aka He Who Never Stops Dreaming

  • I live in The Endless Ocean
  • My occupation is The All Dreamer

When you add users, the series should be in italics, not quotation marks. CrystalStorm51 (talk) 22:41, October 6, 2019 (UTC)

Meta Omnipotence implies its greater then omnipotence.

So its not a valid Also Called in any way. As no power can be greater then omnipotence by definition.SageM (talk) 02:39, October 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Not really.

Author Authority isn't any more or less real then omnipotence.

Omnipotence will always be the greatest power on the site, their is no meta version of it.

All the powers on the site are fully in the realm of fiction, even AA and Omni-Creator.

So its impossible for them to be more real or more powerful.

So it doesn't belong.SageM (talk) 03:06, October 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

When you add users, series should be in italics. CrystalStorm51 (talk) 21:15, October 8, 2019 (UTC)

It doesn't erase fictional verses. It erases stories. As in the contents of books.

It has absolutely no effect on the outside world or anything else.

Its simple erasure. Nothing more and nothing less. Please stop adding it back.

You apparently didn't even read the SCP wikia as it clearly says that it doesn't erase people, places or objects.SageM (talk) 21:18, October 8, 2019 (UTC)SageM

No.SageM (talk) 21:51, October 8, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Please stop changing the capabilities and definitions of the powers.

You have been asked multiple times in the past to stop by various users, and yet you continue to do so.

The powers are already defined properly about they can do, and they are in no way omnipotent.

I am not sure why you have the crazy idea to make powers more powerful then they actually are, but I would like to ask you to stop.

Thank you.SageM (talk) 06:50, October 9, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Please stop trying to find limitations for powers that have been defined as having none.

For those powers that have no limitations by default are never going to have any, now or in the future.

And the wikia is cutting down on any new absolute/almighty/omnipotent powers due to the new change in management.

So they really won't have limitations.

I don't know how many more times I need to repeat whats already common knowledge.

So please find something else to ask in the comments instead of trying to find weaknesses for powers that will never have any.SageM (talk) 22:43, October 17, 2019 (UTC)SageM

please stop asking the same thing again and again.

You were already given the answer, so i'm not sure why you keep asking the same thing.

The answer isn't going to change, and your not going to get anymore from it,

So find something else to talk about instead of a pointless discussion that will never have any other answer, because its not going to change regardless of your opinion on the matter.SageM (talk) 22:59, October 17, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Actually you have asked the same questions before. maybe not on the same page, but overall for multiple different omnipotent powers.

And the answer you have been given is always the same.

Anyone can see that just by looking at the contributions section of your user page.

So its not really a lie, as you have asked the same type of question many times before.

While you might notice it, you have in fact done so before.SageM (talk) 03:22, October 18, 2019 (UTC)SageM

I'm not badmouthing you. Its just something you keep doing when it comes to omnipotent powers on the wikia.

You keep questioning about users and how they work and asking the same type of question again and again and again, even when given the answers on your talk page or the comments. Even when other users give you answers you still do so.

So its hard to stay patient even when your given accurate answers, as you immediately ask the same question again.

So when I ask you to try commenting on something else, I am speaking from experience. because you do ask the same question multiple times.

The basic answer is thus. The powers are omnipotent, which means they can do anything. Asking for any other answer is pointless or meaningless overall.SageM (talk) 03:29, October 18, 2019 (UTC)SageM


There is only one anti-god in Marvel, and that is Oblivion. 

The One Below All nothing more then a joke character, he isn't meant to be taken seriously and he was easily defeated by the Hulk.

He also has nothing to do with creation or the One Above All.

He was already removed multiple times before. As he doesn't fit the description of the power in the slightest.

Oblivion is the only Anti-God that exists in Marvel Comics, and he always has been. As he existed even before the first multiverse (First Firmament) and will exist long after the last one.

He is the primordial void and the nonexistence that preceded existence.

the One Below All on the other hand had absolutely nothing to do with creation, and didn't even come into being until long after the multiverse was created. So he can't be the primordial void or an Anti-God.

even the staff at marvel confirmed that he isn't anything special or important, and that he doesn't have an actual place in the cosmic hierachy.SageM (talk) 03:28, October 20, 2019 (UTC)SageM

He faced natural disasters on occasion, eliminated an earthquake with his fists.~~User talk:Arquetion

He has defeated Natural Disasters before, and not simply personified ones.

Actual intangible/non-physical natural disasters.

Point of fact, natural phenomena (such as disasters) cannot be destroyed, only delayed. As they will automatically reappear again once the conditions that caused them reform.

Yujiro has actually caused those conditions to stop entirely. Which is not possible.~~User talk:Arquetion

Defeating God is not the only thing that qualifies a user for Meta Combat.

Its being able to defeat anything with combat.

And Yujiro's strength is such that absolutely nobody knows if he has a limit. He has beaten everything on the planet, and not even the forces of nature can stop him as he can defeat and destroy them if he wished (and he has).

So yes, he counts as a user.SageM (talk) 01:46, October 22, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Considering that the SCP verse has 4 separate beings that could be considered as god/supreme being, its hard to say if the Scarlet King could be considered an Anti-God or not.

