All posts by undefined

13,593Pages

A reply to Wyz'Ard Arogoa

Ghost of Sparta696·6/30/2020

See, both Levitation and the Behemoth are incapable of being defeated by anything less than an omnipotent being. They’re both just so damn cool and I want that level of indestructibility in my hands. However, they don’t have many powers themselves, I believe. So aside from being impossible to destroy, they’re just animals you can ride and scare people with. Good protection, too. The raiju are electrical beasts from Japanese mythology, which can be quite helpful in many different situations. If the animal knows how to control the strength of their electricity, then they could, theoretically, charge your phone pretty well. And electricity would be helpful in general, but I’m not sure since I don’t recall any situations where I needed that. And the Kujato is a cosmic bull who rides a Bahamut, so I’m unsure of what uses they could have.

All in all, I’d probably choose between Leviathan or the raiju. They both seem pretty cool to have as pets. The Behemoth is neat, but I’d prefer a water animal more. And the Kujato doesn’t seem very useful, from what I know.

A reply to Yoruharu

Ghost of Sparta696·6/30/2020

It’s a hard thing to explain. It’s like asking who would win between Omnipotence or Metapotence. They’re basically of equal power. Absolute is unbeatable, while Meta is just as invincible because of meta reasons. Absolute Combat would entail you have attacks that none can withstand, and Meta Combat would mean you can beat anyone without having to worry about the logic behind it. The example the page gives is some character beating a multiversal-level entity despite that otherwise being implausible with just sheer combat. I can’t say whether the character had any supernatural strength or anything, but I’d assume not from what I know about Meta Combat.

A reply to Supergamer100x

Ghost of Sparta696·6/30/2020

Wait, what? I’m certain he doesn’t have that. I haven’t personally seen the anime, but I’ve seen his feats and different moves before. I’m pretty sure the man hasn’t manipulated transcendent or demonic energy before, nor anything of that nature. But again, as I’ve never actually seen the anime for myself, this could be a false statement.

A reply to Supergamer100x

Ghost of Sparta696·6/30/2020

Depends on the level. Ultimate telekinesis could manipulate particles, subatomic matter and the most basic unit. And it also just has omni-manipulation, which is just far superior to atomic manipulation.

A reply to Ghost of Sparta696

Ghost of Sparta696·6/29/2020

Mm. Got it. Thanks for sharing your view on the matter!

A reply to Ghost of Sparta696

Ghost of Sparta696·6/29/2020

And would transcending duality affect your mind or personality at all? Forgot to ask.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/29/2020

in General

What does transcending duality imply?

I’ve been wondering about duality transcendence for a while now and what it would account for. If I transcend the concept of duality, the quality of two separate ideas opposing the other, would that entail I am specifically good or evil in terms of morality? And if so, then would an omnimalevolent/omnibenevolent person transcending duality? Or at the very least, transcend the duality of morals?

Or am I stupid and it just means you don’t give a shit about any of that? You’re not good or evil, just gray, or something like that.

Duality Transcendence

A reply to Kal-Karot

Ghost of Sparta696·6/27/2020

I’d have to disagree with you, 13 Apostles. Although the spear gives many advantages, the weapon isn’t what makes a warrior good. Power comes from the heart and mind. Even with how fast a spearman could retract their weapon, an effective swordsman could attack before they could do much, especially if it’s an amateur behind the tool. But if we are to have both fighters be equally skillful, then that’d be an interesting fight. I’m not sure who’d win the most, but I’d assume there wouldn’t be too much of a difference. Having a fight 100 times would probably have a 50/50 result, possibly a 48/52 or 52/48. However, I’d have to place my bet on the swordsman since a spear can only really stab to kill, while a sword can be used to swipe/slash and stab. That alone could turn the tide of battle, I believe.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Retrorge

Ghost of Sparta696·6/27/2020

Think of our current world with the belief of God and Satan (Christianity). True Omnipotence (Type II) would give way to God and an Anti-God, both roles taken up by Christianity’s two opposing entities. Although the Devil isn’t really believed to be omnipotent like God, he is pretty damn close and is the strongest entity aside from Him. But in my own personal belief, I see Satan as equal to God, both needing the other for true balance in our world. One creates all, while the other destroys all. You don’t have to see the latter has necessarily evil, just a required form of evil for the universe to be balanced. That’s how I’d imagine a world with two omnipotent beings would be like. A world filled with cruelty and menace, yet beauty and happiness. A world of duality, if you will. If I’m being honest, despite me technically being Christian, I only really believe in two “highest” entities, Good and Evil. I don’t believe God to be a human-like being with a mighty voice, or Satan a slippery serpent, but instead, two almighty forces who have zero true consciousness, existing only as our world’s prime forces. I see God as the representation of Good, and Satan the representation of Evil. This is why I still consider myself Christian despite not fully believing everything that is told to me by the Bible or other Christians. I still do believe in God and Satan, but in a separate light than most others. I’m not sure if my belief has a specific name or not. If you know what it’s called, then please, do inform me of it. Other than that, I hope this helped you in coming to a conclusion on what our world would be like. Unfortunately, this only took into account the system of God and Anti-God, not God and God or Anti-God and Anti-God, or anything in-between or outside.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

You keep confusing Author Authority with being the actual author. If a *character* had Author Authority, they are not the author, but someone who has similar levels of control over the story. And again, omnipotence can not beat omnipotence since the loser would not have been omnipotent to begin with. You have to understand that. These questions are automatically wrong since you keep forgetting what omnipotence is. If a person with AA beat an “omnipotent” being, then that world make *them* the omnipotent being, not whoever they beat or “taken the power of.”

