All posts by Carcassfrozenyogurt
Not at all, it was more of a framing device on my part for ease of comprehension. Fandom doesn't take kindly to repeat offenders and more often than not have no hesitation to just do away with 'em. If the user already gone to the Fandom reporting system? *you're dead gesture*
@Neosaiyan7 recidivism is conventionally used as an aggravating circumstance, yes. having a globally bannable offense, more so 😕🙁.
See what I mean 🤷🏽♂️?
Not in our list, so most likely a globan ban, or an IP ban (VPN IPs are most the common suspect).
We have a discussion category commonly used to confront, discuss, and compromise on anything about the this wiki. On the Main Discussions' filter on the app or desktop you'd find it.
I know. They are real, yet there's a difference between an ailment one has to live and adjust your lifestyle to, and bodily traits that may come genetically, internal or external factors, what have you, arising from supernatural or fantastical consequences. "Videogames cause violence" : "Media causes intolerance".
If you still intend to do this, go to the Consensus Building, build your case, reach as much members of this community as possible to place their opinion or vote, and then we may in talks to act on this.
We cannot, as it will alienate religious people for for those same reasons, they're made for the same religious people wanting to document or use this site as outreach of sorts. Some want to be represented in different ways, and some who that condition may feel coddled or looked down by being made an exception. Some won't see it your way as you can't speak for them, you and I don't have any authority for it unless it's incortrovertibly put into due process. I know it's good intentions, but it will do more harm than good if it's something drastic, and I don't like things biting off our asses down the line when it's blown out proportion. I'm a highly functioning autistic man resentful from alienation, condescension, or intolerance. Censoring doesn't agree with me.
Which is never the intention, have principles and rules to never include real people, are always users that have supernatural or fasntastical basis to those traits that aren't achievable or attainable for normal people, and while the pages are borderline by a millimeter made by someone I have mixed feelings for, I'd be argue it'll alienating or counterproductive to remove said pages for those reasons
The Paradox of Representation, to avoid them feels alienating to me.
Specify which pages, as it never the intention to be demeaning as such as it is a technicality, more so to be condescendingly speaking for those who happen to have said condition to avoid them... And sometimes some pages take the fantastical route, it's to narrow hard it down.
I'm under DC or Marvel, too, if possible. But not now, I'll be undisposed. Gotta have my rest from time to time.
Contact me to proceed with the appealing process.
As with any vandal, indefinitely. But he can apply for appeals.
Seems your siblings have a few things in common like your attachment with Yin-Yang Powers.
Only if they go to avoid any kind of responsibility or wrongdoing at a moment's notice from a simple proof, it would be the case. If they did appeal and explained it to me while also understanding the impression this gives, and maturely be accountable I would've been more lenient. That doesn't seem right up their following their response.
You just can't use the "I got hacked/my cousin took my phone" excuse that quickly when it was one after the other, oddly targeted to a section (which implies familiarity only *you* could have), and the time it occurred. You cannot claim innocence with aggravating circumstances like this.
It didn't fuckin' bother to clean up and left the Lists formats.
Two examples. Those limitations occur for some users, it doesn't make sense to remove when they still have those weaknesses.
You were removing limitations sections on a bunch of pages without any reason, man. How can I not see it as vandalism.
E~excellent. And this is also the premise as to why Pataphysics as a page didn't work: Metaphysics also takes upon itself the very question of something "beyond metaphysics", its self-reference is a cyclical loop! It can be "about physics" just as "about metaphysics"! Pataphysics itself by that very fact was a poorly disguised and made metaphysics, which can conveniently be for just about anything. Fiction, SCP-wise.