He is a devil, that much I can agree with. but for anything beyond that I couldn't say for certain.

Since he isn't a primordial void nor did he exist until after the birth of the Tree of Knowledge and the creation of the multiverse.

There is another entity similar to the Scarlet King that's just as bad (and potentially even more destructive) as he is-


Its impossible to say who is worse though, as they are both capable of ending creation with their mere presence.SageM (talk) 04:47, October 22, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Well, firstly, on top of the wikia, you will be able to see the no. of pages listed on the wikia (over 12,000). Just adjacent to it will be apage like symbol. Clicking that symbol allows you to add a new page. After that use the Page Creation and Details for the format of the page you want to create. Also, just in case what exactly is the power you have in mind? Can you give me a description?Nekron2 (talk) 15:07, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

The power seems fine to me but I can't guarantee about other admins. So, give it try but remember it has chances of being deleted.Nekron2 (talk) 16:08, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

Well, in the source (while in classic editor, you will be able to see both source and visual at the top of the page) just copy paste it from another page and make the required changes. For example open the page of meta transcendence, go to the source and just copy paste it to the source of your power and then simply edit itNekron2 (talk) 17:31, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

Are you creating this page on a laptop or Desktop, if not then these problems can definitely happen. Try using a laptop or desktop to create powersNekron2 (talk) 19:09, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

Then, it is a technical problem, try contacting community central. Nekron2 (talk) 19:17, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

Already covered by existing powers.

If your going to make a power, try and make something that isn't already on here.SageM (talk) 18:52, October 28, 2019 (UTC)SageM

The power which you are talking about has already been covered by existing powers.Nekron2 (talk) 19:16, October 28, 2019 (UTC)

No, Anu is not an uncaring god distant from creation.

Anu is the monotheistic god of Elder Scrolls. 

Anu pulled himself and Padomay outside the verse in order to prevent their conflict from destroying creation.

He created the elder scrolls verse and all that exists within it alongside Padomay (his antithesis).

He is not an example of Cosmic Otherness, and in fact their is no user of cosmic otherness in Elder Scrolls.

Your information is totally inaccurate.SageM (talk) 19:22, October 28, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Also Anu does in fact care about Creation/the Aubris.

I am not sure where your getting your info from, but your source isn't true.SageM (talk) 19:27, October 28, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Absolute condition is the first thing a user of eternal transcendence will gain along with nigh-omnipotence. It's just the user cannot lose ALL limitations which is what meta Transcendence is.

Losing all limitations essentially erases you out of existence as limitations are what define you in the long run which is why complete usage of Meta Transcendence is actually harmful (see the limitation of meta transcendence).So, yeah, absolute condition being an application of eternal transcendence does make sense. 

Eternal evolution actually covers condition infinitum, so that can't be made. Nekron2 (talk) 06:41, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

Eternal Transcendence

Well, the powers of eternal evolution, superior adaptation and eternal transcendence can stay as different pages under the current rules but under the new changes, they can very well be redirected as a single page. You see, the main focus of the new changes is to reduce the no. of pages and rather make detailed pages. So, yeah the three powers might be merged in future, I am not saying that they absolutely will be merged (I would prefer them as separate pages too as they are completely different concepts) but there is a possibility as we don't quite know what exactly the changes will be.

Also, even if the pages are merged, you don't need to worry about it as the concept itself will not be lost on merging the pages. The concept of eternal transcendence will still stay but in a much more efficient way Nekron2 (talk) 04:27, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

I would also request you to remove your message from Alissa's talk page and not post that message in any bureaucrat's talk page as the discussion regarding the new changes haven't even started and no pages are being deleted right now. Nekron2 (talk) 04:40, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

Well, you just need to go to her talk page and click the "edit" option. After that just select your own message and just press delete (or click the right mouse button and cut it). Remember, you can edit your own messages on other peoples talk pages but removing or editing someone else's message is strictly prohibited (even for admins).Nekron2 (talk) 18:33, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

Sorry but that's basically authority manipulation. So,no.Nekron2 (talk) 08:55, November 11, 2019 (UTC)

RE: There's no war:

Yes, there is. Repeatedly undoing and redoing the same edit is an edit war. I don't care who'se right, talk it out and find an agreement before redoing that edit. Timjer (talk) 20:47, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

...A lack of reply is not permission, you know. Life doesn't work that way. Personally, I don't know anything about that example, so I would say it's up to SageM to decide, as he disagreed to begin with. But since he still hasn't answered yet, I suppose you're free to add it with my permission. Timjer (talk) 21:05, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

If an admin says no to something, it doesn't mean you can add it back as if nothing happened.

I shouldn't have to reply again, given that I already said he doesn't have the power.

Because he doesn't. And even the SCP wikia confirms as such.

All he did was simple erasure, and even that wasn't complete as there were still records and memories of the events.

True ultimate erasure is a step above that, its beyond recovery. Even by the gods or other higher powers.

