FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • SageM, did you receive my latest message?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey SageM, would you happen to know of any users to this power that I’ve been given the permission to create called Faith (as in: religious faith) Magic?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • SageM, is there a power in this wiki in which the user is one with the universe (basically the cosmic equivalent of Nature Unity) or is that one of them powers that are yet to be made?

      Loading editor
  • Is it cool to add "Achievable Omnipotence" to the also called list? It's pretty much Omnipotence that can be achieved.

      Loading editor
  • Why should I keep it the way it is? Is the use of, say, 'mental/brain supremacy' for the sake of simplicity and to convey the fact that if a user shifts their mind, it affects the brain? 

      Loading editor
    • the brain is the organ where consciousness originates and the brain is associated with the mind

        Loading editor
    • If you're saying consciousness awareness, I agree with you. Otherwise, that is simply false. If you are claiming the 'self' consciousness is a product of the brain, you are assuming materialism/physicalism is true. Materialism/Physicalism has not been proven to be true, so using the terms interchangeably might not be ideal or accurate. 

      And before you say, no, alcohol and drugs are not evidence of the brain producing consciousness. They are evidence of correlation between mind and brain, not causation. Consciousness pertaining to the self/identity is still accepted as a mystery, hence the Hard Problem of Consciousness. Consciousness originating in the brain is not a proven fact. 

      If the terms are being used interchangeably for the sake of simplicity then that is fine. 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why do you consider it in the user list? in which panel of the comic does it show?

      Loading editor
    • She literally cannot die, regardless of anything that happens.

      Even if all concepts, ideas, narratives, dimensions, realities, creation and destruction are gone, she will still exist.

      Even the plot is erased and she manages to come back from that.

      She even causes an even similar to what would happen if Azathoth woke up, and she was perfectly fine and intact.

      Its not subjective or objective. Its literally the nature of her being. She even survived and reformed herself beyond even what Doctor Manhattan experienced when he was disintergrated.

      She is for all intents and purposes beyond death.

      She already lived through the end of the multiverse (both temporally and its physical destruction)

      So honestly speaking, what could ever hope to kill her?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I told some people online about SCP-583 and it being included in the absolute character erasure.



    But they told me this.



    as quoted by one of the people.

    "That's not what 583 does though?
    Its a Cognitohazard.

    From the first part of its Description:
    "Subjects who watch SCP-583's recording suffer from a unique perception disorder: after seeing [REDACTED] die of asphyxiation, subjects witness the similar death of every character, fictional or not, that they see on TV or in a movie, hear on radio, or read about, whether printed or in electronic format " It has literally nothing to do with character erasure."



    Basically even if you watch 583. while you will see the character die in another form of media. in that form of media. everyone else will see everything normally.



    More quotes from the users from online who are knowledgeable about 583

    "No it doesn't.
    The affected individual will see any character in any piece of media choke and die.
    For those not exposed to 583, the piece of media proceeds as normal."



    "I mean it doesn't actually kill them. Like stated its Cognitohazard. Nowhere is it stated for example that the Clash of Kings book that was read changed at all. How the reader perceived it changed, but if you then gave the book to someone else not infected they would have a normal copy.
    Similarly you see real people dying, but they don't die in real life. If your watching a newscast the person you see on screen would die, but everyone else would see the normal newscast and the person isn't actually dead. Presumbably you can see them die multiple times if you watch different episodes."



    so i'm not sure it actually counts as a user.

      Loading editor
    SageM
    SageM closed this thread because:
    resolved
    23:20, June 27, 2020
  • Sorry about the Void Dragon edit -PlatinumFist(7

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • My latest idea. Weakness Immunity. Or Aversion Immunity, whichever works better. A mid-level sub-power of Limitation Transcendence and enhanced version of Weakness Resistance.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.