Absolute Derivation

Supreme being asks you what power you want and there's no limit to how powerful the power you ask for could be.

What is it?

For me probably unity since I still get complete arsenal and absolute derivation

I was thinking about omnipotence and absolutes after watched some "Surfbone" channel video. First I was thinking that there is NO absolute, perfect, flawless, boundless and etc character or power. Just because wharves fans, authors or even the character itself taking about their power it's mean nothing actually. There is only one thing that have all of that - omnipotence, and I was right, but I've also thought that any character can be overpowered by a character from another fiction.

For example, there is an absolutely immortal character that can't be killed by literally anything in their fiction, like Lilith from World of Darkness. You think she's really absolute, but then comes Death from DC kill her and say "That's all". That is interesting, but little disappointing, so was thinking "Is there some logical mistakes in my theory?"

Don't remember how, but then I have concluded that omnipotence is having relative and objectively nature simultaneously.

For example, if I and someone else been the author of book ''X" that would mean that we are one omnipotence being for all 'X' reality. But we in our world objectively are not omnipotent (relative). And our world can be some other fiction and that infinite. You all are good to know that idea from pop culture. All that infinite loop of fiction and beyond create ONE omnipotent being (objectively).

If we make that focus on the concept of absolute. We'll get that objectively absolute is one - omnipotence, but absolute by itself is relative.

For example, Lilith really would be absolutely immortal to anyone in World of Darkness and any other fiction, but still doesn't absolutely immortal in compared to omnipotence. She's only nigh-absolutely immortal to omnipotence, but absolutely to anyone else. So now I think if two opposites absolute meet, they're just neutralizing each other. Because they're both represents different aspect's of omnipotence and don't absolute to him.

That idea is slips between the lines in absolute power and omnipotence pages, but not so cleanly enough. Sure for me. Think it'll be better to label it in those pages.

Hope my thoughts were helpful for you and be glad to your opinion about that.

Ok let me start by saying I have done extensive research on both powers yet still struggle to find the discretion between the two at times. I know Omniarch (OA) is to have lordship or leadership of everything, while Prime Source (PS) says you are the source of a concept or source of everything.

I understand to an extent how they are different, but I'm confused as to 1) which is more powerful (i'm assuming OA is) and 2) how the Judeo-Christian God isn't labeled as a PS. Maybe I'm grasping at straws here both I though God was the Heavenly Host and The Creator of All, so I'm inclined to think God is a PS.

On another thought, OA is just the "lordship version of omnipotence", yet as far as I can tell someone or something that is an OA has complete control over everything. So how does OA differ from omnipotence? Maybe I didn't read as closely as I should when it came to omnipotence but I can't find a huge difference.

TL;DR

1) Which is more powerful? Omniarch or Prime Source?

2)How is the Judeo-Christian God not a Prime Source?

3)Omniarch vs. omnipotence?