Nothing remains of the target, even the origin and memory of it. All levels of the target are erased from existence. Its the most focused form of Nonexistence for a very good reason.SageM (talk) 21:22, November 12, 2019 (UTC)SageM

To put in perspective for you to understand-

Ultimate Erasure is essentially the equivalent of a Reality Dreamer waking up, an annihilation so through that nothing points to or shows that the target ever existed in any form or on any level.

Why do you think Goner is one of the also called?

Its a sub-power of Omnipotence and the focused form of Nonexistence for a very good reason.

Compare GOLB's erasure of Margles from Adventure time, or The Godhead's Zero-Sum to what 3812 did.

You can see a huge difference in the expression and level of the erasure. As it was wiped out from everywhere and everywhen, even outside of reality itself.

Now tell me, did 3812 ever do anything like that? Did he ever erase anything on a different level of Narrative or Higher dimension?

No. He didn't. He did a lousy job of erasing an island off the coast of California, he briefly blinked Mongolia out of existence for about 3 days. 

And the so called final entry? Yeah, all those locations still exist as SCPs. Even the highlighted Addendum shows that all the information in the file was recovered multiple times before the technician gave up trying.

So were is this ultimate erasure you claim he performed? Because I am not seeing anything like what the other users have accomplished. To me, it just looks like simple destruction or event negation.SageM (talk) 21:56, November 12, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Morningstar was the one that made the original edit, and he clarified the reason why Satan is a user.

So please leave it alone, as I don't want to have to lock the page again because of this argument.SageM (talk) 06:10, November 14, 2019 (UTC)SageM

It doesn't fit either of those powers.

It power is nothing more then a poor mans version of Gold Experience Requiem from JoJos Bizarre Adventure.

Flawless Indestructibility is way beyond anything in the SCP Foundation, as its an omnipotent level power and limited only to those who are truly without any weaknesses.

As for Absolute Invulnerability, it doesn't demonstrate anything that shows it has even that and the story doesn't offer any backstory to imply it either.

So the answer is no to both.SageM (talk) 04:20, November 16, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Well, not necessarily, 3812 has schizophrenia but that's not related to the power besides, he overcame his mental problems at the end of the article, so, I don't think that's a valid limitation. I will say that the two limitations seem to be the only possible limitations for the power at present.Nekron2 (talk) 18:50, November 20, 2019 (UTC)

Pralaya isn't really an anti-god. She is just the embodiment of nonexistence.

The anti-god of DC comics is The Great Evil Beast/The Original Darkness, as it is the polar opposite to the presence and the destroyer while the Presence is the creator.

Just because something is the primordial void doesn't automatically make the user an anti-god. 

Oblivion is the Anti-God because that literally how he is defined in Marvel (by Eternity himself no less).

Pralaya isn't defined as a Anti-God at any point in the series. She is just the void from which everything springs.SageM (talk) 18:34, November 22, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Forgiveness but I wasn't trying to make them weaker to fit my personal understanding, I was trying to organize the concept as best I could to try and make sense of it for everyone, and the point of putting the infinitum abilities if Absolute Condition already covers all of them ? Dragon-Fox 7 (talk) 20:52, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

Very well, but I think your better of adding FT to associations, plus I made a resent update to at least organize the abilities together I hope it helps, good luck to you Dragon-Fox 7 (talk) 21:34, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

That's easy because a cosmic has to do with perpetual defiance of all existence as an ungodly eldritch/alien cosmic being and Eternal Transcendence does rise above existence it doesn't necessarily defy it the way CO would, and CO is more a product of Self Origin Manipulation the same way Monotheistic Deities and Anti-Gods while Eternal Transcendence Transends origins instead. Dragon-Fox 7 (talk) 21:51, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

I think we have something like that already, I don't remember which power exactly though.Nekron2 (talk) 18:18, December 1, 2019 (UTC)

You are not allowed to add the Hulk back to the page.

Neither the Hulk nor the One-Below-All have Absolute Strength.

The Hulk only has Strength Infinitum, this is a decision made by the entire wikia staff.

You are not allowed to circumvent it, and if you do I will have to block you. So please drop it.SageM (talk) 04:27, December 2, 2019 (UTC)SageM

You can't define him as Omnipotent

Actually we can't define the Emperor Beyond the Sea as omnipotent or even nigh omnipotent....

...Because he never actually appears in the story, and he is only mentioned off-hand once or twice by Aslan.

The most we do know about him is that he created the Deep and the Deeper Magic, and that's basically about it.

You can't define the character as being all-powerful if the entity in question never makes an actual appearance in the story or even has a backstory to fact check.

Yes he is considered to be more powerful then his son Aslan, and possibly Tash. But that not really enough info to make a ruling that he belongs under Omnipotence.SageM (talk) 06:05, December 4, 2019 (UTC)SageM

I don't think that's enough for qualifying as Omnipotent. You see, the Luminous being is a true author avatar (a true author avatar can do everything as they are the authors) and is as above Ao as he is to the rest of the creation. Hence, he can qualify as a user of true Omnipotence. True author avatars are generally Omnipotent/Metapotent/Ultipotent with there being very few exceptions who aren't any one of them (Omnipotent/Metapotent/Ultipotent)  like TOAA or Tori-Bot.Nekron2 (talk) 06:59, December 4, 2019 (UTC)

The Solution (SCP Foundation) is listed as having 3 zeros. Not 2.

