I believe that we should rename Reactive Adaptation into Adaptivity and ground this ability, while Evolution should be called Reactive Evolution, why? Adaptability or Adaptation is simply adaptation, that is, concentration of all the resources of the organism to adapt to some conditions, for example, when there is a shortage of oxygen you automatically reduce its consumption. But with Reactive Evolution you develop your body, for example, in case of the same oxygen shortage you acquire the ability to do without it at all. That is, Reactive Evolution should bring global changes in the user's existence and is essentially responsible for the character's development in a forced manner. Adaptive Evolution aka Superior Adaptation should have been like this at some point... I realize this could be a simple concept switch and nothing much would change other than the description of powers and the redeployment of ability users, but it's a contradiction in terms in a sense.
All posts by MJL680
If it makes you uncomfortable, you can ask the AI or look it up in Wiktionary, you don't need to be an internet guide for that.
Neosaiyan7, Not exactly. The trait is related to the ability but that doesn't make it the same.
Neosaiyan7, Trait is a characteristic, feature or attribute that defines something or someone. Traits can be either positive or negative and can refer to different aspects such as personality, appearance, behavior, etc.
Example: A person's character trait can be kindness. If someone is always willing to help others and shows care, they can be said to have a trait such as kindness.
So going back I want to say that trait ≠ ability.
Abdalla1234, Sure, theoretically he would have an ability tied to trait granting but to say that trait = power is wrong.
Abdalla1234, Since when is a trait an ability...? It won't.
In my understanding, Adaptive Evolution will be the ultimate version of both Reactive Evolution and Adaptivity and a combination due to the very concept of adapting to any phenomenon and threat, be it even future or conceptual. Eternal Evolution should be placed in Fanon because it brings nothing new as an ultimatum version of Evolution, and in my understanding Evolution has no final goal and version at all, hence is infinite.
Adaptive Evolution will have to become a new reactive adaptation with all its advantages, exclusively treating itself as adaptive and not a constant progressive one as in the case of Reactive Evolution, which will have to be a variation.