FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Kuopiofi
Line 5: Line 5:
   
 
Also side note this is further evidence of what we were talking about earlier. I honestly hate coming to you with tedious stuff like this but since your an admin there is no choice again like u said I don’t see why it’s some big goal of some users on the site. --[[User:RoyalGuard-Elite|Я☻ҰĀℓğטĀЯб-Єℓ│דЄ]] ([[User talk:RoyalGuard-Elite|talk]]) 19:51, November 9, 2018 (UTC)
 
Also side note this is further evidence of what we were talking about earlier. I honestly hate coming to you with tedious stuff like this but since your an admin there is no choice again like u said I don’t see why it’s some big goal of some users on the site. --[[User:RoyalGuard-Elite|Я☻ҰĀℓğטĀЯб-Єℓ│דЄ]] ([[User talk:RoyalGuard-Elite|talk]]) 19:51, November 9, 2018 (UTC)
  +
  +
  +
  +
RoyalGuard nefuses to accept the fact that Omnipotent power users mostly cannot be beaten (solely by other Omnipotent power users) and that some of them are literally forms of Omnipotence, none of the users has actually defetead anyone with Omnipotent powers, only Nigh-Omnipotent beings or Absolute/Omni/Meta power user. The only reason the power itself is a "combination" of Logic Manipulation is because the power is about fighting things you shouldn't even logically be able to fight with, it doesn't allow you to control logic, which is what Logic Manipulation is about.
  +
  +
  +
Could you pleased add the "Omnipotent powers" limitation back and lock the page once again? Or do you think that "Omnipotence" by itself already being there covers most of the Omnipotent powers? Or do you think that "Omnipotence" itself being there covers most of Omnipotent powers? although it would only cover the forms/variations of it i guess.
  +
  +
  +
Sorry, RoyalGuard actually edited over my message before you saw it, which is against the rules i believe?, you can check on your talk page's history.[[User:Tsubasa16|Tsubasa16]] ([[User talk:Tsubasa16|talk]]) 19:56, November 9, 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:56, November 9, 2018

When you post, add the Signature-link (button on top, tenth from the right, looks like writing) at the end of your message. I'm not answering to anyone who doesn't do so. --Kuopiofi (talk) 11:15, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Limit

That message was referring to a further limit of Meta Combat by Tsubasa16. I explained that the Can not beat Omnipotent beings limit covered powers that made you fully Omnipotent. However since not all omnipotent powers offer users full blown Omnipotence adding a further limit to include them all didn’t make sense. Especially because many users under Meta Combat have defeated beings with only Omnipotent level powers but not full blown Omnipotence.

Also side note this is further evidence of what we were talking about earlier. I honestly hate coming to you with tedious stuff like this but since your an admin there is no choice again like u said I don’t see why it’s some big goal of some users on the site. --Я☻ҰĀℓğטĀЯб-Єℓ│דЄ (talk) 19:51, November 9, 2018 (UTC)


RoyalGuard nefuses to accept the fact that Omnipotent power users mostly cannot be beaten (solely by other Omnipotent power users) and that some of them are literally forms of Omnipotence, none of the users has actually defetead anyone with Omnipotent powers, only Nigh-Omnipotent beings or Absolute/Omni/Meta power user. The only reason the power itself is a "combination" of Logic Manipulation is because the power is about fighting things you shouldn't even logically be able to fight with, it doesn't allow you to control logic, which is what Logic Manipulation is about.


Could you pleased add the "Omnipotent powers" limitation back and lock the page once again? Or do you think that "Omnipotence" by itself already being there covers most of the Omnipotent powers? Or do you think that "Omnipotence" itself being there covers most of Omnipotent powers? although it would only cover the forms/variations of it i guess.


Sorry, RoyalGuard actually edited over my message before you saw it, which is against the rules i believe?, you can check on your talk page's history.Tsubasa16 (talk) 19:56, November 9, 2018 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.