So you changed was already accurate edit to a false one.

Please don't change the edit again.SageM (talk) 22:49, December 4, 2019 (UTC)SageM

You have to actually upload the picture for it to show up on the infobox.

You never uploaded that picture, and the upload log confirms it.

Sometimes pictures don't upload because of file differences between the actual image and what its listed as.

When that happens, the wikia won't let you upload the picture regardless of what you do. SageM (talk) 23:43, December 4, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Sorry but thats a definite NO right there.

The staff always shoots down ideas that are basically more powerful then existing omnipotence powers.

Omni-Creator already covers your idea, and there are no limitations for Author Authority saying its only limited to one verse.

So that's not going to be happening, and please don't ask to make anything remotely like that again. As its always going to be a no in that regard.

This same type of discussion has happened before and the answer is not going to change.

So the answer is No.SageM (talk) 00:25, December 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Both Omni-Creator and Author Authority are considered to be Transfictional powers, which means they aren't limited by such things.SageM (talk) 00:28, December 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Its also covered by Totality Manipulation.00:30, December 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Non-Created Physiology is solely for those users that have been originally defined either in story or by word of god to have always existed.

For the TOAA, we don't know if it was self-created or without an origin. So its impossible to say which power it belongs under.

As for the Overvoid, all we know about it is that its just there, acting as the canvas for creation. Nothing else about it is really known since DC comics never gave any hint of a backstory. Plus with the DC canon having changed, its impossible to say where it fits in continuity of the DC franchise.

So you can see my point about neither of them being valid users, since actual confirmation is needed for them to belong.SageM (talk) 01:42, December 7, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Honestly, you would soon transcend time itself, so that limitation will not really have no meaning. As for star maker, I have to do more research before deciding anything. I'll notify you once I make a decision.Nekron2 (talk) 18:38, December 8, 2019 (UTC)

Hmm that's a tricky one, the examples sounds more like Mathematical Strength but I suppose the better name would be Superseding I think ? Dragon-Fox 7 (talk) 20:41, December 10, 2019 (UTC)

if a power has no users, then don't add the rare powers category.

That category is only for powers that actually have users. Your supposed to use the category: "Power with no known users" instead.

Keep that in mind next time.SageM (talk) 19:12, December 11, 2019 (UTC)SageM

No. Since an XK-end of the world scenario isn't the same as the destruction of absolutely everything.

Its just the end of a single reality or universe. Not truly everything.

Even though he says he is going to unmake everything, he never really does.

There aren't really any examples of true Absolute Destruction in SCP foundation. 

All of them are far to limited in scale to count.SageM (talk) 03:53, December 12, 2019 (UTC)SageM


While I admit the power is pretty strong, there are multiple factors to take into account that limit its potential.

For one, it only works if there is actually something to surpass or supersede. If there isn't anything (such as nonexistence, omnilock or Reader embodiment users) then its pretty much useless as a power.

You can't surpass nonexistence (if you tried you would simply erase yourself in the process), there is nothing beyond an Omnilocked being as they are already beyond everything anyway.

And nothing can surpass the reader, as it would just end the story and that would be it for the user of the power.

So yeah, it has too many different factors that limit it from being a true omnipotent power. At the most it might be an Almighty or Infinite power. But definitely not an Omnipotent one....SageM (talk) 00:34, December 14, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Please stop making random pages without approval from the admins.  Especially true if they are omni, meta, absolute or omnipotent powers.

Also the pages you are making are already covered by existing powers.SageM (talk) 06:30, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Thats not how you described the power. 

The way you described it was exactly like Conclusion Dominance. And considering that Conclusion Dominance is already an omnipotent power and the entire point of all other apocalyptic powers on here, there is no reason to keep it.

So believe me, its already covered by it.

Stop making omnipotent powers without admin approval, next time you do so It will result in a block. 

Its right in the wikia rules.SageM (talk) 06:37, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Also Disaster Manipulation is not the opposite to Miracle Manipulation (or even Meta Miracle Manipulation).

So please stop trying to make powers that aren't even remotely related to each other.SageM (talk) 06:40, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM


You already blew your chance by not asking for permission.

Sorry but its not getting remade. And its not even a matter of wording either, the power is the same as conclusion dominance.

And it wouldn't be the opposite to Meta Miracle Manipulation, because Meta Miracle is treated more as an Event. Your power is not one, and thus it wouldn't be considered the opposite to Meta Miracle Manipulation no matter how you tried to describe it.

Its not coming back, so please don't ask about it again. If you want to make more powers in the future, please make sure they aren't already covered by existing pages. As you have a bad habit of doing that.SageM (talk) 06:48, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Your idea is also covered by Omega Reality as well.

So yeah, its already a power on here.SageM (talk) 06:56, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Some powers are fine for the wikia and generally get a pass.