A reply to Hestarne Hum.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

The second omnipotent being would be stronger. If an omnipotent deity created another omnipotent deity, then they’d have given up their own power since there can’t be two of them. But it’s a stupid question regardless since you can easily ask, “Can an omnipotent person give someone omnipotence while retaining their own power?” You’d technically have to say yes since they can, but no as well since there can’t be two. It’s a mind-fuck subject that has no definitive or correct answer since it’s all bullshit.

A reply to Hestarne Hum.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

You can’t — that’s not — two “omnipotent” beings can *not* be equal! How do you people not understand that!? The second a person becomes level with an omnipotent person is the same time that previously “omnipotent” person is no longer omnipotent! If an omnipotent being can not do something (aka, not beat their supposed equal), then that would make them not omnipotent. They’d be *nigh-omnipotent*. Close enough to do pretty much everything, but weak enough to have an equal. There can’t be two “above all” entities in the same world because that completely defeats the purpose of what omnipotence is. Please, actually think about what you’re talking about before saying anything. I know I’m not the best person to be saying that since I’ve been known to say things without much research, but don’t do that.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Hestarne Hum.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

Oh, I wasn’t answering anything of what you were saying since it’s a stupid question that has no chance of being definitively answered. It’s the same thing as the God Paradox, with the question of whether or not God can make an object He can’t pick up. Either way, it supposedly disproves His omnipotent power. I have no idea what cuck came up with that dumbass question, let alone who genuinely believes it makes sense. Do you actually think a person who defies logic has to abide by it? But in my personal opinion and to answer your question: yes, they probably could. But in doing so, they’d have to retire their own power and status of being omnipotent to do so. Again, two “above all” beings can not exist in the same world.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

But Author Authority doesn’t make you the author, just have the same powers over the world as they do, but here’s the thing. If the actual author gave a character the power of their authority, wouldn’t that same author be able to take it away? And a person with Author Authority couldn’t beat an omnipotent being since *they’d* be that omnipotent being. Omnipotence can’t beat omnipotence since omnipotence is unbeatable.

A reply to Hestarne Hum.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

It’s also there because it’s true? What do you think omnipotence is? If we are to actual look at what it is, then yeah, there’s nothing that says anything of what we’re saying is correct. Omni means all, while potent (potence) relatively means strength or power. Put those two together and you get all-powerful. Now, looking at that word doesn’t mean it is above all since it just means able to do all, but here’s the thing. If I am able to do everything, then wouldn’t that mean I can always beat you? In the scenario that you beat me, wouldn’t that mean I wasn’t able to do everything? That’s the reason we say it is “above all.” The second you put a limitation or inability to do something, that automatically takes away the single principle of omnipotence. So if you put two “omnipotent” beings into a room, and they couldn’t beat the other, wouldn’t that mean they were both unable to do something? But how? If they were omnipotent, they should be able to beat the other. But in the scenario that one does actually win, the one who lost wouldn’t have been omnipotent since they, you know, lost? You see what I’m getting at? Again, nothing directly says any of this, but if you have any level of being able to think, then you can assume this would be the idea of omnipotence.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Hestarne Hum.

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

Two omnipotent beings can’t exist in the same world. Omnipotence is the state of being “above all,” so being with someone of equal power would pretty much destroy that whole shtick. Same reason why an omnipotent deity who gets beaten isn’t omnipotent. If you made God bleed, you wouldn’t really think of Him as above all, now, would you? That defeats the purpose of what omnipotence is. The reason two beings can’t be truly omnipotent is because omnipotence is infinitely superior to all, no matter what argument you may bring. Yes, there’s no direct thing that says there can’t be two, but if you have half a brain, then you can easily put two and two together to get such an answer.

(edited by Ghost of Sparta696)

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

So you’ve never heard of transfictional omnipotence? Author Authority is tied to their Verse as well, same with Omnipotence. You are not the author of every single story known to man, just the one you are currently in. I’ve never heard of an author changing the story of another guy’s book.

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/25/2020

Um, no. Just a big ol’ no. That’s not how that works.

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/24/2020

Basically! Again, all you’re really doing is putting an immovable rock against an unstoppable force. But in the end, I guess Omnipotence would still technically be superior since that’s its very nature, being, as you said, “Above all.” Because if it had an equal, then it wasn’t omnipotent to begin with. Regardless of anything and everything, no matter how nonsensical it can get, Omnipotence trumps all because it just does. I fucking despise that and hate such answers, but that’s just how it is. Bullshit vs bullshit = bullshit.

A reply to Capivaradecapacete

Ghost of Sparta696·6/24/2020

But here’s the thing, ignoring *every* power except Ultipotence and Omniscience, what possible limits could those two have? They’re meant to be unlimited, so you’re still putting infinity against infinity, which is a versus we’ll probably never be able to answer since it’s stupid and unanswerable except for the solution that, despite anything, “Omnipotence wins since it is above all by infinity.”