So I been wondering about this joke power, as your just reading a book that can't be affected(omnilock) and thought about meta art control an artistic form of AA so... Could there possibly be an artistic form of RE?
So I been wondering about this joke power, as your just reading a book that can't be affected(omnilock) and thought about meta art control an artistic form of AA so... Could there possibly be an artistic form of RE?
I guess that would be Meta Art Appreciator Embodiment.
Said like that however, it sounds even sillier than Reader Embodiment. This just goes to show how ridiculous the concept of RE is as a power.
First off this power isn't one that YOU get but a FICTIONAL character does. Here's a comment made by Nekron if you don't believe me.
"Okay I found a very good explaination for this- Users of this power while they are fictional to us the totality is fictional to them and thus are immune to everything.Also, as concepts of "harming","affecting" are part of totality which is a story to the user,so just like omnilock another user of this power cannot affect the user,leaving author authority and omnipotence as sole powers that can affect this power."
Imagine a Narrator character from a movie or THE Narrator from The Stanley Parable. It's basically a FICTIONAL character knowing their own verse is fake which makes them immune to everything in it because it's just a story.
Is this power silly?
Yes.
But so is Fictional Transcendence when you think about it.
@Apexpotence the true ruler of best power EVER!!!
Art Embodiment's users are literal personifications of art while Meta Art Appreciator Embodiment's users would represent someone looking at a piece of art (presumably produced by the Artist) in the same way that Reader Embodiment's users should represent someone reading a story (presumably written by the Author).