While others do generally require admin permission, since some users have a habit of just making whatever pops into there head and don't care about the rules.

So yes, its generally accepted to ask the admins about it first before making powers. 

And yes you blew your chance because you don't bother to ask permission about any of the powers, some of which have been absolute/meta powers. Which you do require asking the staff about according to the wikia rules.

So please keep this in mind for the future, and yes even the staff members tend to ask permission from the Bureaucrats before making their pages.

Its just how things are done on here, I am simply doing my job to make sure we don't get constant violations of the rules so everyone can work together on this wikia without getting trolled or vandalized.

Its the staffs job after all.SageM (talk) 07:43, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Also a disaster is not the same as a miracle, and it never has been.

A miracle is a one of a kind event that cannot be properly explained but happens anyway.

A disaster is just a negative experience that occurs in both people and nature, its not even remotely on the same wavelength as a miracle, nor is it its opposite.

In fact disasters are totally normal experiences, while miracles are divine or greater events/experiences.

Miracle Manipulation doesn't have an opposite, because the entire point of the power is that its beyond the experience and understanding of others.

A miracle cannot be explained, Disasters can. They are not opposites and they are not related to each other.

And yes, Creation and Destruction are opposites, but they are also two sides of the same coin.

Your basically saying a normal everyday occurrence is on the same level as a divine event or power that almost never occurs?

Miracles don't have opposites.SageM (talk) 07:53, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

If you check the wikia activity log and the history sections of the user pages, you will see that most of the users ask the staff for permission on creating pages.

Some of the newer powers that the staff have made were asked about a long time ago, they just didn't make them right away.

So yes, almost every user (staff included) asks for permission before making a new page, or they have already asked for it before in the past.

The only users that don't have to ask are the bureaucrats, since they are the ones who make the wikia rules in the first place.SageM (talk) 08:00, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Already Exists

Omni Enhancement- Omni-Augmentation.SageM (talk) 22:19, December 21, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Infinity Maker- Nothing more then Omnificence with a new limitation of making things of endless size. Just add in a new limitation and your done.

Also already covered by Absolute Growth Inducement.

Fiction Negation- Again no, as its still covered by Plot Erasure/Fiction Destruction regardless of its level of effectiveness/throughness. its also mostly covered by Real World Enforcement.

Omni Combat- Covered by Absolute Combat and Combat Merging.

Sorry but all your ideas are either already taken, or they too specific.

You keep choosing powers that already exist on the wikia. Please review the categories for future reference before deciding on anything else.SageM (talk) 00:37, December 22, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Omni Imagination and Omni Imagination manipulation

No for both.

First off, we don't make different levels for various embodiments and we never will. Being an Embodiment of something means that you already cover all the bases, levels and forms that the user is the personification of.

While there are variations to embodiment's, they considered to be separate and special enough to be their own unique power. 

That's the whole point of Embodiment's/Personifications after all.

As for Omni Imagination Manipulation, its totally unnecessary as the original power already covers every form of imagination there is.

Its not really an upgrade since there isn't any real difference between the powers. Meta level and Omni level powers have to cover things that the original power cannot or will not cover under normal circumstances.

Since that isn't the case with your idea, I will have to say no to it as well.

Sorry.SageM (talk) 03:10, December 22, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Yeah, I think that you're good to go. Also, please put your signatures next time.Nekron2 (talk) 06:22, December 22, 2019 (UTC)

It seems your idea is already covered by Omni-Augmentation.Nekron2 (talk) 06:41, December 22, 2019 (UTC)

Omni Combination- Selective Unity/Absolute Fusion.

Real World Destruction- That's nothing more then normal destruction.

Omni Power Combination- Thats just power mixture.

So these powers already exist.

Your not really trying at this point, your just saying whatever comes to your mind.SageM (talk) 01:02, December 23, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Already exists- Almighty Absorbing Replication/Omni-Absorption.SageM (talk) 00:51, December 30, 2019 (UTC)SageM

Well, this TOAA matter can actually only be discussed when we get the full scans of the infinity ending onlineNekron2 (talk) 19:19, January 1, 2020 (UTC)

Almighty Replication already covers that.SageM (talk) 23:04, January 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Sorry but the answer is still no.

It cannot be created as Almighty Replication covers it completely. You are just attempting to remake powers that already exist on this wikia.

There is literally no difference between your idea and Almighty Replication. 

Powers that cover the same basic idea/concept are not allowed, its wikia rule number 1.SageM (talk) 23:17, January 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Wikia rule-

1. Don't make a page that is already on this wiki or it will be deleted.

1a. Powers that cover essentially same thing come under this as well.

1a1. If it can be described as "like (power) but/except", just add new Limitation.

Your idea covers essentially the same thing as Almighty Replication, so the answer is a definite no.SageM (talk) 23:19, January 1, 2020 (UTC)SageM

No. We already have enough fire based abilities on the wikia.

And you really need to stop asking for new Omnipotent powers, because its seriously getting old at this point.

All your powers are just copies of existing ideas with Omnipotence tacked on to it. So the answer is no.

