FANDOM


Line 184: Line 184:
   
 
Should I ask yours for the same ''and'' why it's been quite some time since cap was returned without your complains when it happened? --[[User:Kuopiofi|Kuopiofi]] ([[User talk:Kuopiofi|talk]]) 07:02, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
 
Should I ask yours for the same ''and'' why it's been quite some time since cap was returned without your complains when it happened? --[[User:Kuopiofi|Kuopiofi]] ([[User talk:Kuopiofi|talk]]) 07:02, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
  +
  +
See above, others have argued against your opinion. Might also note that little bit about rule 12.
  +
  +
So, ''your'' argument for removing him? --[[User:Kuopiofi|Kuopiofi]] ([[User talk:Kuopiofi|talk]]) 07:35, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:35, July 24, 2018

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Superpower Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Master Strategist page!

Please leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything! -- Gabriel456 (Talk) 14:49, November 2, 2012

It was covered already by Soul Creation.--Kuopiofi (talk) 06:06, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

We generally tend to keep things fictional. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:30, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

re:Via problem

Technically Arrogante the axe does not grant Baraggan absolute attack. It's his innate ability to control time, which gets stronger when he releases Arrogante. And since the list is called "Known Characters" or "Known Weapons", we don't need to name the ability. That would be redundant. Yatanogarasu (talk) 22:15, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

No, Lille and Obito cannot, but we know they can use the ability of Absolute Attack; no need to go into detail there with naming it. (I actually begin to doubt if Kamui can be considered absolute, since Kakashi and Obito negated each other when they clash, and Minato used his own Space-Time Ninjutsu to escape Obito's attempt to capture him) And Baraggan can dilate time even without releasing his Arrogante, as he aged Sui-Feng's arm to a husk simply by touch. I do suggest removing all via, since the gallery can be the informative section, while the Known Users/Weapons become the simple listing. Yatanogarasu (talk) 00:12, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

When you add pic to Gallery, add the Series. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:33, February 10, 2015 (UTC)

I returned the page and edited it making it obvious it was back. Making answer pointless.

You seriously have massive amount of coding in your signature, I actually clicked the wrong link first time. --Kuopiofi (talk) 15:06, March 21, 2015 (UTC)

He is not a user.

From Emilies wikia page-

"These artificial paths eventually meet with naturally created paths to create completely new paths that lead people to different directions."

It has nothing to do with creating new possibilities, its simply about redirecting people.

If anything he is a user of Path Manipulation, but not Path Maker.

He is not a user.SageM (talk) 01:34, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Its still not the same thing

Thats still not the same thing as Path Maker.SageM (talk) 01:48, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Your going to have to offer actual proof, because it doesn't seem like it has this power.

Has emile created a new method of killing someone, or a new source of energy and a way of using it, has it changed the laws of physics or created a new system of physics? 

Has it done anything remotely like what the capabilities or applications suggest?

The answer is no. Its not about creating new choices or changing decisions, its about creating new methods, new innovations, new things that have never been done or seen before.

If thats truly the case, then your going to have to offer actual proof of it. Otherwise I am going to have to ask you to stop.SageM (talk) 01:53, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

can he do anything like this?

Choices and Decisions are not the same thing as new Innovations. Life Paths have nothing to do with creating entirely new innovations/possibilities.

"User can create new possibilities/methods/ways of doing things into the universe, possibly by altering the laws of the universe. They can create new ways to make things done. For example, they could create a new way to kill undead beings, or they could create a way to live forever. They could also create another way to generate electricity to provide power (especially in an eco-friendly manner), or they could create a way to make machines work without using electricity at all. They could also make it possible/make ways for humans to do superhuman feats."

Can Emile do anything remotely like that?

Can he do any of the applications or associations? If your saying he counts as a user only because he is changing peoples choices, decisions, or life paths; then he doesn't fit and he never did.SageM (talk) 02:12, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Life paths might fit better under Destiny Assignment.SageM (talk) 02:15, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Its way too similar to power borrowing to count as a separate power, regardless if you have a clear point or not.SageM (talk) 20:37, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

From the rules of the wikia- 1. Don't make a page that is already on this wiki or it will be deleted.

1a. Powers that cover essentially same thing come under this as well.

1a1. If it can be described as "like (power) but/except", just add new Limitation.

Its basically the exact same power as it does all of the same things as power borrowing.SageM (talk) 20:40, May 11, 2017 (UTC)SageM

PBn was updated several hours ago. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:32, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Basically removed the categories that call it power and made it fully power source. --Kuopiofi (talk) 22:25, December 2, 2017 (UTC)

We do have Category:Power Sources for a reason. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:09, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

Considering the ways powers are granted in fiction...

If those are what I think, they'd only descriptive specific moment of the process. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:48, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

MS-EE is basically area effect of any power source so not really, PG doesn't give any link so no idea about that.

We had argument over that quite some time ago, several times. They're still here. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:07, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

You need to argue over that with the makers of those pages, because they'd come to ask me why their pages are gone anyway.

I meant as a site, not between us two. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:26, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

12. No repeated Editing/Undoing of the same thing. If this becomes problem take it to Comments/Talk and talk it out instead of repeatedly messing with the page. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:13, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

stop changing the alphabetic order.

