So could path to victory be considered a sub- power of game theory? To "win" in game theory, you typically aim to achieve the best possible outcome for yourself, given the choices and potential strategies of other participants, true or not?
So could path to victory be considered a sub- power of game theory? To "win" in game theory, you typically aim to achieve the best possible outcome for yourself, given the choices and potential strategies of other participants, true or not?
Strategy manipulation has almost everything that game-theory manipulation has except for the manipulation of decision making.