Line 1: Line 1:
 
Patapotence never existed on the Wiki, it was only a subject of discussions.
 
Patapotence never existed on the Wiki, it was only a subject of discussions.
   
"Patapotence" falls in the "semantic abuse" category, in this case a word-based attempt to transcent that which inherently cannot he transcended (Omnipotence and its Metapotence variation, which isn't any stronger since such a thing is impossible, but simply more straightforward).
+
"Patapotence" falls in the "semantic abuse" category, in this case a word-based attempt to transcend that which inherently cannot he transcended (Omnipotence and its Metapotence variation, which isn't any stronger since such a thing is impossible, but simply more straightforward).

Latest revision as of 12:25, 13 July 2017

Patapotence never existed on the Wiki, it was only a subject of discussions.

"Patapotence" falls in the "semantic abuse" category, in this case a word-based attempt to transcend that which inherently cannot he transcended (Omnipotence and its Metapotence variation, which isn't any stronger since such a thing is impossible, but simply more straightforward).

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.