Please discuss your personal issues in a private space, not in a place everyone can see it. Message Walls are not DMs, they're public boards for wiki-related questions/discussions, or friendly exchanges.
"you just son of bitch"-I don't think you realise how serious insulting someones religion is. If I tell you that Islam is a wrong religion because Muslims are terrorists how will you feel? So don't go insulting me and playing the victim just because you're incapable of realising your own mistake. I'm not accepting because even after you apologised you said the exact same thing again. And you have the guts to insult me? I am not the "bro" of anyone with that kind of mindset, so you had better stop calling me that.
I called you one because right after you apologised you went right back to saying that religions with more than one omnipotent are 'wrong' which is disrespect. I'm not gonna repeat this. If you choose to ignore this point and post another reply that makes you look like a victim I won't respond.
Dude. On this site your opinion doesn't matter. Only facts. And the fact is there is a power that allows for more than one omnipotent per verse (metapotence) and there are religions with more than one omnipotent/metapotent being. If you can't understand there is something seriously wrong with you.
"its my opinion"-oh really? Well my opinion is that I don't get along with people who look down on any religion that is not their own. So stop trying to force your friendship on me. It's pissing me off.
"you not Hinduism"-so you're telling me I have to be Hindu to care? Now I know you're not only rude, but that you're insensitive as well. And just so that you know, my best friend is a Hindu.
you not Hinduism"-so you're telling me I have to be Hindu to care? Now I know you're not only rude, but that you're insensitive as well. And just so that you know, my best friend is a Hindu. i told that because you dont know in Hinduism
"metapotence is weaker than omnipotence "-It's just one thing after another with you. Ask anyone. It isn't. Plus I've been on the site longer than you. I'm pretty sure I know how stuff works better than you.
"i told that because you dont know in Hinduism"- ok. Fine. You don't want to apologise. Then that's your problem. Because unlike you, I'm not an insecure loser who wants to do drugs and kill himself. How would you know what I know? If you really want to kill yourself go ahead. At the very least I won't be getting any more texts from you.
ok. Fine. You don't want to apologise. Then that's your problem. Because unlike you, I'm not an insecure loser who wants to do drugs and kill himself. How would you know what I know? If you really want to kill yourself go ahead. At the very least I won't be getting any more texts from you.
iam apologized for you and because i made mistake with religions
I didn't recognize you in the editors of the Alpha Reality page, it's only after checking the Q&A Discussion that I realized you were the same person ^ ^;
I'm honestly not that familiar with the rich buddhist cosmology (only the philosophical teachings), is there something in it that matches the "primordial all-encompassing reality" concept that defines Alpha Reality ?
'By its pataphysical nature/concept as the most highest principle beyond totality; it is absolutely infinite, eternal and blissful plane that can never change, yet acts as a source that can cause all changes throughout the cosmos and it being the very genesis of thought and the nexus of all realities; it can define what beings perceive as possible or impossible'-the buddhaic plane and the concept of nirvana match this description.
And let me just say, the ultimate reality link in the also called list has nirvana listed there. Plus, if you're going to comment on nirvana, how about you try explaining how ne no kuni counts? Stop removing my edits when you feel like your opinion is beyond fact. I have better things to do.
When has it ever been mentioned anywhere that buddha's control the Alpha Reality?
They don't, and even the idea that they do goes against the very nature and definition of Nirvana.
Alpha Reality is a Manipulation power. And Buddhism/Buddhahood is about giving up control and removing the sense of self.
Yeah. At this point your just making stuff up. Please stop adding users that don't belong and have never been mentioned to even have anything to do with it.
In buddhism, Nirvana means a sense of peace and freedom from suffering, where there is no longer any desire or awareness.
In order to be a user of Alpha Reality, they actually have to exert a form of control/shaping or manipulation in regards to the Alpha Reality. But the nature of buddhahood negates that idea completely.
While the idea Nirvana/Sunyata may be similar to how Alpha Reality is described, it doesn't mean that buddha's are considered users.
So they don't belong on the page anymore than users of complete arsenal belong on every power.
Another point of fact that prevents them from being users is that Nirvana is considered freedom from desire.
If one has no desire or sense of self, than how can any control or manipulation ever hope to occur?
The basic fact of the matter is that the whole nature of buddhism means that they would never want to control or harm anyone, because to do so would be the denying of buddhahood and be playing right into Mara's hands.
Yeah, the point stands that they cannot be considered users because they lack the means to do so, and if they ever did so they would be contradicting the very nature of the religion and its principal tenets.
I've already told you. The ultimate reality link in the also called list states that nirvana is the ultimate reality. If you don't like it that's your loss, but I'm not gonna stay up all night just because you don't like admitting when you're wrong. Get. A. Life.
Are you kidding me? I told you there's a link in the page itself stating what I'm talking about. You ignored me. I explained what was in that link. You ignored me. And you literally said that nirvana cannot be described in words and actually used this as a point to defend yourself...meaning you basically said nirvana doesn't grant the buddhas new powers.😧
Obviously you lack in depth knowledge on the buddhaic plane, buddha-nature, nirvana etc. and I wouldn't hold this against you, except everytime we get into an argument about religion, it becomes increasingly evident that you don't even know what you're talking about. Your go to response is always "so please stop making things up". I'm sick and tired of seeing this stupid message spammed on my wall. So please, stop bloody arguing with me when there's a link on the page itself proving you wrong.
...ok, I just saw your rant in the comments section, and you just proved that you positively enjoy twisting information to suit you.
First of all, just so that you know, buddhas are transcendent boundless beings that exist beyond concepts and beyond all space time. This aspect of their nature automatically makes them reality warpers, unless of course you don't understand how transcending space time works.
Secondly, the page didn't deny anything. "Other strands of Buddhism reject the notion of ultimate reality". I know you're trying to prove a point, but telling me the entire religion rejects ultimate reality when only a few do does not help your case.
"Nirvana is expressed as freedom from suffering and the escape from desire. the desire to control anything is essentially abhorrent to buddhahood. As to manipulate anything or anyone would be the same as denying buddhahood and the escape from desire"-yeah, sure, that's why the buddha is considered an absolute, revered and respected by the Gods, and let's not forget that Gautama Buddha is a user of omni Embodiment. The purpose of buddhahood is to let go of desire, yes, but the buddhas still hold control over certain concepts.
I have to do some research? Sorry but I'm not taking that advice from someone who can't even read a link properly.🙄
"Your only going by a single article, and saying that its the truth. When that very article contradicts itself by saying it isn't an example."-let me guess, you didn't click any of the links within the article did you? And you're talking to me about research ability?
"Your making up facts to suit your opinion"-buddy, do I need to remind you of all our previous clashes? Devic Physiology, absolute beauty etc.? Plus you just told me the link said the entire religion when it says some strands. Get of your high horse.