents in flames."
Ha! An Ice-User can do all of your examples, but with ice. They can manipulate ice in different ways, create explosive bursts, create intense cold, and freeze their opponents in ice.
Fact is that ice is much more versatile and practical than fire.
@FeRNdawg626 Make ice cream, snow cones, ice castles, cozy igloos, and cheat at things like ice skating, skiing, and snowboarding, etc.
I think that ice is better suited for versatile usage by those that may wield it, while fire users benefit more from investing in quick, raw damage output. Not that fire isn't used well when used with versatility in mind, nor that ice can't be devastatingly destructive, but given their unique properties as elements without getting into the variants and huggabalooo like solidifying flames or whatever, these elements are naturally better suited to different ways of being used.
Yapfest aside, I can see myself doing a little fireworks show of sorts if i were to become an advanced enough flame user.
Honestly, both are good and have their own uses so I just picked randomly
@Meta-Magician But that still doesn't prove ice is more practical than fire since it can do the same
Also Fire's combustive explosion is more stronger and affective, Even without relying on versatility or melting ice, fire can still have advantages over ice in combat against ice-users.
Fire attacks are more intense and faster-moving than ice attacks. This type of speed can make ice-users have a hard time since fire attacks are pretty fast and the ice-user's can't even rely on they're reaction-time. Not to mention fire spreads pretty quickly and ice definitely cannot do the same.
What do you think?