FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Kuopiofi
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When you post, add the Signature-''link'' (button on top, tenth from the right, looks like writing) at the end of your message. I'm not answering to anyone who doesn't do so.
+
For various reasons I've finally decided to retire from position of bureaucrat and pass it to [https://powerlisting.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:SageM SageM].
   
If you want to argue, do it on your own Talk-pages instead of here. --[[User:Kuopiofi|Kuopiofi]] ([[User talk:Kuopiofi|talk]]) 11:15, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
+
I'm also dropping completely from this site, so please don't try posting anything here or elsewhere relating to the site.
   
Are you talking about summarising after editing?! Explain, I am confused! --[[User:Nengyko|Nengyko]] ([[User talk:Nengyko|talk]]) 
+
It's been a long run, but sometime it has to end.
   
  +
Thanks, there's been good times and bad, but on the whole I'd say it comes to the positive side. --[[User:Kuopiofi|Kuopiofi]] ([[User talk:Kuopiofi|talk]]) 08:16, October 4, 2019 (UTC)
   
  +
Okay, so how do you want me to do the Direct quote thing? [[User:CrystalStorm51|CrystalStorm51]] ([[User talk:CrystalStorm51|talk]]) 14:07, October 4, 2019 (UTC)
   
Spare me the cheap jabs. I'm not the one living with his head burried in the sand.
+
Okay, gotcha, on both counts. [[User:CrystalStorm51|CrystalStorm51]] ([[User talk:CrystalStorm51|talk]]) 14:44, October 4, 2019 (UTC)
   
Are you kidding me ? I showered you with insane anti-moderation proofs (want more ? just ask), and all you care about is her nagging you about the demotion ? ''Seriously'' ? That's your priority as a Bureaucrat ?
+
I returned from my break to find you had offered me the position of bureaucrat, I also saw that you have retracted the offer because I was in a state of distress at the time. If I had been on I would've accepted the position but when I saw that you had given it to SageM I was particularly displeased, and so are many of the current staff due to his history of conflict with users. While he is commendable for how active he is in working on the wiki content, that history can't be ignored by myself or others. However, I'm willing to give him this chance to see if he's matured over time. If at any point you and SageM wish to reconsider I'll be available. [[User:Alissa the Wise Wolf|Alissa the Wise Wolf]] ([[User talk:Alissa the Wise Wolf|talk]]) 07:56, October 5, 2019 (UTC)
 
The "good reason" is that she undeniably screwed up far beyond anything remotely tolerable. She has proven the ''anti-thesis'' of moderation, so ''of course'' she should not remain moderator. If ''that'' is not a "good reason", then nothing is.
 
 
When she nags you, point out the reasons and proofs. When she goes on, point again and warn her. Then 3-days block and so on.
 
 
It's all so clear and simple and downright ''easy''. All you have to do is follow  protocol, yet you refuse to even do that much ?
 
 
Is "not being bothered" really all you care about ? To the point you dismiss both accountability and the most basic reason ?
 
 
[[User:Emergency Alternate Account|DYBAD]] ([[User talk:Emergency Alternate Account|talk]]) 13:38, October 3, 2019 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 07:58, October 5, 2019

For various reasons I've finally decided to retire from position of bureaucrat and pass it to SageM.

I'm also dropping completely from this site, so please don't try posting anything here or elsewhere relating to the site.

It's been a long run, but sometime it has to end.

Thanks, there's been good times and bad, but on the whole I'd say it comes to the positive side. --Kuopiofi (talk) 08:16, October 4, 2019 (UTC)

Okay, so how do you want me to do the Direct quote thing? CrystalStorm51 (talk) 14:07, October 4, 2019 (UTC)

Okay, gotcha, on both counts. CrystalStorm51 (talk) 14:44, October 4, 2019 (UTC)

I returned from my break to find you had offered me the position of bureaucrat, I also saw that you have retracted the offer because I was in a state of distress at the time. If I had been on I would've accepted the position but when I saw that you had given it to SageM I was particularly displeased, and so are many of the current staff due to his history of conflict with users. While he is commendable for how active he is in working on the wiki content, that history can't be ignored by myself or others. However, I'm willing to give him this chance to see if he's matured over time. If at any point you and SageM wish to reconsider I'll be available. Alissa the Wise Wolf (talk) 07:56, October 5, 2019 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.