So no more omnipotent power ideas, Ok?SageM (talk) 00:00, January 2, 2020 (UTC)SageM

It doesn't matter. Its still part of the wikia rules.

And yes, most of your ideas are just existing powers with omnipotence tacked on.

Powers that are considered to be sub-powers or Variations of Omnipotence are still considered to be omnipotent powers regardless of the change in categories.

Also the omnipotent powers category was never actually deleted from the wikia, it still exists even if there isn't anything currently listed on it.

So please stop asking for more Omnipotent powers, the answer is No.SageM (talk) 01:06, January 2, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Already covered by Personal Domain and Territory Empowerment.SageM (talk) 20:34, January 4, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Timeline Manipulation/Multi-Choice/Reality SelectionSageM (talk) 19:27, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Time Collapse/Time Fusion.

Your idea is already covered by existing powers. And I know what the Dragon Break is, and its not what your actually thinking of.

Please stop trying to make powers that are already covered by existing pages. Because that's apparently all your doing right now.20:15, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also covered by Event Rearrangement/Alternate Timeline Creation/Butterfly Effect/Time Distortion/Event Order Manipulation/Temporal Selection.

As you can see, its already covered.SageM (talk) 20:23, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Mmm, fair. I only added Transcendence because Spartan essentially became a monotheistic archetype this side of Jesus Christ.Sypherpol (talk) 20:27, January 6, 2020 (UTC)

for future reference

In the future, please read the category pages before suggesting any new powers. As its quite likely that your power already exists under a different name.SageM (talk) 20:28, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Read wikia rule 1 again.

Powers that essentially cover the same thing aren't allowed. Your idea is already covered by the those powers, it doesn't matter how you try to frame it as its still being done by those powers.

I'm not sure why I have to keep explaining this to you. As it should already be obvious that your just remaking existing pages, the only difference is one or two words. The general capabilities and applications are still the same either way.

I know what the Dragon Break is, as I have already played Elder Scrolls before. And the powers I mentioned already cover it.

Stop asking to make powers that are already on the wikia. Until you actually read through the category pages and actually read the capabilities of those powers please don't contact me again. As I will just delete the message without reading it.

Most of your ideas are currently on the wikia.

Also reality scramble would be covered by Reality Warping, so thats a no go either way.SageM (talk) 21:09, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Its also covered by Reality Randomization.SageM (talk) 21:14, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

I believe Monotheistic Deity Physiology/Omni-Creator/Composite Deity Physiology/Omni-Embodiment/Absolute Embodiment already cover it.SageM (talk) 23:57, January 6, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also 10th dimension physiology is not just about dimensions. Its every single iteration of reality, universe, plane of existence, timeline, etc in one being.

10th dimension physiology is essentially Totality manipulation in physiology form.SageM (talk) 00:05, January 7, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Sorry but i'm going to have to say No on that.

We already have enough of those types of powers as is, we don't need anymore.

The existing powers I mentioned already cover everything you are suggesting. So please don't ask for that kind of thing again.

I already asked you nicely to stop with the omnipotent and absolute level powers, especially ones that like that have multiple powers that cover them.SageM (talk) 02:01, January 7, 2020 (UTC)SageM

And the answer would be the same even if you asked the other admins.

So please stop asking for those kinds of powers, there are plenty as is.SageM (talk) 02:02, January 7, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Pretty sure that Art Physiology covers it.SageM (talk) 22:57, January 7, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Background Manipulation is considered to be an art based power.

Which means background physiology will be the same. I'm sorry but those are the facts and you can't change them.

The admins do have final say on what a power is considered to be, and your idea would be considered to be an art based power

You can't just say it isn't one, when all the evidence points out that it is one according to how things are defined on this wikia.SageM (talk) 04:59, January 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

The background is part of art, it doesn't matter what context you use it as.

That's not something thats ever going to change. Your argument is flawed for the simple fact you literally defined your description of the idea as being an art-based power.SageM (talk) 05:05, January 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Sorry but the answer is No.

The overmonitor is considered to be an art based entity as it forms the canvas of creation that all things are drawn upon.

Its an art based power, you can claim its not. But that's literally what the Overmonitor/Oversoul is and always has been.

There is no arguing this point as its already been stated by word of god to be that.

The oversoul/overvoid is the empty white space that the comic is draw and written upon. You can make all the claims you want, but the facts won't change regardless of how you try to define them.

Everyone on here knows this already, so your argument is trying to change confirmed and factual information just to make a page that isn't what your describing.

The power already exists on here, so please stop asking.SageM (talk) 05:50, January 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Another point of fact about your argument that you don't seem to understand is that you think that it can't do the things you want it to do since its an art based power.

Well sorry to say but your argument has one huge flaw, art powers can in fact be on the level of power your trying to describe and imply- Meta Art Manipulation.

The overmonitor is an art-based being and a user of this power (its the canvas of creation after all).

So for the last time please stop claiming things like that. If you want to make a page, try and think of something that isn't already covered by something else and actually fits in with the existing definitions of this wikia.

Your idea is already on here and is covered by more powers then I care to count. Its an art-based power. that much is set in stone.SageM (talk) 06:00, January 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Think of something more interesting next time...

