FANDOM


Use alphabetical order. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:31, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

I mean, refusing to die to infinite ATK by using your own DETERMINATION is insane and very much deserving of a spot on that power ^-^The Holder Of True Omnipotence (talk) 05:15, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

When you add to Users, series should be in italics. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:40, January 3, 2019 (UTC)

In Edit there's a line of buttons on top-left. Second on left is slanted capital i, that's italics. Or you could use Source (also button on Edit) which shows everything in text. There it's double ' on both sides.

You might want to use Preview to check before posting, it's right above Publish. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:47, January 3, 2019 (UTC)

Please stop removing quotes from the pages.

First warning. four more and your taking a little timeout.SageM (talk) 01:43, October 28, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Don't remove valid users.SageM (talk) 03:24, February 25, 2020 (UTC)SageM

That's not your decision to make.

Especially when its already been proven in the actual show itself that they are users.

Don't remove users. Its not really that hard to understand.SageM (talk) 03:42, February 25, 2020 (UTC)SageM

If there is on-screen proof of the user performing or demonstrating the power in question, then they are considered valid.

Since the episodes they appeared in actually showed them doing so, then your basically removing valid content for no real reason.

Just because you don't think they are users isn't a valid reason to remove them, especially when proof has been shown that they are.SageM (talk) 03:51, February 25, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Don't remove users. Second warning.SageM (talk) 02:49, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Your removing valid users.

All of the users you are removing actually belong on the pages.

Don't do it again.

So please stop or I will have to block you.

You have been doing nothing but removing users and quotes from pages.

Your violating the wikia rules by doing so, so I suggest you quit now.SageM (talk) 03:17, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Proof that you are removing valid users-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1C57iCV1kc

At 8:50 into the episode, Fry has transformed into a butterfly.

Next time you remove valid users without approval, you will be blocked.

Don't do it again. This is your last warning.SageM (talk) 03:23, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

You do not have permission and that is not your choice to make.

You are not an admin, you don't get to decide the rules here.

I suggest you stop before you are blocked.SageM (talk) 03:29, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

You don't decide what series are valid and which are not.

Futurama, simpsons, family guy, south park and all those shows have been around for decades and we use them as valid examples

You are not in charge of this wikia. 

I have already proven to you that you are removing valid users. 

DONT DO IT AGAIN.SageM (talk) 03:32, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Sorry but thats not how it works here. And the admin giving you permission is violating wikia rules.

If you do it again you will be blocked. It doesn't matter if the admin gave you permission, because they are violating wikia rules if they say yes.

Those series have been around for decades, and have been used as examples on hundreds of pages.

This argument is over. and this your only warning on the matter.SageM (talk) 03:42, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

All those shows you claim are stupid have been around for decades. And have been used on more pages then I can count.

You coming along and saying they don't count now, despite them being the cornerstone for thousands of page ideas is not something that a single staff member can decide on.

Its has to be a wikia wide decision. Especially since thousands of entries would have to be removed.

You are overstepping your authority, and so is the admin that you say gave you permission. 

Seriously, you do not have permission and saying you do is nothing but a lie.SageM (talk) 03:47, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Let me point out something to you that you don't seem to understand.

If you are allowed to remove users just because you think they are stupid or meaningless (despite the series having been around longer then most of us have been alive), then the whole idea behind the wikia falls apart and the Rules lose all meaning.

Zataillya was not allowed to give you permission to remove users for a reason like that.

Actual valid and justifiable reasons must be given for a user to be removed. You have not presented that or given evidence that shows otherwise.

I suggest you stop before your banned permanently for trying to break the rules that have been in place since he wikia was founded.

Removing users without valid reasons is not and will never be allowed on this wikia. A decision like this impacts the entire structure and meaning behind the superpower wikia.

And that is not something one staff member can decide on. All the staff have to agree on it. And please note that Zatallya is not a bureaucrat, and a decision like that is outside her authority as an admin.