Stop moving a Certain Magical Index, the word starts with the letter C, not A. And the space doesn't count as part of it.

Its even listed on other sites that use alphabetic ordering as being under the letter C. 

We only use the actual letters and words when sorting by Alphabetic order, spaces do not count as that.

Please stop changing something that you very clearly can't seem to understand.

It has always been listed under the letter C, and thats what its supposed to be listed under.

We don't count the A, and we don't count the space. we only count the actual word.

Do a search online that list anime series by alphabetic order, you will see that the series is listed in order as being under C.SageM (talk) 05:14, December 15, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Its even listed/sorted as being under the letter C on funimation's official page and youtube page (who own the rights to the series).

Thus it was already correct the way it was. the space doesn't count and neither does the the letter A. thus absolute duo goes first by the actual definition of alphabetic order.

So seriously stop changing it when it was clearly listed correctly.SageM (talk) 05:21, December 15, 2017 (UTC)SageM

Chancing it to Acceleration Inducement/editing text to that effect might be best option. --Kuopiofi (talk) 06:15, December 25, 2017 (UTC)

Don't change the scrollboxes.

From the rules of the wikia-

"17b. Scrollboxes are meant to shorten the section (Known Users mainly), not to separate the different sub-sections"

Don't change the scrollboxes when making edits.

Also your changing the very nature of the power with those capabilities, as its no longer about acceleration resistance anymore. the original capabilities describe what acceleration is does . Also enhanced lung capacity is not an association or application, and even if I didn't remove it, it would have been removed by someone else.SageM (talk) 02:50, January 2, 2018 (UTC)SageM

Scrollboxes

High Speed Flight-

http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/High-Speed_Flight?diff=1046199&oldid=1038508

The literature and web series sections are not in the scrollboxes, which means you separated them by sub-section, which is NOT how you are supposed to do that.

The scrollboxes are only supposed to shorten the known users sections, not the sub-sections/categories.

When you make changes like that next time, everything has to be in one of the scrollboxes. You can't leave something out just because it doesn't have enough users to fit.

its a basic rule of the wikia, and one that other users have been blocked for ignoring.

Here is how its supposed to be-

http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/High-Speed_Flight?diff=1046282&oldid=1046205

As you can see in Kuo's edit, every sub-section/category is inside the scrollboxes like they are supposed to be.

Hopefully that explains things.SageM (talk) 03:16, January 3, 2018 (UTC)SageM

Pretty common question that prompted creation of Page Creation and Details. --Kuopiofi (talk) 13:40, January 4, 2018 (UTC)

"People get powers for reason" --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:50, January 5, 2018 (UTC)

OK, returned. But please note 20a. When you make powers that have other powers as their sub-powers, techniques, variations, etc. of some other power, add them to those pages. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:27, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

I can still remove it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 19:31, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

Admittedly it got deleted because I was in hurry/trying to do several things at once. It happens if rarely and luckily people ask about the reason so I get around checking things. After reread it is usable.

Now, that rule above... --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:40, January 7, 2018 (UTC)

Don't do that again please.

Don't do anything like that again please, as you basically removed everything from the pages-

Wikia Rules:

6. Do not change the content of a existing page for your benefit. What I mean is don't change it of how you see it has because opinions will clash and it will disclosed to a argument.

6a. This means especially NO deleting the page contents just because you don't agree with it.

Considering you basically deleted the page contents with those edits, your very lucky the admins didn't block you.

Seriously, don't do that again. You can copy the users to the other pages, but removing users just because you don't agree with them is breaking wikia rules.SageM (talk) 04:29, June 29, 2018 (UTC)SageM

Warning

Hey Demotivator. I undo your editing because even if Captain America (Steve Rogers), Black Widow, and some characters I added is peak human, they are truly classified as Enhanced. Beleive it or not, a fan or not a fan, they are enhanced. They are enhanced and that is powers, so I don't want any trouble, but if you keep this up, there will be consequences. I have more experiences with Marvel than you. I will ask you to not change it, not even the main photo. 

Apologize

Hi Demotivator. I truly want to say apologize for giving you a warning and it won't happen again. I make changes on Enhanced Condition, but at least Deathstroke (DC Comics) is one of the known users. The reason I change the page because for this reason. They have enhanced powers in spite of them having the levels of peak human like Black Widow, Captain America, and Winter Soldier (Steve Rogers and Winter Soldier are the ones who can reach to superhuman levels). If you don't believe me, go to their page and carefully read the details for it. I will never edit it if they are not enhanced. 

Enhanced Condition/Captain America: 12. No repeated Editing/Undoing of the same thing. If this becomes problem take it to Comments/Talk and talk it out instead of repeatedly messing with the page.

Talk it out on Comments/Talk-page, next one to change things before that gets 1 day timeout to think about it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:56, July 8, 2018 (UTC)

Should I ask yours for the same and why it's been quite some time since cap was returned without your complains when it happened? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:02, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

See above, others have argued against your opinion. Might also note that little bit about rule 12.

So, your argument for removing him? --Kuopiofi (talk) 07:35, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.