If you want to make a power, try and think of something that hasn't been done before.

Something that's truly unique and interesting (and please cut down on asking about the omni powers, as that seems to be all you want to make nowadays...)SageM (talk) 06:05, January 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Well that's too specific but how about Monkey God Physiology/Monkey diety physiology. That can include monkey gods from all the different religions like Sun Wukong and Lord Hunamana.Nekron2 (talk) 16:48, January 8, 2020 (UTC)

That's not really valid enough to be a power, as its way too specific to even be a technique.

Just add it as a limitation to the actual power and your done. because its exact same power with just the good or bad part attached to it.

Please re-read wikia rule number one for future reference.SageM (talk) 20:23, January 10, 2020 (UTC)SageM


1a1. If it can be described as "like (power) but/except", just add new Limitation.

Your idea is part of this rule. Sorry.SageM (talk) 20:25, January 10, 2020 (UTC)SageM

powers have to be varied and unique enough to be considered separate from the original power.

Your idea isn't even a variation, its the exact same power in every respect. Just with good or bad attached to it. Otherwise your just remaking the same page.

It wouldn't really be any different, as it would still have all the same applications, associations and limitations as the original power.

Just because you think its a technique, doesn't automatically make it one.

Keep trying.SageM (talk) 20:33, January 10, 2020 (UTC)SageM

I'm sorry, you wanted to do Background Physiology? SageM has not said anything about that, has he? CrystalStorm51 (talk) 00:56, January 11, 2020 (UTC)

No problem. CrystalStorm51 (talk) 01:18, January 11, 2020 (UTC)

No. its just the edge of the multiverse/omniverse. Its not actually outside of everything.

Only Oblivion (who exists outside the marvel verse as a whole due to being the origin of it), The TOAA (of course), the White Phoenix of the Crown (who stepped outside existence in order to repair it), and briefly Kevin Brashear (who is confirmed by the writers to have left the omniverse).are the only examples of true Omnilock in Marvel Comics

Other then that, there are no other examples of actual omnilock in the franchise. If anything, the Far Shore is more along the lines of Spatial-Temporal Lock.

Hope that explains things for you.SageM (talk) 02:06, January 12, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Oblivion is the oldest entity in marvel comics, predating even the Ultimate Ultimates (and every other cosmic abstract being outside of TOAA) and all realms, dimensions, realities, timelines, spaces, and etc..

Its outside even the Far Shore, in fact its realm is not part of the Marvel continuity or omniverse at all.

The far shore is more like the space outside the towers of the White Hot Room (ie the extra dimensional home of the Phoenix Force and the beginning and ending point for the souls/essence of every being that has ever existed- past, present, and future).SageM (talk) 02:24, January 12, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Non-canon characters aren't allowed.

its basically the same deal as using fanmade characters or series on here.

I really shouldn't have to even tell you that, its just basic common sense after all.SageM (talk) 02:55, January 14, 2020 (UTC)SageM

The rules are pretty clear when it comes to characters being Official only.

Which means only canon characters are allowed on the wikia, its really not that hard to understand.SageM (talk) 02:59, January 14, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Yeah, the problem with that is that a lot of contributors tend to put fanmade characters or series on the wikia, so the rules are pretty clear that only official mainstream, public, and canon content is whats allowed on here.

Its the reason why the HOTU from Marvel Comics isn't used on here anymore (due to marvel stating that It and by extension, the entire Marvels: The End storyline is non-canon and didn't actually ever happen.)

So we have to make certain that users are only from mainstream and canon sources.

Its also why we don't allow real life examples on here either (quotes from real people are the only exception/exemption to this, as they enhance the page rather then break the rules).

I understand your confusion, but its quality control matter and something we have to enforce.

Sorry, but that's something that will never actually be changed on here.SageM (talk) 03:24, January 14, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Naw, I think its fine as is.SageM (talk) 18:48, January 14, 2020 (UTC)SageM

That's pretty much covered by Meta Power Opposition. Omnicounter and Superior Adaptation.SageM (talk) 03:30, January 15, 2020 (UTC)SageM

The idea is still too close in nature to those powers. So i'd have to say no.

Also Omnicounter and Superior Adaptation are by definition combat powers.

There is also Superiority also well.

Also your idea is literally an adaptation power, so it really wouldn't work anyway.

Sorry.SageM (talk) 04:01, January 15, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also covered by Adaptive Power-Level/Adaptive Development and Combat Adaptation.SageM (talk) 04:05, January 15, 2020 (UTC)SageM

As long as they can truly be said to fit how the power works you can add them.

But I will be double checking to make sure they actually belong on there.SageM (talk) 00:05, January 16, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Just go ahead and add them for now. The other users and I will check to make sure they belong later.SageM (talk) 00:17, January 16, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Not really.

Astral Regulator Thanos is more of an example of Almighty Absorbing Replication, rather then Almighty Ascension.SageM (talk) 06:17, January 16, 2020 (UTC)SageM

I already explained to you before. 

No more infinite, absolute, almighty, meta, omni powers for right now.