I am an admin as well, so I can also decide whether or not known users are allowed to stay on the wikia. Especially when the wikia rules are in my favor in this matter.SageM (talk) 04:09, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

There is only one concrete rule regarding users on this wikia- 

"Is the user from an officially valid, mainstream and published series/franchise and is it considered canon?" 

That's it. Its the only thing regarding users for this wikia. As long as the user isn't a fanmade/OC creation or fanon content or an example from real life, then its considered valid on this wikia.

Users should only be removed if they don't actually fit the capabilities, they are being fanwanked by someone else (ie false information), or they haven't actually demonstrated the power in question.

Since your reasoning for removing them as users doesn't cover any of those, you don't actually have permission to remove them from the page.

All the characters you are removing are valid, and have been for decades now.

The series being stupid/meaningless is not considered a valid reason.SageM (talk) 05:11, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

the Bureaucrat Edit

Alissa the Wise Wolf and Omuni are the Bureaucrat

https://powerlisting.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:Alissa_the_Wise_Wolf

https://powerlisting.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:Omuni 

DeuzExMachina (talk) 05:28, March 1, 2020 (UTC)

If the power was played for gags and not unironically a power (even in a comedy show), it could stay. But I take it you're removing gags at the moment. SageM isn't in the right to warn you about this. Zatalliya (talk) 18:07, March 1, 2020 (UTC)

Something to keep in mind.... Edit

Please keep in mind that some of the examples you removed were not considered to be jokes or gags. They were actual plot points from the episode and even had a backstory to why they were happening.

The example from Futurama was an actual plot point that was taken seriously, it wasn't meant to be a gag.

And the examples you removed from Pregnancy Inducement had explanations for why they were happening and weren't simply there for laughs. They had actual consequences that made up the whole length of the episode.

Removing a user that is an example of a plot point is not the same as removing a user that is just a joke. This is not something that you should be judging or making decisions on.

It should only be something the staff members/admins should be doing. 

They were not being played for laughs and they were not jokes, they were serious events that defined the episode.

I'm sorry, but this kind of decision making shouldn't be made by the normal wikia contributors. Because you can't judge between what is an example of a joke and what is actually a plot point.

Its to bad this had to escalate into getting the other admins involved, but it really shouldn't have been allowed in the first place. As its something that should have really been left to the admins to decide from the beginning.SageM (talk) 20:29, March 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

You might want to join the official Discord Server. I opened the discussion up there and asked for feedback about gags from rather seasoned wikians, who have not failed to deliver their insight on the subject. Here's a temporary link that you can use to join us. We'd love to have you there. I can introduce you if you'd like. Clicketh!Zatalliya (talk) 04:49, March 2, 2020 (UTC)

I do not see any sense that is removing content from the page, it was scolded before by another user.~~User talk:Arquetion

please wait until the rules have been updated. Edit

The staff hasn't decided yet to implement the rule change about what content is a gag and what is being played straight.

Zatalliya hasn't changed or updated the rules to reflect the discussion from earlier, so your edits are not yet approved.

Until that happens, please avoid removing page content. There was a discussion about it, but nothing concrete has been decided or mentioned to the rest of the wikia.

So your jumping the gun a bit.SageM (talk) 00:10, March 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also there is big difference between removing users from pages and removing page quotes.

Removing page quotes will not be tolerated regardless of your feelings on the matter. A quote is nothing more then a reference material, thus it doesn't need to be removed unless it doesn't fit the definition of the power.

So while i respect your forthrightness, please don't remove quotes from pages. As it doesn't matter what series they come from, as they will always be valid examples no matter what.SageM (talk) 00:14, March 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

He is doing his job, it is not his fault to deal with fools like you.

Additionally, you cannot delete valid users.~~User talk:Arquetion

considering that you eliminate valid users it is surprising that they have not yet blocked you for breaking the rules on repeated occasions. Before Sangem interfered with his editions, it was I who eliminated your editions, since he violates the rules but I did not block you when I was an administrator because I thought you would leave this behavior.~~User talk:Arquetion

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.