The answer is no. Find a power that isn't on an absolute or greater level.SageM (talk) 23:09, January 17, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Sorry for a late reply but yeah, you can add the quote of TOBA.Nekron2 (talk) 16:01, January 18, 2020 (UTC)

The flame sword one is too specific, what does spirit shifting do?Nekron2 (talk) 12:53, January 19, 2020 (UTC)

Spirit shifting seems fine. Go ahead.Nekron2 (talk) 19:51, January 20, 2020 (UTC)

Can I make some edits on the Eternal Transcendence page? It seem the info box image shares the same image with Big Creation Manipulation. (SunlightSoul123 (talk) 18:34, January 22, 2020 (UTC))

You'd have to ask Royal-Guard Elite about that. Since its his page and he has final decision about whats on there.

Sorry but its not my decision to make.SageM (talk) 06:59, January 23, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Already covered by Dimensional Transcendence and Reality Border Transcendence.SageM (talk) 19:59, January 23, 2020 (UTC)SageM

He is already on Dimensional Transcendence, he is covered by Outer Gods.SageM (talk) 20:15, January 23, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Already covered by Freedom, Enlightenment, Higher Consciousness, Knowledge Ascendancy, and True-Self Recognition.

Yeah, its pretty much a power on here.SageM (talk) 06:56, January 25, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also Mental Evolution and State of Mind cover it as well.SageM (talk) 06:59, January 25, 2020 (UTC)SageM

He isn't a user. 

The most we have ever seen him do is erase things from existence. He never demonstrates anything else that could make him a user of Ultipotence.SageM (talk) 07:22, January 28, 2020 (UTC)SageM

If I create or "make" anything it has already been done before it has been seen by physical eyes and at time it is seen in it's time and so it is and will forever be, I need not permission from none for my creations.

I was talking about these powers as real life super powers I do have above omnipotence & are verified. But it's fine I've made my own wiki. in reference to people with having these superpowers on superpowerwiki as real life super powers for people on this earth to display. It's a matter of paying attention to details, being made aware & asking the right questions without offending, such as my avatar. My photo avatar denatotes a fact of real life omnipresence since I did not personally yet in a sense did create the avatar and its in both different variations of my email. He just one day appeared in my e mail as my avatar over some half a decade ago. I am "admin" in a much larger scale than people realize.

Luis 128 Lincoln

Its okay if you didn’t give an edit summary. Because I understand. I still do too. Woo hoo.

pretty sure that Concept Empowerment/Quantum Empowerment/Universal Force Empowerment/Cosmic Empowerment cover it already.SageM (talk) 06:16, February 4, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Honestly, this subject has confused me for a long time. The thing is the power to do everything- Metapotence. As you may know, none of the users listed in metapotence are omniscient but they can become whenever they want to. Ultipotence ca n be replicated because it is the ultimate level of nigh omnipotence as nigh omnipotence is the power to do nearly everything and ultipotence is the power to do everything except for gaining omniscient. Nekron2 (talk) 09:34, February 7, 2020 (UTC)

Sorry but I can't let you add anything to Omnipotence.

Admins are the only ones allowed to edit Omnipotence. 

And the Star Maker was mentioned in the comments before not to fit the general parameters of Omnipotence. So there isn't much I can do about that.SageM (talk) 19:36, February 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Based on your description, it seems to fit Creator Deity Physiology much more closely. Rather then Ultipotence.

So just add the Starmaker to that power.SageM (talk) 20:05, February 8, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Not really. 

I added Transcendence Manipulation as might/maybe limitation. Its basically the same deal as some of the other maybe limitations, as it depends on the writer or verse in question.

So it still fits as a possible limitation.SageM (talk) 21:44, February 9, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Genre Manipulation/Plot Control.SageM (talk) 21:41, February 11, 2020 (UTC)SageM

There was already one on here before, and it was deleted because Omnipotence is not something that can be bestowed.

We have Nigh Omnipotence Bestowal, and that's all we will ever have on here.

Sorry but it ain't happening.SageM (talk) 21:42, February 16, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Also another point of fact

You can't make or create Omnipotence, as its something you always had from the beginning. 

If you could create omnipotence for someone else, then you weren't truly omnipotent to start with.

Its a Catch-22.SageM (talk) 21:46, February 16, 2020 (UTC)SageM

Actually, when it comes to meta transcendence, having control is a pre-requisite for the power since, they can transcend anything at will and can chose to hold back whenever they want.Nekron2 (talk) 08:30, February 18, 2020 (UTC)

Flawless Indestructibility/Omni-Protection.SageM (talk) 23:40, February 22, 2020 (UTC)SageM

If I may, on your power idea you asked Sage, Invulnerability is another name for Immunity, I believe, and since we have Absolute Invulnerability, I believe that would cover Absolute Immunity as well. CrystalStorm51 (talk) 23:46, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, I was very busy IRL but the thing with featherine is that it's been stated that she didn't transcended all the limitations, she just touched the last level/step. Meaning she transcended everything except for her identity.Nekron2 (talk) 19:20, February 24, 2020 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.